When or if I was called upon to make the call,the call of like father like son or CRIMINAL INTENT;What would come to mind is a precedent set in the state of Illinois concerning a progressive liberal democrat,He was accused of soliciting a US senate seat in the character of which a prostitute behaves.The evidence against him did not go as far as the"- Proverbial smoking gun"-which left the prosecutor with no .more than circumstancial shit and the fact that,[in typical republican fashion] he was publicly demeaned,debased, and ridiculed so that the public developed a keen distaste for him as a human being,forgetting all about the fact he rode into office on damn near a mandate due to an advantage of the populous vote.The precedence comes into the picture because I don't think any Governor has been given such a rigid sentence on such a minimul of evidence, and primarily because a presiding official didn't like his politics.This means he could only have been convicted on - Thats right,CRIMINAL INTENT!- Another thing that comes to mind that peaks one's interest is that will there be that double standard.The prevailing double standard-that has stymied .this country in its tracks majority of its existence ; The standard that is of the have and have nots variety;things like race are denominal or systemic to it.Will the consummate right wing white male plutocrat/mercantilist.be given a pass that will supercede constitutional law because they claim they did nothing wrong [ which he thinks should suffice because they are whom they are] or will the Democracy prevail.You make the call, is that criminal Intent,the parties under scrutiny talking to a russian representative to influence a US election which is criminal or is a cute mundane situation that should be dismissed as of like farther,like son.
,
I'd make the call if your rant made one lick of sense.
dongreen76 wrote:
When or if I was called upon to make the call,the call of like father like son or CRIMINAL INTENT;What would come to mind is a precedent set in the state of Illinois concerning a progressive liberal democrat,He was accused of soliciting a US senate seat in the character of which a prostitute behaves.The evidence against him did not go as far as the"- Proverbial smoking gun"-which left the prosecutor with no .more than circumstancial shit and the fact that,[in typical republican fashion] he was publicly demeaned,debased, and ridiculed so that the public developed a keen distaste for him as a human being,forgetting all about the fact he rode into office on damn near a mandate due to an advantage of the populous vote.The precedence comes into the picture because I don't think any Governor has been given such a rigid sentence on such a minimul of evidence, and primarily because a presiding official didn't like his politics.This means he could only have been convicted on - Thats right,CRIMINAL INTENT!- Another thing that comes to mind that peaks one's interest is that will there be that double standard.The prevailing double standard-that has stymied .this country in its tracks majority of its existence ; The standard that is of the have and have nots variety;things like race are denominal or systemic to it.Will the consummate right wing white male plutocrat/mercantilist.be given a pass that will supercede constitutional law because they claim they did nothing wrong [ which he thinks should suffice because they are whom they are] or will the Democracy prevail.You make the call, is that criminal Intent,the parties under scrutiny talking to a russian representative to influence a US election which is criminal or is a cute mundane situation that should be dismissed as of like farther,like son.
,
When or if I was called upon to make the call,the ... (
show quote)
JFlorio wrote:
I'd make the call if your rant made one lick of sense.
Let me try, JF. Other than "76" knowing little of English sentence structure, punctuation, capitalization, spelling and grammar, the political points and reasoning seem to follow in a (D)irect context of "lefty" confusion. You will have to excuse "76," for English, probably being a second language, and our free-market Western civilization is certainly a complete mystery to "76," as are MANY, now in the 21st century "experimental" American culture, and have (D)istinct "red-(D)iaper" rearing; as did our {3 generation} previous "commander," what's his name, who had been electively (D)ecapitated last November. And "lefty," is STILL in shock and fantasy, and currently trying harder-and-harder, everyday, 24/7/365, to get a political "(D)O-OVER," and will do and say ANYTHING to move "forward" {Hummmmm, where have I heard THAT before}, their ideology and agenda. ANYTHING. Hummmmmmmm, again. GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO PRESIDENT "45" DONALD J. {BORN AGAIN} TRUMP (R); JUST LIKE THE WEATHER!!!
