One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Climate Change the Biggest Scam in World History
Sep 5, 2017 11:32:54   #
ziggy88 Loc: quincy illinois 62301
 
Dr. Tim Ball Crushes Climate Change: The Biggest Deception In History

WRITTEN BY: DR. TIM BALL JUNE 15, 2017
Researched by Pastor Gary Boyd
Conclusion by Pastor Boyd

With a 50-year academic career focusing on Historical Climatology, Dr. Tim Ball is uniquely qualified to address man-made climate change, and he demonstrates that it is a flat-out hoax. Thinking people everywhere should get multiple copies of this book and hand them out to everyone they know. ⁃ TN Editor

President Trump was correct to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement. He could have explained that the science was premeditated and deliberately orchestrated to demonize CO2 for a political agenda. Wisely, he simply explained that it was a bad deal for the United States because it gave a competitive economic edge to other nations, especially China. A majority of Americans think he was wrong, but more would disagree if he got lost in the complexities of the science. I speak from experience having taught a Science credit course for 25 years for the student population that mirrors society with 80 percent of them being Arts students. Promoters of what is called anthropogenic global warming (AGW) knew most people do not understand the science and exploited it.


The plants need more atmospheric CO2 not less. Current levels of 400 parts per million (ppm) are close to the lowest levels in 600 million years. This contradicts what the world was told by people using the claim that human production of CO2 was causing global warming. They don’t know the UN agency, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), established to examine human-caused global warming, were limited to only studying human causes by the definition they were given by Article 1 of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). It is impossible to identify the human cause without understanding and including natural causes. Few know that CO2 is only 4 percent of the total greenhouse gases. They assume that a CO2 increase causes a temperature increase. It doesn’t, in every record the temperature increases before CO2. The only place where a CO2 increase causes a temperature increase is in the computer models of the IPCC. This partly explains why every single temperature forecast (they call them projections) the IPCC made since 1990 was wrong. If your forecast is wrong, your science is wrong.

I studied weather as aircrew with the Canadian Air Force, including five years of search and rescue in Arctic Canada. After the Air Force, I went to university to study weather and climate, culminating in a Ph.D., in Historical Climatology from the University of London, England. When I began in the late 1960s global cooling was the consensus. I was as opposed to the prediction that it would continue cooling to a mini-Ice Age, as I later was to the runaway AGW claim. I knew from creating and studying long-term records that climate changes all the time and are larger and more frequent than most know. I also knew changes in CO2 were not the cause.

The Club of Rome (COR), formed in 1968, decided that the world was overpopulated and expanded the Malthusian idea that the population would outgrow the food supply to all resources, especially the developed nations. COR member Maurice Strong told Elaine Dewar in her book Cloak of Green that the problem for the planet were the industrialized nations and it was everybody’s duty to shut them down. Dewar asked Strong if he planned to seek political office. He effectively said you cannot do anything as a politician, so he was going to the UN because:
He could raise his own money from whomever he liked, appoint anyone he wanted, control the agenda.
After five days with him at the UN she concluded:
Strong was using the U.N. as a platform to sell a global environment crisis and the Global Governance Agenda.

He created the crisis that the by-product of industry was causing global warming. Even Obama claimed that 97 percent of scientists agree. If he checked the source of the information, he would find the research was completely concocted. It is more likely that 97 percent of scientists never read the IPCC Reports. Those who do express their concern in very blunt terms. Consider German meteorologist and physicist Klaus-Eckart Puls experience.
“Ten years ago, I simply parroted what the IPCC told us. One day I started checking the facts and data – first I started with a sense of doubt but then I became outraged when I discovered that much of what the IPCC and the media were telling us was sheer nonsense and was not even supported by any scientific facts and measurements. To this day, I still feel shame that as a scientist I made presentations of their science without first checking it.”

He discovered what I exposed publicly for years. My challenge to the government version of global warming became increasingly problematic. They couldn’t say I wasn’t qualified. Attacks include death threats, false information about my qualifications posted on the Internet, and three lawsuits from IPCC members. Most people can’t believe that such things occur about opinions in a democratic society. Test the idea by telling people that you don’t accept the human-caused global warming idea. The reaction from most, who know nothing about the science, will invariably be dismissive at best.

I documented what went on in a detailed, fully referenced, book titled The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science. A lawyer commented that it lays out and effectively supports the case, however, it was “a tough slog.” I recently published a brief ‘non-slog’ handbook (100 pages) for the majority of people, not to insult their intelligence, but to help them understand the science and its misuse for a political agenda. Titled, Human Caused Global Warming: The Biggest Deception in History. Presented in the logical form of a criminal or journalistic investigation it answers the basic questions, Who, What, Where, When, Why, and How.

