pafret Loc: Northeast

The REAL New World Order - Jeff Nielson
By Jeff Nielson
April 24, 2017

Regular readers are familiar with the Old World Order : the cabal of Western oligarchs who control not only our own puppet governments, but generally dictate events to most nations around the world. The vehicle used by these oligarchs to maintain their (economic) control over Western governments to keep them meek and submissive is the One Bank .

Regular readers are also familiar with this entity. The One Bank is a banking crime syndicate. Its dimensions have been previously defined in the computer modeling of a trio of Swiss researchers. The finding of that model is that by itself this crime syndicate controls roughly 40% of the entire global economy – all of the most important sectors.

What is one of the biggest problems for the One Bank? When you are a crime syndicate which controls 40% of the global economy, it becomes hard to continue to hide in the shadows.

The solution? The oligarchs resorted to the same solution they use to cover up all of the One Bank’s mega crimes: propaganda. In this case, it was disinformation. The oligarchs went and borrowed a metaphor which already existed in the extremes of conspiracy-theory writing: “the New World Order.”

They then began spreading this disinformation on a much larger scale than any of the previous conspiracy-mongering in this area. To give the disinformation a veneer of plausibility, the oligarchs of the Old World Order even allowed themselves to be (supposedly) linked to the mythological New World Order.

What is the NWO supposed to be? According to the propagandists (inadvertent and otherwise) who promote it, it is a secret, socialist, one-world government being constructed “above” the level of our own pathetic puppet governments.

How do you hide if you are a crime syndicate which controls 40% of the global economy? Where do you hide? Inside a great, big lie.

Alert and intelligent readers should automatically dismiss this NWO as nothing but absurd propaganda. What has the OWO been doing, perpetually and ravenously? Stealing all of the wealth of the masses and piling it atop the own obscene hoards of the oligarchs.

That is not “socialism”. Socialism is “share the wealth”, not steal all of the wealth.

It has become so easy to fool most people with vacuous ideological labels. Barack Obama was frequently labeled a “socialist” by much of the brain-dead Right. What did Obama do for eight years? He stole from the bottom 80% of the U.S. population and gave to his Masters: the Top 0.01%. That is not socialism either. Just another reverse-Robin Hood, right-wing government: steal from the Poor; give to the (very, very) Rich.

There is no “new world order”. There is only the Old World Order, or at least this has been the case for many, many decades up until now.

There is great irony here. The Old World Order invented the myth of the “New World Order” to hide its raping-and-pillaging of the planet. But it is precisely this continuous and ever more rapacious plundering that has now resulted in the rise of an actual New World Order.

This NWO is not a crime syndicate of psychopaths like the Old World Order. Neither is it some totally ridiculous ideological contrivance like the (mythological) New World Order. The real New World Order that is coming into existence today is an association of necessity, led by China and Russia, to help the nations of the Rest of the World protect themselves from the psychopathic West, and the oligarchs in control of it.

Remember the demise of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War? Weren’t those happy times? The “evil” Soviets had been defeated, and now we were all going to live happily ever after. China and even Russia were wooed by the West – old enemies becoming new friends.

However, when the oligarchs of the One Bank learned that Russia and China had no intentions of serving the West (i.e. the Old World Order), this new friendship quickly deteriorated. The next thing we knew, the Corporate media in the West were back to Cold War rhetoric, simply substituting “Russia” for “Soviet Union”.

Russia was first in the cross-hairs because it had never really benefitted from the new (supposed) era of cooperation between East and West. Put another way, the oligarchs had invested nothing in their faux friendship with Russia. Meanwhile, their puppets in the Corrupt West had already begun targeting nations allied to Russia.

One of the ways these puppet governments have been covering up their own campaign of naked aggression is through fabricating a massive blanket of propaganda. Every act of naked aggression by the West was supposedly a “reaction” by these fascist governments to supposed aggression from Russia’s allies or even Russia itself -- or else “the terrorists” (the West’s mercenary henchmen ).

