I've been wondering..... (Page 4): Heavy and bulky. The rifles don't weigh that much; the ammo does. I think he had help.

Loki Loc: Georgia

Iamdjchrys wrote:

Suitcases

Heavy and bulky. The rifles don't weigh that much; the ammo does. I think he had help.

Bevos

Randy131 wrote:

WikiLeaks Ready to Provide Evidence Russian Collus... (show quote)

I didn't say it was hacked by the Russians!!! Are you now telling me that during the Primaries, that the election was not STOLEN from Burney Sanders by Hillary Clinton? That the DNC was not hacked by Wasserman?

moldyoldy

He probably did not stick out.

Organizers of the Eastside Cannery Casino Gun Show, which was scheduled for this weekend, have canceled the event.
Boyd Gaming Corp. spokesman David Strow said Thursday that canceling the show was “a mutual decision” between gun show organizers and Boyd Gaming, which acquired Las Vegas assets of Cannery Casino Resorts last December.
It didn’t seem “prudent” to go on with the show, Strow said, in light of the mass shooting Sunday, in which Stephen Paddock killed 58 people and injured 489 others before killing himself, according to Las Vegas police.

http://www.reviewjournal.com/business/organizers-cancel-gun-show-in-las-vegas/

Ricktloml

Bevos wrote:

THAT is what they have BEEN Saying all along!!! STOP TALKING and put your money where your MOUTH is!!!

Before Mueller a Special Counsel was appointed to investigate a crime. There has never been a crime connected to Mueller's investigation. He was appointed to find something, anything to hang on Trump. What is appalling is this investigation keeps turning up corruption by the Democrats, yet Mueller and his army of Clinton donor investigators won't touch the Democrat corruption. This isn't an investigation, it's a witch hunt and always has been since that lying Comey engineered it

archie bunker Loc: Texas

Ricktloml wrote:

Before Mueller a Special Counsel was appointed to investigate a crime. There has never been a crime connected to Mueller's investigation. He was appointed to find something, anything to hang on Trump. What is appalling is this investigation keeps turning up corruption by the Democrats, yet Mueller and his army of Clinton donor investigators won't touch the Democrat corruption. This isn't an investigation, it's a witch hunt and always has been since that lying Comey engineered it

Pointing out the obvious doesn't seem to work around here. Good luck on this one.

moldyoldy

Ricktloml wrote:

Before Mueller a Special Counsel was appointed to investigate a crime. There has never been a crime connected to Mueller's investigation. He was appointed to find something, anything to hang on Trump. What is appalling is this investigation keeps turning up corruption by the Democrats, yet Mueller and his army of Clinton donor investigators won't touch the Democrat corruption. This isn't an investigation, it's a witch hunt and always has been since that lying Comey engineered it

Trumps whole family are criminals.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/05/trumps-russia-scandal-is-becoming-a-corruption-scandal.html

Randy131 Loc: Florida

Debbie Wasserman Schultz didn't have to hack the DNC, she was the chief operating officer of the DNC and was running it, she got to see everything, as her assisting chief operating officer Donna Brazile also had that same access, and they both worked from the inside to cheat Bernie Sanders out of the Democratic candidacy for President. Donna Brazile also worked for CNN and obtained in advance the CNN questions for the debates, and gave them to Hillary Clinton for her debate with Bernie Sanders and the debate with then candidate Donald Trump.

Why can't you understand that there has never been any proof of the DNC computers being hacked, only accusations by John Podesta and Hillary Clinton because of Wikileaks releasing their e-mails that showed what they thought about the American people, so had to do something to get the attention off them, and tried to use that Wikileak's release to attack President Trump by claiming President Trump had something to do with Wikileaks releasing what they falsely claimed was hacked by the dirty Russians, making candidate Donald Trump as dirty as the Russians. But the American people wouldn't buy it, especially when the DNC would not allow the NSA and FBI to investigate the DNC computers to find out if they were hacked, and if they were, who did the hacking. Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Donna Brazile, who were running the DNC, adamantly claim the DNC computers were never hacked, and they would have known if they were, just as the NSA and FBI would have known had they been allowed to investigate the DNC computers.

Seth Rich was an IT employee of the DNC and had access to everything on the DNC computers. After his unexplained and mysterious murder, the FBI searched where he lived and confiscated his personal and private laptop computer, and found all those Wikileaks released DNC and Clinton campaign e-mails on it. The celebration party for Washington DC IT workers, that Seth Rich had left from the bar that it was being celebrated at right before he was murdered, had security cameras that showed three of the Pakistani IT specialists (all brothers) who were working for Debbie Wasserman Schultz and more than 20 other elected Democratic US Congress men and women, and who are now either being searched for or under arrest for other IT crimes involving Congressional IT work, and suspicion of involvement in Seth Rich's murder.

There needs to be a special prosecutor assigned to Seth Rich's murder, and his association with Wikileaks, and why he had all those secret DNC and Clinton campaign e-mails, that Wikileaks publicly released, on his private personal laptop computer, spawning John Podesta's and Hillary Clinton's false accusations, that they had absolutely no proof of, otherwise they would have released it, that Trump/Russian collusion was behind the hacking of the DNC computers that never happened, according to Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Donna Brazile.

Bevos wrote:

I didn't say it was hacked by the Russians!!! Are you now telling me that during the Primaries, that the election was not STOLEN from Burney Sanders by Hillary Clinton? That the DNC was not hacked by Wasserman?

