One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
Home | Political Digest | Active Topics | Newest Pictures | Search | Login | Register | Help
Not logged in
 

You must be logged in to compose private messages. Please use the Login link at the top.

 
 
The Newest Discussions On Our Forum:
 
Listen....
This is not fair...Millions of people voted for our President,He won very fair. im very frustrated because i was one of these people And ever since then liberals,,FAKE media, dems,and some of the old school Republicans are trying to do everything possible to undermine him, I AM REALLY TICKED OFF!!! STOP THESE NON=SENSE LET HIM DO HIS JOB FOR CRYING OUT LOUD!!Resist,resist,resist does not help anyone. Dont you idiots understand that if our President lose,we will lose too, There are other stories then Russia out there!! STOP THJS BULL SHIT!! HE IS OUR PRESIDENT!! GET IT??
...continue reading this topic >>
 
Dear Mr. President and our Manifest Destiny
Your thoughts unwelcome among these people !!!

Here is a perspective by Dr. Peter Hammond. Dr. Hammond's doctorate is in Theology. He was born in Capetown in 1960, grew up in Rhodesia and converted to Christianity in 1977. Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond's book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat:

Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult. In its fullest form, it is a complete, total, 100% system of life.Angry face with horns

Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social, and military components. The religious component is a beard for all of the other components.

Islamization begins when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their religious privileges.

When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies agree to Muslim demands for their religious privileges, some of the other components tend to creep in as well..

Here's how it works:

As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 3% in any given country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens. This is the case in:

United States -- Muslim 2% Australia -- Muslim 2.5% Canada -- Muslim 2.8% Norway -- Muslim 2.8% China -- Muslim 2.9% Italy -- Muslim 2.5%

At 3% to 8%, they begin to proselytize (Convert or attempt to convert
(someone) from one religion, belief, or opinion to another) from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs.
This is happening in:

Denmark -- Muslim 5% Germany -- Muslim 6.7% United Kingdom -- Muslim 7.7% Spain -- Muslim 8% Thailand -- Muslim 7.6%

From 8% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves -- along with threats for failure to comply.

This is occurring in:

France -- Muslim 12% Philippines -- 9% Sweden -- Muslim 8% Switzerland -- Muslim 8.3% The Netherlands -- Muslim 8.5% Trinidad & Tobago -- Muslim 10.8%

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

When Muslims approach 15% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris, we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam, and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam, with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam.

Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections, in:

Guyana -- Muslim 15% India -- Muslim 19.4% Israel -- Muslim 16% Kenya -- Muslim 18% Russia -- Muslim 21%

After reaching 25%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues, such as in:

Ethiopia -- Muslim 32.8%

At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare, such as in:

Bosnia -- Muslim 40% Chad -- Muslim 53.1% Lebanon -- Muslim 59.7%

From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Joya, the tax placed on infidels, such as in:

Albania -- Muslim 70% Malaysia -- Muslim 60.4% Qatar -- Muslim 77.5% Sudan -- Muslim 70%

After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such as has been experienced and in some ways is on-going in:

Bangladesh -- Muslim 83% Egypt -- Muslim 90% Gaza -- Muslim 98.7% Indonesia -- Muslim 86.1% Iran -- Muslim 98%

Iraq -- Muslim 97% Jordan -- Muslim 92% Morocco -- Muslim 98.7% Pakistan -- Muslim 97% Syria -- Muslim 90% Tajikistan -- Muslim 90% Turkey -- Muslim 99.8% United Arab Emirates -- Muslim 96%

100% will usher in the peace of 'Dar-es-Salaam' -- the Islamic House of Peace.. Here there's supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word, such as in:

Afghanistan -- Muslim 100% Saudi Arabia -- Muslim 100% Somalia -- Muslim 100% Yemen -- Muslim 100%

Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, as in these 100% states the most radical Muslims intimidate and spew hatred, and satisfy their blood lust by killing less radical Muslims, for a variety of reasons.

'Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my other against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; the tribe against the world, and all of us against the infidel. -- Leon Uris, 'The Haj'

It is important to understand that in some countries, with well under 100% Muslim populations, such as France, the minority Muslim populations live in ghettos, within which they are 100% Muslim, and within which they live by Sharia Law. The national police do not even enter these ghettos.

There are no national courts, nor schools, nor non-Muslim religious facilities. In such situations, Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. The children attend madrasses. They learn only the Koran. To even associate with an infidel is a crime punishable with death.

Therefore, in some areas of certain nations, Muslim Imams and extremists exercise more power than the national average would indicate.

Today's 2 billion Muslims make up 28% of the world's population. But their birth rates dwarf the birth rates of Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, and all other believers. Muslims will exceed 50% of the world's population by the end of this century.

Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond's book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat
...continue reading this topic >>
 
Sean Spicer Never Had A Chance
By John Moody

FOX NEWS

Published July 21, 2017

White House press secretary Sean Spicer resigns

Benito Mussolini once said of his country: It’s not impossible to govern Italy. It’s useless.

The same can be said for trying to explain what Donald Trump is thinking and what he’ll do next. That is an exercise in futility and frustration, as Sean Spicer found out this week.

The appointment of Anthony Scaramucci as White House Communications Director left Spicer as a man without a country in the Trump administration. And what Spicer, who resigned Friday, should be thinking is: good luck, pal!

Last year, Fox Business Network was selected to host one of the debates among Republican candidates for president. Spicer at that time was chief strategist and communications director for the Republican National Committee and so was deeply involved in preparations for the event in Charleston, S.C.

I had several interactions with him, and found him to be a man of honor and integrity. When he saw things developing in a way that might not help the Party, he said so. He had the interests of all the candidates in mind, and treated them equally – at least when he was speaking with us.

I was surprised when Sean accepted the job of White House press secretary. The Trump family’s animus toward the news media had been clearly foreshadowed, and he must have known he would quickly be at odds with the journalists he was supposed to keep informed.

What I bet surprised even Sean was the all-out warfare that quickly developed with the White House press corps, which has an inflated opinion of itself and its mission. And that mission, it soon became clear, was to delegitimize Trump’s presidency.

Sean’s temper sometimes boiled over in public, and it didn’t help his image. He was in the unenviable position of walking into a journalistic lion’s den on a daily basis, knowing he would be pummeled mercilessly – but never into submission.

To those Americans who still support Trump, Spicer’s feisty exchanges with reporters were a welcome push-back on a profession for which they have little respect.

When Spicer allowed beyond-the-Beltway journalists to Skype in their questions, the usual suspects camped out in the press briefing room were outraged. How dare you give those country bumpkins direct access to the White House! You have to go through us!

Spicer also exposed the vanity of the presidential press corps. The truth is, they love being on TV. When Sean announced that the daily briefings would be transmitted by audio only, the collective stamping of little feet could be heard clear across the Potomac.

But even as he was settling scores with the press corps, Spicer was being undermined by his so-called colleagues in the administration. Trying to explain accurately what the president was thinking and what he intended to do was downright impossible. Why? Because Spicer was being left out of the meetings where decisions were made and strategy crafted.

Explaining Donald Trump is like handling public relations for Kim Jong Un. And Spicer met the same fate as someone who disappoints the little big man of Pyongyang.

Leave with your head held high, Sean.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
John Moody is Executive Vice President, Executive Editor for FOX NEWS.
...continue reading this topic >>
 
 
Maxine Waters for President??/
HELL NO!!!!
...continue reading this topic >>
 
Breaking News in Mpls
The lesbian police chief in Mpls has resigned. Heavy pressure from many resulted in the resignation. Maybe the mayor will go next.
...continue reading this topic >>
 
Anthony Scaramucci new White House communication director
Sean Spicer is out Anthony Scaramucci is in, Nothing against Sean, but i think Anthony is waaay better. aLL THESE CHANGES ARE EXCITING!!!Ihope this all the excitment there will be for a while.
...continue reading this topic >>
 
Meeting with your County Sheriff
Many of us in Washington County have had our troubles with corporate governance. Myself included. I asked for a received and appointment with my county Sheriff.

