Muslims Tell Employer to BOW DOWN to Islam, Company Has 3-Word Response
Jun 27, 2017 20:19:09 #
Muslims Tell Employer to BOW DOWN to Islam, Company Has 3-Word Response
Muslims have been convinced that they are special and deserve perks above those of any other American.
Over 200 Muslim employees at a meat-packaging plant in Colorado walked out of their jobs to protest. The Muslims demanded to have dedicated breaks to prayer. The company refused and told the protesters “you’re all fired.” (via Denver Post)
The company asked their employees to return to their jobs, and the vast majority refused. As a result, over 190 Muslims were fired from the plant.
http://newstodayflash.com/latest/muslims-tell-employer-to-bow-down-to-islam-company-has-3-word-response/
Good news--America is waking the ***k UP!!!
Muslims have been convinced that they are special and deserve perks above those of any other American.
Over 200 Muslim employees at a meat-packaging plant in Colorado walked out of their jobs to protest. The Muslims demanded to have dedicated breaks to prayer. The company refused and told the protesters “you’re all fired.” (via Denver Post)
The company asked their employees to return to their jobs, and the vast majority refused. As a result, over 190 Muslims were fired from the plant.
http://newstodayflash.com/latest/muslims-tell-employer-to-bow-down-to-islam-company-has-3-word-response/
Good news--America is waking the ***k UP!!!
Jun 27, 2017 20:41:44 #
Jun 27, 2017 20:41:56 #
Jun 27, 2017 21:24:26 #
Oldsailor65 wrote:
Muslims Tell Employer to BOW DOWN to Islam, Compan... (show quote)
Good news? That's an understatement.
Jun 27, 2017 21:31:06 #
Oldsailor65 wrote:
Muslims Tell Employer to BOW DOWN to Islam, Compan... (show quote)
I would bet the farm (no pun intended) that those 200 Muslims that walked out constantly spits on our food before it gets packaged!
Jun 27, 2017 21:47:24 #
vettelover wrote:
I would bet the farm (no pun intended) that those 200 Muslims that walked out constantly spits on our food before it gets packaged!
Yes I believe that
Jun 27, 2017 21:48:19 #
nwtk2007 wrote:
This is my very immature response, sorry Kira, my three words are Go Fuck Yourselves. They get the same breaks as everyone else. They can dedicate their breaks to what ever. But don't go demanding an entire company to join in your religious exercises.
Yes America is waking the fuck up!!
Jun 27, 2017 22:29:21 #
JFlorio
Loc: Seminole Florida
I'm curious why they hired a bunch of stinking Somalis anyway.
Oldsailor65 wrote:
Muslims Tell Employer to BOW DOWN to Islam, Compan... (show quote)
Jun 27, 2017 22:38:05 #
Oldsailor65 wrote:
Muslims Tell Employer to BOW DOWN to Islam, Compan... (show quote)
>>>>>>>>>
Woo hoooo great news...
On another note an Immigrant with 7 children living on welfare and housing assistance (who's scumbag Loser Gang banging criminal ignorant 3rd world mentality husband was deported) is living in a paid State Apartment on Tax payer dollars and milking it for all it's got... until today.
The Locals found out and Torched the place, threatened her and Hope she packs up with all
7 of her unplanned
Bastard
Illegitimate scumbag babies
Back to Central America where they belong !
More of this is coming in the Months ahead as Patriots and Citizens start to RAT OUT and Expose the
Free
Phucking
Scumbag
Loaders and
Muslim Trash...
Spread the Word
Do your part
Do your Jobs to help save the Republic.
How's that sound ?
Jun 27, 2017 22:41:32 #
vettelover wrote:
I would bet the farm (no pun intended) that those 200 Muslims that walked out constantly spits on our food before it gets packaged!
Agreed! And that is why I will not be able to buy food that is picked out for me by workers at Amazon after they take over Whole Foods. They are infested with Muslim Workers!!
Jun 27, 2017 22:50:24 #
Weasel wrote:
Agreed! And that is why I will not be able to buy food that is picked out for me by workers at Amazon after they take over Whole Foods. They are infested with Muslim Workers!!