It provides the motive and method for the corruption of science to substantiate and bolster Trump’s decision.

Conclusion

Also please read Brian Sussman ‘Climategate’ that is a light shining on the darkness of the global warming scam. A wise man once said that darkness hates the light. That truth has an amazing application to perhaps the biggest fraud of our era: global warming. In the first place it is not a settled science with 87% of scientists agreeing there is no global warming caused by carbon dioxide. In fact plants suck it up bigtime and the world needs more of it. As you must know it is no secret that ever since serpentine Marxism coiled itself around Russia and Eastern Europe, its tyrannical philosphy of destruction cast its eyes westward. For many decades, communists, socialists, and the global elite (the Rothschilds and company) have tossed a dizzying array of predicaments into American culture; the one most relied upon is that carbon dioxide emissions generated by mankind are ruining our planet.

Author Brian Sussman’s thorough investigation into the motives, practices, and ultimate agenda of these radical anti-American agents is critical to Americans who wish to untangle the web of deceit being sold as concern for the environment.

Questions to ponder:
Why has science been willingly corrupted by activists with Ph.D.s?
Who stands to make millions off the global warming scam?
What is really happening to the earth’s climate?
Why are political leaders and government bureaucrats continuing to limit the amount of energy available to the American people?
How are the United Nations policies driving U.S. environmental laws?

Answer these questions and you will solve the mystery.



Reply
Sep 5, 2017 12:49:56   #
Glaucon
 
ziggy88 wrote:
Dr. Tim Ball Crushes Climate Change: The Biggest Deception In History

WRITTEN BY: DR. TIM BALL JUNE 15, 2017
Researched by Pastor Gary Boyd
Conclusion by Pastor Boyd

With a 50-year academic career focusing on Historical Climatology, Dr. Tim Ball is uniquely qualified to address man-made climate change, and he demonstrates that it is a flat-out hoax. Thinking people everywhere should get multiple copies of this book and hand them out to everyone they know. ⁃ TN Editor

President Trump was correct to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement. He could have explained that the science was premeditated and deliberately orchestrated to demonize CO2 for a political agenda. Wisely, he simply explained that it was a bad deal for the United States because it gave a competitive economic edge to other nations, especially China. A majority of Americans think he was wrong, but more would disagree if he got lost in the complexities of the science. I speak from experience having taught a Science credit course for 25 years for the student population that mirrors society with 80 percent of them being Arts students. Promoters of what is called anthropogenic global warming (AGW) knew most people do not understand the science and exploited it.


The plants need more atmospheric CO2 not less. Current levels of 400 parts per million (ppm) are close to the lowest levels in 600 million years. This contradicts what the world was told by people using the claim that human production of CO2 was causing global warming. They don’t know the UN agency, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), established to examine human-caused global warming, were limited to only studying human causes by the definition they were given by Article 1 of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). It is impossible to identify the human cause without understanding and including natural causes. Few know that CO2 is only 4 percent of the total greenhouse gases. They assume that a CO2 increase causes a temperature increase. It doesn’t, in every record the temperature increases before CO2. The only place where a CO2 increase causes a temperature increase is in the computer models of the IPCC. This partly explains why every single temperature forecast (they call them projections) the IPCC made since 1990 was wrong. If your forecast is wrong, your science is wrong.

I studied weather as aircrew with the Canadian Air Force, including five years of search and rescue in Arctic Canada. After the Air Force, I went to university to study weather and climate, culminating in a Ph.D., in Historical Climatology from the University of London, England. When I began in the late 1960s global cooling was the consensus. I was as opposed to the prediction that it would continue cooling to a mini-Ice Age, as I later was to the runaway AGW claim. I knew from creating and studying long-term records that climate changes all the time and are larger and more frequent than most know. I also knew changes in CO2 were not the cause.

The Club of Rome (COR), formed in 1968, decided that the world was overpopulated and expanded the Malthusian idea that the population would outgrow the food supply to all resources, especially the developed nations. COR member Maurice Strong told Elaine Dewar in her book Cloak of Green that the problem for the planet were the industrialized nations and it was everybody’s duty to shut them down. Dewar asked Strong if he planned to seek political office. He effectively said you cannot do anything as a politician, so he was going to the UN because:
He could raise his own money from whomever he liked, appoint anyone he wanted, control the agenda.
After five days with him at the UN she concluded:
Strong was using the U.N. as a platform to sell a global environment crisis and the Global Governance Agenda.

