One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
CNN Accidentally Proves That Trump Didn’t Conspire With The Russians To Steal The Election
Apr 22, 2017 08:20:08   #
Nuclearian Loc: I live in a Fascist, Liberal State
 
CNN, along with MSNBC, are the leading propaganda outlets for the anti-Trump resistance. These fake news sources will broadcast any unfounded rumor or baseless accusation as long as it portrays the President in an unfavorable light. That’s what makes this most recent piece so puzzling. CNN pretty much just proved that Donald Trump and his campaign did not collude with the Russians to steal the election from Hillary Clinton. I think this was unintentional as the liberal media is trying desperately to have Trump impeached for this made up crime.

As you may have noticed, the liberal media and democrats have been pushing this bullshit conspiracy theory that says Trump and his campaign coordinated with the Kremlin and Russian intelligence agents to influence the outcome of last November’s election, thus robbing Queen Hillary of her rightful place on the throne. Despite a dishonest media and an investigation that has been going on since last summer, not one shred of evidence has been produced to support this fantasy story. CNN has been at the forefront of this disinformation campaign, but they done f*cked up and put this story out today:

Sources: Russia tried to use Trump advisers to infiltrate campaign


The FBI gathered intelligence last summer that suggests Russian operatives tried to use Trump advisers, including Carter Page, to infiltrate the Trump campaign, according to US officials.

The new information adds to the emerging picture of how the Russians tried to influence the 2016 election, not only through email hacks and propaganda but also by trying to infiltrate the Trump orbit. The intelligence led to an investigation into the coordination of Trump’s campaign associates and the Russians.

Stay with me on this one: if the Russians were trying to infiltrate the Trump campaign, that means that they weren’t coordinating with it, right? Why would they try to infiltrate if they were already working with Trump’s people? This story totally busts the liberal narrative that Trump worked with the Russians to “steal” the election.

It’s very simple: if Trump was colluding with the Russians, then they wouldn’t be attempting to get inside his campaign because they’d already be in the door. Therefore, this CNN piece completely exonerates Trump and his campaign for any collusion with the Russians to influence the election.

It should be noted that the CNN piece doesn’t even suggest that the Russians were successful in infiltrating Trump’s campaign, so by the network’s own admission, Trump did nothing wrong.

The big question here is: if CNN admits that Trump didn’t secretly work with the Russians, why don’t they just come out and say it? The problem is liberals are full of shit and one of the biggest issues with being full of shit is it gets hard to keep your shit straight. I don’t think the liberal bullshitters at CNN even realize this this story totally busts their conspiracy theory.

The other factor keeping CNN from coming clean is that they’ve put everything they have into attacking the President and they don’t even know how to cover real news anymore. If they drop the Trump/Russia conspiracy story the’ll have nothing but dead airspace or hours of Wolf Blitzer picking things out of his beard.

Reply
Apr 22, 2017 08:35:54   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
Nuclearian wrote:
CNN, along with MSNBC, are the leading propaganda outlets for the anti-Trump resistance. These fake news sources will broadcast any unfounded rumor or baseless accusation as long as it portrays the President in an unfavorable light. That’s what makes this most recent piece so puzzling. CNN pretty much just proved that Donald Trump and his campaign did not collude with the Russians to steal the election from Hillary Clinton. I think this was unintentional as the liberal media is trying desperately to have Trump impeached for this made up crime.

As you may have noticed, the liberal media and democrats have been pushing this bullshit conspiracy theory that says Trump and his campaign coordinated with the Kremlin and Russian intelligence agents to influence the outcome of last November’s election, thus robbing Queen Hillary of her rightful place on the throne. Despite a dishonest media and an investigation that has been going on since last summer, not one shred of evidence has been produced to support this fantasy story. CNN has been at the forefront of this disinformation campaign, but they done f*cked up and put this story out today:

Sources: Russia tried to use Trump advisers to infiltrate campaign


The FBI gathered intelligence last summer that suggests Russian operatives tried to use Trump advisers, including Carter Page, to infiltrate the Trump campaign, according to US officials.

The new information adds to the emerging picture of how the Russians tried to influence the 2016 election, not only through email hacks and propaganda but also by trying to infiltrate the Trump orbit. The intelligence led to an investigation into the coordination of Trump’s campaign associates and the Russians.