It culminated when the U.S. staged a coup in Ukraine, Russia’s closest neighbour and ally. The coup was justified according to the West because the regime previously in power was corrupt. There are two obvious rebuttals to that pathetically flimsy argument.

There was already an election scheduled in Ukraine in less than six months. Are the Champions of Democracy (what the Corrupt West likes to call itself) telling us that a coup d’etat is better than simply waiting for an election?
If “corruption” was reason enough to stage a revolution, there would already be revolutions-in-progress all over the West itself.

After the U.S. staged that coup, demonization of Russia dramatically escalated, along with the military campaign against Syria – another Russian ally. Economic terrorism was launched against Russia’s economy. The ruble was ruthlessly attacked by the convicted currency manipulators of the One Bank. Oil prices were manipulated dramatically lower, with Barack Obama publicly boasting that this manipulation was “a part of the U.S. strategy” against Russia.

Soon, even China was targeted. China had outlived its usefulness as a (low wage) jurisdiction for Western multinational corporations. The Chinese people now wanted to be paid decent wages, so the oligarchs had already begun to shift their corporate operations to other even lower-wage jurisdictions.

The excuse for (once again) referring to China as an enemy was/is the South China Sea. While the West flexes its muscles by dropping bombs on the heads of people in Africa and Asia, the Western media has been relentlessly demonizing China for building artificial islands in essentially unoccupied waters.

Building islands or dropping bombs? Which is the more deplorable international crime? According to Western media, it is (conveniently) the “crime” of building islands.

This renewed aggression against Russia and China by the West did not spawn the Rest of the World’s “New World Order”. Instead, this aggression is the belated realization by the West’s psychopathic oligarchs of the existence of this new, world order. While the oligarchs have been busy destroying everything in sight, China and Russia were attempting to build something.

Here China has taken the lead with its Belt and Road Initiative . Loosely based upon China’s ancient “Silk Road”, it is the world’s largest project in terms of infrastructure and economic cooperation, even larger than the Marshall Plan at the end of World War II.

The Marshall Plan was an enormously successful initiative where the oligarchs actually worked on fixing all of the damage and destruction they had engineered after manufacturing World War II. In contrast, the Belt and Road Initiative is a plan to economically fortify (first) Asia and (then) the Rest of the World against the Corrupt West.

Along with this, China and Russia have constructed “parallel” economic institutions which now exist side-by-side with similar Western-based institutions. The great joke here is that while China and Russia have publicly spoken of these institutions existing in conjunction with their (corrupted) versions in the West, the oligarchs can clearly see that they are intended to replace Western-based institutions.

With which institutions would the Rest of the World prefer to do business: entities rancid with corruption like the World Bank and the IMF, or an honest broker like the Asia Development Bank?

Constant economic predation. Ever more reckless military acts from ever more-desperate regimes. The psychopathic empire of the One Bank has simply become so intolerable and so dangerous that the Rest of the World is being forced to unite as a mechanism of self-preservation.

This is the New World Order – the real one.

It really is “new”. It really does involve the “world” (except for the Corrupt West). And it really could/should lead to “order”, not the ever-worsening chaos as the One Bank regularly orders its puppet governments to destroy any nation that gets in its way.

What the New World Order is not is any sort of one-world government. What the New World Order is not is some (supposed) “socialist utopia”.

The new, world order being crafted by China and Russia is non-ideological. It is non-controlling. Another great irony here is that as Western regimes have gotten increasingly corrupt, belligerent, and simply evil, the Eastern powers have become relatively more virtuous.

Perhaps it was simply being able to observe how not to run the world (for several decades), but China and Russia have seemingly adopted the doctrine of Enlightened Self-Interest. By helping neighbouring nations and acting as honest brokers in the global community, China and Russia see the surest path to their own prosperity and security.

Another thing that the New World Order is not is perfect. As global powers, China and Russia do not resemble White Knights, merely the lessers-of-evil – much less evil. The New World Order coming into existence today is not some ideologically based pipe-dream. It is a construct of pragmatism, designed to help nations co-exist and (hopefully) prosper. In time, perhaps it will replace the United Nations – another corrupted Western institution.

