S. Maturin

Naw, you give yourself far too much multi-syllabic credit. Most of us see you as the hedonistic throwback who found morals to be insurmountable.

And, guess what? We're correct, aren't we?

Singularity

You would be incorrect.

As well as extremely rude in the manner in which you express your hateful fantasy.

Your argument for the existence of gods is logically flawed and rationally inconsistent.

And you don't even indicate that you understand the essence of the opposing arguments, your logic fail, or even what that means, much less have a rebuttal argument to offer.

Let's see now. Usually following the ad hominem argument against the atheist themselves, the 'loving Christians' will then express with great emotion some tacit approval (if not glee disguised by and almost lost in morose self righteous pity) of their hideously immoral deity's desire that their opponent should spend the rest of eternity in maximum torture for no good reason.

S. Maturin

Hooked on hate, aren't you? Every expression differing from what you have in your snarl of a brain constitutes HATE, right?

First you dismiss, call a name, label, THEN we are to feel blessed by your "superior" views.

Somehow, I do not feel enlightened from what you offer.

You are blinded by hate and prejudice. Admit it.

See? Admitting you have a problem is the first step, right?

Singularity

Right.

I have a problem with your emotional immaturity and silly baiting techniques. Watch now and you will not see how I have learned to handle myself in such instances.

Bye.

S. Maturin

Oh, the humanity! The whine!

Have a good life.