He created the crisis that the by-product of industry was causing global warming. Even Obama claimed that 97 percent of scientists agree. If he checked the source of the information, he would find the research was completely concocted. It is more likely that 97 percent of scientists never read the IPCC Reports. Those who do express their concern in very blunt terms. Consider German meteorologist and physicist Klaus-Eckart Puls experience.
“Ten years ago, I simply parroted what the IPCC told us. One day I started checking the facts and data – first I started with a sense of doubt but then I became outraged when I discovered that much of what the IPCC and the media were telling us was sheer nonsense and was not even supported by any scientific facts and measurements. To this day, I still feel shame that as a scientist I made presentations of their science without first checking it.”

He discovered what I exposed publicly for years. My challenge to the government version of global warming became increasingly problematic. They couldn’t say I wasn’t qualified. Attacks include death threats, false information about my qualifications posted on the Internet, and three lawsuits from IPCC members. Most people can’t believe that such things occur about opinions in a democratic society. Test the idea by telling people that you don’t accept the human-caused global warming idea. The reaction from most, who know nothing about the science, will invariably be dismissive at best.

I documented what went on in a detailed, fully referenced, book titled The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science. A lawyer commented that it lays out and effectively supports the case, however, it was “a tough slog.” I recently published a brief ‘non-slog’ handbook (100 pages) for the majority of people, not to insult their intelligence, but to help them understand the science and its misuse for a political agenda. Titled, Human Caused Global Warming: The Biggest Deception in History. Presented in the logical form of a criminal or journalistic investigation it answers the basic questions, Who, What, Where, When, Why, and How.

It provides the motive and method for the corruption of science to substantiate and bolster Trump’s decision.

Conclusion

Also please read Brian Sussman ‘Climategate’ that is a light shining on the darkness of the global warming scam. A wise man once said that darkness hates the light. That truth has an amazing application to perhaps the biggest fraud of our era: global warming. In the first place it is not a settled science with 87% of scientists agreeing there is no global warming caused by carbon dioxide. In fact plants suck it up bigtime and the world needs more of it. As you must know it is no secret that ever since serpentine Marxism coiled itself around Russia and Eastern Europe, its tyrannical philosphy of destruction cast its eyes westward. For many decades, communists, socialists, and the global elite (the Rothschilds and company) have tossed a dizzying array of predicaments into American culture; the one most relied upon is that carbon dioxide emissions generated by mankind are ruining our planet.

Author Brian Sussman’s thorough investigation into the motives, practices, and ultimate agenda of these radical anti-American agents is critical to Americans who wish to untangle the web of deceit being sold as concern for the environment.

Questions to ponder:
Why has science been willingly corrupted by activists with Ph.D.s?
Who stands to make millions off the global warming scam?
What is really happening to the earth’s climate?
Why are political leaders and government bureaucrats continuing to limit the amount of energy available to the American people?
How are the United Nations policies driving U.S. environmental laws?

Answer these questions and you will solve the mystery.
Dr. Tim Ball Crushes Climate Change: The Biggest D... (show quote)


You ask loaded questions such as, "Why has science been willingly corrupted by activists with Ph.D.s?" and provide no evidence that and have actually been corrupted. That is dishonest as are the other loaded questions. Do you still beat your wife?

Your "facts' are not supported by ANY evidence and seem to be your very own delusional opinions.

If it turns out all legitimate, trained, educated climate scientists are right and the politicians, and trailer dwellers are wrong, humanity is screwed and humans will become extinct. If all the legitimate, trained, educated climate scientists are wrong and climate change isn't really happening or it is no big deal, we survive to have children and grand children. Seems like an obvious way to bet.

Reply
Sep 5, 2017 15:26:37   #
wuzblynd Loc: thomson georgia
 
Glaucon wrote:
You ask loaded questions such as, "Why has science been willingly corrupted by activists with Ph.D.s?" and provide no evidence that and have actually been corrupted. That is dishonest as are the other loaded questions. Do you still beat your wife?

Your "facts' are not supported by ANY evidence and seem to be your very own delusional opinions.

If it turns out all legitimate, trained, educated climate scientists are right and the politicians, and trailer dwellers are wrong, humanity is screwed and humans will become extinct. If all the legitimate, trained, educated climate scientists are wrong and climate change isn't really happening or it is no big deal, we survive to have children and grand children. Seems like an obvious way to bet.
You ask loaded questions such as, "Why has sc... (show quote)





Thought u were leaving?? Oh well, guess we just have to put up with a child. But u gotta learn somewhere, why not here!! Enjoy your buttspankings!!!

