A little support for the south
Apr 27, 2017 08:07:06 #
Loki wrote:
You certainly think a lot of yourself. God knows why. A stupid bastard who has no idea what the Constitution says about secession considers it treason because HE thinks it is. You have no idea what the rulings were, where or how to find it. You are an ignorant piece of shit who is easily offended because your parochial, bigoted opinions are all you have.
Do you not think a lot of yourself?
Like you recommended, go read the FIRST AMENDMENT, prove I'm wrong to have an opinion that doesn't agree with yours. That's why it's called an opinion.
In what way was I offended, do I sound like I'm offended, you're the one forking out insults.
Apr 27, 2017 08:49:15 #
Dummy Boy wrote:
Do you not think a lot of yourself?
Like you recommended, go read the FIRST AMENDMENT, prove I'm wrong to have an opinion that doesn't agree with yours. That's why it's called an opinion.
In what way was I offended, do I sound like I'm offended, you're the one forking out insults.
Like you recommended, go read the FIRST AMENDMENT, prove I'm wrong to have an opinion that doesn't agree with yours. That's why it's called an opinion.
In what way was I offended, do I sound like I'm offended, you're the one forking out insults.
Why, you were offended when that nasty old Constitution disagreed with your poorly reasoned opinion. You were even more offended when your stupidity was pointed out to you.
Apr 27, 2017 09:06:34 #
Loki wrote:
Why, you were offended when that nasty old Constitution disagreed with your poorly reasoned opinion. You were even more offended when your stupidity was pointed out to you.
The first amendment doesn't require it to be a "reasoned opinion". An opinion is an opinion.
It appears that you need to reread the first amendment again and again, because it isn't sinking in.
I don't care what law is contrarian to my OPINION, I don't like the speed limit either. But it doesn't mean I won't get a speeding ticket for violating the law. My opinion doesn't violate the first amendment anymore than your reasoned OPINION. It doesn't unsupport your OPINION or my OPINION.
...so I'm not offended, but apparently you are offended by my OPINION and the straightforward approach to the first amendment.
Apr 27, 2017 09:22:39 #
Dummy Boy wrote:
The first amendment doesn't require it to be a &qu... (show quote)
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." - See more at: http://constitution.findlaw.com/amendment1.html#sthash.hTzJk3Gz.dpuf
I never said you had no right to expose your ignorance and bigotry in public. I kind of enjoy watching you do it. I have a weakness for Schadenfreude moments.
Apr 27, 2017 09:48:39 #
Loki wrote:
i "Congress shall make no law respecting an ... (show quote)
I prefer bigotry, ignorance is: "the earth is flat", from my perspective, being a traitor, is in the eye of the beholder. Anyhow, a fun exchange is a fun exchange. LOL.
Apr 27, 2017 09:59:55 #
Dummy Boy wrote:
I prefer bigotry, ignorance is: "the earth is flat", from my perspective, being a traitor, is in the eye of the beholder. Anyhow, a fun exchange is a fun exchange. LOL.
Au contraire; ignorance is accusing someone of a crime when they did nothing illegal. Bigotry is believing such drivel.
Apr 27, 2017 10:06:17 #
Loki wrote:
Au contraire; ignorance is accusing someone of a crime when they did nothing illegal. Bigotry is believing such drivel.
LOL: I agree, I'm a bigot and I've said it many times. It won't be the first I have explained this....
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.