S. Maturin wrote:
No, yu back up your outlandish claims by using half-truths and deflection.
If, for instance, you think all of CA's tax money goes to the US military and not, for instance to the HUGE entitlement/welfare programs, you are in for a shock.
I never said ALL of CA's taxes go to the U.S. Military. Go back and look. I never said that.
I said CA pays for 12% of the Military...
You think that amounts to ALL the money California gives the Federal Government? Pa-leeeese.
But I never let a good strawman go to waste. So, I'm going to answer your question anyway.
No, I won't be shocked.
I read the budgets when they come out. The Republicans haven't figured out how to hide the books yet, so it's still public information.
The 2016 budget allocated $1.1 trillion to healthcare. It's the largest single category in the budget. And ya know what? I can see why. The American population of 350 million people is aging, so demand is up. The system we have to help them is profit driven and fragmented into a multitude of separate profit chains, from hospitals to labs, to transport, to outsourced food services... all separate bills... all separate corporations. Profit-driven pharmaceuticals are literally holding the keys to people's very lives for ransom. It's multiplexed capitalism, providing millionaires like Trump the most expensive and the best healthcare in the world and for me and YOU, the most expensive but shittiest healthcare in the developed world... IF you can afford it... otherwise, you get DICK. For every bill there is a cut, for every cut, there's price increase.
That's why it costs the government 1.1 trillion dollars to take care of the elderly, the sick and the injured in a population of 350 million. No... I am not shocked... not in the slightest.
But let's not disappoint the readers... While I'm burning this strawman, let me ask you something about the money the federal government spends on the military. How much do you think the federal government spends on that?
Let's take the 2016 budget again... (apples to apples, right?). $616 billion allocated to "national defense". That's roughly 56% of what we spend on "defense". So, I got this right? We spend almost twice as much on healthcare than we do on the military right? Well, I'm hoping you're a man who can see beyond the obvious because there's more to cover...
The military takes a bite of of more budget allocations than "national defense". $98,742 is allocated to transport. That means "federal transport", of which a good percentage is military. $30 billion goes to the Department of Energy. Guess what they do? They handle our nuclear arsenal under military command, so there's another percentage there...
OK, but percentages of smaller allocations don't add up to 42% of what we spend on healthcare, right? I'm feeling generous today, so I won't even add that in... Forget I even mentioned the nuclear arsenal and military transportation. Let's just go to the allocations for covering what the military incurs. That's right, the wheel doesn't stop at cost of operations... it keeps spinning into the incurred costs, like veteran benefits. You can't just dump American servicemen in the street when "operations" is done with them. They put their lives on the line for the country, the country should provide them with something in return. So... 2016 budget... $180 billion. As far as I am concerned not a penny too much. But now we're looking at $796 billion in military expense... And there's more... Have a look at the 2016 budget allocation for "net interest" ... $283 billion. Guess where that comes from? That's just the interest on money the government borrowed which isn't even in the federal budget. $283 billion in interest payments..!
Why?
Because of military operations that the American people can't even afford. That $796 billion in budget allocations is just for the same operations that you would normally see in peacetime. Wars are on a whole different scale. Iraq and Afghanistan were NOT funded by the budget. We couldn't afford it, so of course it wasn't in the budget... Welcome to "offline spending" where the WhiteHouse has the power to borrow money from the Federal Reserve without Congressional consent.
According to Reuters "The U.S. war in Iraq has cost $1.7 trillion with an additional $490 billion in benefits owed to war veterans, expenses that could grow to more than $6 trillion over the next four decades counting interest". That's just Iraq. And here's an important thing to notice... Unlike the money spent on healthcare, most of the military spending (at least since 2001) is NOT covered by the budget and is instead, borrowed from the Federal Reserve, using mortgage securities as collateral... which means, unlike the money spent on social programs, the money spent on military is not really getting paid off... we're just paying interest forever on the amount we can't afford to pay down.
That's called debt servitude and it's big business in America.
S. Maturin wrote:
But, if it was truth you were after, your financial info would have come from the US Government offices releases and not from Wiki.
A person with some mental capacity would understand the annotation system Wikipedia uses to link sources and find among them an abundance of data from the government. In case you're not getting this... I am not suggesting that you trust Wiki because someone says they have links to government sources; I am suggesting that you use the system to trace the source for each piece of data you question.
S. Maturin wrote:
Anyhow, you are more into agenda and WA statements than pursuit of truth, so-- fuggitabboudit.
Well, I'm sure that's how it looks to you.