One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The Problem With Calling All Republicans Racist
Page <<first <prev 17 of 22 next> last>>
Apr 28, 2017 06:28:55   #
Ve'hoe
 
Even in his own BS about his father,,, keeping him from "rambling"... he is telling someone who doesnt know him,,
a whole pack of lies,,,,,
Even the new person could see the dichotomy of what he was claiming and how he acted,,, knowing that the two do not match.

That was one of the main problems I had with him when he was Khh1,,,, he always claimed to be "responding in kind",,, yet I never called him a single racist name.... his response was always, still is,,, "Im not wasting my time going back on some b-tch as-ed h-mosexual fight..."

It is my experience, that education, and the demands of leadership, are not conducive to lying, hate, and such anger... people like that cannot control it... which is why he is here to get the respect he feels cheated out of. It is unlikely that any of it is true.. at least the symptoms he reveals,,, (changing his name, when even HE realizes he has gone too far) are a source of embarrassment to him,,, and he "re-invents himself.......However, being uneducated, he is aghast that people can recognize him by his writing.....

Wherever he goes,, He brings HIMSELF along.........



eagleye13 wrote:
Ve'hoe; That was a gooood outing of Kevin/Khh1/Democrat in 2016/Prog One.
What a goombah

Reply
Apr 28, 2017 07:39:31   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Ve'hoe; Thank you for adding more clarity to the real Progressive One.
"It is my experience, that education, and the demands of leadership, are not conducive to lying, hate, and such anger... people like that cannot control it... which is why he is here to get the respect he feels cheated out of. It is unlikely that any of it is true.. at least the symptoms he reveals,," - Ve'hoe
You nailed Progressive One on his name changing! He can't hide style. A keeper!!!!

But,,, you are one of the worst racists here...... Kevin,,, that is why you have had to change your avatar and name several times......first you were Khh1 then Democrat in 2016,, now prog one,,,,,,,

Here are some of your quotes,,,, and I have never called you a racist name... how do you explain that,,, other than lying like you did here???
A Democrat In 2016 wrote:
br 1. yeah and your mom gave her twat away while... (show quote)

Khh1 wrote:
. YOU LITTLE DELUSIONAL CUNT, THIS IS WHAT YOU SAI... (show quote)


Progressive One wrote:
you're probably right but I do spend a lot of my t... (show quote)

I am on PO2016 like stink on a skunk.


Ve'hoe wrote:
Even in his own BS about his father,,, keeping him from "rambling"... he is telling someone who doesnt know him,,
a whole pack of lies,,,,,
Even the new person could see the dichotomy of what he was claiming and how he acted,,, knowing that the two do not match.

That was one of the main problems I had with him when he was Khh1,,,, he always claimed to be "responding in kind",,, yet I never called him a single racist name.... his response was always, still is,,, "Im not wasting my time going back on some b-tch as-ed h-mosexual fight..."



It is my experience, that education, and the demands of leadership, are not conducive to lying, hate, and such anger... people like that cannot control it... which is why he is here to get the respect he feels cheated out of. It is unlikely that any of it is true.. at least the symptoms he reveals,,, (changing his name, when even HE realizes he has gone too far) are a source of embarrassment to him,,, and he "re-invents himself.......However, being uneducated, he is aghast that people can recognize him by his writing.....

Wherever he goes,, He brings HIMSELF along.........
Even in his own BS about his father,,, keeping him... (show quote)



Reply
Apr 28, 2017 09:19:59   #
Big Bass
 
Ve'hoe wrote:
But,,, you are one of the worst racists here...... Kevin,,, that is why you have had to change your avatar and name several times......first you were Khh1 then Democrat in 2016,, now prog one,,,,,,,

Here are some of your quotes,,,, and I have never called you a racist name... how do you explain that,,, other than lying like you did here???


A great collection! Also, add cool breeze and theotts.
He is the vilest hating-racist bigot on OPP. He was practicing his usual rhetorical invective on me so I called him a ni@@er. He said I was a racist, because he speaks for all our black communities, and if I call him out, I am talking to all black folks. Not only a hypocrite, but one with delusions of grandeur.