Stay with me on this one: if the Russians were trying to infiltrate the Trump campaign, that means that they weren’t coordinating with it, right? Why would they try to infiltrate if they were already working with Trump’s people? This story totally busts the liberal narrative that Trump worked with the Russians to “steal” the election.

It’s very simple: if Trump was colluding with the Russians, then they wouldn’t be attempting to get inside his campaign because they’d already be in the door. Therefore, this CNN piece completely exonerates Trump and his campaign for any collusion with the Russians to influence the election.

It should be noted that the CNN piece doesn’t even suggest that the Russians were successful in infiltrating Trump’s campaign, so by the network’s own admission, Trump did nothing wrong.

The big question here is: if CNN admits that Trump didn’t secretly work with the Russians, why don’t they just come out and say it? The problem is liberals are full of shit and one of the biggest issues with being full of shit is it gets hard to keep your shit straight. I don’t think the liberal bullshitters at CNN even realize this this story totally busts their conspiracy theory.

The other factor keeping CNN from coming clean is that they’ve put everything they have into attacking the President and they don’t even know how to cover real news anymore. If they drop the Trump/Russia conspiracy story the’ll have nothing but dead airspace or hours of Wolf Blitzer picking things out of his beard.
CNN, along with MSNBC, are the leading propaganda ... (show quote)


You should have kept reading. The report says that the FBI has proof that there WAS collusion, but haven't determined criminality yet. Stay tuned!

Reply
Apr 22, 2017 08:49:34   #
Nuclearian Loc: I live in a Fascist, Liberal State
 
lpnmajor wrote:
You should have kept reading. The report says that the FBI has proof that there WAS collusion, but haven't determined criminality yet. Stay tuned!


Still have that tin foil cap on?

Reply
 
 
Apr 22, 2017 08:54:09   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Nuclearian wrote:
CNN, along with MSNBC, are the leading propaganda outlets for the anti-Trump resistance. These fake news sources will broadcast any unfounded rumor or baseless accusation as long as it portrays the President in an unfavorable light. That’s what makes this most recent piece so puzzling. CNN pretty much just proved that Donald Trump and his campaign did not collude with the Russians to steal the election from Hillary Clinton. I think this was unintentional as the liberal media is trying desperately to have Trump impeached for this made up crime.

As you may have noticed, the liberal media and democrats have been pushing this bullshit conspiracy theory that says Trump and his campaign coordinated with the Kremlin and Russian intelligence agents to influence the outcome of last November’s election, thus robbing Queen Hillary of her rightful place on the throne. Despite a dishonest media and an investigation that has been going on since last summer, not one shred of evidence has been produced to support this fantasy story. CNN has been at the forefront of this disinformation campaign, but they done f*cked up and put this story out today:

Sources: Russia tried to use Trump advisers to infiltrate campaign


The FBI gathered intelligence last summer that suggests Russian operatives tried to use Trump advisers, including Carter Page, to infiltrate the Trump campaign, according to US officials.

The new information adds to the emerging picture of how the Russians tried to influence the 2016 election, not only through email hacks and propaganda but also by trying to infiltrate the Trump orbit. The intelligence led to an investigation into the coordination of Trump’s campaign associates and the Russians.

Stay with me on this one: if the Russians were trying to infiltrate the Trump campaign, that means that they weren’t coordinating with it, right? Why would they try to infiltrate if they were already working with Trump’s people? This story totally busts the liberal narrative that Trump worked with the Russians to “steal” the election.

It’s very simple: if Trump was colluding with the Russians, then they wouldn’t be attempting to get inside his campaign because they’d already be in the door. Therefore, this CNN piece completely exonerates Trump and his campaign for any collusion with the Russians to influence the election.

It should be noted that the CNN piece doesn’t even suggest that the Russians were successful in infiltrating Trump’s campaign, so by the network’s own admission, Trump did nothing wrong.

The big question here is: if CNN admits that Trump didn’t secretly work with the Russians, why don’t they just come out and say it? The problem is liberals are full of shit and one of the biggest issues with being full of shit is it gets hard to keep your shit straight. I don’t think the liberal bullshitters at CNN even realize this this story totally busts their conspiracy theory.

