Richard Rowland wrote:
Sorry, 4430, I addressed you as Quote. LOL. No, 4430, I don't know for a fact, at this point, what Bollyn has written hasn't been proven. One of the things he has proposed is that the evidence was purposely destroyed before it could be used as evidence. If you haven't read the book, allow me to suggest that you read it.
The book gets somewhat dry at times and attempting to keep up with all the players that Bollyn writes about gets a bit confusing. Still, it's a worthwhile read, for no other reason than to get a different perspective on what has been the official report.
Sorry, 4430, I addressed you as Quote. LOL. No, 44... (
show quote)
Same thing about the assassination of JFK I still believe that LBJ had him killed , however I can't prove it no matter what goes on there will always be a question as to whether or not this of that is true .
My thinking it's just another author out to make a name for himself plus a lot of money .
One of the biggest problems is the fact that there is so much corruption in high places that cover up is always in the lime light .