Reply
Apr 28, 2017 12:15:39   #
samtheyank
 
eagleye13 wrote:
Ve'hoe; Thank you for adding more clarity to the real Progressive One.
"It is my experience, that education, and the demands of leadership, are not conducive to lying, hate, and such anger... people like that cannot control it... which is why he is here to get the respect he feels cheated out of. It is unlikely that any of it is true.. at least the symptoms he reveals,," - Ve'hoe
You nailed Progressive One on his name changing! He can't hide style. A keeper!!!!

But,,, you are one of the worst racists here...... Kevin,,, that is why you have had to change your avatar and name several times......first you were Khh1 then Democrat in 2016,, now prog one,,,,,,,

Here are some of your quotes,,,, and I have never called you a racist name... how do you explain that,,, other than lying like you did here???
A Democrat In 2016 wrote:
br 1. yeah and your mom gave her twat away while... (show quote)

Khh1 wrote:
. YOU LITTLE DELUSIONAL CUNT, THIS IS WHAT YOU SAI... (show quote)


Progressive One wrote:
you're probably right but I do spend a lot of my t... (show quote)

I am on PO2016 like stink on a skunk.

I try to be civil to him, but he is a sad and lost soul. Full of anger, rage and he directs it towards people he doesn't like. Whether he has all that education is another story. I remember when I was a kid I use to bullshut all these women I use to date. When I found the Love of my Life, I did the samething to her. When she found out I was a liar and a fraud, she gave me my walking papers. She ended up in the arms of another man. I was devastated by that event. As a result, I cleaned up my act and realized the purpose of honesty and truth in who and what you are as a person.


Ve'hoe; Thank you for adding more clarity to the r... (show quote)

Reply
Apr 28, 2017 12:56:49   #
Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ
 
Ve'hoe wrote:
Even in his own BS about his father,,, keeping him from "rambling"... he is telling someone who doesnt know him,,
a whole pack of lies,,,,,
Even the new person could see the dichotomy of what he was claiming and how he acted,,, knowing that the two do not match.

That was one of the main problems I had with him when he was Khh1,,,, he always claimed to be "responding in kind",,, yet I never called him a single racist name.... his response was always, still is,,, "Im not wasting my time going back on some b-tch as-ed h-mosexual fight..."

It is my experience, that education, and the demands of leadership, are not conducive to lying, hate, and such anger... people like that cannot control it... which is why he is here to get the respect he feels cheated out of. It is unlikely that any of it is true.. at least the symptoms he reveals,,, (changing his name, when even HE realizes he has gone too far) are a source of embarrassment to him,,, and he "re-invents himself.......However, being uneducated, he is aghast that people can recognize him by his writing.....

Wherever he goes,, He brings HIMSELF along.........
Even in his own BS about his father,,, keeping him... (show quote)


The two of you seem to know that prevaricator very well.

Reply
Apr 28, 2017 13:02:27   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Louie27 wrote:
The two of you seem to know that prevaricator very well.

Yep; PO has been hung by his own tongue and (key board pounders)

Reply
Apr 29, 2017 10:05:36   #
Ve'hoe
 
strangest of all,, is no response from him????

eagleye13 wrote:
Yep; PO has been hung by his own tongue and (key board pounders)

Reply
May 1, 2017 21:55:36   #
Nuclearian Loc: I live in a Fascist, Liberal State
 
PeterS wrote:
It's a question of propensity. Conservatives have a stronger propensity towards racism than do liberals. Does that mean all conservatives are racist, no, only if you are a racist you are more likely a conservative too. And what conservatives forget is that the Democratic party is was founded by southern conservatives. Its as the parties traded positions, conservative for liberal, that the propensity for racism migrated towards the republican party. The one truth about racism is that where ever you find conservatives you will find those with the highest propensity to be racists and you can take that to the bank.

