One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Just the beginning-Craven Maine Democrats block bill to protect safety of little girls
Page 1 of 2 next>
Jul 20, 2017 12:32:01   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
A Republican-sponsored bill to outlaw the barbaric procedure is being opposed by Democrats, who say they fear it will offend the cultural sensitivity of the approximately 10,000 Somalis living in the state. But there’s an uglier, more malevolent reason lurking behind the scenes.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/07/20/maine-politics-now-comes-first-even-when-it-comes-to-protecting-safety-little-girls.html

Bet your sweet ass MSNBC, ABC, CBS nor CNN will not cover this.

Reply
Jul 20, 2017 13:00:31   #
Big dog
 
bmac32 wrote:
A Republican-sponsored bill to outlaw the barbaric procedure is being opposed by Democrats, who say they fear it will offend the cultural sensitivity of the approximately 10,000 Somalis living in the state. But there’s an uglier, more malevolent reason lurking behind the scenes.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/07/20/maine-politics-now-comes-first-even-when-it-comes-to-protecting-safety-little-girls.html

Bet your sweet ass MSNBC, ABC, CBS nor CNN will not cover this.


Democrats are very SICK people.

Reply
Jul 20, 2017 13:06:38   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
bmac32 wrote:
A Republican-sponsored bill to outlaw the barbaric procedure is being opposed by Democrats, who say they fear it will offend the cultural sensitivity of the approximately 10,000 Somalis living in the state. But there’s an uglier, more malevolent reason lurking behind the scenes.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/07/20/maine-politics-now-comes-first-even-when-it-comes-to-protecting-safety-little-girls.html

Bet your sweet ass MSNBC, ABC, CBS nor CNN will not cover this.


This entire concept is asinine and requires no bill.

This procedure is child abuse in every jurisdiction in this country and immediately upon the first examination of one of these children for any reason by any physician, the physician is required by law to report his/her findings as suspected abuse to the proper authorities.

Additionally, any physician I know would be so outraged that the pbysician would intensely follow up to ensure the child would be properly protected and cared for.

Any physician failing to report this would be subject to disciplinary action that could include loss of license.

The laws protecting these children are already in place. Enforce them!

Reply
 
 
Jul 20, 2017 13:46:14   #
wuzblynd Loc: thomson georgia
 
bmac32 wrote:
A Republican-sponsored bill to outlaw the barbaric procedure is being opposed by Democrats, who say they fear it will offend the cultural sensitivity of the approximately 10,000 Somalis living in the state. But there’s an uglier, more malevolent reason lurking behind the scenes.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/07/20/maine-politics-now-comes-first-even-when-it-comes-to-protecting-safety-little-girls.html

Bet your sweet ass MSNBC, ABC, CBS nor CNN will not cover this.





What a disgusting practice. What a disgusting"religion". Not that it's a religion anyway. Every thing about islam should be banned from our country.

Reply
Jul 20, 2017 13:54:59   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
You are correct. I'm still happy that she introduced the bill. At least more people may become aware of this barbaric bunch we are letting in our country. Hopefully one liberal will look at his party and say WTF am I supporting these people for. On the flip side I hear they make great cops also.
Docadhoc wrote:
This entire concept is asinine and requires no bill.

This procedure is child abuse in every jurisdiction in this country and immediately upon the first examination of one of these children for any reason by any physician, the physician is required by law to report his/her findings as suspected abuse to the proper authorities.

Additionally, any physician I know would be so outraged that the pbysician would intensely follow up to ensure the child would be properly protected and cared for.

Any physician failing to report this would be subject to disciplinary action that could include loss of license.

The laws protecting these children are already in place. Enforce them!
This entire concept is asinine and requires no bil... (show quote)

Reply
Jul 20, 2017 14:33:08   #
E
 
Docadhoc wrote:
This entire concept is asinine and requires no bill.

This procedure is child abuse in every jurisdiction in this country and immediately upon the first examination of one of these children for any reason by any physician, the physician is required by law to report his/her findings as suspected abuse to the proper authorities.

Additionally, any physician I know would be so outraged that the pbysician would intensely follow up to ensure the child would be properly protected and cared for.

Any physician failing to report this would be subject to disciplinary action that could include loss of license.

The laws protecting these children are already in place. Enforce them!
This entire concept is asinine and requires no bil... (show quote)


But a Somoli doctor or a Muslim doctor won't report it.

