Steve700

To ALL 9/11 Truth Deniers:

What I want is for you to watch this video that clearly shows the explosions of planned demolition going off several floors below the ones collapsing in on each other and it ain't the Windows blowing out from air compression of the floors above collapsing in on each other (as I mentioned those are 3 or 4 floors above the explosions) because there's only 9 or 10 Evenly Spaced (and in the same position on each floor) explosions causing columns or pillars of smoke being blasted out. (Not a natural collapse phenominon, but Same as you see in every planned demolition of those tall buildings) But there are 56 Windows across the face of the building. (I got a close-up picture and counted them) This video completely destroys any ideas that the twin towers were Not a Planned Demolition within the 1st 30 seconds of the video. You think you can spend that much time to see it ??? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdYu46M6gr0

Then there is also this retired CIA agent who, while on his deathbed, said he was involved in the planting the demolition explosives for 9/11. See this article also along with the video link I just gave you and let's see if you still hold your views that the government narrative is the truth. Article: http://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-107953-1.html OR Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Rmj_B4lejg (If your a truth denier, please don't bother giving your opinion without seeing the videos)
More information proving it was an inside job in the very next post below

Steve700

Of course this is but a tiny fraction of the totally overwhelming amount of proof that 9/11 was an inside job for the purpose of getting the American people behind the idea of a secret long-term plan, that was destined to failure, to remold the Middle East. It is obvious to demolition experts, -- nearly 1000 have certified, that those were obviously control demolitions of the three skyscrapers in Manhattan, and while a fire appeared on one side of building #7, there was never any evidence of anything ever hitting it. Plus for the first time in history no black boxes were ever found from any of these supposed four planes. And in the Pentagon and on flight 97 that was said to have crashed in a field there is no evidence whatsoever of any airliner or its wreckage of ever having been anywhere around there.

This is supposed to be the totality of the remains of flight 97 that supposedly crashed into the field. There is nothing else in the surrounding area outside of this picture. Does this look like the remains of an airliner to you. Not one body part, no luggage, no engines, fuselage, tale or seats, NOTHING. ----- And there isn't even this much (as in the 1st picture) -- actually NOTHING but a single truck load of wreckage at all at the Pentagon. (the 2 lower pictures)

The cockpit or even a little private plane would've made more wreckage and over a wider area than this. It looks like they just threw a little half melted aluminum salvage into a hole they dug out, then sprinkle a little petrol over it and set it on fire. Compare that to the Lockerbie airliner wreckage or that of the airliner the Russians shot down and blamed on the Ukraine.

Are you beginning to feel like you've bamboozled yet??? ---- If you still have doubts, see this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PY_qM28rnA
.

This is what is supposed to be all that remains of the commercial airliner that supposedly crashed into that field in Pennsylvania


This is at the Pentagon and all that was found of a supposedly airliner could have been carried their in the back of a single truck

rebob14

You claim the section above the collapsing building is gone.........but........if you observe the beginning, you'll see it is inside and isi the driver of the collapse, not controlled explosions.

Steve700

1st off, I thought I asked everyone to not comment without seeing the videos. Secondly, I don't know what you're talking about. I never claimed anything like that. But of course it's the piledriver that started the downward movement after the explosive detonations that knocked out the majority of the metal framework. It probably had explosives going off as it was going down also because it seemed to disappear before it got to the bottom. As you probably know, no other steel structure has ever come down like that from a fire, only the 3 buildings of that complex. (And there has been much more serious fires in such buildings} those towers were overbuilt and those small oxygen starved localized fires certainly didn't burn hot enough to be melting massive 4 and 6 inch thick I-beams. Please see the videos be.ore commenting -- Those explosions are going off 3 or 4 floors below the collapsing floors, continually as it descends all the way down. Obvious Signature detonation Plumes being ejected and evenly spaced with about 6 windows between each one,