As for shutting down dialogue--so long as conservatives refuse to face who they are there will be no constructive dialogue between the two parties. I mean after all, in 1860 the Republican party was made up of northern liberals as it is largely today. The question I have for you republicans is--are you northern liberals or southern conservatives? Because if you are conservative then the democratic party was your original home...
It's a question of propensity. Conservatives have ... (show quote)


Conservatives are racist? Is that liberal speak for we dont kiss black ass, and talk bad about them behind theirr back, but say how much we love you when you are around? Yes. DEMOCRATS are the racists.

Reply
May 2, 2017 13:08:13   #
Progressive One
 
Let their kids be some obese southern bastards and then take away their health care.....pain and suffering for the poor....the GOP way:

USDA to ease school-meal rules
Chief says he’ll loosen the tough nutritional standards championed by Michelle Obama.
AGRICULTURE Secretary Sonny Perdue has lunch with students at Catoctin Elementary in Leesburg, Va. One lawmaker condemned the rule change: “This isn’t about flexibility; it’s about making kids less healthy.” (Carolyn Kaster Associated Press)
By Melissa Etehad
Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue said Monday that he would roll back part of former First Lady Michelle Obama’s healthy eating initiative: stricter nutritional standards for school lunches.
Perdue, who became head of the agency last week, announced he would be relaxing guidelines and providing greater flexibility in nutrition requirements for schools’ meal programs.
“This announcement is the result of years of feedback from students, schools and food service experts about the challenges they are facing in meeting the final regulations for school meals,” Perdue said during a visit to Catoctin Elementary School in Leesburg, Va.
“If kids aren’t eating the food, and it’s ending up in the trash, they aren’t getting any nutrition — thus undermining the intent of the program,” said Perdue, who was accompanied by Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan.) and Patricia Montague of the School Nutrition Assn.
Under the changes to the federal nutrition standards, schools won’t have to cut salt in meals, states will be able to allow some schools to serve fewer whole grains, and schools will be allowed to serve 1% milk rather than only nonfat milk.
Advocates for change on school lunch nutrition have said it’s difficult to meet rules set under the Obama administration.
“We have been wanting flexibility so that schools can serve meals that are both nutritious and palatable,” Montague said during Monday’s announcement. “We don’t want kids wasting their meals by throwing them away. Some of our schools are actually using that food waste as compost. That shouldn’t be happening.”
The Obama administration placed standards on school lunch nutrition in 2010 when it passed the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act. During that time, Michelle Obama was seen by many as a leading advocate in the fight against childhood obesity. She started the Let’s Move! campaign, which sought to encourage children to take part in more physical activity and help provide healthier food options in schools in underserved communities.
The percentage of U.S. children with obesity has more than tripled since the 1970s, causing long-term physical and emotional distress for children, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Children with obesity are at higher risk for having asthma and Type 2 diabetes. Many are bullied and, as a result, are likely to suffer from depression and self-esteem issues.
In 2014, the standards were met with challenges in Congress led by the School Nutrition Assn., which has called the regulations too rigid, and House Republicans who supported the powerful lobbying group’s efforts.
But according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, 97% of schools across the country are implementing the school nutrition standards set by the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act.
The changes announced Monday are seen by some as undermining a bipartisan breakthrough.
“Michelle Obama started a conversation with every mom and dad in America on what they were feeding their kids in a way that didn’t cast judgment,” said Scott Faber, senior vice president from the Environmental Working Group, which specializes in research and advocacy.
“Nothing will change that legacy, but unfortunately today’s actions will delay and undermine Obama’s food policy legacy,” he said.
Politicians and public health advocates have also criticized the rollbacks.
Reps. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) and Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) condemned the Trump administration’s change to nutrition standards for school meals across the country.
“Just days into his new job as Secretary of USDA, Secretary Perdue has decided to put special interests ahead of the health of America’s children,” DeLauro said in a statement.
“The USDA and President Trump have now decided to roll back much of the progress we have made in the fight against rates of childhood obesity and malnutrition,” DeLauro said. “This interim final rule by the USDA is a slippery slope that will completely undermine school breakfast and lunch programs and the USDA should immediately reverse course.”
McGovern said the country should build on the progress made rather than “turn our backs” on youths who rely on the meals.
“This isn’t about flexibility; it’s about making kids less healthy,” McGovern said. “Just because President Trump thinks fast food is a balanced meal doesn’t mean we should lower our standards for our kids.”
The Alliance for a Healthier Generation has worked with more than 35,000 schools to reduce the prevalence of childhood obesity.
“We would not lower standards for reading, writing and arithmetic just because students found them challenging subjects and we should not do it for school nutrition either,” Howell Wechsler, the organization’s chief executive, said in a statement.
melissa.etehad@latimes.com
Twitter: @melissaetehad

