KiraSeer2016

So here goes, EC's: From a post I made on Southfront, (You should visit the SF article, you might learn something, as long as you keep your eyes open) then sent as a PM to a friend on OPP:


It is too late for America. America was left the sole superpower, without restraints, at the fall of the Soviet Union, but chose to use its power irresponsibly and with detriment for other countries and other peoples. Power is now shifting eastwards....And justice WILL be done.

KiraSeer

P.S. I recommend this book: "Lawless World" by Philippe Sands.

Don't know if you're following me on Southfront, but I've recently---yesterday---made some remarks (truthful ones) about Evangelicals. You know, that wart on God's ass. It was in the article "U.S. Led Coalition confirms: Syrian Democratic Forces Reach Deal with ISIS in Raqqa City", if you're interested.

I also said this: "Evangelicals are bothersome for at least two reasons:

1. Their insistence that one can't get into (metaphorical) Heaven, (I say metaphorical, because the word Heaven is used as a concept for the presence of God/Allah), unless he accepts Jesus as his Lord and Savior. John Wesley has stated: "[Christianity] declares that all men are conceived in sin,” and “shapen in wickedness;” — that hence there is in every man a “carnal mind, which is enmity against God, which is not, cannot be, subject to” his “law;” and which so infects the whole soul, that “there dwelleth in” him, “in his flesh,” in his natural state, “no good thing;” but “every imagination of the thoughts of his heart is evil,” only evil, and that “continually.” And in stating this, Wesley has committed the sin of believing that God's creations are wicked. He seems to believe that God, in creating man, created a worthless piece of crap.

2. Their belief that the formation of the state of Israel is what has been foretold as the precipitation of the Last Days, or End Times, and therefore any other people of any other religion has no place in the world.

P.S. A reminder: if God had wanted man to be perfect, he would have allowed him to see the future. But in that case, man would not have freedom of choice.
P.P.S. And if you think you're a worthless piece of crap, maybe that is EXACTLY what God thinks of you too."

On the article: "Syria War Report – October 19, 2017: U.S. Blames Assad For ‘Hindering’ Its Anti-ISIS Efforts"

Have fun.

KiraSeer2016

Here's another post I made on Southfront: (to the article: Syria War Report – November 13, 2017: ISIS Conducts Suicide Attempt To Seize Back Al-Bukamal)

"Did this article actually say there had been an "al-Baghdadi sighting?" I was thinking of all the Elvis sightings there have been since 1976.---

I'm sure the American MSM media (and the neocons) are all excited. These happenings seem to be raising the threat of sectarian violence to a height never seen before. Go for it, Fox News!!"

A height we may refer to as Level 7, perhaps?

P.S.: Al-Bukamal is in Syria; Al-Buquerque is in New Mexico, where I am.

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

I dont get your point??? What is your point,Kira??? You hate Israel?? We all knew that from before.So what is your point ?

KiraSeer2016

Who cares? Whether you get my point or not. I don't.

KiraSeer2016

From another post I made on Southfront:

"I have said this before, on another forum, that Christianity is the most intolerant of religions, and at least the most childish.
It was Aquinas in the 13th century that first made Aristotle palatable to the Church, and he was very intellectual about it (the parts of his writings I have read), but he deferred a lot to whom he called "The Commentator"---Averroes, ibn Rushd.
Then the Protestant Reformation occurred, a backlash to corruption in the Church, but also an outgrowth of individual Europeans becoming more confident in their own thought processes. Unfortunately some of this thinking was primitive and immature. Calvin, for instance, who believed that everyone was predestined to be either bad or good, and it was Calvin himself who decided what category an individual fit.
I have also stated this, on another forum, that Europeans do not introspect well. They are outgoing and extroverts. But the American Evangelicals have taken Christian emotionalism to a higher level.


And as an afterthought, but an important one, remember that people who think ill of themselves are going to make bad choices. Maybe even evil ones. A person who feels he is a "good" person will likely make better choices, moral as well as practical choices. Any psychologist will tell you that. As long as he is not an Evangelical Born Again Christian."