apply this same stupid argument to hitlery,,,,,,,,, and you will have your answer
dongreen76 wrote:
When or if I was called upon to make the call,the call of like father like son or CRIMINAL INTENT;What would come to mind is a precedent set in the state of Illinois concerning a progressive liberal democrat,He was accused of soliciting a US senate seat in the character of which a prostitute behaves.The evidence against him did not go as far as the"- Proverbial smoking gun"-which left the prosecutor with no .more than circumstancial shit and the fact that,[in typical republican fashion] he was publicly demeaned,debased, and ridiculed so that the public developed a keen distaste for him as a human being,forgetting all about the fact he rode into office on damn near a mandate due to an advantage of the populous vote.The precedence comes into the picture because I don't think any Governor has been given such a rigid sentence on such a minimul of evidence, and primarily because a presiding official didn't like his politics.This means he could only have been convicted on - Thats right,CRIMINAL INTENT!- Another thing that comes to mind that peaks one's interest is that will there be that double standard.The prevailing double standard-that has stymied .this country in its tracks majority of its existence ; The standard that is of the have and have nots variety;things like race are denominal or systemic to it.Will the consummate right wing white male plutocrat/mercantilist.be given a pass that will supercede constitutional law because they claim they did nothing wrong [ which he thinks should suffice because they are whom they are] or will the Democracy prevail.You make the call, is that criminal Intent,the parties under scrutiny talking to a russian representative to influence a US election which is criminal or is a cute mundane situation that should be dismissed as of like farther,like son.
,
When or if I was called upon to make the call,the ... (
show quote)
Ve'hoe wrote:
apply this same stupid argument to hitlery,,,,,,,,, and you will have your answer
Or Van Hollen or Pelosi or Schumer or Conyers or Warren or Booker or Cummings or Coons or Perez or Ellison or Brown or Waters or Gillibrand or McDermott or Schultz or Stark or Blumenthal or Filner or Menendez or Sanders or Schakowsky or Leahy or Lee or Feinstein or Grijalva or Kaine or Evans or Franken or Mink or Owens or Nadler or Woolsey or Oliver or Bonior, etc.; the NEXT prong of (D)emonrat "leaders." Hummmmmmmmmm. GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO PRESIDENT "45" DONALD J. {BORN AGAIN} TRUMP (R); JUST LIKE THE WEATHER!!!
dongreen76 wrote:
When or if I was called upon to make the call,the call of like father like son or CRIMINAL INTENT;What would come to mind is a precedent set in the state of Illinois concerning a progressive liberal democrat,He was accused of soliciting a US senate seat in the character of which a prostitute behaves.The evidence against him did not go as far as the"- Proverbial smoking gun"-which left the prosecutor with no .more than circumstancial shit and the fact that,[in typical republican fashion] he was publicly demeaned,debased, and ridiculed so that the public developed a keen distaste for him as a human being,forgetting all about the fact he rode into office on damn near a mandate due to an advantage of the populous vote.The precedence comes into the picture because I don't think any Governor has been given such a rigid sentence on such a minimul of evidence, and primarily because a presiding official didn't like his politics.This means he could only have been convicted on - Thats right,CRIMINAL INTENT!- Another thing that comes to mind that peaks one's interest is that will there be that double standard.The prevailing double standard-that has stymied .this country in its tracks majority of its existence ; The standard that is of the have and have nots variety;things like race are denominal or systemic to it.Will the consummate right wing white male plutocrat/mercantilist.be given a pass that will supercede constitutional law because they claim they did nothing wrong [ which he thinks should suffice because they are whom they are] or will the Democracy prevail.You make the call, is that criminal Intent,the parties under scrutiny talking to a russian representative to influence a US election which is criminal or is a cute mundane situation that should be dismissed as of like farther,like son.
,
When or if I was called upon to make the call,the ... (
show quote)
You need to lay off that weed, it's turning your brain to mush. Is your key board ok?
It took the LIBIDIOTS 7 mos to find what was in PLAIN SIGHT. ie the notation in Kushner's Discovery Report since Jan of this year, of a meeting between He and Don Jr. and a Russian agent that turned out to be BOGUS. You want to take bets on HOW LONG it would take those SAME LIBIDIOTS to find their butts with BOTH hands????
dongreen76 wrote:
When or if I was called upon to make the call,the call of like father like son or CRIMINAL INTENT;What would come to mind is a precedent set in the state of Illinois concerning a progressive liberal democrat,He was accused of soliciting a US senate seat in the character of which a prostitute behaves.The evidence against him did not go as far as the"- Proverbial smoking gun"-which left the prosecutor with no .more than circumstancial shit and the fact that,[in typical republican fashion] he was publicly demeaned,debased, and ridiculed so that the public developed a keen distaste for him as a human being,forgetting all about the fact he rode into office on damn near a mandate due to an advantage of the populous vote.The precedence comes into the picture because I don't think any Governor has been given such a rigid sentence on such a minimul of evidence, and primarily because a presiding official didn't like his politics.This means he could only have been convicted on - Thats right,CRIMINAL INTENT!- Another thing that comes to mind that peaks one's interest is that will there be that double standard.The prevailing double standard-that has stymied .this country in its tracks majority of its existence ; The standard that is of the have and have nots variety;things like race are denominal or systemic to it.Will the consummate right wing white male plutocrat/mercantilist.be given a pass that will supercede constitutional law because they claim they did nothing wrong [ which he thinks should suffice because they are whom they are] or will the Democracy prevail.You make the call, is that criminal Intent,the parties under scrutiny talking to a russian representative to influence a US election which is criminal or is a cute mundane situation that should be dismissed as of like farther,like son.
