PeterS wrote:
Say Rand Paul is walking along and he sees a traffic accident and a family of 4 is bleeding out in front of him. Now he says he would love to help them but since they don't have a right to his services he has to be compensated X number of dollar's before he will do anything. Well the dad says he doesn't have any money and no insurance. Rand Paul says, well sorry, can't help you, and moves on...
You are right, it's not a perfect analogy but conservatives believe so strongly in the right to life how on earth could you believe that life should have no quality thereafter? Tell me, would Rand Paul consider a system where everyone pays into it and then that system pays him fair? He would be compensated so he wouldn't be a slave! No, he would reject that too as socialism so this isn't about compensation or being a slave so now the question becomes, what is it...
Say Rand Paul is walking along and he sees a traff... (
show quote)
Actually we have to help or lose our licenses, and we can't bill for it.
That being said, Paul makes a good point. Where do our rights stop if we can hijack healthcare as a right??