Trump vs Comey vs Flynn vs NYT and WAPO: The evidence and the transcripts from Flynn and the Russian Ambassador conversation are "classified" documents. The only crime committed was...

Tomtrout

The evidence and the transcripts from Flynn and the Russian Ambassador conversation are "classified" documents. The only crime committed was allowing the transcript to be released to the media. The "unmasking" of Flynn violates legal and ethical protocols of the intelligence community because at the time he was a private citizen and not an government official. In other words, because the information was leaked and a crime was committed, the evidence gathered for ( but not "in" )the commission of a separate crime (leaking classified information") is tainted and is not admissible.as evidence.

Am I the only one who sees this?

Flynn had the right to gather information from the Russian ambassador not unlike you or me and his conversations could possibly defuse a diplomatic crisis with Russia created by a false narrative spun by the former administration. This was not the high crime that has been interpreted by the left and the media. He was rightfully dismissed because he tried to cover it up and lied to the Vice President.

Where is the transcript of the FBI's interview with Hillary Clinton? Why are only a brief hand written in the form of notes description of the interview available to the public and to the justice department? Why was her testimony not recorded as is the usual procedure? Why was she not sworn in as is the usual procedure? This is a major failure by the FBI under the Comey's guidance as director of the FBI. Why does a known crime of leaking classified information have a lower priority in the FBI than the suspected crime of collusion in a Presidential election with a foreign government which has so far not produced any concrete evidence as verified by the former DNI chief and the fired former assistant Attorney General. Now there are suspicions that the DNC computers were leaked by a disgruntled staffer and an ardent Bernie Sanders supporter and not by Russian hacking. That DNC staffer was shot in the back last summer in "botched robbery" but nothing was taken. The local police were "allegedly" told to "stand down" on the investigation by someone higher up. That staffer's personal computer can not be found as the personal computer is always in evidence in a homicide investigation. The DC police claim that it was taken by the FBI but the FBI claims that the DC police have it in custody as evidence. If this was a simple "botched robbery," Why and how was the FBI involved? Why did the FBI allow the DNC server to be examined by an analyst paid by the DNC and be denied access to more skilled government intelligence analysts? If a foreign government was involved in the hacking of the DNC computer this would be a threat to national security and the intelligence community should be all over this.

It is a wonder that Comey lasted as long as he did and now the left and the media is crying foul claiming that the firing was motivated to impede the Russian investigation. The present assistant FBI director testified that there have been no interference by either the White House or the Department of Justice and the investigation will continue as before.He also testified that the narrative of Comey asking for additional funds for the Russian investigation is false and he stated that the FBI has adequate resources to continue as before.

Who is kidding who? DC is not just a swamp but has become a cesspool of political and disloyal crap

Don G. Dinsdale Loc: El Cajon, CA (San Diego County)

Well Said... Don D.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Tomtrout wrote:

The evidence and the transcripts from Flynn and the Russian Ambassador conversation are "classified" documents. The only crime committed was allowing the transcript to be released to the media. The "unmasking" of Flynn violates legal and ethical protocols of the intelligence community because at the time he was a private citizen and not an government official. In other words, because the information was leaked and a crime was committed, the evidence gathered for ( but not "in" )the commission of a separate crime (leaking classified information") is tainted and is not admissible.as evidence.

Am I the only one who sees this?

Flynn had the right to gather information from the Russian ambassador not unlike you or me and his conversations could possibly defuse a diplomatic crisis with Russia created by a false narrative spun by the former administration. This was not the high crime that has been interpreted by the left and the media. He was rightfully dismissed because he tried to cover it up and lied to the Vice President.

Where is the transcript of the FBI's interview with Hillary Clinton? Why are only a brief hand written in the form of notes description of the interview available to the public and to the justice department? Why was her testimony not recorded as is the usual procedure? Why was she not sworn in as is the usual procedure? This is a major failure by the FBI under the Comey's guidance as director of the FBI. Why does a known crime of leaking classified information have a lower priority in the FBI than the suspected crime of collusion in a Presidential election with a foreign government which has so far not produced any concrete evidence as verified by the former DNI chief and the fired former assistant Attorney General. Now there are suspicions that the DNC computers were leaked by a disgruntled staffer and an ardent Bernie Sanders supporter and not by Russian hacking. That DNC staffer was shot in the back last summer in "botched robbery" but nothing was taken. The local police were "allegedly" told to "stand down" on the investigation by someone higher up. That staffer's personal computer can not be found as the personal computer is always in evidence in a homicide investigation. The DC police claim that it was taken by the FBI but the FBI claims that the DC police have it in custody as evidence. If this was a simple "botched robbery," Why and how was the FBI involved? Why did the FBI allow the DNC server to be examined by an analyst paid by the DNC and be denied access to more skilled government intelligence analysts? If a foreign government was involved in the hacking of the DNC computer this would be a threat to national security and the intelligence community should be all over this.

It is a wonder that Comey lasted as long as he did and now the left and the media is crying foul claiming that the firing was motivated to impede the Russian investigation. The present assistant FBI director testified that there have been no interference by either the White House or the Department of Justice and the investigation will continue as before.He also testified that the narrative of Comey asking for additional funds for the Russian investigation is false and he stated that the FBI has adequate resources to continue as before.