>>>>>
Keep spreading the word,
Make them feel they are unwanted
Make them know they'll be leaving and no longer welcome here
Draw them into the fight, this needs to happen.
The sooner it happens the better off everyone will be.
Begin the Escalations
Divisions
Do the hard work required so your children and grand children can leave in peace.
These scumbags don't belong here and never did...
They've been outlawed twice in the past and I've posted it several times.
>>>>>>>>>>
No Muslims Allowed:
Nationality Act June 27, 1952
ISLAM WAS BANNED from the USA in "1952"..
But Obama doesn't want you to know that nor does he respect or uphold US law. The Immigration and Nationality Act passed June 27, 1952 revised the laws relating to Immigration, naturalization, and nationality for the United States.
That act, which became Public Law 414, established both the law and the intent of Congress regarding the immigration of Aliens to the US and remains in effect today" Among the many issues it covers, one in particular, found in Chapter 2 Section 212, is the prohibition of entry to the US if the Alien belongs "to any organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by "force, violence, or other unconstitutional means."
This, by it's very definition. rules out Islamic Immigration to the United States, but this law is being ignored by the White House, Islamic Immigration to the US would be prohibited under this law because the Koran, Sharia Law and the Hadith all require complete submission to Islam, which is antithetical to the US government, the Constitution, and to the Republic.
All Muslims who attest that the Koran is their life's guiding principal subscribe to submission to Islam and its form of government.
Now the political correct crowd would say that Islamists cannot be prohibited from entering the US because Islam
is a religion. Whether it is a religion is immaterial because the law states that Aliens who are affiliated with any "organization" that advocates the overthrow of our government are prohibited"
ISLAM:
" A Doctrine masquerading as a Religion for millennia based upon Laws ( Shari'a) , a Constitution ( the Qur'an) and an ideology that DEMANDS the death of ALL Jews, Christians and other infidels and is the most misogynistic society in the history of the world"- author unknown
It is time for the government to uphold it's written laws.
Muslims Were Banned From the Americas as Early as the 16th Century, Long before today’s anxiety about terror attacks, Spain and England feared that enslaved Africans would be more susceptible to revolt if they were Muslim.
Jun 28, 2017 08:55:11 #
[quote=Sicilianthing]>>>>>
Keep spreading the word,
Make them feel they are unwanted
Make them know they'll be leaving and no longer welcome here
Draw them into the fight, this needs to happen.
The sooner it happens the better off everyone will be.
Begin the Escalations
Divisions
Muslims were banned from immigrating to the United States in 1952 under the provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act. See Example(s)
RATING
FALSE
ORIGIN
In late 2015 a claim spreading on social media under the heading “ISLAM WAS BANNED FROM THE USA IN 1952,” holding that Muslims has been banned from entering or immigrating to the United States back in the early 1950s:
Follow
Doug Parks @LDougParks
ISLAM WAS BANNED FROM THE USA IN 1952, but Obama doesn't want you to know that nor does he respect or uphold US... http://fb.me/1XKem6nFh
6:21 AM - 30 Nov 2015
48 48 Retweets 40 40 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy
The image sharply escalated in popularity following an unprecedented statement from Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, who on 7 December 2015 (in the wake of a mass shooting in San Bernardino that had occurred five days earlier) suggested the United States should bar all Muslims from entering the country until such time as lawmakers could “figure out what [was] going on”
Simply put, the rumor maintained that Muslims as a group were ineligible for admission to the United States based upon a law that prohibited entry to any alien who “belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by ‘force, violence, or other unconstitutional means.'”
The law referenced was the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, also known as the McCarran–Walter Act. Its text is available in full at the U.S. Citizenship and Naturalization Services (USCIS) web site, where a preface indicates that the law has “been amended many times over the years but is still the basic body of immigration law.”
The claim typically cited “Chapter 2 Section 212” of the Act, which excludes as ineligible for admission the following persons:
In general any alien who a consular officer or the Attorney General knows, or has reasonable ground to believe, seeks to enter the United States to engage solely, principally, or incidentally in any activity a purpose of which is the opposition to, or the control or overthrow of, the Government of the United States by force, violence, or other unlawful means.