Reply
May 2, 2017 19:52:54   #
Ve'hoe
 
But,,, you are one of the worst racists here...... Kevin,,, that is why you have had to change your avatar and name several times......first you were Khh1 then Democrat in 2016,, now prog one,,,,,,,

Here are some of your quotes,,,, and I have never called you a racist name... how do you explain that,,, other than lying like you did here???

Progressive One wrote:

br 1. yeah and your mom gave her twat away while... (show quote)



Khh1 wrote:

. YOU LITTLE DELUSIONAL CUNT, THIS IS WHAT YOU SAI... (show quote)




[quote=Democrat In 2016]
you're probably right but I do spend a lot of my t... (show quote)
Progressive One wrote:
Let their kids be some obese southern bastards and then take away their health care.....pain and suffering for the poor....the GOP way:

USDA to ease school-meal rules
Chief says he’ll loosen the tough nutritional standards championed by Michelle Obama.
AGRICULTURE Secretary Sonny Perdue has lunch with students at Catoctin Elementary in Leesburg, Va. One lawmaker condemned the rule change: “This isn’t about flexibility; it’s about making kids less healthy.” (Carolyn Kaster Associated Press)
By Melissa Etehad
Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue said Monday that he would roll back part of former First Lady Michelle Obama’s healthy eating initiative: stricter nutritional standards for school lunches.
Perdue, who became head of the agency last week, announced he would be relaxing guidelines and providing greater flexibility in nutrition requirements for schools’ meal programs.
“This announcement is the result of years of feedback from students, schools and food service experts about the challenges they are facing in meeting the final regulations for school meals,” Perdue said during a visit to Catoctin Elementary School in Leesburg, Va.
“If kids aren’t eating the food, and it’s ending up in the trash, they aren’t getting any nutrition — thus undermining the intent of the program,” said Perdue, who was accompanied by Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan.) and Patricia Montague of the School Nutrition Assn.
Under the changes to the federal nutrition standards, schools won’t have to cut salt in meals, states will be able to allow some schools to serve fewer whole grains, and schools will be allowed to serve 1% milk rather than only nonfat milk.
Advocates for change on school lunch nutrition have said it’s difficult to meet rules set under the Obama administration.
“We have been wanting flexibility so that schools can serve meals that are both nutritious and palatable,” Montague said during Monday’s announcement. “We don’t want kids wasting their meals by throwing them away. Some of our schools are actually using that food waste as compost. That shouldn’t be happening.”
The Obama administration placed standards on school lunch nutrition in 2010 when it passed the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act. During that time, Michelle Obama was seen by many as a leading advocate in the fight against childhood obesity. She started the Let’s Move! campaign, which sought to encourage children to take part in more physical activity and help provide healthier food options in schools in underserved communities.
The percentage of U.S. children with obesity has more than tripled since the 1970s, causing long-term physical and emotional distress for children, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Children with obesity are at higher risk for having asthma and Type 2 diabetes. Many are bullied and, as a result, are likely to suffer from depression and self-esteem issues.
In 2014, the standards were met with challenges in Congress led by the School Nutrition Assn., which has called the regulations too rigid, and House Republicans who supported the powerful lobbying group’s efforts.
But according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, 97% of schools across the country are implementing the school nutrition standards set by the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act.
The changes announced Monday are seen by some as undermining a bipartisan breakthrough.
“Michelle Obama started a conversation with every mom and dad in America on what they were feeding their kids in a way that didn’t cast judgment,” said Scott Faber, senior vice president from the Environmental Working Group, which specializes in research and advocacy.
“Nothing will change that legacy, but unfortunately today’s actions will delay and undermine Obama’s food policy legacy,” he said.
Politicians and public health advocates have also criticized the rollbacks.
Reps. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) and Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) condemned the Trump administration’s change to nutrition standards for school meals across the country.
“Just days into his new job as Secretary of USDA, Secretary Perdue has decided to put special interests ahead of the health of America’s children,” DeLauro said in a statement.
“The USDA and President Trump have now decided to roll back much of the progress we have made in the fight against rates of childhood obesity and malnutrition,” DeLauro said. “This interim final rule by the USDA is a slippery slope that will completely undermine school breakfast and lunch programs and the USDA should immediately reverse course.”
McGovern said the country should build on the progress made rather than “turn our backs” on youths who rely on the meals.
“This isn’t about flexibility; it’s about making kids less healthy,” McGovern said. “Just because President Trump thinks fast food is a balanced meal doesn’t mean we should lower our standards for our kids.”
The Alliance for a Healthier Generation has worked with more than 35,000 schools to reduce the prevalence of childhood obesity.
“We would not lower standards for reading, writing and arithmetic just because students found them challenging subjects and we should not do it for school nutrition either,” Howell Wechsler, the organization’s chief executive, said in a statement.
melissa.etehad@latimes.com
Twitter: @melissaetehad
Let their kids be some obese southern bastards and... (show quote)

