slatten49 wrote:
Yes, I stand corrected...Deshaun Watson. I must'a been tired/off last night. I had to have a late snack as my blood sugar was running really low. After the snack, I went straight to bed.
Maybe I'll make more sense this morning.
No worries my friend. I totally understand, I'm married to a diabetic. On paper the young man seems like he could be a super star, let's hope he pans out better than David Car did. He's still going to need some wideouts to throw to though.
He is a Swabbie, thus requiring lots of tutoring.
PoppaGringo wrote:
He is a Swabbie, thus requiring lots of tutoring.
Bless his heart. So long as BB recognizes his shortcomings, there is always hope for our lesser brethren of the Naval Department.
slatten49 wrote:
Bless his heart. So long as BB recognizes his shortcomings, there is always hope for our lesser brethren of the Naval Department.
In his case, hope springs eternal.
PoppaGringo wrote:
In his case, hope springs eternal.
Or, in "time immemorial."
slatten49 wrote:
Or, in "time immemorial."
I am not quite ready for him to be memorialized. At least not until he makes good on all those IOU's of his we hold.
PoppaGringo wrote:
I am not quite ready for him to be memorialized. At least not until he makes good on all those IOU's of his we hold.
Good point. But, in his delusional state, he still maintains we owe him.
We may just have to accept his entertainment value as payback for those massive poker debts.
Sad, isn't it
slatten49 wrote:
Good point. But, in his delusional state, he still maintains we owe him.
We may just have to accept his entertainment value as payback for those massive poker debts.
Sad, isn't it
Good point. But, in his delusional state, he stil... (
show quote)
you guys are the original "dreamers"
hopefully you will be the first two deported
Sorry to be the one to inform you, but we are legal, having been born in this great big beautiful, wonderful, country.
SEMPER FI
badbobby wrote:
Alas
I can only hope
Instead of wastefully idling away your time with hope, try real improvement by studying the following:
The Theory of Poker by David Sklansky (1994 Edition)
Most game theorists and serious poker players regard this master work by David Sklansky as the game’s strategic dictionary. At 276 pages long divided into 25 chapters, this book from Two Plus Two Publishing contains all the basic strategic fundamentals. While not necessarily entertaining nor appealing to casual readers or anyone else other than serious players, this book contains nearly a lifetime of well-researched and painstakingly debated poker concepts, ultimately encapsulated in the sub-title, How to Think Like a Professional Poker Player. Here’s a summation of what’s contained in The Theory of Poker: “Beginning poker players sometimes ask, ‘What do you do in this particular situation?’ There really is no correct answer to that question because it’s the wrong question... The right question is: ‘What do you consider in this particular situation before determining what you do?’ The Theory of Poker addresses itself to such considerations.” I don’t know of anyone who takes poker seriously who hasn’t read this book or who isn’t at the very least familiar with its significance in the chronology of poker knowledge. It’s the benchmark for all future strategy debate and theory discussion. Period. End of discussion.
I suggest you read it slowly, and several times. You are in dire need of a deep study in the fine art of playing poker. I suggest this even at the detriment of losing one of my most lucrative sources of income...you at the table.
slatten49 wrote:
Instead of wastefully idling away your time with hope, try real improvement by studying the following:
The Theory of Poker by David Sklansky (1994 Edition)
Most game theorists and serious poker players regard this master work by David Sklansky as the game’s strategic dictionary. At 276 pages long divided into 25 chapters, this book from Two Plus Two Publishing contains all the basic strategic fundamentals. While not necessarily entertaining nor appealing to casual readers or anyone else other than serious players, this book contains nearly a lifetime of well-researched and painstakingly debated poker concepts, ultimately encapsulated in the sub-title, How to Think Like a Professional Poker Player. Here’s a summation of what’s contained in The Theory of Poker: “Beginning poker players sometimes ask, ‘What do you do in this particular situation?’ There really is no correct answer to that question because it’s the wrong question... The right question is: ‘What do you consider in this particular situation before determining what you do?’ The Theory of Poker addresses itself to such considerations.” I don’t know of anyone who takes poker seriously who hasn’t read this book or who isn’t at the very least familiar with its significance in the chronology of poker knowledge. It’s the benchmark for all future strategy debate and theory discussion. Period. End of discussion.
I suggest you read it slowly, and several times. You are in dire need of a deep study in the fine art of playing poker. I suggest this even at the detriment of losing one of my most lucrative sources of income...you at the table.
Instead of wastefully idling away your time with h... (
show quote)
a really meaningful book
I enjoyed it tremendously
and it has paid for itself over and over
specially when I played with Marines(You an Papi)
I know you are sleeping even now
but you should awaken and face up to the real world
badbobby wrote:
a really meaningful book
I enjoyed it tremendously
and it has paid for itself over and over
specially when I played with Marines(You an Papi)
I know you are sleeping even now
but you should awaken and face up to the real world
BTw
tell Papi that it explains why a straight flush beats two pair.
that might save him a little
pay your IOUs when you wake up
badbobby wrote:
a really meaningful book
I enjoyed it tremendously
and it has paid for itself over and over
specially when I played with Marines(You an Papi)
I know you are sleeping even now
but you should awaken and face up to the real world
Are you saying you found a Big Chief copy of the book in crayons & huge block letters
Good for you
A pity it (obviously) hasn't taken hold with you, yet.
slatten49 wrote:
Are you saying you found a Big Chief copy of the book in crayons & huge block letters
Good for you
A pity it (obviously) hasn't taken hold with you, yet.
And, it is unlikely it ever will.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.