Bevos

Ricktloml wrote:

Before Mueller a Special Counsel was appointed to investigate a crime. There has never been a crime connected to Mueller's investigation. He was appointed to find something, anything to hang on Trump. What is appalling is this investigation keeps turning up corruption by the Democrats, yet Mueller and his army of Clinton donor investigators won't touch the Democrat corruption. This isn't an investigation, it's a witch hunt and always has been since that lying Comey engineered it

EXACTLY!!! And that is ALL it will EVER BE!!! I don't care if it continues for the next 10 yrs. The LIBIDIOTS will keep CLAIMING that they are "VERY CLOSE" to wrapping it up and arresting Trump!!! If it keeps them busy and OUT OF OUR HAIR for awhile, maybe it is a good thing!!! In THAT sense only though!!!

Bevos

Randy131 wrote:

Debbie Wasserman Schultz didn't have to hack the DNC, she was the chief operating officer of the DNC and was running it, she got to see everything, as her assisting chief operating officer Donna Brazile also had that same access, and they both worked from the inside to cheat Bernie Sanders out of the Democratic candidacy for President. Donna Brazile also worked for CNN and obtained in advance the CNN questions for the debates, and gave them to Hillary Clinton for her debate with Bernie Sanders and the debate with then candidate Donald Trump.

Why can't you understand that there has never been any proof of the DNC computers being hacked, only accusations by John Podesta and Hillary Clinton because of Wikileaks releasing their e-mails that showed what they thought about the American people, so had to do something to get the attention off them, and tried to use that Wikileak's release to attack President Trump by claiming President Trump had something to do with Wikileaks releasing what they falsely claimed was hacked by the dirty Russians, making candidate Donald Trump as dirty as the Russians. But the American people wouldn't buy it, especially when the DNC would not allow the NSA and FBI to investigate the DNC computers to find out if they were hacked, and if they were, who did the hacking. Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Donna Brazile, who were running the DNC, adamantly claim the DNC computers were never hacked, and they would have known if they were, just as the NSA and FBI would have known had they been allowed to investigate the DNC computers.

Seth Rich was an IT employee of the DNC and had access to everything on the DNC computers. After his unexplained and mysterious murder, the FBI searched where he lived and confiscated his personal and private laptop computer, and found all those Wikileaks released DNC and Clinton campaign e-mails on it. The celebration party for Washington DC IT workers, that Seth Rich had left from the bar that it was being celebrated at right before he was murdered, had security cameras that showed three of the Pakistani IT specialists (all brothers) who were working for Debbie Wasserman Schultz and more than 20 other elected Democratic US Congress men and women, and who are now either being searched for or under arrest for other IT crimes involving Congressional IT work, and suspicion of involvement in Seth Rich's murder.

There needs to be a special prosecutor assigned to Seth Rich's murder, and his association with Wikileaks, and why he had all those secret DNC and Clinton campaign e-mails, that Wikileaks publicly released, on his private personal laptop computer, spawning John Podesta's and Hillary Clinton's false accusations, that they had absolutely no proof of, otherwise they would have released it, that Trump/Russian collusion was behind the hacking of the DNC computers that never happened, according to Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Donna Brazile.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz didn't have to hack the D... (show quote)

I KNOW all of that. What I want to know is, WHY did Wasserman REFUSE FBI help, when she "CLAIMED" their computers had been hacked?? And WHAT was the reason "used" for her firing??

Randy131 Loc: Florida

It seems that you can't read to well. Debbie Wasserman Schultz did not claim that the DNC computers were ever hacked by the Russians, and neither did her second in command of the DNC Donna Brazile, but instead they both claimed adamantly that the DNC computers were not hacked by the Russians, or anyone else for that matter. It was John Podesta and Hillary Clinton who made up the lie about the Russians hacking the DNC computers, in order to get the e-mails and give them to Wikileaks for Donald Trump's benefit, because Hillary Clinton's and John Podesta's own e-mails revealed what they thought of the American people, and the terrible things that they both did, and they wanted to get the American people's minds off those terrible e-mails so they made up this sensational lie to get the people to start chasing the story about the lie, instead of their terrible e-mails published by Wikileaks.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and eventually Donna Brazile, were fired from the DNC because they were caught cheating other candidates, to make sure that Hillary Clinton was going to win. The DNC now has several lawsuits against them by the Democratic donators, who are suing to get their donated money back because of the cheating that was going on in the DNC, who they donated their money to expecting it to be used fairly and lawfully, without the leaders rigging the election in favor of one candidate over all the rest. I said all this in the previous e-mails to you, what is your problem with understanding the written word?

Bevos wrote:

I KNOW all of that. What I want to know is, WHY did Wasserman REFUSE FBI help, when she "CLAIMED" their computers had been hacked?? And WHAT was the reason "used" for her firing??

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Peewee wrote:

Good post Linda, made a good start to my day. I could almost smell the coffee and will get a cup of Joe when I finish typing this. Just wondering, what are the white structures in the back of your back yard? It looks like your getting ready have it hauled off or refurbish some furniture. Always loved white board fences, except for painting them every few years. Have a wonderful Sunday morning.

Thank You, Peewee,

Those white object towards the street are cable boxes for Comcast and Dish.. The area is the main adjoining easement for lack of a better way to explain.

Hope you got your Joe!! I'm sipping some now...

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

padremike wrote:

Loki asked a sincere and genuine disturbing question and although my comment was lite it, nevertheless, was true. In this age we can burn up our brains trying to figure out or giving reason to "how" and "why."

As it will be in the end Mike!! Your reply was just as pointed and yes, true...

Loki Loc: Georgia

Randy131 wrote:

It seems that you can't read to well. Debbie Wass... (show quote)

Perhaps the problem lies in the way you write it. Be nice.