Reply
 
 
Sep 5, 2017 15:39:38   #
Glaucon
 
wuzblynd wrote:
Thought u were leaving?? Oh well, guess we just have to put up with a child. But u gotta learn somewhere, why not here!! Enjoy your buttspankings!!!


I think you feel much better when you can release some of your bile and venom on someone or some thing. If you hang onto the hate and rage, it will continue to ravish your body and mind. There are other people you can unload on and I don't think you will miss me all that much. Goo luck with your thump sucking, but try to limiting it to thumbs.

Reply
Sep 5, 2017 15:49:56   #
Glaucon
 
ziggy88 wrote:
Dr. Tim Ball Crushes Climate Change: The Biggest Deception In History

WRITTEN BY: DR. TIM BALL JUNE 15, 2017
Researched by Pastor Gary Boyd
Conclusion by Pastor Boyd

With a 50-year academic career focusing on Historical Climatology, Dr. Tim Ball is uniquely qualified to address man-made climate change, and he demonstrates that it is a flat-out hoax. Thinking people everywhere should get multiple copies of this book and hand them out to everyone they know. ⁃ TN Editor

President Trump was correct to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement. He could have explained that the science was premeditated and deliberately orchestrated to demonize CO2 for a political agenda. Wisely, he simply explained that it was a bad deal for the United States because it gave a competitive economic edge to other nations, especially China. A majority of Americans think he was wrong, but more would disagree if he got lost in the complexities of the science. I speak from experience having taught a Science credit course for 25 years for the student population that mirrors society with 80 percent of them being Arts students. Promoters of what is called anthropogenic global warming (AGW) knew most people do not understand the science and exploited it.


The plants need more atmospheric CO2 not less. Current levels of 400 parts per million (ppm) are close to the lowest levels in 600 million years. This contradicts what the world was told by people using the claim that human production of CO2 was causing global warming. They don’t know the UN agency, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), established to examine human-caused global warming, were limited to only studying human causes by the definition they were given by Article 1 of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). It is impossible to identify the human cause without understanding and including natural causes. Few know that CO2 is only 4 percent of the total greenhouse gases. They assume that a CO2 increase causes a temperature increase. It doesn’t, in every record the temperature increases before CO2. The only place where a CO2 increase causes a temperature increase is in the computer models of the IPCC. This partly explains why every single temperature forecast (they call them projections) the IPCC made since 1990 was wrong. If your forecast is wrong, your science is wrong.

I studied weather as aircrew with the Canadian Air Force, including five years of search and rescue in Arctic Canada. After the Air Force, I went to university to study weather and climate, culminating in a Ph.D., in Historical Climatology from the University of London, England. When I began in the late 1960s global cooling was the consensus. I was as opposed to the prediction that it would continue cooling to a mini-Ice Age, as I later was to the runaway AGW claim. I knew from creating and studying long-term records that climate changes all the time and are larger and more frequent than most know. I also knew changes in CO2 were not the cause.

The Club of Rome (COR), formed in 1968, decided that the world was overpopulated and expanded the Malthusian idea that the population would outgrow the food supply to all resources, especially the developed nations. COR member Maurice Strong told Elaine Dewar in her book Cloak of Green that the problem for the planet were the industrialized nations and it was everybody’s duty to shut them down. Dewar asked Strong if he planned to seek political office. He effectively said you cannot do anything as a politician, so he was going to the UN because:
He could raise his own money from whomever he liked, appoint anyone he wanted, control the agenda.
After five days with him at the UN she concluded:
Strong was using the U.N. as a platform to sell a global environment crisis and the Global Governance Agenda.

He created the crisis that the by-product of industry was causing global warming. Even Obama claimed that 97 percent of scientists agree. If he checked the source of the information, he would find the research was completely concocted. It is more likely that 97 percent of scientists never read the IPCC Reports. Those who do express their concern in very blunt terms. Consider German meteorologist and physicist Klaus-Eckart Puls experience.
“Ten years ago, I simply parroted what the IPCC told us. One day I started checking the facts and data – first I started with a sense of doubt but then I became outraged when I discovered that much of what the IPCC and the media were telling us was sheer nonsense and was not even supported by any scientific facts and measurements. To this day, I still feel shame that as a scientist I made presentations of their science without first checking it.”

He discovered what I exposed publicly for years. My challenge to the government version of global warming became increasingly problematic. They couldn’t say I wasn’t qualified. Attacks include death threats, false information about my qualifications posted on the Internet, and three lawsuits from IPCC members. Most people can’t believe that such things occur about opinions in a democratic society. Test the idea by telling people that you don’t accept the human-caused global warming idea. The reaction from most, who know nothing about the science, will invariably be dismissive at best.