On the article:
US-Led Coalition Confirms: Syrian Democratic Forces Reached Deal With ISIS In Raqqa City

KiraSeer2016

If Christians want to impress Us with their religious views, or impress anyone for that matter, they will need to come up with something good about Christianity, not something bad about Islam.

Highlander66 Loc: Illinois

As a conservative Christian, I have no interest at all in wanting to impress you with my religious views. As you have indicated that you are aware of the Christian requirement for forgiveness from God and have rejected it, I personally feel no further obligation to pester you with anything remotely religious. You can do whatever you want because you are not bound in any away by the Christian Bible or any other tenet of religion of which you disagree. I won’t even feel bad about you complaining about Christianity because it doesn’t affect me. However since you requested something “good” about Christianity, I will say that we do not require conversion upon pain of death and can and have coexisted with nearly all other religions peacefully except one. You can defend that other cult all you want, but it will not change the fact that they actively and specifically want you either converted, enslaved or dead.

KiraSeer2016

As a God-believer, and intelligent person, I have no interest in you.

And for the record, I didn't bother to read your comment. Anything that starts out: "As a conservative Christian I have no interest at all in wanting to impress you..." doesn't need my concern. If you have no interest, then stay off the topic.

KiraSeer2016

Along this same line (try to connect the dots, people):

I posted this comment on another forum a couple of days ago. It is time for the international community to address the issue of sovereign rights, and the violation thereof. Specifically, when is it advisable for a state actor, or non-state actor, to intervene on behalf of the peoples of a country, and when is it best not to? Also the question of proof, or evidence, also needs explicationWhat would constitute reliable proof of misdeeds on the part of a government towards its people?

Remember that the proper assessment of past and present, and its implications/explications for the future will aid in the determination of violations of sovereignty

KiraSeer2016

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKNRpdWEDwo

Courtesy of my Arabian Knight---you know, the Black One.

KiraSeer2016

Ever hear of Bogomilism? Well, you're going to now. And if you are perceptive, you may see some evidence of that sick heresy in certain Christian sects today.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bogomilism

"The Bogomils had a system of altered traditional orthodox beliefs and rituals. The essence behind their teaching was a dualistic doctrine that the world is divided by God and Satan (good and evil). God rules the spiritual part of the world, and Satan the material. They regarded every material being to be the work of Satan."

RT friend Loc: Kangaroo valley NSW Australia

I thought that the idea of being out there was to communicate, your not seemingly trying too hard, first there was a conscious though it really was the result of wanting, and because of that very fact along came a lie, what a blessing it turned out to be as being was connected to the truth, although that doesn't alter the fact, that a lie was first, end wasn't real, I like the lie best of all, and you know without it we wouldn't know about Arabian coffee, the Bogomill had one thing going for them as did all Manichaean heresies they were anti puritanical and that made them a good fit with the South Slaves and opposed to the Roman Catholic South Slaves and the Orthodox South Slaves so they had free choice but were unable to become sediment, original Islam was the same, the Hanif finished up worshipping stones we only think that because they disappeared like the Bogomill, the reason the Presbyterians are still around is because of the Jacobin political movement (James 1st. 1603-25) King James translated he the Bible into English from Latin) I know you know but someone might read this if you quit being, Jacobin the word comes from (P) Jacob and Guy Fawkes blew up the Parliament 1605 to get the Protestant King or tried to, I don't know what the damage was.
How long are you in New Mexico for?.

KiraSeer2016

I somewhat communicated on Southfront, Rodney.

And as you know the English beheaded their king in 1648. Nice going, Brits. Then Cromwell closed all the theatres. My own feeling was who on earth would even want to be a Puritan anyway? You do know they migrated to the New World and thus gave rise to the American-Stupids.

And by "wanting", of course, you are defining "desire".

As for New Mexico, until I'm finished here.

Talk to you later, Rodney. A little bird is telling me it's time to go. But before I go, I have to tell you that you are perhaps the smartest man I have known. And I love your afterthoughts!!

RT friend Loc: Kangaroo valley NSW Australia

It's ok for Allah to desire stuff

KiraSeer2016

Well, maybe. But how about his Stand-In?

Gotta go, now.