thinksense

http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-09-07-rna-interference-crop-technology-weaponizes-food-into-the-ultimate-eugenics-weapon.html

A devastating new food weaponization technology has been developed called “RNA interference.” This technology, initially rolled out to destroy the fertility of pests, could easily be expanded into a genocidal food-based weapon that targets African-Americans to destroy their fertility. The same technology could also be fine-tuned to target Whites, Latinos, Asians or other races with various “biological payloads” that could include shutting off their fertility, neurological function or ability to build new blood vessels, eventually leading to death.


RNA interference technology could be used to “weaponize” food against humans.
1. In 1969, the New York Times published a story by Gladwin Hill entitled A STERILITY DRUG IN FOOD IS HINTED; Biologist Stresses Need to Curb Population Growth. Read the full PDF of the NYT story at this link. That story opens with the following sentence:
A possibility that the Government might have to put sterility drugs in reservoirs and in food shipped to foreign countries to limit human multiplication was envisioned today by a leading crusader on the population problem.
The article goes on to quote Dr. Lee DuBridge, the chief science adviser of President Nixon, who says:
Can we not invent a way to reduce our population growth rate to zero? Every human institution — school, university, church, family, government and international agencies such as Unesco — should set this as its prime task.
Dr. Paul Erlich, a favorite hero of the environmental movement, is also quoted in the story, saying:
Changing the pattern of Federal support of biomedical research so that the majority of it goes into the broad areas of population regulation, environmental science, behavior science and related areas rather than into short-sighted programs on death control.
Paul Erlich then goes on to explain that the nation might need “the addition of a temporary sterilant to staple food, or to the water supply,” along with a “lottery system” where people could win the antidote and restore their fertility.
You have all read that Monsanto and other chemical companies have developed these chemicals since the original article was written, and I'm sure that you already knew what this article tells you.But you may not have put it all together or thought of it being used this way. Why not go to the website and read the whole article and associated PDF?

As an aside...We know that these chemicals exist and can be distributed as an aerosol.
On a discussion of Chem trails one of the posters asked, why would the sprayers allow the chemicals to be sprayed when they and their loved ones would also be exposed to them. Could the answer be that they have antidotes to those chemicals?

F.D.R.

I have long believed that the world is grossly over populated which is the cause of most problems. Reduce the population and everything else falls into place via less demand for everything. The planet would finally begin to heal itself.

thinksense

I feel that you are right about the overpopulation. And I am in favor of gently reducing the birth rate to drop it back to a reasonable population. So I would have to agree with the idea of making a large proportion of the population strile.

An experiment that has been tried with grasshoppers helps to understand the strain on a species as the population advances to overpopulation. The experiment started with 4 green grasshoppers living in a specific sized environment. They hopped around and lived a normal grasshopper life pattern. Then they added 4 more hoppers. No problem, they too lived comfortably. then 4 more, and 4 more, etc. untill the hopper population reached a breaking point, at which time the green hoppers turned brown and became locusts, fighting each other and eating everything, including each other, until there were only a few left alive.

But having lived in a smaller population world, (about 1/2 the world population of today) I do not remember it being less crazy. I think that we need to decrease the population dramatically before we reach a proper level.

This bothers me because if I am right the 95% reduction that the one worlders are aiming for would seem to be a reasonable base to aim for, and where does that leave my family and yours.

And even that drastic reduction may not work, considering that 92.2% of those making up the surviving 5% would not be true humans. The few true humans left would not be able to keep a world alive and functioning for human beings.

To understand that last statement, spend a little thought on the following...

Suppose that a very advanced, powerful THING from outer space came to earth and that it anounced to the people of the world that only true humans would be allowed to occupy the world; all the rest would be deported to another planet. How would you determine who was a true human? What characteristics would define a true uman?

You couldn't go by the fact that they can stand and walk on 2 feet. Many animals and all birds can do that.

You couldn't go by the configuration of their body, with 2 arms/hands, 2 legs and feet with a body in the middle and a head at one end. Practically all animals and many fish would fit that description.

You couldn't go by their ability to talk, or communicate. All animals do that. Even plants communicate.

There is only ONE CHARACTERISTIC that defines the true human. That is that they are able to think original thoughts...THEY ARE INVENTIVE!!! When a problem comes up they would find an answer.

But the children of the original True Humans would work out to 92.2% unable to think an original thought, and the poor little 7.8% of that generation that could think would have a task that would soon become insurmountable. Certainly in a very few generations, there would not be enough true humans to sustain the race.

Eventually the human race would perish on the earth.

Is the above scenario just nutty ravings? Or...........

Now where does that leave us? At least we wouldn't have to read the crap written by certain ?????s on this board.