I documented what went on in a detailed, fully referenced, book titled The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science. A lawyer commented that it lays out and effectively supports the case, however, it was “a tough slog.” I recently published a brief ‘non-slog’ handbook (100 pages) for the majority of people, not to insult their intelligence, but to help them understand the science and its misuse for a political agenda. Titled, Human Caused Global Warming: The Biggest Deception in History. Presented in the logical form of a criminal or journalistic investigation it answers the basic questions, Who, What, Where, When, Why, and How.

It provides the motive and method for the corruption of science to substantiate and bolster Trump’s decision.

Conclusion

Also please read Brian Sussman ‘Climategate’ that is a light shining on the darkness of the global warming scam. A wise man once said that darkness hates the light. That truth has an amazing application to perhaps the biggest fraud of our era: global warming. In the first place it is not a settled science with 87% of scientists agreeing there is no global warming caused by carbon dioxide. In fact plants suck it up bigtime and the world needs more of it. As you must know it is no secret that ever since serpentine Marxism coiled itself around Russia and Eastern Europe, its tyrannical philosphy of destruction cast its eyes westward. For many decades, communists, socialists, and the global elite (the Rothschilds and company) have tossed a dizzying array of predicaments into American culture; the one most relied upon is that carbon dioxide emissions generated by mankind are ruining our planet.

Author Brian Sussman’s thorough investigation into the motives, practices, and ultimate agenda of these radical anti-American agents is critical to Americans who wish to untangle the web of deceit being sold as concern for the environment.

Questions to ponder:
Why has science been willingly corrupted by activists with Ph.D.s?
Who stands to make millions off the global warming scam?
What is really happening to the earth’s climate?
Why are political leaders and government bureaucrats continuing to limit the amount of energy available to the American people?
How are the United Nations policies driving U.S. environmental laws?

Answer these questions and you will solve the mystery.
Dr. Tim Ball Crushes Climate Change: The Biggest D... (show quote)


Man made climate change is a very serious matter. I am surprised anyone would post this nonsense. Do you ever fact check your delusions. Do you know the backgrounds and lack educational accomplishments of the people you put forth as experts on the matter. Find the fuk out.

Reply
Sep 5, 2017 15:51:04   #
Glaucon
 
Glaucon wrote:
You ask loaded questions such as, "Why has science been willingly corrupted by activists with Ph.D.s?" and provide no evidence that and have actually been corrupted. That is dishonest as are the other loaded questions. Do you still beat your wife?

Your "facts' are not supported by ANY evidence and seem to be your very own delusional opinions.

If it turns out all legitimate, trained, educated climate scientists are right and the politicians, and trailer dwellers are wrong, humanity is screwed and humans will become extinct. If all the legitimate, trained, educated climate scientists are wrong and climate change isn't really happening or it is no big deal, we survive to have children and grand children. Seems like an obvious way to bet.
You ask loaded questions such as, "Why has sc... (show quote)


NO RESPONSE from person making this silly comment.

Reply
Sep 5, 2017 15:56:17   #
Glaucon
 
wuzblynd wrote:
Thought u were leaving?? Oh well, guess we just have to put up with a child. But u gotta learn somewhere, why not here!! Enjoy your buttspankings!!!


I guess I will decide to leave when I decide to leave. I plan to officially cease contact with OPP on September 15. If my presence on this site and the reality I bring to it makes you uncomfortable and causes you to be an asshole, you will feel better after the 25th, but, I am sorry to say, you will still be an asshole.

Reply
 
 
Sep 5, 2017 18:07:24   #
Gatsby
 
That most scientific studies are ultimately wrong is normal for science.

There are more theories in the graveyard of science than theories that stand the test of time.

Why? Because new data is always emerging and theories have to be adjusted.

Theories are only as good as theories are, until new data comes along and ruins them.

http://www.theguardian.com/science/occams-corner/2013/sep/17/scientific-studies-wrong

ziggy88 wrote:
Dr. Tim Ball Crushes Climate Change: The Biggest Deception In History

WRITTEN BY: DR. TIM BALL JUNE 15, 2017
Researched by Pastor Gary Boyd
Conclusion by Pastor Boyd

With a 50-year academic career focusing on Historical Climatology, Dr. Tim Ball is uniquely qualified to address man-made climate change, and he demonstrates that it is a flat-out hoax. Thinking people everywhere should get multiple copies of this book and hand them out to everyone they know. ⁃ TN Editor

President Trump was correct to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement. He could have explained that the science was premeditated and deliberately orchestrated to demonize CO2 for a political agenda. Wisely, he simply explained that it was a bad deal for the United States because it gave a competitive economic edge to other nations, especially China. A majority of Americans think he was wrong, but more would disagree if he got lost in the complexities of the science. I speak from experience having taught a Science credit course for 25 years for the student population that mirrors society with 80 percent of them being Arts students. Promoters of what is called anthropogenic global warming (AGW) knew most people do not understand the science and exploited it.