Steve700

Also Bush made a Freudian slip on 2 different occasions implicating himself, then both times, upon realizing what he said his speech became very discombobulated and he did hardly get the next sentence out. Larry Silverstein, the owner of the building had over insured the buildings for terrorism 2 months previous, He also made a statement saying that they decided to pull building 7. That can't be done without preset explosives. For the 1st time in history No black boxes were ever founded any of the locations. On the hundreds of surveillance videos at the different airports. None of the supposed terrorists could ever be found (parking area, reservation and check in counter, walkways, waiting area. boarding the plane ---- NOWHERE) No plane wreckage at the Pentagon or in that field, at least not more than one little truckload. (Where's the engines,, the seats, the luggage, the body parts, the fuselage, the tail section NOTHING) You must see -- ABSOLUTELY Must See Loose Change or one of the other full feature-length documentaries that go through all the things that just don't add up and that the only answer to is that it was indeed an inside job. All those who have seen those videos know the truth, but you who haven't can believe that our government would do such a thing. But when you know why they would and did it all makes Total sense.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Thanks for putting this together, Steve.
I watched the full 2 1/2 hour video.
A real investigation should have occurred.

buffalo Loc: Texas

As to the Pentagon, there is NO way that even the most experienced 757 pilot could have made the maneuvers a plane of that size had to make to hit the Pentagon the way the "official narrative" is presented, let alone a "terrorist".

Watch the last 2 videos...

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_90.htm

Steve700

The information obtained through the use of your link is pretty conclusive proof that the whole 9/11 Islamic attack scenario is a Not a Very Complete and So Well Planned Fraud on the American people. But then there was just too many difficulties and impossible obstacles to overcome. But then, obvious they were able to rely on an unwittingly complicit media and a trusting gullible populous. Yet, with all its aspects, it is not more than 1/100th of the totally overwhelming mountain of evidence that the 9/11 Islamic attack scenario was actually an inside job by our own government. Yet so many people are staunch believers of what they do not know and just refuse to even watch any videos or look at any of the evidence. Deliberate self-delusion is so common these days of universal deceit. You would think the liberals especially, would want to know and believe such evidence against RINO Republican George Bush.

Steve700

This fraud perpetrated on us is a result of an action by the shadow government, deep state, Globalist agenda or whatever you want to call it, which has been actively growing for years and is now coming out into the open, with its activities against anti-globalist Pres. Trump. Presidents Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan all warned about this encroaching and growing international globalist plot to take us over in order to finally acclimate us into the coming one world government and JFK gave his life for his declared intentions to put a stop to it.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Well, Steve, I see you've dug another fine shithole for all the conspiracy lemmings to jump into.

emarine

Stevo... turn off the sound & watch a structure peel from gravity & a large falling mass in motion... why do you troofers allow Chandler to brainwash you with bullshit over & over... F=m*a... learn about it... it's really as simple as what goes up must come down... learn about potential energy & the laws of physics... the bigger they are the harder they fall... learn instead of follow...

buffalo Loc: Texas

E, your simplifying the impossible. The laws of physics says that a 100 ton 757 canNOT be maneuvered (even by an experienced pilot) the way it would have had to have been maneuvered to hit the Pentagon the way it supposedly did. That being the case, then NO physical or photographical proof could be presented.

"Further suspension in logic exists in the 'official story's' narrative as to who flew Flight 77 so expertly into the Pentagon's west wing. Hani Hanjour is credited with being the airplane's pilot. This is a man who, three weeks before September 11, attempted to rent a Cessna at an airfield in Maryland. Suspicious of his dubious 'pilot's license', officials at the airfield insisted he take a chaperoned test-flight before rental would be approved. He failed his test flight miserably. He could neither control, nor properly land the Cessna. In fact, the instructors at the airfield in Maryland said, "It was like he had hardly even ever driven a car. He could not fly at all." Other source. And yet, the official narrative of 9/11 asks us to believe that Hanjour pulled off a stunt that would press the limits of even the most experienced aviation test pilot.