The real NWO will succeed as the new “order” in the world because the Old World Order has succeeded in making itself obsolete.



Jeff Nielson is co-founder and managing partner of Bullion Bulls Canada; a website which provides precious metals commentary, economic analysis, and mining information to readers and investors. Jeff originally came to the precious metals sector as an investor around the middle of last decade, but with a background in economics and law, he soon decided this was where he wanted to make the focus of his career. His website is www.bullionbullscanada.com.

CounterRevolutionary

Jeff Nielson seems oblivious to all the writings of Karl Marx, including his Gotha Report. Nielson asks:

"What has the OWO (Old World Order) been doing, perpetually and ravenously? Stealing all of the wealth of the masses and piling it atop the own obscene hoards of the oligarchs. That is not “socialism”. Socialism is “share the wealth”, not steal all of the wealth."

I am afraid that "stealing all the wealth" is exactly what socialism is all about. Socialism was designed to put the mixed races back on the government plantation, property-less, that they might perish all the sooner. Marx arose during US Civil War years. Marx's Gotha Report explains his real agenda.

Socialism not only controls the means of production and all the property, it controls the decision making, as "centralized planning," and hence has a monopoly on IDEAS, far more valuable than goods and services.

I suggest Jeff Nielson read the papers of economist and Nobel Prize winner, John Forbes Nash, on "Non Cooperative Games," using game theory to calculate winners and losers in open and closed economies (capitalist free markets vs. socialist centralized planned markets).
http://www.lsi.upc.es/~ia/nash51.pdf

Nash proved mathematically using vectors that one could not only calculate the failure of socialist economies financially, but name the exact date of the collapse of nations. The man was driven mad by his enemies, but his math still holds true. Why do you think the Chinese have a "one baby policy"? They know very well that their population growth would outstrip their production growth under socialism. But they are so arrogant, they do not trust their own people to make rational decisions, they hate their own people. Nixon's Détente was all about Nash's Equilibrium.

CounterRevolutionary

If you really want to end world poverty, shut down the United Nations and its New World Order provoking endless wars.

Write to President Donald Trump at www.whitehouse.gov and ask him to sign into law:
The American Sovereignty Restoration Act, HR 193 and get the United States out of the United Nations.

Dr.Dross

Take the green pill.

pafret Loc: Northeast

Your view of Socialism varies significantly from the classic norm. Ownership of the the means of production by the State and controlled by the community does not have racist elements as you suggest. It is true that socialist nations have reduced their communities to the status of serfs, while the controlling group fattens on what leavings there are left, this is due to human fallibility, not the philosophical concept of equal sharing of benefits. Our Constitution was created primarily to protect ownership of property, because only through such ownership could freedom be achieved.

The hive like mentality that can accept living in Socialistic conditions is unconcerned with who owns ideas or property; the fiction being that they all own that property or ideas. The underpinning conceit is that mankind has been pushed through some cosmic meat grinder and the resulting slush pressed into cookie cutter molds so that each unit is identical in abilities, needs, and wants.

Nash's equilibrium theories are useful in an enormous number of fields but if one party changes strategy or there is mutual cooperation, it does not hold,. What would cause a change in strategy? The author, Jeff Nielson, contends that we have been deluded into fighting phantasms while the real player has concealed his strategy. Nash's equilibrium presumes the players are engaged in the same game but such is not the case and this would necessitate a change in strategy at which time we would then be playing a zero sum game..

Detente was an example of mutual cooperation; the consequences of either party winning would be pyrrhic, given MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) and hence it was not an equilibrium balance. It was rational and successful since we are still here, but the game thought to be resolved has begun anew.

