thinksense

175 U.S. patents prove that geoengineering and weather control technologies are REAL…
The United States government has granted patent approval to at least 175 inventions and technologies that are officially recognized to control or augment weather systems. (See a partial list below.)

As you’re attempting to unravel all the contradictions found in global warming narrative, consider these 175 patents that describe — in tremendous detail — highly advanced weather control technology. These patents describe known processes for generating rain, augmenting hurricanes, seeding storm systems, accomplishing weather modification and much more. Keep in mind that all these patents have already been approved by the U.S. patent office, meaning that the U.S. government affirms the scientific feasibility of these inventions.

For years, Dane Wigington, the founder of GeoengineeringWatch.com, has been mocked by the fake news media for daring to claim that weather control technology exists. Now, with two back-to-back superstorms targeting the United States of America in less than two weeks — Hurricane Harvey and Hurricane Irma — more and more people are beginning to ask whether these storms are being influenced, augmented or even “steered” into their intended targets through the use of exotic technologies.

Here is a partial list of Patents...Better yet Go to GeoengineeringWatch.com for the full list.
0462795 – July 16, 1891 – Method Of Producing Rain-Fall
1103490 – August 6, 1913 – Rain-Maker
1. 1338343 – April 27, 1920 – Process And Apparatus For The Production of Intense Artificial Clouds, Fogs, or Mists
1. 1892132 – December 27, 1932 – Atomizing Attachment For Airplane Engine Exhausts
1. 1957075 – May 1, 1934 – Airplane Spray Equipment
1. 2480967 – September 6, 1949 – Aerial Discharge Device
2550324 – April 24, 1951 – Process For Controlling Weather
2582678 – June 15, 1952 – Material Disseminating Apparatus For Airplanes
1. 3313487 – April 11, 1967 – Cloud Seeding Apparatus
1. 3534906 – October 20, 1970 – Control of Atmospheric Particles
1. 3564253 – February 16, 1971 – System And Method For Irradiation Of Planet Surface Areas
1. 3608820– September 20, 1971 – Treatment of Atmospheric Conditions by Intermittent Dispensing of Materials Therein
1. 3899144 – August 12, 1975 – Powder contrail generation
1. 3940060 – February 24, 1976 – Vortex Ring Generator
1. 3994437 – November 30, 1976 – Broadcast dissemination of trace quantities of biologically active chemicals
4042196 – August 16, 1977 – Method and apparatus for triggering a substantial change in earth characteristics and measuring earth changes
1. RE29,142 – February 22, 1977 – Combustible compositions for generating aerosols, particularly suitable for cloud modification and weather control and aerosolization process
1. 4096005 – June 20, 1978 – Pyrotechnic Cloud Seeding Composition
4129252 – December 12, 1978 – Method and apparatus for production of seeding materials
4141274 – February 27, 1979 – Weather modification automatic cartridge dispenser
1. 4362271 – December 7, 1982 – Procedure for the artificial modification of atmospheric precipitation as well as compounds with a dimethyl sulfoxide base for use in carrying out said procedure
1. 4412654 – November 1, 1983 – Laminar microjet atomizer and method of aerial spraying of liquids
1. 4470544 – September 11, 1984 – Method of and Means for weather modification
1. 4643355 – February 17, 1987 – Method and apparatus for modification of climatic conditions
1. 4686605 – August 11, 1987 – HAARP Patent / EASTLUND PATENT – Method and apparatus for altering a region in the earth’s atmosphere, ionosphere, and/or magnetosphere
1. 4999637 – March 12, 1991 – Creation of artificial ionization clouds above the earth
5003186 – March 26, 1991 – Stratospheric Welsbach seeding for reduction of global warming
1. 5038664 – August 13, 1991 – Method for producing a shell of relativistic particles at an altitude above the earths surface
1. 5104069 – April 14, 1992 – Apparatus and method for ejecting matter from an aircraft
1. 6382526 – May 7, 2002 – Process and apparatus for the production of nanofibers

1. 3601312 – August 24, 1971 – Methods of Increasing The Likelihood oF Precipitation By The Artificial Introduction Of Sea Water Vapor Into The Atmosphere Winward Of An Air Lift Region
(THIS LOOKS A LOT LIKE THE TEXAS HURRICANE WORK)
.
Go to the source GeoengineeringWatch .com and see them all.

Carol Kelly

I'll just let God do the engineering. It's good enough for me. And I live in that area that is between NewOrleans and Mobile, known as the Mississippi Gulf Coast. We get hit and everybody wants to help NO. They're still talking about Katrina's damage to New
Orleans. Well,folks the truth is the city government misused government funds to keep
the sea wall and levees in good condition and similar to Houston. How does 35 to 40 ft.
surge grab you? In my hometown, it washed one entire side of town away. All the way to the bay.

Carol Kelly

I know no one will read this, but those of us who lived it know.

pafret Loc: Northeast

Carol: Are you claiming City government failed to use funds to fix sea walls or they used them for that purpose when they shouldn't have? A forty foot storm surge isn't going to be contained or deterred by any sea wall, it is just too big.

thinksense

You and that silly other thing have done a good job of Hi-Jacking the string. Thanks, it tells me a lot.

Carol Kelly

New Orleans didn't have a storm surge. The Gulf Coast of Ms. did. The Mayor of New Orleans and other city officials did not use the federal funds to keep up the levies. Therefore, New Orleans had flooding. They didn't actually get the hurricane. They had buses gassed up, but the buses weren't used. All the blacks piled into the dome stadium and caused the big muck up. My son was in the National Guard down there trying to bring some kind of control, but it was useless. We are still hearing about poor New Orleans and how they suffered in Katrina. I wish it had gone there. We lost everything and the insurance only paid us for one wall. The whole damn house was gone with everything in it. Is that the explanation you were looking for? And you are right, the levies wouldn't have held that kind of surge. That's just not what happened.

mongo Loc: TEXAS

At least they didn't demand a "Ransom,"...yet!

SEMPER FI

pafret Loc: Northeast

Sorry about that, what comment do you think is appropriate for a listing of weather related patents? There isn't much argument that there has been ongoing research into weather modification, including weaponizing it. The government is not going to admit they did anything which caused severe damage so where does this thread go from here?

thinksense

OK, see your point. I just thought people who weren't aware of this would benefit by seeing what has been discovered, and I'm sure used. Might explain a lot about Chem trails and other things happening ..

To both of you , please accept my apology.