The official story unfolds something like this. The rather diminutive Hanjour, sometime after take-off, fought his way into the cockpit, and wrestled control of Flight 77 from a 6'4" former Marine combat fighter pilot named Charles Burlingame, a man family members and colleagues say would never have given up his aircraft or the safety of his passengers. After dispatching with the co-pilot as well, Hanjour settled in and turned his attention to the bewildering array of gadgets and devices of a Boeing 757 instrument panel - a panel he was wholly unfamiliar with - in an airplane traveling 500 mph, 7 miles in the air, under the stress of a recently executed hijacking plot. Then, without the help of any ground control or air-traffic controllers providing him information and/or settings, this pilot who could not control a tiny Cessna 3 weeks earlier "would have to very quickly interpret his heading, ground track, altitude, and airspeed information on the displays before he could even figure out where in the world he was, much less where the Pentagon was located in relation to his position." (From the essay 'The Impossibility of Flying Heavy Aircraft Without Training', by Nila Sagadevan, an aeronautical engineer and pilot.)"

Full Text:

http://www.911hardfacts.com/report_14.htm

Steve700

In my attempts to engage you both on this issue you both have repeatedly failed to Address and Deal With the specific points (that dismantle your argument) that I have continually asked you to deal with. There is something seriously Wrong with you two. I can not imagine myself ever being that unco-operative, selfish & obstinate, but then I am a decent person with integrity who has my fellow human being's best interest at hart. You are both irritating immature uncooperative and obstinate truth suppressing ass holes and idiots incapable of rational discussion. Neither of you have any integrity and are not to be taken seriously. Go tell it to your wife and see how much of your nonsense she puts up with.

You can't prove the government narrative is true, and you can't answer questions that indicate it was an inside job and I'm tired of you ignoring my points and when pressed, denying the obvious, so sorry, but you're just ...

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Yep.
Could the problem be that Emar and BadRunner have a guilt complex, and feel compelled to defend the 911 perps?
Or are they just paid to be here?

Radiance3

================
You lying Muslim Steve700! I posted my answer shown yesterday, and today, you've deleted it because you do not want people to see the truth and facts that happened. You want to lie and deceive by defending and protecting your Muslim blood via your expertise of LIES and DECEPTIONS. Only Muslims, stupid, and liberal people like you will believe your fake news.
==========

Jul 20, 2017 10:47:06   #
Radiance3 (a regular here) (online) Joined: Oct 21, 2014 Posts: 6183
 
Steve700 wrote:
b To ALL 9/11 Truth Deniers: /b br br What I wa... (show quote)

==================
You are again barking Lucifer Muslim Steve700. Your fake news will never prevail. Those video images you've seen are revised computerized images to deceive the people who hate America. These are all FAKE NEWS!. Fake news of engineers, claimed scientists, greedy lawyers, made tens of millions of dollars, by presenting FAKE revised images to convince the people, to make money, and to defend their ISLAM demon friends. Islam your religion of peace is demonic run by Satan.

Here are the facts. I watched the 9/11 terror bombing by these airlines American Airline #11; United Airline 175; American Airline 77; and United Airline 93. The images those fake news presented were NOT the actual images of the burning towers during the attack. All these airline companies testified that their Airplane bound for California, were hijacked by Muslim terrorists who were all killed as they smashed the airplane into the towers to burn. They chose those airlines traveling to California because they are loaded with more fuels due to the distance. More fuels burned the building and cause severe damages to collapse.

Some passengers who were with flight 93, had wrestled with the hijackers to save the plane. They were able to call, communicated with their families, and reported that their flight was hijacked by terrorists.

Saudi Arabia spent billions of dollars to deny that these terror events happened. And the clients are those lawyers, engineers, and so called fake scientists who were paid hundreds of millions of dollars to present FAKE SCENARIO of the events to justify their claims.

Muslims are born and trained deceivers and LIARS to deceive and mislead the enemies, for their joy and glory of their so called prophet Mohammad who made their Islam.