There is no reason in the world that a law enforcement officer investigating criminal activity needs to be a supporter of the suspect, in fact that alone would compromise the investigation.
Kevyn wrote:
There is no reason in the world that a law enforcement officer investigating criminal activity needs to be a supporter of the suspect, in fact that alone would compromise the investigation.
Do you remember the process potential jurors go through? If there is any bias whatsoever, there OUT. Get the picture? If you don't understand this concept, then you are really showing your bias.
fullspinzoo wrote:
Do you remember the process potential jurors go through? If there is any bias whatsoever, there OUT. Get the picture? If you don't understand this concept, then you are really showing your bias.
There’s are not jurors they are investigators, their job is to uncover evidence loyalty to a criminal suspect has never been a requirement for effective law enforcement, if anything it is a hinderence to justice. If Trump is not dirty he has nothing to fear.
Weasel
Loc: In the Great State Of Indiana!!
Kevyn wrote:
There’s are not jurors they are investigators, their job is to uncover evidence loyalty to a criminal suspect has never been a requirement for effective law enforcement, if anything it is a hinderence to justice. If Trump is not dirty he has nothing to fear.
And if Trump is dirty, we would have an unremovable stain by now! ¥
¥
Kevyn wrote:
There’s are not jurors they are investigators, their job is to uncover evidence loyalty to a criminal suspect has never been a requirement for effective law enforcement, if anything it is a hinderence to justice. If Trump is not dirty he has nothing to fear.
Their job is to impartial, something you and your ilk know nothing about.
Evidence is evidence no matter who gathers it ask yourself this why is tru,p scared shirtless why does his lawyers have lawyers.why do they try and obstruct justice
,
===================
All of them gave money to Hillary Clinton's campaign funds.
They also created an insurance that in case Trump wins, the group has that "
Dossier", and the fake malicious investigation to harass and remove Trump.
The American taxpayers have already paid them in tens of millions of dollars as they grip on this FAKE DOSSIER and the fake accusation of Russian collusion. Fact was it was Hillary who had the Russian collusion.
FBI needs to be drained out! It is dangerous to our country, corrupt, fraudulent, dishonest, liars to the American people who are the victims.
Lonewolf wrote:
Evidence is evidence no matter who gathers it ask yourself this why is tru,p scared shirtless why does his lawyers have lawyers.why do they try and obstruct justice
,
Any one with a half a brain realizes how corrupt it is. Maybe we should do the same, put a team of strong Trump supporters/lawyers together and see how long Hillary stays out of prison. Now you have the biggest azzhat lawyer during the scandalous Obama tenure threatening to create WWIII if Mueller is fired. It's nice to see Obama and his idiot team trying to throw a wrench in the great things Trump is doing.
It is interesting to follow the thread leading to the insurance policy that was (and has) been enacted if President Trump won. Well, it sounds to me that the FBI, aided and abetted by our "loyal opposition" (the Democrats) were conspiring to remove an elected president by a Coup d’état, also called "Coup". This is how Encyclopedia Britannica defines a Coup d’état; "the sudden, violent overthrow of an existing government by a small group. The chief prerequisite for a coup is control of all or part of the armed forces, the police, and other military elements. Unlike a revolution, which is usually achieved by large numbers of people working for basic social, economic, and political change, a coup is a change in power from the top that merely results in the abrupt replacement of leading government personnel. A coup rarely alters a nation’s fundamental social and economic policies, nor does it significantly redistribute power among competing political groups. Among the earliest modern coups were those in which Napoleon overthrew the Directory on Nov. 9, 1799 (18 Brumaire), and in which Louis Napoleon dissolved the assembly of France’s Second Republic in 1851. Coups were a regular occurrence in various Latin American nations in the 19th and 20th centuries and in Africa after the countries there gained independence in the 1960s." Conspiring to enact a Coup is treasonous and those who were the conspirators (FBI, la resistance leaders, etc) should be held accountable. To let them off the hook would be unconscionable. Does anyone else think this way?
Lonewolf wrote:
Evidence is evidence no matter who gathers it ask yourself this why is tru,p scared shirtless why does his lawyers have lawyers.why do they try and obstruct justice
,
Evidence of what, exactly? The hate Trump have been digging and digging for over a year now and still nothing. Exactly what do they expect to find? Will they just make something up ? Get someone to lie by threatening them with jail for "lying" while being questioned? Fascist tactics is all that's left to the leftwingnutbars.
Mueller isn't investigating anything. He's building a phony case to remove Trump from office. This is a coup.
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Mueller isn't investigating anything. He's building a phony case to remove Trump from office. This is a coup.
It will be a failed unconstitutional attempt.
peter11937 wrote:
It will be a failed unconstitutional attempt.
Everyone involved with the constitution is for the removal of Trump. The coup started when obama slithered into the Whitehouse. Trump is the intruder. Everyone in Washington wants to cancel our decision.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.