That law, originally aimed at Communists, could be used now to exclude persons (both Muslims and non-Muslims) who have demonstrated an affiliation or sympathy with violent extremist groups professing Islamist motivations and goals (e.g., ISIS, al-Qaeda, Al-Shabaab, Boko Haram) from entering the U.S., but asserting that it enables a de facto ban on all Muslims is inaccurate. Most major religions involve basic, agreed-upon sets of tenets by which their faithful live, and no widely-accepted understanding of Islam encompasses a prohibition on following the laws of any country or advocates the overthrow of government.
The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 was not without critics, among them President Harry S. Truman, who vetoed the bill on 25 June 1952. In a letter titled “Veto of Bill to Revise the Laws Relating to Immigration, Naturalization, and Nationality” and addressed to the House of Representatives, President Truman described the bill’s provisions as both antithetical to American values and discriminatory:
The greatest vice of the present quota system, however, is that it discriminates, deliberately and intentionally, against many of the peoples of the world … The desired effect [of selective admission of immigrants] was obtained … People from such countries as Greece, or Spain, or Latvia were virtually deprived of any opportunity to come here at all, simply because Greeks or Spaniards or Latvians had not come here before 1920 in any substantial numbers.
The idea behind this discriminatory policy was, to put it baldly, that Americans with English or Irish names were better people and better citizens than Americans with Italian or Greek or Polish names. It was thought that people of West European origin made better citizens than Rumanians or Yugoslavs or Ukrainians or Hungarians or Baits or Austrians. Such a concept is utterly unworthy of our traditions and our ideals. It violates the great political doctrine of the Declaration of Independence that “all men are created equal.” It denies the humanitarian creed inscribed beneath the Statue of Liberty proclaiming to all nations, “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free.”
It repudiates our basic religious concepts, our belief in the brotherhood of man, and in the words of St. Paul that “there is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free …. for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.”
In that letter President Truman further maintained the act’s provisions were out of alignment with foreign policy goals, inhibiting immigrants who needed it most from seeking safe harbor in America:
The basis of this quota system was false and unworthy in 1924. It is even worse now. At the present time, this quota system keeps out the very people we want to bring in. It is incredible to me that, in this year of 1952, we should again be enacting into law such a slur on the patriotism, the capacity, and the decency of a large part of our citizenry.
Today, we have entered into an alliance, the North Atlantic Treaty, with Italy, Greece, and Turkey against one of the most terrible threats mankind has ever faced. We are asking them to join with us in protecting the peace of the world. We are helping them to build their defenses, and train their men, in the common cause. But, through this bill we say to their people: You are less worthy to come to this country than Englishmen or Irishmen; you Italians, who need to find homes abroad in the hundreds of thousands — you shall have a quota of 5,645; you Greeks, struggling to assist the helpless victims of a communist civil war — you shall have a quota of 308; and you Turks, you are brave defenders of the Eastern flank, but you shall have a quota of only 225!
Truman’s words seemed exceptionally prescient when he spoke of citizens in countries that had in recent years fallen behind the Iron Curtain:
Today, we are “protecting” ourselves, as we were in 1924, against being flooded by immigrants from Eastern Europe. This is fantastic. The countries of Eastern Europe have fallen under the communist yoke — they are silenced, fenced off by barbed wire and minefields — no one passes their borders but at the risk of his life. We do not need to be protected against immigrants from these countries — on the contrary we want to stretch out a helping hand, to save those who have managed to flee into Western Europe, to succor those who are brave enough to escape from barbarism, to welcome and restore them against the day when their countries will, as we hope, be free again … some 30,000 Rumanians, who have managed to escape the labor camps and the mass deportations of their Soviet masters, have asked our help. These are only a few examples of the absurdity, the cruelty of carrying over into this year of 1952 the isolationist limitations of our 1924 law.
