One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Court Records Cast Severe Doubt on Corfman's Story About Judge Roy Moore
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Nov 25, 2017 20:27:13   #
moldyoldy
 
EmilyStrode wrote:
Moore never met Corfman.


He does not deny meeting her.

Reply
Nov 25, 2017 20:48:19   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Super Dave wrote:
LOL.

Good point...

Hahaha...



Reply
Nov 25, 2017 20:51:23   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
moldyoldy wrote:
The war has become us vs them instead of right and wrong, or good and bad. Moore's court decisions have him defending the rapists or molesters instead of the victims. He has shown exactly who and what he is.


Been that way since Clinton and the fault is yours. Suddenly finding your morality isn't going to change a thing this election; of that you can be assured.

Reply
 
 
Nov 25, 2017 23:22:12   #
EmilyStrode
 
lindajoy wrote:
Coincidental it is not..

They can’t beat their opponent so they revert to smear tactics.. Speaks volumes.....They must be pretty scared or they haven’t learned a thing in the hillary debacle


Sorry, it may not be coincidence for an unrelated reason: the Harvey Weinstein accusations. How many women prefer the indignity of rape over decades than being exposed as a harlot or liar? Sean Hannity saying those women are in it for the money. It is common knowledge about rape trials that the defense makes the accuser a wanton slut. The man accused may have slept with twenty women in twenty days but the "harlot" accuser had sex once a year ago and is a promiscuous whore, whose word cannot be relied on. That is the reality of bringing rape or sexual abuse charges.

Reply
Nov 25, 2017 23:25:53   #
EmilyStrode
 
fullspinzoo wrote:
https://www.teaparty.org/bombshell-court-records-cast-severe-doubt-corfmans-story-roy-moore-278470/


What that link says is total crap. As usual, the lack of detail by the right and its propensity, at times, to leap to conclusions is at fault. Corfman never met or had an exchange with Moore.

Reply
Nov 25, 2017 23:31:54   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
EmilyStrode wrote:
What that link says is total crap. As usual, the lack of detail by the right and its propensity, at times, to leap to conclusions is at fault. Corfman never met or had an exchange with Moore.


That is what Moore claims.

Reply
Nov 25, 2017 23:41:48   #
EmilyStrode
 
PoppaGringo wrote:
That is what Moore claims.


And there is proof. The Right takes the tack of denial.

Reply
 
 
Nov 26, 2017 00:05:05   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
EmilyStrode wrote:
And there is proof. The Right takes the tack of denial.


I am sorry, but there are just too many discrepancies and coincidences for me to believe Moore is guilty of any of the charges.

Reply
Nov 26, 2017 00:08:49   #
EconomistDon
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Stick this up your orifice.

_In Sex Crimes and Other Cases, Roy Moore Often Sided With Defendants

http://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/17/us/roy-moore-judicial-record.html

Roy Moore challenged Alabama law that protects rape victims

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/nov/14/roy-moore-alabama-law-rape-victims-judge


Sorry Moldy, I don't "stick things up my orifice" the way you weirdos do. But your article is quite interesting. It shows that Moore is a thinking man. He does not yield to the torch-carrying mentality that wants to destroy rather than understand. Certainly a teenager convicted of sexual misconduct against another teenager does not deserve 23 years in prison; Moore was right. The punishment must fit the crime; it must not be a sledge hammer wielded by wild-eyed maniacs. And Moore was right that Defendants deserve a right to appeal. You don't slap an unreasonable sentence on someone and then deny them an appeal. The ultra-left New York Times has a way of twisting facts to suit their left-wing attitude, and they have you thoroughly convinced. But I am convinced that Moore is a fair and honest judge, one who is willing to push emotions aside to look at a case and its facts honestly. Everybody deserves a fair trial. I think that Moore is a better choice than Jones, who is totally in bed with the political establishment. We have too many establishment politicians; they need to go.

Reply
Nov 26, 2017 00:13:23   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
EconomistDon wrote:
Sorry Moldy, I don't "stick things up my orifice" the way you weirdos do. But your article is quite interesting. It shows that Moore is a thinking man. He does not yield to the torch-carrying mentality that wants to destroy rather than understand. Certainly a teenager convicted of sexual misconduct against another teenager does not deserve 23 years in prison; Moore was right. The punishment must fit the crime; it must not be a sledge hammer wielded by wild-eyed maniacs. And Moore was right that Defendants deserve a right to appeal. You don't slap an unreasonable sentence on someone and then deny them an appeal. The ultra-left New York Times has a way of twisting facts to suit their left-wing attitude, and they have you thoroughly convinced. But I am convinced that Moore is a fair and honest judge, one who is willing to push emotions aside to look at a case and its facts honestly. Everybody deserves a fair trial. I think that Moore is a better choice than Jones, who is totally in bed with the political establishment. We have too many establishment politicians; they need to go.
Sorry Moldy, I don't "stick things up my orif... (show quote)


Well stated.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.