Who is kidding who? DC is not just a swamp but has become a cesspool of political and disloyal crap

The evidence and the transcripts from Flynn and th... (show quote)

Ricko Loc: Florida

Tomtrout wrote:

The evidence and the transcripts from Flynn and the Russian Ambassador conversation are "classified" documents. The only crime committed was allowing the transcript to be released to the media. The "unmasking" of Flynn violates legal and ethical protocols of the intelligence community because at the time he was a private citizen and not an government official. In other words, because the information was leaked and a crime was committed, the evidence gathered for ( but not "in" )the commission of a separate crime (leaking classified information") is tainted and is not admissible.as evidence.

Am I the only one who sees this?

Flynn had the right to gather information from the Russian ambassador not unlike you or me and his conversations could possibly defuse a diplomatic crisis with Russia created by a false narrative spun by the former administration. This was not the high crime that has been interpreted by the left and the media. He was rightfully dismissed because he tried to cover it up and lied to the Vice President.

Where is the transcript of the FBI's interview with Hillary Clinton? Why are only a brief hand written in the form of notes description of the interview available to the public and to the justice department? Why was her testimony not recorded as is the usual procedure? Why was she not sworn in as is the usual procedure? This is a major failure by the FBI under the Comey's guidance as director of the FBI. Why does a known crime of leaking classified information have a lower priority in the FBI than the suspected crime of collusion in a Presidential election with a foreign government which has so far not produced any concrete evidence as verified by the former DNI chief and the fired former assistant Attorney General. Now there are suspicions that the DNC computers were leaked by a disgruntled staffer and an ardent Bernie Sanders supporter and not by Russian hacking. That DNC staffer was shot in the back last summer in "botched robbery" but nothing was taken. The local police were "allegedly" told to "stand down" on the investigation by someone higher up. That staffer's personal computer can not be found as the personal computer is always in evidence in a homicide investigation. The DC police claim that it was taken by the FBI but the FBI claims that the DC police have it in custody as evidence. If this was a simple "botched robbery," Why and how was the FBI involved? Why did the FBI allow the DNC server to be examined by an analyst paid by the DNC and be denied access to more skilled government intelligence analysts? If a foreign government was involved in the hacking of the DNC computer this would be a threat to national security and the intelligence community should be all over this.

It is a wonder that Comey lasted as long as he did and now the left and the media is crying foul claiming that the firing was motivated to impede the Russian investigation. The present assistant FBI director testified that there have been no interference by either the White House or the Department of Justice and the investigation will continue as before.He also testified that the narrative of Comey asking for additional funds for the Russian investigation is false and he stated that the FBI has adequate resources to continue as before.

Who is kidding who? DC is not just a swamp but has become a cesspool of political and disloyal crap

The evidence and the transcripts from Flynn and th... (show quote)

guitarman Loc: University Park, Florida

Tomtrout wrote:

The evidence and the transcripts from Flynn and the Russian Ambassador conversation are "classified" documents. The only crime committed was allowing the transcript to be released to the media. The "unmasking" of Flynn violates legal and ethical protocols of the intelligence community because at the time he was a private citizen and not an government official. In other words, because the information was leaked and a crime was committed, the evidence gathered for ( but not "in" )the commission of a separate crime (leaking classified information") is tainted and is not admissible.as evidence.

Am I the only one who sees this?

Flynn had the right to gather information from the Russian ambassador not unlike you or me and his conversations could possibly defuse a diplomatic crisis with Russia created by a false narrative spun by the former administration. This was not the high crime that has been interpreted by the left and the media. He was rightfully dismissed because he tried to cover it up and lied to the Vice President.

Where is the transcript of the FBI's interview with Hillary Clinton? Why are only a brief hand written in the form of notes description of the interview available to the public and to the justice department? Why was her testimony not recorded as is the usual procedure? Why was she not sworn in as is the usual procedure? This is a major failure by the FBI under the Comey's guidance as director of the FBI. Why does a known crime of leaking classified information have a lower priority in the FBI than the suspected crime of collusion in a Presidential election with a foreign government which has so far not produced any concrete evidence as verified by the former DNI chief and the fired former assistant Attorney General. Now there are suspicions that the DNC computers were leaked by a disgruntled staffer and an ardent Bernie Sanders supporter and not by Russian hacking. That DNC staffer was shot in the back last summer in "botched robbery" but nothing was taken. The local police were "allegedly" told to "stand down" on the investigation by someone higher up. That staffer's personal computer can not be found as the personal computer is always in evidence in a homicide investigation. The DC police claim that it was taken by the FBI but the FBI claims that the DC police have it in custody as evidence. If this was a simple "botched robbery," Why and how was the FBI involved? Why did the FBI allow the DNC server to be examined by an analyst paid by the DNC and be denied access to more skilled government intelligence analysts? If a foreign government was involved in the hacking of the DNC computer this would be a threat to national security and the intelligence community should be all over this.

It is a wonder that Comey lasted as long as he did and now the left and the media is crying foul claiming that the firing was motivated to impede the Russian investigation. The present assistant FBI director testified that there have been no interference by either the White House or the Department of Justice and the investigation will continue as before.He also testified that the narrative of Comey asking for additional funds for the Russian investigation is false and he stated that the FBI has adequate resources to continue as before.

Who is kidding who? DC is not just a swamp but has become a cesspool of political and disloyal crap

The evidence and the transcripts from Flynn and th... (show quote)

Have either Donald Trump or Michael Flynn been charged with a crime?

Tomtrout

Thank you Don! I was hoping that this would be read by someone with an open and logical mind and not generate copious threads involving accusations and foul rhetoric.

GmanTerry

The Demmunists are in the "Overthrow the elected American Government" mode, full scale. They want their wonderful "People's Worker Socialist Paradise" and are in full destroy the United States of America and it's Constitution mode. God help us.

Semper Fi