,
When or if I was called upon to make the call,the ... (
show quote)
You're referring to Blagojevich; he was convicted in court by jurors of corruption, period!
The double standard? It would behoove you to look through events of Obamas and associates progressive past, especially his appointed people in key positions of Government.
The problem I see with liberals like yourself, is, you're unrepentant, incorrigible, narcissistic. All liberals come from the same barrel. Therefore, all people should scrutinize everything that progressives speak, print or otherwise convey.
Hence liberals are fish. We should put them back in the barrel. Then it would be like shooting fish in a barrel. Great idea.
plainlogic wrote:
You're referring to Blagojevich; he was convicted in court by jurors of corruption, period!
The double standard? It would behoove you to look through events of Obamas and associates progressive past, especially his appointed people in key positions of Government.
The problem I see with liberals like yourself, is, you're unrepentant, incorrigible, narcissistic. All liberals come from the same barrel. Therefore, all people should scrutinize everything that progressives speak, print or otherwise convey.
You're referring to Blagojevich; he was convicted ... (
show quote)
robmull wrote:
Let me try, JF. Other than "76" knowing little of English sentence structure, punctuation, capitalization, spelling and grammar, the political points and reasoning seem to follow in a (D)irect context of "lefty" confusion. You will have to excuse "76," for English, probably being a second language, and our free-market Western civilization is certainly a complete mystery to "76," as are MANY, now in the 21st century "experimental" American culture, and have (D)istinct "red-(D)iaper" rearing; as did our {3 generation} previous "commander," what's his name, who had been electively (D)ecapitated last November. And "lefty," is STILL in shock and fantasy, and currently trying harder-and-harder, everyday, 24/7/365, to get a political "(D)O-OVER," and will do and say ANYTHING to move "forward" {Hummmmm, where have I heard THAT before}, their ideology and agenda. ANYTHING. Hummmmmmmm, again. GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO PRESIDENT "45" DONALD J. {BORN AGAIN} TRUMP (R); JUST LIKE THE WEATHER!!!
Let me try, JF. Other than "76" knowing... (
show quote)
One thing I would not do is plagiarize a fool,not it's style,not even it's words.One whoms essence of his critique is pure-dy pervaracation and nothing it says is germane or relative to the issue discussed ,and, is only relative to it's convoluted ego because when one does this,one becomes a bigger fool
JFlorio wrote:
Hence liberals are fish. We should put them back in the barrel. Then it would be like shooting fish in a barrel. Great idea.
Would you classify "Jesus,the Christ" as liberal or conservative.
plainlogic wrote:
You're referring to Blagojevich; he was convicted in court by jurors of corruption, period!
The double standard? It would behoove you to look through events of Obamas and associates progressive past, especially his appointed people in key positions of Government.
The problem I see with liberals like yourself, is, you're unrepentant, incorrigible, narcissistic. All liberals come from the same barrel. Therefore, all people should scrutinize everything that progressives speak, print or otherwise convey.
You're referring to Blagojevich; he was convicted ... (
show quote)
The problem I see with you conservatives is that whenever you're caught with your hand in the 'cookie jar` ,you immediately break into your deflection mode,"SOoo,I seen Clinton did dis'and did dat' n' you ain't said nuthin' bout' it."
dongreen76 wrote:
Would you classify "Jesus,the Christ" as liberal or conservative.
Neither. I classify him as the Son of God. He had a lot of different teachings. Some could be construed as liberal and some conservative. He was definitely not a leftist.
JFlorio wrote:
Neither. I classify him as the Son of God. He had a lot of different teachings. Some could be construed as liberal and some conservative. He was definitely not a leftist.
So having criticized the liberals,and acknowledging that he had liberal views and conservative views,one could ascertain,that his teachings would not be the absolute point of reference to the right and wrong of things,and yet you criticize and demean liberals when their perspective does not corroborate yours,and one can further surmise,since you refute the liberal,you are buking God it self,one can further surmise that it is not the word of God you are expounding but your own egotistical agendas'.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.