Reply
Jul 20, 2017 14:38:13   #
Alicia Loc: NYC
 
bmac32 wrote:
A Republican-sponsored bill to outlaw the barbaric procedure is being opposed by Democrats, who say they fear it will offend the cultural sensitivity of the approximately 10,000 Somalis living in the state. But there’s an uglier, more malevolent reason lurking behind the scenes.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/07/20/maine-politics-now-comes-first-even-when-it-comes-to-protecting-safety-little-girls.html

Bet your sweet ass MSNBC, ABC, CBS nor CNN will not cover this.

**************************
Your article is ridiculous! The clitoris is removed in order to prevent "enjoyment" of the sexual act. Just think of it - if the vagina is stitched closed, how would babies be conceived. I leave that to your imagination.

Reply
 
 
Jul 20, 2017 14:52:07   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
You are too stupid to talk with.
Alicia wrote:
**************************
Your article is ridiculous! The clitoris is removed in order to prevent "enjoyment" of the sexual act. Just think of it - if the vagina is stitched closed, how would babies be conceived. I leave that to your imagination.

Reply
Jul 20, 2017 16:06:02   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
E wrote:
But a Somoli doctor or a Muslim doctor won't report it.


Then what good would the bill accomplish? Redundancy costs taxpayer money. Enforce existing law and stop wasting time and money writing and passing what is already there.

Put a few of these barbarians on a slow boat to the middle east, with rations, and publicize it.

Reply
Jul 20, 2017 16:13:34   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
Alicia wrote:
**************************
Your article is ridiculous! The clitoris is removed in order to prevent "enjoyment" of the sexual act. Just think of it - if the vagina is stitched closed, how would babies be conceived. I leave that to your imagination.


Before you comment on things you don't know about, read about them. What can be stitched closed, can be reopened.

You obviously don't think very much and that is sad because the information regarding this insane procedure, both pre and post, are readily available including complications and prognosis.

Would you prefer to be treated like a 2nd class possession? It appears what you don't know about Islamics and their practices far outweighs your knowledge of same.

Reply
Jul 20, 2017 18:21:24   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
I can't imagine anyone would want her if she stood at a yard sale with a sign around her neck, "Free to a good home."
Docadhoc wrote:
Before you comment on things you don't know about, read about them. What can be stitched closed, can be reopened.

You obviously don't think very much and that is sad because the information regarding this insane procedure, both pre and post, are readily available including complications and prognosis.

Would you prefer to be treated like a 2nd class possession? It appears what you don't know about Islamics and their practices far outweighs your knowledge of same.

Reply
 
 
Jul 21, 2017 02:24:24   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
JFlorio wrote:
I can't imagine anyone would want her if she stood at a yard sale with a sign around her neck, "Free to a good home."


It's one thing to have an opinion, but feigning superiority when actually producing ignorance is just stupid considering the easily obtainable volume of documentation on this issue.

But then she hasn't been known for erudition, or higher cognitive function of any type.

Reply
Jul 21, 2017 23:06:55   #
Mikki Loc: Ohio
 
Alicia wrote:
**************************
Your article is ridiculous! The clitoris is removed in order to prevent "enjoyment" of the sexual act. Just think of it - if the vagina is stitched closed, how would babies be conceived. I leave that to your imagination.


The article I recently read said that the lucky groom gets to remove the stitches on their wedding night. Bunch of savages if you ask me.

Reply
Jul 22, 2017 03:59:15   #
E
 
Docadhoc wrote:
Before you comment on things you don't know about, read about them. What can be stitched closed, can be reopened.

You obviously don't think very much and that is sad because the information regarding this insane procedure, both pre and post, are readily available including complications and prognosis.

Would you prefer to be treated like a 2nd class possession? It appears what you don't know about Islamics and their practices far outweighs your knowledge of same.


Yes, what can be stiched together can be reopened. For the satisfaction of the man. But they cut off the clitoris and throw it to the dogs. She can never attain real sexual satisfaction again. Why the so called feminists and women of America aren't up in arms about that practice is baffling beyond belief.

Reply
Jul 22, 2017 04:09:24   #
E
 
Mikki wrote:
The article I recently read said that the lucky groom gets to remove the stitches on their wedding night. Bunch of savages if you ask me.


Come on. You have got to have more knowledge of medical practices and the results then that. If it is stitched together, it grows together, and the stitches are removed shortly after it heals, that is, if it doesn't kill her. She is left with just enough opening to pee. For the man to again have access to her pussy, it would have to be cut, that's cut open again. How sick are the women of America to not be up in arms about that evil cruel practice. They bitch about a man saying he could just grab a woman's pussy (and he probably could because so many women would let him just because he is rich and they want a piece of that 'rich'), but do nothing about a woman who chops up a pussy like a piece of cheap meat for a taco. Disgusting. Especially women's lack of offensive at that practice.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.