The other factor keeping CNN from coming clean is that they’ve put everything they have into attacking the President and they don’t even know how to cover real news anymore. If they drop the Trump/Russia conspiracy story the’ll have nothing but dead airspace or hours of Wolf Blitzer picking things out of his beard.
CNN, along with MSNBC, are the leading propaganda ... (show quote)


CBS published an article that said the CIA is on a massive man hunt for the leaker of the emails and that it was this person, affiliated with the CIA that put in motion the conspiracy of the TRUMP/RUSSIA garbage...Time tells all, it will be interesting to see take place..I'll see if I can find the article for you...Read it the other day~

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/cia-fbi-on-manhunt-for-leaker-who-gave-top-secret-documents-to-wikileaks/

Reply
Apr 22, 2017 09:47:03   #
pafret Loc: Northeast
 
lindajoy wrote:
CBS published an article that said the CIA is on a massive man hunt for the leaker of the emails and that it was this person, affiliated with the CIA that put in motion the conspiracy of the TRUMP/RUSSIA garbage...Time tells all, it will be interesting to see take place..I'll see if I can find the article for you...Read it the other day~

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/cia-fbi-on-manhunt-for-leaker-who-gave-top-secret-documents-to-wikileaks/


The likelihood of the CIA finding the leaker is zero! They already know there were about 100 individuals who had access to the information; polygraphs and interrogation would have revealed the individual in short order. They may select a sacrificial goat and manufacture proof of guilt. Alternatively, if they cannot pinpoint the guilty party, a small group of potential perpetrators will have sudden heart attacks or swallow a spoon while eating soup.

The reality is that whoever did this knew the access pool was limited and if he was a member of that group he would come under suspicion. It is probably someone the CIA doesn't know had the ability to see those files. This individual could be a double agent or someone being blackmailed, by a foreign power's intelligence service. That spy agency could have supplied him with hacking technology, to obtain files, which he should not have been able to access. If he was controlled or simply a traitor, he could turn the files over to Julian Assange, who then can say with absolute honesty that it was a CIA insider who leaked the information.

Win win for the other team; the damning information and secrets are revealed and the CIA goes into a frenzy of purging their own agents -- foreign involvement is completely concealed.

Reply
Apr 22, 2017 10:17:46   #
America Only Loc: From the right hand of God
 
lpnmajor wrote:
You should have kept reading. The report says that the FBI has proof that there WAS collusion, but haven't determined criminality yet. Stay tuned!


The FBI has NOT made the statement they have any proof. Of course, from maggots that are dip stick democraps....any lies wil work for you!

Reply
Apr 22, 2017 10:22:04   #
America Only Loc: From the right hand of God
 
Nuclearian wrote:
CNN, along with MSNBC, are the leading propaganda outlets for the anti-Trump resistance. These fake news sources will broadcast any unfounded rumor or baseless accusation as long as it portrays the President in an unfavorable light. That’s what makes this most recent piece so puzzling. CNN pretty much just proved that Donald Trump and his campaign did not collude with the Russians to steal the election from Hillary Clinton. I think this was unintentional as the liberal media is trying desperately to have Trump impeached for this made up crime.

As you may have noticed, the liberal media and democrats have been pushing this bullshit conspiracy theory that says Trump and his campaign coordinated with the Kremlin and Russian intelligence agents to influence the outcome of last November’s election, thus robbing Queen Hillary of her rightful place on the throne. Despite a dishonest media and an investigation that has been going on since last summer, not one shred of evidence has been produced to support this fantasy story. CNN has been at the forefront of this disinformation campaign, but they done f*cked up and put this story out today:

Sources: Russia tried to use Trump advisers to infiltrate campaign


The FBI gathered intelligence last summer that suggests Russian operatives tried to use Trump advisers, including Carter Page, to infiltrate the Trump campaign, according to US officials.

The new information adds to the emerging picture of how the Russians tried to influence the 2016 election, not only through email hacks and propaganda but also by trying to infiltrate the Trump orbit. The intelligence led to an investigation into the coordination of Trump’s campaign associates and the Russians.