In that letter, President Truman spoke specifically of immigration quotas arranged deliberately to exclude specific nationalities. A large portion of the letter directly addressed Truman’s belief that the American way of life ought to be extended to those living under the same totalitarian regimes the U.S. hoped to vanquish. Truman lamented that in “no other realm of our national life are we so hampered and stultified by the dead hand of the past, as we are in this field of immigration.”
The “ISLAM WAS BANNED FROM THE USA IN 1952” claim proved popular following a period of increasing rhetoric similar to that which Truman decried as discriminatory and outdated in 1952. The basic claim hinged on the tautological assertion that adherence to Islam alone constitutes participation in an “organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by ‘force, violence, or other unconstitutional means.'”
Do the hard work required so your children and grand children can leave in peace.
Keep spreading the word,
Make them feel they are unwanted
Make them know they'll be leaving and no longer welcome here
Draw them into the fight, this needs to happen.
The sooner it happens the better off everyone will be.
Begin the Escalations
Divisions
Muslims were banned from immigrating to the United States in 1952 under the provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act. See Example(s)
RATING
FALSE
ORIGIN
In late 2015 a claim spreading on social media under the heading “ISLAM WAS BANNED FROM THE USA IN 1952,” holding that Muslims has been banned from entering or immigrating to the United States back in the early 1950s:
Follow
Doug Parks @LDougParks
ISLAM WAS BANNED FROM THE USA IN 1952, but Obama doesn't want you to know that nor does he respect or uphold US... http://fb.me/1XKem6nFh
6:21 AM - 30 Nov 2015
48 48 Retweets 40 40 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy
The image sharply escalated in popularity following an unprecedented statement from Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, who on 7 December 2015 (in the wake of a mass shooting in San Bernardino that had occurred five days earlier) suggested the United States should bar all Muslims from entering the country until such time as lawmakers could “figure out what [was] going on”
Simply put, the rumor maintained that Muslims as a group were ineligible for admission to the United States based upon a law that prohibited entry to any alien who “belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by ‘force, violence, or other unconstitutional means.'”
The law referenced was the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, also known as the McCarran–Walter Act. Its text is available in full at the U.S. Citizenship and Naturalization Services (USCIS) web site, where a preface indicates that the law has “been amended many times over the years but is still the basic body of immigration law.”
The claim typically cited “Chapter 2 Section 212” of the Act, which excludes as ineligible for admission the following persons:
In general any alien who a consular officer or the Attorney General knows, or has reasonable ground to believe, seeks to enter the United States to engage solely, principally, or incidentally in any activity a purpose of which is the opposition to, or the control or overthrow of, the Government of the United States by force, violence, or other unlawful means.
That law, originally aimed at Communists, could be used now to exclude persons (both Muslims and non-Muslims) who have demonstrated an affiliation or sympathy with violent extremist groups professing Islamist motivations and goals (e.g., ISIS, al-Qaeda, Al-Shabaab, Boko Haram) from entering the U.S., but asserting that it enables a de facto ban on all Muslims is inaccurate. Most major religions involve basic, agreed-upon sets of tenets by which their faithful live, and no widely-accepted understanding of Islam encompasses a prohibition on following the laws of any country or advocates the overthrow of government.
The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 was not without critics, among them President Harry S. Truman, who vetoed the bill on 25 June 1952. In a letter titled “Veto of Bill to Revise the Laws Relating to Immigration, Naturalization, and Nationality” and addressed to the House of Representatives, President Truman described the bill’s provisions as both antithetical to American values and discriminatory:
The greatest vice of the present quota system, however, is that it discriminates, deliberately and intentionally, against many of the peoples of the world … The desired effect [of selective admission of immigrants] was obtained … People from such countries as Greece, or Spain, or Latvia were virtually deprived of any opportunity to come here at all, simply because Greeks or Spaniards or Latvians had not come here before 1920 in any substantial numbers.