Marx's Gotha letter to the German Socialist party espoused the idea that communism was the logical evolution of capitalism and how he arrived at that conclusion is beyond me. There is a reason that certain people create enterprises, which employ numerous others and it has to do with ability, determination and the will to succeed at any personal cost. Most of us do not have one or more of those elements and there is no way that the workers will simply do as well or better than the owner. He also postulated the communist mantra "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs." and this is the submerged rock that caused every communistic community in the United States to founder. In literature this problem is exemplified by Orwell's "Animal Farm". The needs of those who produce little or nothing always seem greater than the needs of those with ability. A well known phenomena is that "eighty percent of the work is done by twenty percent of the workers" and for those who have worked in situations other than rigid production lines know this to be a trueism. There is no cookie mold man, abilities, work ethics, diligence and sloth are all different in different individuals.

CounterRevolutionary

Pafret writes:
"Your view of Socialism varies significantly from the classic norm. Ownership of the the means of production by the State and controlled by the community does not have racist elements as you suggest...."

CR responds: Oh, gimme a break! "I love you but --- you are too stupid to manage your own affairs, so hand over all your weapons, paychecks and property, and I will take care of you stupid little jerks, but I love you" ?????? Try to convince me!

Pafret writes:
"Marx's Gotha letter to the German Socialist party espoused the idea that communism was the logical evolution of capitalism and how he arrived at that conclusion is beyond me...."

CR responds: Right! "Each according to his ability, each according to his needs," is Marx's last response to the Spartans' question about wages for people who have different production rates. But what happens if the State determines you have no ability, asked the German Communist Party (Spartans) advocates in the National German Socialist Workers Party (NAZIs): the Eugenics of Euthanasia? Read Andrew Carnegie's "Wealth" exposing the role of monopolies, the power of a communist to organize and manage thousands of workers. Monopolies would consume small businesses through mergers and acquisitions and then, in turn, be nationalized by the State under socialism, and after the "idle rich and idle poor" were exterminated in the gulag prison chains, they would achieve their communist Utopia. Capitalists can be commies, too.
http://wps.prenhall.com/wps/media/objects/107/110273/ch20_a1_d1.pdf

Pafret writes:
"There is a reason that certain people create enterprises, which employ numerous others and it has to do with ability, determination and the will to succeed at any personal cost."

CR responds: Surely, not at "any cost" but by determination and hard work. Passion is the key factor behind risk taking. This is the character of 99% of United States citizens, not unusual at all. We have welfare for handicapped, but putting an entire nation on the welfare of socialism is absurd and spells the extinction of the human race!
Welfare for the masses is the alibi of tyrants. Quote Albert Camus.

Parfret, you really need to take a second look at Marx's letters and that Gotha Report to understand how the German Communist Party of Spartans morphed into the Nazi Party Platform that Hitler rose to power on. Don't just read Marx's propaganda in the Communist Manifesto and Das Capital, read his letters and look at his time period of the US Civil War and emancipation of the slaves and revolts against colonialism beginning around the world. The Intelligentsia, the old aristocrats and the new aristocrats, the nouveau educated, were panicking.

susanblange Loc: USA

The "New World Order" is another name for the Kingdom Of God. It will be established on earth by the Messiah and he will reign and rule forever. This government will be characterized by justice and peace. The Messiah will also never be corrupted. The NWO is the Kingdom of Heaven on earth. The Messiah is here and this could happen at any time now.

CounterRevolutionary

This is an interesting interpretation, but I don't think Jeff Nielson has this in mind. Mr. Nielson has swallowed the commie cool aid.

pafret Loc: Northeast

You obviously have never been exposed to any entrepreneurs, who put their personal lives on hold, to make their businesses grow. I have known several and they typically worked fourteen hour days. Most of them thought weekends were for catching up on the work they didn't get done Monday through Friday. Some of them had families and a few managed to keep them. If you think the ability to create businesses is so common why aren't we buried in firms calling for more laborers?

Advising me to read more books and bringing in the excesses of the German socialist was not germane to the original comments or my commentary. I don't need any exercises, you are not the Professor and I am not your student. You can learn all you need to know about socialism in Hayek's "The road to Serfdom".

Starting off your response by telling me I am stupid is insulting and more than a little impolitic. As soon as I send this you are going to join the assholes on my ignore list. You can't conduct a civil discourse then I want no interaction with you at all.