Stay with me on this one: if the Russians were trying to infiltrate the Trump campaign, that means that they weren’t coordinating with it, right? Why would they try to infiltrate if they were already working with Trump’s people? This story totally busts the liberal narrative that Trump worked with the Russians to “steal” the election.

It’s very simple: if Trump was colluding with the Russians, then they wouldn’t be attempting to get inside his campaign because they’d already be in the door. Therefore, this CNN piece completely exonerates Trump and his campaign for any collusion with the Russians to influence the election.

It should be noted that the CNN piece doesn’t even suggest that the Russians were successful in infiltrating Trump’s campaign, so by the network’s own admission, Trump did nothing wrong.

The big question here is: if CNN admits that Trump didn’t secretly work with the Russians, why don’t they just come out and say it? The problem is liberals are full of shit and one of the biggest issues with being full of shit is it gets hard to keep your shit straight. I don’t think the liberal bullshitters at CNN even realize this this story totally busts their conspiracy theory.

The other factor keeping CNN from coming clean is that they’ve put everything they have into attacking the President and they don’t even know how to cover real news anymore. If they drop the Trump/Russia conspiracy story the’ll have nothing but dead airspace or hours of Wolf Blitzer picking things out of his beard.
CNN, along with MSNBC, are the leading propaganda ... (show quote)


Frigging retarded democraps...they just do not get it....we voted for Trump...no Russian ever showed up at where we voted...as to anyone letting the cat out of the bag on Hillary...tuff crap! Her being exposed for what she really is...is all that mattered. AND if what was leaked about her was not true...she would be suing like crazy!

One sentence for Democrats...;

The world needs to EXTERMINATE all LIBERALS including DEMOCRATS!

Reply
 
 
Apr 23, 2017 04:08:35   #
CounterRevolutionary
 
America Only wrote:
Frigging retarded democraps...they just do not get it....we voted for Trump...no Russian ever showed up at where we voted...as to anyone letting the cat out of the bag on Hillary...tuff crap! Her being exposed for what she really is...is all that mattered. AND if what was leaked about her was not true...she would be suing like crazy!

One sentence for Democrats...;

The world needs to EXTERMINATE all LIBERALS including DEMOCRATS!


Mellow out, America Only. The Democrats are doing a good job exterminating themselves.

Take a look at this situation where President Obama and Raoul Castro were hijacking the Columbian election:

https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/south-america/item/23975-with-obama-support-santos-gives-colombia-to-marxist-terrorists
The New American
Thursday, 01 September 2016
With Obama Support, Santos Gives Colombia to Marxist Terrorists
Written by Frank de Varona

"As expected, the Colombian Marxist traitor, President Juan Manuel Santos (shown, left), has concluded the peace of the cemetery with the bloody communist guerrillas on August 24, 2016 in Havana, Cuba after nearly four years of negotiations. The agreement is a complete and shameful surrender to the bloody communist rebels of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia, known as FARC), who are responsible for more than 200,000 deaths, tens of thousands of injuries, and millions who were forced to abandon their homes during a more than half-century of conflict assisted in every way by the Cuban regime. The agreement will not bring peace but a future communist take over as happened in El Salvador.

President Santos stated in a televised speech, 'We have reached a final accord, complete and definitive, to end an armed conflict with the FARC.'....” [This is a very long, detailed article, horrific, so read it in full at your leisure.]

In short, President Obama with the help of Raoul Castro has put the FARC terrorist drug cartel on the ballot of the Columbian elections to insure their voice as a 3rd party in the Columbian government - for "peace," peace at any price?. The Columbian citizens voted NO.

World News | Mon Oct 3, 2016 | 12:12am EDT
Colombians reject deal to end 52-year FARC rebel war
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-colombia-peace-idUSKCN12204M

How ironic that President Obama and the Clinton campaign charge the Russians for meddling in the American elections. Why do we hear nothing of this in the Main Stream Media? This is our government attempting to place the largest drug cartel in the world, the FARC, which is a merger of the Golden Triangle, the North Koreans, the Odessa drug cartel, the Mexican gangs, all supplying international terrorism, on the Columbian Parliament as a 3rd Party.

What the hell is the matter with these screwball Democrats? And these same corrupt politicians are trying to frame Carter Page as the secret Russian agent working for the Trump campaign? Why in God's name is nobody saying anything about Obama meddling in the Columbian election?