What are you doing?
...continue reading this topic >>
 
 
Connections, connections
Even snopes says this is true:

FBI Director James Comey has worked for some organizations that have donated to or partnered with the Clinton Foundation.
...continue reading this topic >>
 
John Kerry's daughter
--43JH.,B60

The Kerry's are about as bad as the Clinton's....now I got this:
Initially, the Peace Corps awarded Dr. Vanessa Kerry’s group — now called Seed Global Health — with a three-year contract
worth $2 million of State Department money on Sept. 10, 2012, documents show. Her father was then the chairman of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, which oversees both the Department of State and the Peace Corps.
Seed secured a four-year extension in September 2015, again without competition. This time, the Peace Corps gave the nonprofit $6.4 million provided by the Department of State while John Kerry was secretary of state.

Nothing surprises me anymore....but sometimes they explain other things.
Who's married to John Kerry's daughter ..
Who knew, Surprise - Surprise!

Nothing ever from the news media on this!

In 2009 the daughter of Secretary of State John Kerry
(Dr. Vanessa Bradford Kerry), married an
Iranian physician named Dr. Brian Vale Nahed.
No mainstream media reported this.

Guess who was the best man at the wedding?
Mohammad Javad Zarif.
So who is Mr. Zarif?, He's just the current
Minister of Foreign Affairs for Iran.
He was Kerry’s chief counterpart in the nuclear deal negotiations that recently concluded .....
meaning Kerry was dealing with his daughter's
father-in-law.
Cozy 'eh what?

source-cfg

State Department Gave Millions To Foundation Led By John Kerry’s Daughter 43j.,b60
September 13, 2016 By Bre Payton
Hillary Clinton isn’t the only secretary of State under the Obama administration to have familial connections to a private, non-profit foundation that has received millions in tax dollars.
Throughout Secretary of State John Kerry’s tenure in public office, his daughter’s private, non-profit organization received more than $9 million in taxpayer funds from government entities he oversaw, The Daily Caller News Foundation’s Ethan Barton reports.
The money trail begins in 2012, when the Peace Corps awarded a $2 million contract to an organization now called Seed Global Health (SGH) launching a partnership with the Peace Corps and the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), which provides 42 health educators to 13 sites in Malawi, Tanzania, and Uganda.
Then-senator John Kerry — whose daughter, Dr. Vanessa Kerry, is the president of SGH — was serving as chairman on the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, which oversees State Department and Peace Corps spending when the contract was approved in 2012.
Internal memos reveal bureaucrats worked with Vanessa Kerry to ensure she would get the contract without having to compete for it and assured her of such in a 2011 meeting — a year before the partnership was approved. Peace Corps directors Buck Buckingham and Sarah Morgenthau and U.S. Ambassador Eric Goosby, who oversaw the State Department funding the contract, assured Vanessa Kerry her organization would get the contract by using a special grant mechanism fast-tracking the approval process.
Minutes from the 2011 meeting state: “Buck obtained clarity of the mechanism by which federal money will be provided to (SGH). . . The process can be fast tracked and non-competed through a specific grant mechanism.”
While John Kerry was serving as secretary of State, the State Department granted a four-year contract extension to SGH worth $6.4 million without competition in 2015. The extension seems to violate the Peace Corps’s own contracting policies, which typically limits non-competitive funding to five years.
The money trail raises questions about the integrity of the State Department. Its collusion with SGH is reminiscent of Hillary Clinton’s involvement with the Clinton Foundation.
While serving as secretary, Hillary Clinton seemed to be influenced by those who wrote large checks to her family’s private charitable organization. Of the private individuals she met with, Clinton spent a majority of her time with Clinton Foundation donors. She also rearranged her schedule in order to accommodate Clinton Foundation bigwigs’ requests for meetings and favors.
Although John Kerry’s level of involvement in the deal remains unclear, at the very least his connections to the people who hold the purse strings certainly didn’t hurt his daughter’s endeavors to snag taxpayer funding for her project.
Bre Payton is a staff writer at The Federalist. Follow her on Twitter.
...continue reading this topic >>
 
