mwdegutis Loc: Illinois

I never said anything about the KC story. I mentioned that Snopes is BS and provided evidence to support it. Don't change the subject.

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

Here are the words from under YARDBARKER that keep me from reading. REALTIME RUMORS, GOSSIP, OPINIONS AND HUMOR FROM THE BEST SPORTS BLOGS

These very words keep me from reading Yardbarker. Rumors and gossip are really involved with each other.

EL Loc: Massachusetts

Good work!

moldyoldy

Evidence from a tabloid, good source.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

What are you guys so intense about? Are you cheering the supposed speech by Hunt?

Or are you promoting the hope that Snopes is not reliable as they have been??

mwdegutis Loc: Illinois

Forbes is a tabloid????????????? Read the Forbes article you idiot!

Randy131 Loc: Florida

First off the 'Daily Mail' is not just a tabloid, but a news organization, and the article that you refused to read was done on what the 'Daily Mail' reported, by the author of the article going straight to the owner of 'snopes' and asking him questions about what the 'Daily Mail' reported on, and other questions he thought pertinent to an organization that is supposed to be a "fact checker", and what he was given from the owner od 'snopes' falls well short of what a reliable "fact checker' should be, as many other reports on 'snopes' have come to the same conclusion. But we know you're a far left liberal that needs someone to stick up for your propaganda, so you'll keep using them no matter how much 'snopes' has proven to have lied to cover for the liberal propagandists.

Randy131 Loc: Florida

'Snopes' is anything but reliable, and that has been proven many times, but then again, as usual, you ignore what you don't want to hear, no matter how truthful it is proven to be.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

It may be that marital problems are bringing the end of Snopes.

B ut we shall hope that one of the many other fact checking media will grow to fill that void if it in fact does happen..

Randy131 Loc: Florida

'Snopes' unreliability has nothing to do with the marriage breakup of the two owners. I personally hope 'snopes' goes out of business, and an honest and unbiased "fact checker" takes it's place, one can only hope and pray.

moldyoldy

It seems that everybody else has snopes as one of the best.


http://www.technorms.com/454/get-your-facts-right-6-fact-checking-websites-that-help-you-know-the-truth

http://www.dailydot.com/layer8/best-fact-checking-websites/

http://mediabiasfactcheck.com/2016/07/20/the-10-best-fact-checking-sites/

http://www.skeptical-science.com/critical-thinking/top-5-fact-checking-websites/

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

Not at all. snopes is recognized as one of the best.. World wide..

I even included a couple examples of statements snopes made that you should have liked.

But the truth is, you hate when the right wing lies are exposed.

It has been asked why no right wing fact checking organizations exist.

The answer is simply, the right wing only lies, they never tell the truth.

Therefore no fact checking organization can exist for the right wing..

None of the right wing statements are true..

mwdegutis Loc: Illinois

I see your four websites and raise you one. Snopes is BS…

https://ethicsalarms.com/2016/07/31/bye-bye-snopes-youre-dead-to-me-now/comment-page-1/

https://medium.com/@JasonTLouis/left-leaning-fact-checking-site-snopes-lies-about-cnn-staging-protest-3036c1a1fde5

http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/17/fact-checking-snopes-websites-political-fact-checker-is-just-a-failed-liberal-blogger/

http://yournewswire.com/snopes-caught-lying-for-hillary-again-questions-raised/

http://www.jewworldorder.org/snopes-forced-to-admit-that-the-human-soul-exists/

PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

Did you follow your own links..

I do not think so..

This is what I found for the first link..


In 2014, the Washington Free Beacon published the audio of an interview that Arkansas reporter Roy Reed conducted with Clinton in the 1980s. In the interview, Clinton recalls some unusual details of the rape case, and she can be heard laughing in three instances, beginning with a joke she makes about the accuracy of polygraphs.
Clinton: Of course he claimed he didn’t. All this stuff. He took a lie detector test. I had him take a polygraph, which he passed, which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs. [laughs]

At another point, Clinton said the prosecutor balked at turning over evidence, forcing her to go to the judge to obtain it.
Clinton: So I got an order to see the evidence and the prosecutor didn’t want me to see the evidence. I had to go to Maupin Cummings and convince Maupin that yes indeed I had a right to see the evidence [laughs] before it was presented.

Clinton then said that the evidence she obtained was a pair of the accused’s underwear with a hole in it. Clinton told Reed that investigators had cut out a piece of the underwear and sent the sample to a crime lab to be tested, and the only evidence that remained was the underwear with a hole in it.
Clinton took the remaining evidence to a forensic expert in Brooklyn, New York, and the expert told her that the material on the underwear wasn’t enough to test. “He said, you know, ‘You can’t prove anything,'” Clinton recalled the expert telling her.
Clinton: I wrote all that stuff and I handed it to Mahlon Gibson, and I said, “Well this guy’s ready to come up from New York to prevent this miscarriage of justice.” [laughs]

The emails we have received about this case contain some misinformation. Some have claimed, for example, that Clinton volunteered for the case and the accused rapist was found not guilty. That’s not accurate, as we just explained. But Clinton did laugh in the retelling of some unusual aspects of the rape case, and we leave it to others to decide whether her laughter was appropriate or not.


So yes, as the rumor insists, she did laugh. But no one ever reveals what she laughed about..

Nothing at all to do with the poor girl and all to do with the foolish results of the evidence hunt..

I did not bother to look at the rest of you hopeless links..