Reply
May 3, 2017 12:47:58   #
Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ
 
Progressive One wrote:
Let their kids be some obese southern bastards and then take away their health care.....pain and suffering for the poor....the GOP way:

USDA to ease school-meal rules
Chief says he’ll loosen the tough nutritional standards championed by Michelle Obama.
AGRICULTURE Secretary Sonny Perdue has lunch with students at Catoctin Elementary in Leesburg, Va. One lawmaker condemned the rule change: “This isn’t about flexibility; it’s about making kids less healthy.” (Carolyn Kaster Associated Press)
By Melissa Etehad
Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue said Monday that he would roll back part of former First Lady Michelle Obama’s healthy eating initiative: stricter nutritional standards for school lunches.
Perdue, who became head of the agency last week, announced he would be relaxing guidelines and providing greater flexibility in nutrition requirements for schools’ meal programs.
“This announcement is the result of years of feedback from students, schools and food service experts about the challenges they are facing in meeting the final regulations for school meals,” Perdue said during a visit to Catoctin Elementary School in Leesburg, Va.
“If kids aren’t eating the food, and it’s ending up in the trash, they aren’t getting any nutrition — thus undermining the intent of the program,” said Perdue, who was accompanied by Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan.) and Patricia Montague of the School Nutrition Assn.
Under the changes to the federal nutrition standards, schools won’t have to cut salt in meals, states will be able to allow some schools to serve fewer whole grains, and schools will be allowed to serve 1% milk rather than only nonfat milk.
Advocates for change on school lunch nutrition have said it’s difficult to meet rules set under the Obama administration.
“We have been wanting flexibility so that schools can serve meals that are both nutritious and palatable,” Montague said during Monday’s announcement. “We don’t want kids wasting their meals by throwing them away. Some of our schools are actually using that food waste as compost. That shouldn’t be happening.”
The Obama administration placed standards on school lunch nutrition in 2010 when it passed the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act. During that time, Michelle Obama was seen by many as a leading advocate in the fight against childhood obesity. She started the Let’s Move! campaign, which sought to encourage children to take part in more physical activity and help provide healthier food options in schools in underserved communities.
The percentage of U.S. children with obesity has more than tripled since the 1970s, causing long-term physical and emotional distress for children, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Children with obesity are at higher risk for having asthma and Type 2 diabetes. Many are bullied and, as a result, are likely to suffer from depression and self-esteem issues.
In 2014, the standards were met with challenges in Congress led by the School Nutrition Assn., which has called the regulations too rigid, and House Republicans who supported the powerful lobbying group’s efforts.
But according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, 97% of schools across the country are implementing the school nutrition standards set by the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act.
The changes announced Monday are seen by some as undermining a bipartisan breakthrough.
“Michelle Obama started a conversation with every mom and dad in America on what they were feeding their kids in a way that didn’t cast judgment,” said Scott Faber, senior vice president from the Environmental Working Group, which specializes in research and advocacy.
“Nothing will change that legacy, but unfortunately today’s actions will delay and undermine Obama’s food policy legacy,” he said.
Politicians and public health advocates have also criticized the rollbacks.
Reps. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) and Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) condemned the Trump administration’s change to nutrition standards for school meals across the country.
“Just days into his new job as Secretary of USDA, Secretary Perdue has decided to put special interests ahead of the health of America’s children,” DeLauro said in a statement.
“The USDA and President Trump have now decided to roll back much of the progress we have made in the fight against rates of childhood obesity and malnutrition,” DeLauro said. “This interim final rule by the USDA is a slippery slope that will completely undermine school breakfast and lunch programs and the USDA should immediately reverse course.”
McGovern said the country should build on the progress made rather than “turn our backs” on youths who rely on the meals.
“This isn’t about flexibility; it’s about making kids less healthy,” McGovern said. “Just because President Trump thinks fast food is a balanced meal doesn’t mean we should lower our standards for our kids.”
The Alliance for a Healthier Generation has worked with more than 35,000 schools to reduce the prevalence of childhood obesity.
“We would not lower standards for reading, writing and arithmetic just because students found them challenging subjects and we should not do it for school nutrition either,” Howell Wechsler, the organization’s chief executive, said in a statement.
melissa.etehad@latimes.com
Twitter: @melissaetehad
Let their kids be some obese southern bastards and... (show quote)