The plants need more atmospheric CO2 not less. Current levels of 400 parts per million (ppm) are close to the lowest levels in 600 million years. This contradicts what the world was told by people using the claim that human production of CO2 was causing global warming. They don’t know the UN agency, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), established to examine human-caused global warming, were limited to only studying human causes by the definition they were given by Article 1 of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). It is impossible to identify the human cause without understanding and including natural causes. Few know that CO2 is only 4 percent of the total greenhouse gases. They assume that a CO2 increase causes a temperature increase. It doesn’t, in every record the temperature increases before CO2. The only place where a CO2 increase causes a temperature increase is in the computer models of the IPCC. This partly explains why every single temperature forecast (they call them projections) the IPCC made since 1990 was wrong. If your forecast is wrong, your science is wrong.

I studied weather as aircrew with the Canadian Air Force, including five years of search and rescue in Arctic Canada. After the Air Force, I went to university to study weather and climate, culminating in a Ph.D., in Historical Climatology from the University of London, England. When I began in the late 1960s global cooling was the consensus. I was as opposed to the prediction that it would continue cooling to a mini-Ice Age, as I later was to the runaway AGW claim. I knew from creating and studying long-term records that climate changes all the time and are larger and more frequent than most know. I also knew changes in CO2 were not the cause.

The Club of Rome (COR), formed in 1968, decided that the world was overpopulated and expanded the Malthusian idea that the population would outgrow the food supply to all resources, especially the developed nations. COR member Maurice Strong told Elaine Dewar in her book Cloak of Green that the problem for the planet were the industrialized nations and it was everybody’s duty to shut them down. Dewar asked Strong if he planned to seek political office. He effectively said you cannot do anything as a politician, so he was going to the UN because:
He could raise his own money from whomever he liked, appoint anyone he wanted, control the agenda.
After five days with him at the UN she concluded:
Strong was using the U.N. as a platform to sell a global environment crisis and the Global Governance Agenda.

He created the crisis that the by-product of industry was causing global warming. Even Obama claimed that 97 percent of scientists agree. If he checked the source of the information, he would find the research was completely concocted. It is more likely that 97 percent of scientists never read the IPCC Reports. Those who do express their concern in very blunt terms. Consider German meteorologist and physicist Klaus-Eckart Puls experience.
“Ten years ago, I simply parroted what the IPCC told us. One day I started checking the facts and data – first I started with a sense of doubt but then I became outraged when I discovered that much of what the IPCC and the media were telling us was sheer nonsense and was not even supported by any scientific facts and measurements. To this day, I still feel shame that as a scientist I made presentations of their science without first checking it.”

He discovered what I exposed publicly for years. My challenge to the government version of global warming became increasingly problematic. They couldn’t say I wasn’t qualified. Attacks include death threats, false information about my qualifications posted on the Internet, and three lawsuits from IPCC members. Most people can’t believe that such things occur about opinions in a democratic society. Test the idea by telling people that you don’t accept the human-caused global warming idea. The reaction from most, who know nothing about the science, will invariably be dismissive at best.

I documented what went on in a detailed, fully referenced, book titled The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science. A lawyer commented that it lays out and effectively supports the case, however, it was “a tough slog.” I recently published a brief ‘non-slog’ handbook (100 pages) for the majority of people, not to insult their intelligence, but to help them understand the science and its misuse for a political agenda. Titled, Human Caused Global Warming: The Biggest Deception in History. Presented in the logical form of a criminal or journalistic investigation it answers the basic questions, Who, What, Where, When, Why, and How.

It provides the motive and method for the corruption of science to substantiate and bolster Trump’s decision.

Conclusion

Also please read Brian Sussman ‘Climategate’ that is a light shining on the darkness of the global warming scam. A wise man once said that darkness hates the light. That truth has an amazing application to perhaps the biggest fraud of our era: global warming. In the first place it is not a settled science with 87% of scientists agreeing there is no global warming caused by carbon dioxide. In fact plants suck it up bigtime and the world needs more of it. As you must know it is no secret that ever since serpentine Marxism coiled itself around Russia and Eastern Europe, its tyrannical philosphy of destruction cast its eyes westward. For many decades, communists, socialists, and the global elite (the Rothschilds and company) have tossed a dizzying array of predicaments into American culture; the one most relied upon is that carbon dioxide emissions generated by mankind are ruining our planet.

