One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Dick Morris Update
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
Dec 12, 2017 16:30:57   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Glaucon wrote:
Correction, It is incorrect to say you ain't done reading the book so far, you haven't even started reading the book yet. The disappointing thing is that you have apparently formed your opinions of the book's contents already. I am beginning to think you not only have not yet started reading the book, but I suspect you have yet to obtain a copy of the book. It is very difficult to believe you are much smarter and honest than that.


I was merely voicing a concern and trying to be honest about it. You really need to relax.

Reply
Dec 12, 2017 16:35:09   #
Glaucon
 
Voice of Reason wrote:
LOL. Maybe you could introduce your 'daughters' to some nice Dems, like Anthony Weiner, or Bill Clinton. Better yet, send them to spend a weekend at the Kennedy compound. Just make sure they bring scuba gear with them. And condoms. Lots of condoms.


I am confused about the point you are trying to make: Are you saying the fact that some Democrats r committed some unacceptable sexual acts, that makes it ok for Republicans to commit equally unacceptable acts or are you saying the fact that some Democrats have committed unacceptable sexual acts, it means they are both wrong?

Reply
Dec 12, 2017 16:37:41   #
Glaucon
 
BigMike wrote:
I was merely voicing a concern and trying to be honest about it. You really need to relax.


I think it would be good if you would try a lot harder to be honest. Here is a chance to be honest: Have you even bothered to obtain a copy of Dark Money?
that could be a yes or no.

Reply
Dec 12, 2017 16:41:03   #
Glaucon
 
BigMike wrote:
I was merely voicing a concern and trying to be honest about it. You really need to relax.


Apparently you have "relaxed" your honesty standards.

Reply
Dec 12, 2017 17:20:35   #
Voice of Reason Loc: Earth
 
Glaucon wrote:
I am confused about the point you are trying to make: Are you saying the fact that some Democrats r committed some unacceptable sexual acts, that makes it ok for Republicans to commit equally unacceptable acts or are you saying the fact that some Democrats have committed unacceptable sexual acts, it means they are both wrong?


Of course you are. If you weren't easily confused you wouldn't be a leftist.

My point was neither of the only two options your confused little brain could pontificate. I was referring to your hypocrisy.

But there is yet another aspect that easily confused leftists fail to consider. When it comes to the "unacceptable sexual acts" committed by the Dems I mentioned, those are proven facts. When it comes to the "unacceptable sexual acts" alleged about Trump and Moore, those are unproven allegations. That is a distinction that is highly relevant except to easily confused leftists.

In fact, the closest thing to proof concerning Moore was the yearbook inscription that has now been proven to be fake. To those of us who are not easily confused, the fact that she faked the inscription is reason to question her honesty.

Finally, referring to Teddy K, I don't think murder qualifies as an "unacceptable sexual act", but then I'm not easily confused.

Sorry if this is confusing to you.

Reply
Dec 12, 2017 17:47:35   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Glaucon wrote:
I think it would be good if you would try a lot harder to be honest. Here is a chance to be honest: Have you even bothered to obtain a copy of Dark Money?
that could be a yes or no.


You only asked me...like...two days ago.

You aren't amazed I even looked it up online and read the preface?

When I go to the library, if they have it I'll get it and if not I'll have them order it and notify me when it gets here. I live in a small town and our library doesn't have as much as many others do.

Relax, Glauc, I take you seriously.

Reply
Dec 12, 2017 19:02:54   #
Glaucon
 
Voice of Reason wrote:
Of course you are. If you weren't easily confused you wouldn't be a leftist.

My point was neither of the only two options your confused little brain could pontificate. I was referring to your hypocrisy.

But there is yet another aspect that easily confused leftists fail to consider. When it comes to the "unacceptable sexual acts" committed by the Dems I mentioned, those are proven facts. When it comes to the "unacceptable sexual acts" alleged about Trump and Moore, those are unproven allegations. That is a distinction that is highly relevant except to easily confused leftists.

In fact, the closest thing to proof concerning Moore was the yearbook inscription that has now been proven to be fake. To those of us who are not easily confused, the fact that she faked the inscription is reason to question her honesty.

Finally, referring to Teddy K, I don't think murder qualifies as an "unacceptable sexual act", but then I'm not easily confused.

Sorry if this is confusing to you.
Of course you are. If you weren't easily confused ... (show quote)


The inscriptions on the year book was placed under Moore's statement and signature by the child he molested and seeing that as fake is truly confusing unless you are an extremist with no interest in facts and truth and I hope you have not descended to that level, yet. I think Moore's behavior is beyond reasonable doubt for everyone, but those with their head inserted in a moist, dark, nasty smelling place. Your insults are duly noted and your evidence and rationale will be considered if it ever arrives. Try to use your intellect and stop using only your hateful emotions for making decisions.

I Hadn't heard that Teddy Kennedy had been convicted of murder. Where did you hear that. Fox? However, I have heard of the United States Constitution, due process, and the presumption of innocence unless proven otherwise. We might want to consider the fact that I may not be the person who is confused.

If you ever read the book, I would still be interested in your opinions.

Reply
Dec 12, 2017 19:07:50   #
Glaucon
 
BigMike wrote:
You only asked me...like...two days ago.

You aren't amazed I even looked it up online and read the preface?

When I go to the library, if they have it I'll get it and if not I'll have them order it and notify me when it gets here. I live in a small town and our library doesn't have as much as many others do.

Relax, Glauc, I take you seriously.
You only asked me...like...two days ago. img src=... (show quote)


My relaxation is deep and comforting, but thanks for your concern.