So, you believe that is good to throw out food when the kids will not eat it. That sure does not provide any nutrition for the kids, when they will not eat the food.

Reply
Check out topic: Presidential Immunity
May 3, 2017 13:23:03   #
Progressive One
 
Louie27 wrote:
So, you believe that is good to throw out food when the kids will not eat it. That sure does not provide any nutrition for the kids, when they will not eat the food.


fk em...let em go hungry...the little ungrateful fks are too stupid to a)understand nutrition and b) know that there are starving kids all over the world that would be happy for ANYTHING to eat because they have ignorant ass parents who let their kids dictate to them what they will and won't do..........and trust me....a hungry motherfker will eat the food....but let them be some ungrateful fks....those kind always struggle in life when they cannot get what they want because their stupid ass parents accommodated their stupid ass dumbshit....fk em........and when their obese asses get illnesses. hopefully trump will have killed their ObamaCare...I hate ungrateful or selfish ass people......I don't even use the word hate but this could be one of those times.......

Reply
May 3, 2017 16:15:53   #
Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ
 
Progressive One wrote:
fk em...let em go hungry...the little ungrateful fks are too stupid to a)understand nutrition and b) know that there are starving kids all over the world that would be happy for ANYTHING to eat because they have ignorant ass parents who let their kids dictate to them what they will and won't do..........and trust me....a hungry motherfker will eat the food....but let them be some ungrateful fks....those kind always struggle in life when they cannot get what they want because their stupid ass parents accommodated their stupid ass dumbshit....fk em........and when their obese asses get illnesses. hopefully trump will have killed their ObamaCare...I hate ungrateful or selfish ass people......I don't even use the word hate but this could be one of those times.......
fk em...let em go hungry...the little ungrateful f... (show quote)


One question for you. Can you ever respond to a post with out cussing?

Reply
May 3, 2017 16:28:21   #
E
 
Louie27:
Thank Progressive One's cussing. Any poster that starts out like PO just keeps real intelligent people from bothering to read further. Stops PO's crap from going forth with PO BS.

Reply
May 3, 2017 16:41:38   #
Progressive One
 
Louie27 wrote:
One question for you. Can you ever respond to a post with out cussing?


Can I means do I have the ability? yes. Will I means will I choose not to do so? Maybe

Reply
Page <<first <prev 17 of 22 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out topic: End the Deficit in 5 minutes
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.