Reply
Apr 23, 2017 06:59:18   #
QuestGirl Loc: Jayhawk Country
 
pafret wrote:
The likelihood of the CIA finding the leaker is zero! They already know there were about 100 individuals who had access to the information; polygraphs and interrogation would have revealed the individual in short order. They may select a sacrificial goat and manufacture proof of guilt. Alternatively, if they cannot pinpoint the guilty party, a small group of potential perpetrators will have sudden heart attacks or swallow a spoon while eating soup.

The reality is that whoever did this knew the access pool was limited and if he was a member of that group he would come under suspicion. It is probably someone the CIA doesn't know had the ability to see those files. This individual could be a double agent or someone being blackmailed, by a foreign power's intelligence service. That spy agency could have supplied him with hacking technology, to obtain files, which he should not have been able to access. If he was controlled or simply a traitor, he could turn the files over to Julian Assange, who then can say with absolute honesty that it was a CIA insider who leaked the information.

Win win for the other team; the damning information and secrets are revealed and the CIA goes into a frenzy of purging their own agents -- foreign involvement is completely concealed.
The likelihood of the CIA finding the leaker is ze... (show quote)


Personally, I believe it has something to do with that server of Hillary's. It opened portals into the State Department. From there...who knows where the worm(s) went as it slinked throughout and about Cyberville, USA.

I read back when the "server" story broke (2015?), WND I believe. That the State Department had to peel away their "firewalls" in order to receive Hillary's emails that were sent through her unsecured home brewed server.

Any knowledgeable technological responses to scenario?

Reply
Apr 23, 2017 16:59:29   #
Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ
 
lpnmajor wrote:
You should have kept reading. The report says that the FBI has proof that there WAS collusion, but haven't determined criminality yet. Stay tuned!


Please show the proof to this statement by you.

Reply
Apr 23, 2017 17:05:32   #
Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ
 
pafret wrote:
The likelihood of the CIA finding the leaker is zero! They already know there were about 100 individuals who had access to the information; polygraphs and interrogation would have revealed the individual in short order. They may select a sacrificial goat and manufacture proof of guilt. Alternatively, if they cannot pinpoint the guilty party, a small group of potential perpetrators will have sudden heart attacks or swallow a spoon while eating soup.

The reality is that whoever did this knew the access pool was limited and if he was a member of that group he would come under suspicion. It is probably someone the CIA doesn't know had the ability to see those files. This individual could be a double agent or someone being blackmailed, by a foreign power's intelligence service. That spy agency could have supplied him with hacking technology, to obtain files, which he should not have been able to access. If he was controlled or simply a traitor, he could turn the files over to Julian Assange, who then can say with absolute honesty that it was a CIA insider who leaked the information.

Win win for the other team; the damning information and secrets are revealed and the CIA goes into a frenzy of purging their own agents -- foreign involvement is completely concealed.
The likelihood of the CIA finding the leaker is ze... (show quote)


Who says they have not already found the leakier. With only about 100 to check, that should not take to much time.

Reply
 
 
Apr 23, 2017 17:17:40   #
pafret Loc: Northeast
 
Louie27 wrote:
Who says they have not already found the leakier. With only about 100 to check, that should not take to much time.


Have there been any unexplained sudden deaths in the CIA Roster? Any charges filed? This is another leak to the Lame Stream Media in the hopes of stampeding someone into an error which will pinpoint him. My money is still on the cockroach behind the baseboards.

Reply
Apr 23, 2017 17:27:26   #
QuestGirl Loc: Jayhawk Country
 
pafret wrote:
Have there been any unexplained sudden deaths in the CIA Roster? Any charges filed? This is another leak to the Lame Stream Media in the hopes of stampeding someone into an error which will pinpoint him. My money is still on the cockroach behind the baseboards.


Where there is one, there are hundreds!

Reply
Apr 23, 2017 19:42:23   #
CounterRevolutionary
 
CounterRevolutionary wrote:
Mellow out, America Only. The Democrats are doing a good job exterminating themselves.