I am inclined to believe you, but how did you get so many opinions and factoids if you only read the preface? Do you have super powers or super biases? If you have already made up your mind, there is no need to bother to get the book and actually read it.

Reply
Dec 12, 2017 22:40:53   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Glaucon wrote:
My relaxation is deep and comforting, but thanks for your concern.

I am inclined to believe you, but how did you get so many opinions and factoids if you only read the preface? Do you have super powers or super biases? If you have already made up your mind, there is no need to bother to get the book and actually read it.


It's hard to explain but to me there's a basic interconnectedness in current events that causes the same themes to manifest themselves in diverse places and ways repeatedly.

I see them over and over everywhere.

That is what the preface led me to infer I might find in the book.

Reply
Dec 12, 2017 23:18:25   #
Glaucon
 
BigMike wrote:
It's hard to explain but to me there's a basic interconnectedness in current events that causes the same themes to manifest themselves in diverse places and ways repeatedly.

I see them over and over everywhere.

That is what the preface led me to infer I might find in the book.


I must be handicapped, I have to read books to know or even infer what is in it. If I can infer what is a book before I read it, I can't really know that until after I have read it.

What do you mean by "a basic interconnectedness in current events that causes the same themes to manifest themselves in diverse places and ways repeatedly ?" You will need to explain that to me. That sounds very erudite and profound, but I don't know what it means.

Reply
Dec 12, 2017 23:19:06   #
Glaucon
 
Glaucon wrote:
I think it would be good if you would try a lot harder to be honest. Here is a chance to be honest: Have you even bothered to obtain a copy of Dark Money?
that could be a yes or no.


No answer???????

Reply
 
 
Dec 13, 2017 00:20:33   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Glaucon wrote:
I must be handicapped, I have to read books to know or even infer what is in it. If I can infer what is a book before I read it, I can't really know that until after I have read it.

What do you mean by "a basic interconnectedness in current events that causes the same themes to manifest themselves in diverse places and ways repeatedly ?" You will need to explain that to me. That sounds very erudite and profound, but I don't know what it means.


And difficult to explain...we'll work on it. There will be time and frankly, thinking of a place to start is kind of a stumper.

There is an overarching force at work in world politics and economics...a single authority. It's ubiquitous. Hence the interconnectedness I mentioned. I see it in pop culture, academics, media, politics, economics and now religion.

But I believe the closer we get to that ideal the closer we get to the tyranny the will inevitably follow because humans are corrupted by power.

This is just a small bush in my garden but it's part of the overall picture...where to start...

Reply
Dec 13, 2017 11:39:16   #
S. Maturin
 
Glaucon wrote:
The inscriptions on the year book was placed under Moore's statement and signature by the child he molested and seeing that as fake is truly confusing unless you are an extremist with no interest in facts and truth and I hope you have not descended to that level, yet. I think Moore's behavior is beyond reasonable doubt for everyone, but those with their head inserted in a moist, dark, nasty smelling place. Your insults are duly noted and your evidence and rationale will be considered if it ever arrives. Try to use your intellect and stop using only your hateful emotions for making decisions.

I Hadn't heard that Teddy Kennedy had been convicted of murder. Where did you hear that. Fox? However, I have heard of the United States Constitution, due process, and the presumption of innocence unless proven otherwise. We might want to consider the fact that I may not be the person who is confused.

If you ever read the book, I would still be interested in your opinions.
The inscriptions on the year book was placed under... (show quote)



" by the child he molested" " by the child he molested" " by the child he molested" ... and since there exists no PROOF.. I hope Moore sues your ASS INTO THE POOR HOUSE AND BEYOND.
It's malicious, libelous diarrhea mouth stuff like you continually spew that should be knocked from the public discourse.

Not that I am against 'freedom of pseech' but that I am for personal responsibility. Say whatever you wish--- but be prepared for someone like judge Moore to come after your reptilian hide.

Like I said: I hope he searches you out and nails your butt with a law suit that puts you into public care forever.

Reply
Dec 13, 2017 14:38:38   #
Voice of Reason Loc: Earth
 
Glaucon wrote:
The inscriptions on the year book was placed under Moore's statement and signature by the child he molested and seeing that as fake is truly confusing unless you are an extremist with no interest in facts and truth and I hope you have not descended to that level, yet. I think Moore's behavior is beyond reasonable doubt for everyone, but those with their head inserted in a moist, dark, nasty smelling place. Your insults are duly noted and your evidence and rationale will be considered if it ever arrives. Try to use your intellect and stop using only your hateful emotions for making decisions.

I Hadn't heard that Teddy Kennedy had been convicted of murder. Where did you hear that. Fox? However, I have heard of the United States Constitution, due process, and the presumption of innocence unless proven otherwise. We might want to consider the fact that I may not be the person who is confused.

If you ever read the book, I would still be interested in your opinions.
The inscriptions on the year book was placed under... (show quote)


This is hilarious! Your second paragraph contradicts your first. Just how short is your attention span?

As for the book, you're still confused (surprise, surprise!). That was BigMike. This is me. I am thoroughly disinterested in your reading list.

Reply
Dec 13, 2017 14:44:31   #
S. Maturin
 
Voice of Reason wrote:
This is hilarious! Your second paragraph contradicts your first. Just how short is your attention span?

As for the book, you're still confused (surprise, surprise!). That was BigMike. This is me. I am thoroughly disinterested in your reading list.



LOL!!

"This is hilarious! Your second paragraph contradicts your first. Just how short is your attention span?".. Just really funny!!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.