Author Brian Sussman’s thorough investigation into the motives, practices, and ultimate agenda of these radical anti-American agents is critical to Americans who wish to untangle the web of deceit being sold as concern for the environment.

Questions to ponder:
Why has science been willingly corrupted by activists with Ph.D.s?
Who stands to make millions off the global warming scam?
What is really happening to the earth’s climate?
Why are political leaders and government bureaucrats continuing to limit the amount of energy available to the American people?
How are the United Nations policies driving U.S. environmental laws?

Answer these questions and you will solve the mystery.
Dr. Tim Ball Crushes Climate Change: The Biggest D... (show quote)

Reply
Sep 5, 2017 21:03:22   #
Glaucon
 
Gatsby wrote:
That most scientific studies are ultimately wrong is normal for science.

There are more theories in the graveyard of science than theories that stand the test of time.

Why? Because new data is always emerging and theories have to be adjusted.

Theories are only as good as theories are, until new data comes along and ruins them.

http://www.theguardian.com/science/occams-corner/2013/sep/17/scientific-studies-wrong


Your lack of understanding is a bit humorous, but mostly terrifying. If you want me to explain why your comment was horrifying, I would do so, but in your ignorance, you sound like you know everything about science and are not open to information. If I am wrong, let me know.

"There is a widely used notion that does plenty of damage: the notion of "scientifically proven" nearly an oxymoron. The very foundation of science is to keep the door open to doubt." Carlo Rovelli From the Uselessness of certainty

Reply
Sep 8, 2017 09:58:15   #
Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas
 
Glaucon wrote:
I guess I will decide to leave when I decide to leave. I plan to officially cease contact with OPP on September 15. If my presence on this site and the reality I bring to it makes you uncomfortable and causes you to be an asshole, you will feel better after the 25th, but, I am sorry to say, you will still be an asshole.




Soooooo, good for you, finally reaching the post-op phase of your transformation on the 15th......too bad they have nothing to remove the Douche' bag from you like they do your little pecker.......Punk!

I will miss you.......about the same as a venereal disease....tell your mom I finally cured what she gave me, have the other 1000 she infected give me a call so I can share the fix......Punk!

Reply
Sep 8, 2017 11:02:08   #
Glaucon
 
ziggy88 wrote:
Dr. Tim Ball Crushes Climate Change: The Biggest Deception In History

WRITTEN BY: DR. TIM BALL JUNE 15, 2017
Researched by Pastor Gary Boyd
Conclusion by Pastor Boyd

With a 50-year academic career focusing on Historical Climatology, Dr. Tim Ball is uniquely qualified to address man-made climate change, and he demonstrates that it is a flat-out hoax. Thinking people everywhere should get multiple copies of this book and hand them out to everyone they know. ⁃ TN Editor

President Trump was correct to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement. He could have explained that the science was premeditated and deliberately orchestrated to demonize CO2 for a political agenda. Wisely, he simply explained that it was a bad deal for the United States because it gave a competitive economic edge to other nations, especially China. A majority of Americans think he was wrong, but more would disagree if he got lost in the complexities of the science. I speak from experience having taught a Science credit course for 25 years for the student population that mirrors society with 80 percent of them being Arts students. Promoters of what is called anthropogenic global warming (AGW) knew most people do not understand the science and exploited it.


The plants need more atmospheric CO2 not less. Current levels of 400 parts per million (ppm) are close to the lowest levels in 600 million years. This contradicts what the world was told by people using the claim that human production of CO2 was causing global warming. They don’t know the UN agency, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), established to examine human-caused global warming, were limited to only studying human causes by the definition they were given by Article 1 of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). It is impossible to identify the human cause without understanding and including natural causes. Few know that CO2 is only 4 percent of the total greenhouse gases. They assume that a CO2 increase causes a temperature increase. It doesn’t, in every record the temperature increases before CO2. The only place where a CO2 increase causes a temperature increase is in the computer models of the IPCC. This partly explains why every single temperature forecast (they call them projections) the IPCC made since 1990 was wrong. If your forecast is wrong, your science is wrong.

I studied weather as aircrew with the Canadian Air Force, including five years of search and rescue in Arctic Canada. After the Air Force, I went to university to study weather and climate, culminating in a Ph.D., in Historical Climatology from the University of London, England. When I began in the late 1960s global cooling was the consensus. I was as opposed to the prediction that it would continue cooling to a mini-Ice Age, as I later was to the runaway AGW claim. I knew from creating and studying long-term records that climate changes all the time and are larger and more frequent than most know. I also knew changes in CO2 were not the cause.

