One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Evolution - Useful or Useless?
Page <prev 2 of 2
Sep 22, 2017 14:06:27   #
working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina
 
Ve'hoe wrote:
cant respond intelligently huh???


I did. That you can't see it isn't my fault. Ever wonder why you don't hear from conservative non-believers on this site on topics like this?
Followers of Ms. Rand, for example. They know, just as liberal non-believers know, that it is useless to argue with a true believer. They are not hiding in a safe space.

So while the theory of evolution is useful in science, it is useless to discuss the topic with believers.

Reply
Sep 22, 2017 21:12:48   #
Mr Bombastic
 
working class stiff wrote:
Oh my....not dealing with an internet troll is now considered 'safe place'? LOL at this idiocy. Mr. Bomb? Little ball of hate, rivers, bomb has been posting this crap for years now. We know he is impervious to discussion. Mr. Bomb is a sock puppet.

You do know there are conservative atheists, right? Are they in their safe space? I doubt it.

We're all in our dens (that's the comfortable room in our house) laughing.


Perhaps you could show some positive contribution that the TOE has made for the betterment of science or mankind in general. I mean, you can continue to throw insults if you like, but that's what children do. Adults discuss things. So, let's hear it. What contributions has evolution made for the betterment of mankind?

Reply
Sep 22, 2017 21:13:49   #
Mr Bombastic
 
working class stiff wrote:
I did. That you can't see it isn't my fault. Ever wonder why you don't hear from conservative non-believers on this site on topics like this?
Followers of Ms. Rand, for example. They know, just as liberal non-believers know, that it is useless to argue with a true believer. They are not hiding in a safe space.

So while the theory of evolution is useful in science, it is useless to discuss the topic with believers.


How is it useful? Let's hear it.

Reply
 
 
Sep 22, 2017 21:45:22   #
Mr Bombastic
 
Well. Looks like no one can answer my question. Thanks for playing.

Mr. Bombastic: 1
Atheists: A BIG FAT ZERO!

Reply
Sep 23, 2017 06:01:10   #
working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina
 
Mr Bombastic wrote:
Wow! You're too stupid to know the difference between Darwinian evolution and adaptation. Tell me. Can you tie your shoes without assistance, or have you done away with laces entirely?


Yeah, you can tell me all you'd like about how insults are the weapon of children, but until you apply that same standard to yourself you are nothing but a hypocrite.

Reply
Sep 23, 2017 07:30:22   #
Mr Bombastic
 
working class stiff wrote:
Yeah, you can tell me all you'd like about how insults are the weapon of children, but until you apply that same standard to yourself you are nothing but a hypocrite.


First of all, I wasn't talking to you. Second, it was not an insult. Merely a statement of fact. I call it like I see it.

Reply
Sep 27, 2017 09:50:51   #
Ve'hoe
 
because it is itself,,,, a baseless belief,,, which is why you dodge with adhominem attacks instead of any actual discussion

"that I cannot see it" isnt my fault,, it is that it doesnt exist and you didnt provide it,, because YOU are the one who believes in a baseless superstition....... ie evolution

non-beleif,,,???? I have degrees in Chem, Bio and physics,,,, plus that "Dr" thingy in front of my name,,, give me your best shot....

You have provided NO science,,,,,,,,,


working class stiff wrote:
I did. That you can't see it isn't my fault. Ever wonder why you don't hear from conservative non-believers on this site on topics like this?
Followers of Ms. Rand, for example. They know, just as liberal non-believers know, that it is useless to argue with a true believer. They are not hiding in a safe space.

So while the theory of evolution is useful in science, it is useless to discuss the topic with believers.

Reply
 
 
Sep 27, 2017 09:56:31   #
Ve'hoe
 
actually,,, it makes scientific sense,, that if a mutation improves the species then the species would evolve,,, like a longer necked giraffe......

Where it fails is that mutations dont tend to survive,,,, and herd mechanics favor the group not the individual,,,, which is why white wildebeast get eaten first,,,, they stand out,,,,

Never mind the science that ALL vertebrate mamals have only 8 cervical vertebrae,,,,, and mutations almost never survive,,,, AND even if you had a "taller" giraffe,,, he is still a giraffe,,,, and can breed with the others,,,, therefore the species did not change




Mr Bombastic wrote:
You are deflecting. I should have expected it. The question is what use is evolution to anyone? I say it is completely useless and irrelevant. It is not a scientific theory. It is nothing but speculation. It makes no predictions and has not furthered scientific understanding. In fact, it has caused and continues to cause, great harm.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.