Just foolin' with Blade Runner and emarine (Page 19): If the fire was half a mile away, it would not exist anywhere near the towers. What are you sniffing today? I used the open...

payne1000

emarine wrote:

Depending on the angle of impact the ground debris can trail for long distances... the fire could be a half mile away... where's your bionic sheetrock wall's putz?...

If the fire was half a mile away, it would not exist anywhere near the towers. What are you sniffing today?
I used the open concept photo from the 1970s because the walled in floors popular in 2001 do not allow a photo to show much.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

payne1000 wrote:

I didn't say "a" picture proves nothing. I said "your" picture proves nothing without giving your name and location.

Nothing in there to burn? what about all those seats from the airliner? What about all the baggage the passengers had on board? What about all the plastic of the passenger overhead storage?
What about all the office furniture existing on the floors impacted?

What about it? The jet and everything in it--all the seats, people, baggage, plastic, wings, engines, everything--hit the tower at over 500 mph, and in the immediate area inside the tower where the jet entered the building everything in there--floor systems, office contents, people, everything--was accelerated in the direction the jet impacted. The disintegrating 130 ton jet bulldozed everything back into the building. Newton's 2nd Law.

I figured you couldn't reason that out.

About your picture analysis, you cannot be selective in what you see or don't see. What is there is there, what isn't, isn't. I showed you a photo of one of the fire crews I served with. The location is a city in the western United States and my name is irrelevant.

emarine

payne1000 wrote:

If the fire was half a mile away, it would not exist anywhere near the towers. What are you sniffing today?
I used the open concept photo from the 1970s because the walled in floors popular in 2001 do not allow a photo to show much.

I'm sniffing fresh NC air... my reply was to your plane crash pictures where you were wondering where the burnt shit was... the towers are stuck in your head putz... no glue required...

payne1000

Blade_Runner wrote:

What about it? The jet and everything in it--all t... (show quote)

The photo of the airliner hole is seen straight on. You could see all the way through the building if the airliner had penetrated the center core and the back walls. If any of the debris I listed was burning you'd be able to see it.
You can be accurate in what you see. There was no fire inside the building where the airliner hit. Yes . . . what isn't, isn't.

Your name is relevant. It would help prove you aren't a liar.
You have always had a problem with lying. Why don't you try to prove you aren't a liar?

payne1000

emarine wrote:

I'm sniffing fresh NC air... my reply was to your plane crash pictures where you were wondering where the burnt shit was... the towers are stuck in your head putz... no glue required...

I was giving you the benefit of the doubt by assuming you were ingesting mind altering substances instead of being so confused when in a normal state of mind.
Your reading comprehension has left you once again.
The crash photos were showing all the flammable materials inside an airliner . . . not "wondering where the burnt shit was."

emarine

payne1000 wrote:

I was giving you the benefit of the doubt by assuming you were ingesting mind altering substances instead of being so confused when in a normal state of mind.
Your reading comprehension has left you once again.
The crash photos were showing all the flammable materials inside an airliner . . . not "wondering where the burnt shit was."

Why were you showing us flammable materials we already knew would burn?... why are you so consumed with fire anyway?... Fire & heat are two different things... you keep showing us pictures of big fires when it has little to do with heat...

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

payne1000 wrote:

The photo of the airliner hole is seen straight on... (show quote)

You don't read very well, do you? You might want to try reading what I said with a bit more attention to what you are reading. Get all the garbage in your head out of the way and think about what you read. If that doesn't work, I'll explain it so that even a retard might get the picture.

Steve700

Blade_Runner wrote:

You don't read very well, do you? You might want to try reading what I said with a bit more attention to what you are reading. Get all the garbage in your head out of the way and think about what you read. If that doesn't work, I'll explain it so that even a retard might get the picture.

Do you mean "Get all the garbage in your head out of the way and think about what you read" like You do???

You couldn't explain your way out of a wet paper bag. ---- Proof of a degenerate, expecting from others what they are not willing to produce from themselves

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Steve700 wrote:

Do you mean "Get all the garbage in your head out of the way and think about what you read" like You do???

You couldn't explain your way out of a wet paper bag.

It wouldn't matter how well or how poorly I could explain anything, you are too damned retarded to understand anything more complex than 1 + 1 = 2.

Steve700

Blade_Runner wrote:

It wouldn't matter how well or how poorly I could explain anything, you are too damned retarded to understand anything more complex than 1 + 1 = 2.

payne1000

emarine wrote:

Why were you showing us flammable materials we already knew would burn?... why are you so consumed with fire anyway?... Fire & heat are two different things... you keep showing us pictures of big fires when it has little to do with heat...

It takes a big fire to generate much heat . . . unless the fire is from thermite . . . which burns at 4,000 F.

payne1000

Blade_Runner wrote:

You don't read very well, do you? You might want to try reading what I said with a bit more attention to what you are reading. Get all the garbage in your head out of the way and think about what you read. If that doesn't work, I'll explain it so that even a retard might get the picture.

Since you're defending lies, it doesn't serve your agenda well to be clear in what you post.
Obfuscation is your main tactic here. Insults are your secondary tactics.
Posting insults while hiding behind cowardly anonymity should give readers a good idea where you are coming from.

Richard Rowland

payne1000 wrote:

Since you're defending lies, it doesn't serve your agenda well to be clear in what you post.
Obfuscation is your main tactic here. Insults are your secondary tactics.
Posting insults while hiding behind cowardly anonymity should give readers a good idea where you are coming from.

Let's forget about the towers for a moment. Here's a Jew with a different view, about being a Jew. Brother Nathanael has forsaken his Jewishness, for Christianity. Or at least that's what he says, I'm a bit suspicious, though. However, I do find him entertaining.

http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=1219

payne1000

Richard Rowland wrote:

Let's forget about the towers for a moment. Here's a Jew with a different view, about being a Jew. Brother Nathanael has forsaken his Jewishness, for Christianity. Or at least that's what he says, I'm a bit suspicious, though. However, I do find him entertaining.

http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=1219

Brother Nathanael has always been an enigma to me.
I totally agree with what he says but his outfit makes him look somewhat like a buffoon.
I'm sure he has given his image a lot of thought. Maybe it works on the religious majority.
This clip is a good one for the message he conveys.