Take a look at this situation where President Obama and Raoul Castro were hijacking the Columbian election:

https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/south-america/item/23975-with-obama-support-santos-gives-colombia-to-marxist-terrorists
The New American
Thursday, 01 September 2016
With Obama Support, Santos Gives Colombia to Marxist Terrorists
Written by Frank de Varona

"As expected, the Colombian Marxist traitor, President Juan Manuel Santos (shown, left), has concluded the peace of the cemetery with the bloody communist guerrillas on August 24, 2016 in Havana, Cuba after nearly four years of negotiations. The agreement is a complete and shameful surrender to the bloody communist rebels of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia, known as FARC), who are responsible for more than 200,000 deaths, tens of thousands of injuries, and millions who were forced to abandon their homes during a more than half-century of conflict assisted in every way by the Cuban regime. The agreement will not bring peace but a future communist take over as happened in El Salvador.

President Santos stated in a televised speech, 'We have reached a final accord, complete and definitive, to end an armed conflict with the FARC.'....” [This is a very long, detailed article, horrific, so read it in full at your leisure.]

In short, President Obama with the help of Raoul Castro has put the FARC terrorist drug cartel on the ballot of the Columbian elections to insure their voice as a 3rd party in the Columbian government - for "peace," peace at any price?. The Columbian citizens voted NO.

World News | Mon Oct 3, 2016 | 12:12am EDT
Colombians reject deal to end 52-year FARC rebel war
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-colombia-peace-idUSKCN12204M

How ironic that President Obama and the Clinton campaign charge the Russians for meddling in the American elections. Why do we hear nothing of this in the Main Stream Media? This is our government attempting to place the largest drug cartel in the world, the FARC, which is a merger of the Golden Triangle, the North Koreans, the Odessa drug cartel, the Mexican gangs, all supplying international terrorism, on the Columbian Parliament as a 3rd Party.

What the hell is the matter with these screwball Democrats? And these same corrupt politicians are trying to frame Carter Page as the secret Russian agent working for the Trump campaign? Why in God's name is nobody saying anything about Obama meddling in the Columbian election?
Mellow out, America Only. The Democrats are doing ... (show quote)


Here's a second example of President Obama and the Secretary of State meddling with foreign elections, this one in Macedonia:

https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/25855-judicial-watch-soros-using-us-funds-to-help-overthrow-macedonian-government
Friday, 21 April 2017
Judicial Watch: Soros Using U.S. Funds to Help Overthrow Macedonian Government
Written by Bob Adelmann

"... [b]Judicial Watch, a conservative non-partisan government watchdog group, said in its suit that USAID, working with radical elements inside the DOS [Department of State] (left over from the Obama administration), have disbursed $5 million to Soros-backed groups in Macedonia through Soros' Open Society Foundation-Macedonia, with another $9.5 million due to be disbursed over the next several years...
Soros’ activities have not gone unnoticed in Washington. On January 17, 2017, Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah) sent a letter to Ambassador to Macedonia Jess Baily — an Obama holdover who remains at State — asking him to explain the State Department’s relationship with Soros’ Open Society Foundations. Lee said, in part, “I have received credible reports that, over the past few years, the US Mission to Macedonia actively intervened in the party politics of Macedonia, as well as the shaping of its media environment and civil society, often favoring groups of one political persuasion over another.”

When members of Lee’s staff met with Macedonian lawmakers, they presented Lee’s people with a 40-page dossier put together by that country’s citizens, entitled “Stop Operation Soros.” That report provided the details of where U.S. monies were being used by Soros’ “infantry” to support far-left causes, including instigating violent riots in the streets. It also connected the flow of U.S. dollars to the translation of Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals for that “infantry” to use in infiltrating and turning over the Macedonian government.

On February 24, Representatives Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) and Chris Smith (R-N.J.), among others, called on the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to conduct an investigation and audit of the DOS/USAID’s activities in Macedonia, looking to see if there is any interference in domestic affairs there, which would be a violation of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.

When its request for records from DOS/USAID was ignored by Baily, Judicial Watch filed suit..."


Why isn't this news on the front pages of the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, or the topic of Rachel Maddow and Megan Kelley's investigations? Not even Rupert Murdoch's media empire is covering these Soros - Obama fiascos. Oh, right, Rupert Murdoch is also a high-wheeler in the Bilderberg Group.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.