buffalo Loc: Texas

Be sure to read to the end. The clintons are the biggest crooks to ever set foot in DC!

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/452972/uranium-one-deal-obama-administration-doj-hillary-clinton-racketeering?utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_content=59eb306e04d3016f3ce10446&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

peter11937 Loc: NYS

The most corrupt admin. since Andy Jackson, but Andy himself was not corrupt. This Obama Admin., everyone in it was corrupt.

slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas

I'd go with the Grant and Harding administrations as being the most corrupt in history.

peter11937 Loc: NYS

Harding was the nation's worst president prior to Obama, a closet Marxist who paved the way for FDR....a terrible thing , not necessarily corrupt. Grant had no appetite for governing as it was done at that time and spent a considerable time writing rather than administering, so he failed as a president. Corrupt does not seem to fit him as it does Obama, who is working on his first billion dollars for his library as we write.....

Geo

11/14/2017
Fox News anchor Shepherd Smith debunked what his own network has called the Hillary Clinton uranium “scandal,” infuriating Fox viewers, some of whom suggested that he ought go work for CNN or MSNBC.
Smith’s critique, which called President Trump’s accusations against Clinton “inaccurate,” was triggered by renewed calls from Republicans on Capitol Hill for a special counsel to investigate Clinton.
Fox News, along with Trump and his allies, have been suggesting for months a link between donations to the Clinton Foundation and the approval of a deal by the State Department and the Obama administration allowing a Russian company to purchase a Canada-based mining group with operations in the United States.

Subscribe to the Post Most newsletter: Today’s most popular stories on The Washington Post
Trump called it “Watergate, modern-age.” Former White House adviser Sebastian Gorka, speaking on Fox News last month, said it was “equivalent to” the Julius and Ethel Rosenberg spying case of the 1950s, in which the couple was charged with providing U.S. atomic secrets to the Soviet Union, noting that “those people got the chair.”
Various fact-checkers, including The Washington Post’s, have already dismantled the underpinnings of these accusations. No one expected a similar debunking from Fox.
But Smith, in his broadcast, made many of the same points as the fact-checkers. “Now, here’s the accusation,” he said.

Nine people involved in the deal made donations to the Clinton Foundation totaling more than $140 million. In exchange, Secretary of State [Hillary] Clinton approved the sale to the Russians, a quid-pro-quo. The accusation first made by Peter Schweizer, the senior editor-at-large of the website Breitbart in his 2015 book Clinton Cash. The next year, candidate Donald Trump cited the accusation as an example of Clinton corruption.

He then played a video of Trump’s version of the “scandal” in which he claimed:

Hillary Clinton’s State Department approved the transfer of 20 percent of America’s uranium holdings to Russia. Well, nine investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation.

Smith called the statement “inaccurate in a number of ways,” noting that “the Clinton State Department had no power to veto or approve that transaction.” Rather, it must be approved by an interagency committee of the government consisting of nine department heads, including the Secretary of State.
Most of the Clinton Foundation donations in question, he pointed out, came from Frank Giustra, the founder of the uranium company in Canada. But Giustra, Smith noted, “says he sold his stake in the company back in 2007,” three years before the uranium/Russia deal and “a year and a half before Hillary Clinton became secretary of state. He added:

. . . The accusation is predicated on the charge that Secretary Clinton approved the sale. She did not. A committee of nine evaluated the sale, the president approved the sale, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and others had to offer permits, and none of the uranium was exported for use by the U.S. to Russia.

Smith has deviated from the Fox and Trump line before, to the point that his Fox colleague Sean Hannity accused him of being “anti-Trump.”
Tuesday night, Twitter was brimming with outrage from people who appeared to share Hannity’s view.

buffalo Loc: Texas

You believe that bitch clinton and her slick willie did not benefit from that transaction? LOL

I do not watch Smith, he is a moonbatty faggot!

peter11937 Loc: NYS

I think of him as a sanctimonious egocentric jerk. I do not want to know ANYTHING about his "lifestyle"!