The Club of Rome (COR), formed in 1968, decided that the world was overpopulated and expanded the Malthusian idea that the population would outgrow the food supply to all resources, especially the developed nations. COR member Maurice Strong told Elaine Dewar in her book Cloak of Green that the problem for the planet were the industrialized nations and it was everybody’s duty to shut them down. Dewar asked Strong if he planned to seek political office. He effectively said you cannot do anything as a politician, so he was going to the UN because:
He could raise his own money from whomever he liked, appoint anyone he wanted, control the agenda.
After five days with him at the UN she concluded:
Strong was using the U.N. as a platform to sell a global environment crisis and the Global Governance Agenda.

He created the crisis that the by-product of industry was causing global warming. Even Obama claimed that 97 percent of scientists agree. If he checked the source of the information, he would find the research was completely concocted. It is more likely that 97 percent of scientists never read the IPCC Reports. Those who do express their concern in very blunt terms. Consider German meteorologist and physicist Klaus-Eckart Puls experience.
“Ten years ago, I simply parroted what the IPCC told us. One day I started checking the facts and data – first I started with a sense of doubt but then I became outraged when I discovered that much of what the IPCC and the media were telling us was sheer nonsense and was not even supported by any scientific facts and measurements. To this day, I still feel shame that as a scientist I made presentations of their science without first checking it.”

He discovered what I exposed publicly for years. My challenge to the government version of global warming became increasingly problematic. They couldn’t say I wasn’t qualified. Attacks include death threats, false information about my qualifications posted on the Internet, and three lawsuits from IPCC members. Most people can’t believe that such things occur about opinions in a democratic society. Test the idea by telling people that you don’t accept the human-caused global warming idea. The reaction from most, who know nothing about the science, will invariably be dismissive at best.

I documented what went on in a detailed, fully referenced, book titled The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science. A lawyer commented that it lays out and effectively supports the case, however, it was “a tough slog.” I recently published a brief ‘non-slog’ handbook (100 pages) for the majority of people, not to insult their intelligence, but to help them understand the science and its misuse for a political agenda. Titled, Human Caused Global Warming: The Biggest Deception in History. Presented in the logical form of a criminal or journalistic investigation it answers the basic questions, Who, What, Where, When, Why, and How.

It provides the motive and method for the corruption of science to substantiate and bolster Trump’s decision.

Conclusion

Also please read Brian Sussman ‘Climategate’ that is a light shining on the darkness of the global warming scam. A wise man once said that darkness hates the light. That truth has an amazing application to perhaps the biggest fraud of our era: global warming. In the first place it is not a settled science with 87% of scientists agreeing there is no global warming caused by carbon dioxide. In fact plants suck it up bigtime and the world needs more of it. As you must know it is no secret that ever since serpentine Marxism coiled itself around Russia and Eastern Europe, its tyrannical philosphy of destruction cast its eyes westward. For many decades, communists, socialists, and the global elite (the Rothschilds and company) have tossed a dizzying array of predicaments into American culture; the one most relied upon is that carbon dioxide emissions generated by mankind are ruining our planet.

Author Brian Sussman’s thorough investigation into the motives, practices, and ultimate agenda of these radical anti-American agents is critical to Americans who wish to untangle the web of deceit being sold as concern for the environment.

Questions to ponder:
Why has science been willingly corrupted by activists with Ph.D.s?
Who stands to make millions off the global warming scam?
What is really happening to the earth’s climate?
Why are political leaders and government bureaucrats continuing to limit the amount of energy available to the American people?
How are the United Nations policies driving U.S. environmental laws?

Answer these questions and you will solve the mystery.
Dr. Tim Ball Crushes Climate Change: The Biggest D... (show quote)


Questions to ponder:
Why has science been willingly corrupted by activists with Ph.D.s?

Answer: Science has not been corrupted by activists with Ph.Ds.
Who stands to make millions off the global warming scam?
Answer: I don’t know, either, what is your biased guess? Do you have any evidence or just your gossip?

What is really happening to the earth’s climate?
Answer: It is being destroyed.

Why are political leaders and government bureaucrats continuing to limit the amount of energy available to the American people?

Answer: They aren’t.
How are the United Nations policies driving U.S. environmental laws?
Answer: They aren’t.

Answer these questions and you will solve the mystery.
Mystery solved…………………………………….

Tell the people in Texas and Florida climate change is a hoax. Get real.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.