One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The Madman With Nuclear Weapons is Donald Trump, Not Kim Jong-un
Page <<first <prev 8 of 8
Aug 13, 2017 18:53:27   #
emarine
 
payne1000 wrote:
I know who the real Neo-Nazis are:





More BS propaganda ... a religious Jewish pacifist who died in 94... Long before Hamas terrorists took control of Gaza & Hezbollah in the west bank ... things change in a decade with terrorists

Reply
Aug 13, 2017 20:12:09   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
payne1000 wrote:
No. That's not true. I give credibility to anyone who identifies themselves with a name and location which can be checked.
That does not mean I won't disagree with that person. It does mean that I won't judge that person to be a shill.
Shills have to hide behind anonymity in order to function. What is your reason for hiding?
Yeah, YOU give or deny someone's credibility to satisfy your own personal agenda, and your basis for that is infantile. The standards of credibility in providing information have nothing to do with a person's identity or location, it has to do with the substance of what information is provided. If someone came to Texas and shoved his birth certificate and driver's license up your ass, you would still refuse him any credibility if the information he provides offends you, opposes you, or challenges you. So, don't sit there on your arrogant ass thinking you are the universal arbiter of anyone's credibility. The only credibility you are responsible for is your own.

Reply
Aug 13, 2017 20:46:08   #
Gatsby
 
Every time payne2000 get's his ass handed to him in debate, he resorts to his "identity fetish" to change the subject.


Blade_Runner wrote:
Yeah, YOU give or deny someone's credibility to satisfy your own personal agenda, and your basis for that is infantile. The standards of credibility in providing information have nothing to do with a person's identity or location, it has to do with the substance of what information is provided. If someone came to Texas and shoved his birth certificate and driver's license up your ass, you would still refuse him any credibility if the information he provides offends you, opposes you, or challenges you. So, don't sit there on your arrogant ass thinking you are the universal arbiter of anyone's credibility. The only credibility you are responsible for is your own.
Yeah, YOU give or deny someone's credibility to sa... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Aug 13, 2017 20:56:19   #
payne1000
 
PoppaGringo wrote:
He/it is a real sicko, is he/it not?


Perhaps it's you who is sick . . .



Reply
Aug 13, 2017 20:58:13   #
payne1000
 
emarine wrote:
More BS propaganda ... a religious Jewish pacifist who died in 94... Long before Hamas terrorists took control of Gaza & Hezbollah in the west bank ... things change in a decade with terrorists


The crimes and atrocities of Zionists haven't changed in over a hundred years.

Reply
Aug 13, 2017 21:00:42   #
payne1000
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Yeah, YOU give or deny someone's credibility to satisfy your own personal agenda, and your basis for that is infantile. The standards of credibility in providing information have nothing to do with a person's identity or location, it has to do with the substance of what information is provided. If someone came to Texas and shoved his birth certificate and driver's license up your ass, you would still refuse him any credibility if the information he provides offends you, opposes you, or challenges you. So, don't sit there on your arrogant ass thinking you are the universal arbiter of anyone's credibility. The only credibility you are responsible for is your own.
Yeah, YOU give or deny someone's credibility to sa... (show quote)


Any thinking person should not believe an unnamed source.
You're an unnamed source who cannot give any valid reason for remaining unnamed.

Reply
Aug 13, 2017 21:02:21   #
payne1000
 
Gatsby wrote:
Every time payne2000 get's his ass handed to him in debate, he resorts to his "identity fetish" to change the subject.


You're an unnamed source as well.
What's your reason for hiding behind anonymity?

Reply
 
 
Aug 13, 2017 21:21:05   #
Gatsby
 
Buzz off LOSER!
payne1000 wrote:
You're an unnamed source as well.
What's your reason for hiding behind anonymity?

Reply
Aug 13, 2017 23:57:44   #
samtheyank
 
Cmac wrote:
Keep your ammo dry and good post,we are in for a hell of a time in this country and it's going to get worse!!!


You are right Cmac. It is a shame it has come to this. The Libs and Liebtards have carried it to the max. If they are not stopped, it will mean the end all of those things we hold dear like our Constitution, The Rule of Law, etc.

Reply
Aug 14, 2017 02:35:10   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
payne1000 wrote:
Any thinking person should not believe an unnamed source.
You're an unnamed source who cannot give any valid reason for remaining unnamed.
Like I said, a person's identity and location have nothing to do with the credibility of his sources. I am just the messenger, not the message.

Reply
Aug 14, 2017 04:23:50   #
samtheyank
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Like I said, a person's identity and location have nothing to do with the credibility of his sources. I am just the messenger, not the message.


This is a picture of a typical Liebtard or Liberal. This is why they don't get it.





Reply
 
 
Aug 14, 2017 14:03:03   #
payne1000
 
Gatsby wrote:
Buzz off LOSER!


I'll assume you're a coward like Blade and emarine.

Reply
Aug 14, 2017 14:05:01   #
payne1000
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Like I said, a person's identity and location have nothing to do with the credibility of his sources. I am just the messenger, not the message.


Messengers of truth have names.
Messengers who lie hide their identities.
My name is Larry Payne.
What's your name?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 8 of 8
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.