The idea behind this discriminatory policy was, to put it baldly, that Americans with English or Irish names were better people and better citizens than Americans with Italian or Greek or Polish names. It was thought that people of West European origin made better citizens than Rumanians or Yugoslavs or Ukrainians or Hungarians or Baits or Austrians. Such a concept is utterly unworthy of our traditions and our ideals. It violates the great political doctrine of the Declaration of Independence that “all men are created equal.” It denies the humanitarian creed inscribed beneath the Statue of Liberty proclaiming to all nations, “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free.”
It repudiates our basic religious concepts, our belief in the brotherhood of man, and in the words of St. Paul that “there is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free …. for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.”
In that letter President Truman further maintained the act’s provisions were out of alignment with foreign policy goals, inhibiting immigrants who needed it most from seeking safe harbor in America:
The basis of this quota system was false and unworthy in 1924. It is even worse now. At the present time, this quota system keeps out the very people we want to bring in. It is incredible to me that, in this year of 1952, we should again be enacting into law such a slur on the patriotism, the capacity, and the decency of a large part of our citizenry.
Today, we have entered into an alliance, the North Atlantic Treaty, with Italy, Greece, and Turkey against one of the most terrible threats mankind has ever faced. We are asking them to join with us in protecting the peace of the world. We are helping them to build their defenses, and train their men, in the common cause. But, through this bill we say to their people: You are less worthy to come to this country than Englishmen or Irishmen; you Italians, who need to find homes abroad in the hundreds of thousands — you shall have a quota of 5,645; you Greeks, struggling to assist the helpless victims of a communist civil war — you shall have a quota of 308; and you Turks, you are brave defenders of the Eastern flank, but you shall have a quota of only 225!
Truman’s words seemed exceptionally prescient when he spoke of citizens in countries that had in recent years fallen behind the Iron Curtain:
Today, we are “protecting” ourselves, as we were in 1924, against being flooded by immigrants from Eastern Europe. This is fantastic. The countries of Eastern Europe have fallen under the communist yoke — they are silenced, fenced off by barbed wire and minefields — no one passes their borders but at the risk of his life. We do not need to be protected against immigrants from these countries — on the contrary we want to stretch out a helping hand, to save those who have managed to flee into Western Europe, to succor those who are brave enough to escape from barbarism, to welcome and restore them against the day when their countries will, as we hope, be free again … some 30,000 Rumanians, who have managed to escape the labor camps and the mass deportations of their Soviet masters, have asked our help. These are only a few examples of the absurdity, the cruelty of carrying over into this year of 1952 the isolationist limitations of our 1924 law.
In that letter, President Truman spoke specifically of immigration quotas arranged deliberately to exclude specific nationalities. A large portion of the letter directly addressed Truman’s belief that the American way of life ought to be extended to those living under the same totalitarian regimes the U.S. hoped to vanquish. Truman lamented that in “no other realm of our national life are we so hampered and stultified by the dead hand of the past, as we are in this field of immigration.”
The “ISLAM WAS BANNED FROM THE USA IN 1952” claim proved popular following a period of increasing rhetoric similar to that which Truman decried as discriminatory and outdated in 1952. The basic claim hinged on the tautological assertion that adherence to Islam alone constitutes participation in an “organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by ‘force, violence, or other unconstitutional means.'”
Do the hard work required so your children and grand children can leave in peace.
Jun 28, 2017 09:15:48 #
Oldsailor65 wrote:
I would have at first told them to go F--- a duck, however in their case "go f--- a mamma pig !Muslims Tell Employer to BOW DOWN to Islam, Compan... (show quote)
Jun 28, 2017 09:33:01 #
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>> br br Keep spreading the wor... (show quote)
It is past time that we begin to play "Cowboys and Muslims" and circle our wagons! To begin with we should be aware that there are 34 distinctly different "Americas" and the USA is only one of them, and honor our borders, language and culture above all others. There is a distinct difference between a "Migrant" and an "Immigrant" and most migrants are illegal aliens, where most immigrants are not, having been through our immigration process and have assimilated into our culture as proud and productive United States citizens. True Muslims are not able to qualify to be US citizens unless they lie about their beliefs, which their Qur'an allows them to do if it promotes Islam. There is no place for them in the USA!
Jun 28, 2017 10:07:55 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.