Ve'hoe

That's not even true,,, though on your part,,,, since England does not have Republican's, Democrats, etc,,

See,,, that's what I was talking with you about, when I said you "lie"...

you post this crapola, claim it is from some guy in England, where they don't have those policital parties, so would not come up with the divisions you have on the graph you superimposed over some goofball data,,,,,,, then claim it had nothing to do with politics, government, etc,,,

Whats worse yet, is you think we are too stupid to catch you,,,, that's insulting,,,,,,

So yeah, whatever "religious belief" you are espousing here, and supporting with lies and spurious information,,,,, is worth rejecting,,,,

If you cannot be honest about what you are getting at,, why would anyone trust you,,,, and to be sure,,,, ie the growing number of intelligent people understanding the lie of climate change,,, people are abandoning your lies, mistruths, and misleading arguments........

That's all I am saying,,,,, not that you suck and should die, just that you have become so accustomed to lying that you no longer can discern truth.....

Why your posts are rejected is because they are not true,,,,


perhaps you should post what you really intend,,, "OPP,,, will you accept and agree with me on this LIE?"

Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA

Of course. How can you even ask?

Abortion is a great example.

It is 100% proven as a current known fact (not future speculation) that unborn children are human beings that feel pain and suffer greatly at the hands and tools of abortionists, yet the vast majority of Democrats bury their heads in the sand to support their party. The science of Life is a proven certainty that can be demonstrated in real time with real examples in clinical settings for all to see.

The science of Global Warming/Cooling is future speculation that time and time again over the past 40 years has been proven wrong as their apocalyptic predictions don't come to pass.

Here's a good, easy to understand example: Remember just after Katrina, when the GWA crowd said that Katrina proved global warming and the Gulf Coast will have many more tornadoes in the coming years? This was to the GWA crowd as a certainty, proven, settled science. There was no dissent allowed. Those heretics that disagreed were 'deniers'.

The Heretics were right. Katrina did not prove Global Warming, did it?

Ve'hoe

betcha she doesn't answer the question...... she would have to concede some truth,,,, and GW is a religious belief not a science

Morgan

Ok sooo?

Ve'hoe

amazing,,,,,,,,,,, do you actually think of yourself as "honest" and intellectually "intelligent"????

When you are "evasive" like this,,, it shows otherwise,,,, it is representative of manipulation, not representative of intelligence think about how you appear to others,, from "their" perspective ,,,,

I am not just "talking to you like this",,,,, you actually warrant being called to task

Morgan

Well Ve'hoe, you're now trying to find fault with me over grammar, though I thought I was correct in the usage of the word than versus then, I checked on line to be sure, guess what... no errors found, imagine that. you

One other thing I never say what someone should do, I usually give my reasoning to why I chose the way I did. That would be your way of thinking... telling people what they should or should not do and if they don't they're some kind of degenerate.

...and yes I know all about the Constitution.

I don't have to insult people to prove my point, but if someone does to me first, well "then" all's fair in love and war.

People certainly don't have to follow me or reply to me, that is their prerogative.

Big Bass

(Sarcasm font on) Sorry you don't understand English! (Sarcasm font off)

Ve'hoe

guess what,,,, you are still wrong,,,, about "than" and "then" you probably misspelled it again....

and you still lied about what you were saying,,,,,


I will reply to your post every time I choose,, so long as you post lies on the public forum.....and yes, we did notice you didn't address the fact that you lied...




Than,, is incorrect,,, it is "then",,, better get a grammar site,,, smarter THAN you,,,, not THEN you,,,,, they are not interchangeable,, and idiocy isn't your prerogative ,,,

Ve'hoe

But you do have to lie?????

Morgan

Anyone if free to reply him as you just did, I'm not preventing anyone from doing so. BTW it should be "else's"

Morgan

What do you call this...

quote: " look at what Obama care is doing,,,,,,,,,, and I suppose you do,,,,,, "free helfkair feral" yet it is not free, nor is it healthcare,,,, it is piss poor "insurance" but you don't ever seem to see the card the govt has in its other hand.

Can you remember? It was/is about climate change and why people choose to believe it or not.

Morgan

Now you start in the middle of a thought, with "that's not even true" what exactly are you referring to now? You need to follow the conversation a bit more carefully. Your sentence doesn't even make sense to me. All I did was mention the author of the article was not from our government, as weewilly referred to the government, which I naturally assumed he was alluding to our American government with the reference to the word collective, and it not being to benefit the majority.

So now where did I lie? Are you under the assumption that people from other country's don't do studies elsewhere? And you're incorrect on party's in the UK, they are similar...1 Conservatives.
2 Labour.
3 SNP.
4 Liberal Democrats.
5 UKIP.
Plaid CymruConservative PartySinn FéinLiberal DemocratsAlliance Party (Northern Ireland)SNP (Scottish National Party)SDLP (Social Democratic and Labour Party)Labour PartyGreen Party (England and Wales)UUP (Ulster Unionist Party)UKIP (UK Independence Party)DUP (Democratic Unionist Party)

Ve'hoe you're a very untrusting person, I intentionally posted the person's name in case anyone wanted to look him up. I'm not trying to mislead any one, I am discussing what I've read from someone else's perspective, who is a scientist and did research on why people wouldn't believe the published research on climate warming. That is all.

I will apologize for the comment I made on your party not liking the government unless it only works in their favor, not that, that isn't true, but that both sides are guilty of it.

Morgan

I understand it just fine, but you are vague, why am I a hypocrite? I never mentioned what party, so why are you so offended?

Morgan

Go right ahead I'm not stopping you from replying. Sorry though you're still incorrect on correcting me.

Then is used in the sense of time, as in what comes next. Than is used in a comparison between two things. You are stubborn, I'll accept a grammatical checker on line over you whom I don't know, no offense...and I still haven't lied, maybe you should state exactly what I intentionally lied about to deceive people. That's just not my way Ve'hoe.

Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas

Geeeeeeez, i am against the word collective and everything associated with it......ithas never done a thing but take from one and give to another, plain and simple.

I am not against government, i am against what our government has become....an over bloated colllection of takers, comprised mostly of individuals that have never held a real job in the private sector, making decisions about things they have never experienced......then make a 40 yr career of making bad decisions based on getting reelected. ......not that I'm against them all......but wouldn't piss on most of them if they were on fire.....unless that fire threatened something i owned.....then i would think about it.

Government has never fixed anything, never met a budget and came under it, rarely kept a promise!!

I would have no problem with what you say, the problem is its not the whole world, it would be us and a few supporting other countries.....mostly us....NO!! That's not a collective...that's called a collection....of our tax money to them, the corruption in this area is rampant in these so called collective other countries....as you know, i am done getting 10cents worth for my dollar. .....i would rather keep my dollar.....there is no working together on this, that's unicorn farts and leprechaun fairy dust thinking....it won't work.

Other than that.......we're on the same page....i think