former obama national intelligence director refutes hillary ridiculous russian Interference claims: "it wasn't 17"
-47JH.,B43
Former Director of National Intelligence for Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah, James Clapper, appeared on CNN's "The Situation Room" and called into question a talking point that was made by Hillary Clinton during last year's election cycle. Instead of 17 intelligence agencies agreeing on Russian interference, Clapper said it was only three or four.
If you recall, former FBI Director James Comey claims there is no doubt that the Russians interfered in the elections. He was basically claiming the same thing as former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
Situation Room host Jim Sciutto asked, "First on the big picture, In a foreign country next to a foreign leader the day before he meets Russia, the president of Russia, did he just throw the U.S. intelligence community under the bus?"
"Well, it is hard not to reach that conclusion that, exactly so," he said. "First of all, on the number of components in the international community, yes, there are 17; the 16 components by law plus the Office of the Director of National Intelligence."
Clapper went on to expound, "When then president-elect Trump was briefed on this on the 6th of January, there were four of us — meaning the directors of NSA, FBI and CIA and myself. That’s all. And we explained who did the report. So how this narrative got out there about 17 components being involved, I don’t know. But the report itself makes it clear that it was the three agencies plus the Office of the Director of National Intelligence that put this intelligence community assessment together."
"As far as others doing this, boy, that’s news to me," he added. "We saw no evidence whatsoever there was other — there was anyone involved in this other than the Russians."
Clapper then seems to imply that the intelligence community dropped the ball on weapons of mass destruction in Iraq fifteen years ago and have taken steps to ensure that they never do it again.
"As far as the infamous weapons of mass destruction, the national intelligence assessment that was done in October of 2002, I remember it because my fingerprints were on it," he affirmed. "It was 15 years ago. The intelligence community has done a lot of things to make sure that never happens again."
While in Warsaw, Poland for the G-20 summit, President Trump echoed Clapper's comments saying, "It turned out to be three or four. It wasn't 17."
“I heard it was 17 agencies," said Trump. "I said, ‘Boy, that’s a lot. Do we even have that many intelligence agencies, right? Let’s check it.’ And we did some very heavy research. It turned out to be three or four. It wasn’t 17. And many of your compatriots had to change their reporting or they had to apologize or they had to correct."
The Daily Caller reports:
The 17 intelligence agencies claim stems from a misunderstanding of what the intelligence community is and two separate reports by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence in October 2016 and January 2017. The October 2016 statement codified the U.S. intelligence community’s “confidence” that the Russian government was behind the hacking of the Democratic National Committee and likely distribution of emails to Wikileaks. The January 2017 unclassified report also definitively assessed that:
“Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency.”
Clinton and supporters extrapolated use of the word “intelligence community” in both reports to claim that all 17 U.S. intelligence agencies concurred. The number essentially asserts that agencies like the Department of Energy, the Drug Enforcement Agency, and Coast Guard Intelligence were somehow involved in the process.
Why? Well one guess is that to a general electorate, 17 sounds a lot more substantial than three.
Sadly, even after the intelligence community has corrected the Clinton narrative, media correspondents and media reporters continue to promote the lie about the 17 agencies confirming the matter.
Both the AP, who was recently caught up in a CNN-style fake news report, admitted it ran reports on June 2, June 26 and June 29 saying “all 17 U.S. intelligence agencies have agreed that Russia tried to influence the 2016 election to benefit Donald Trump.”
They have lost all credibility with those lies.
The New York Times did the same thing, but later retracted the story and admitted, “the assessment was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence community.”
It actually means less than twenty-five percent of the intelligence community is even in agreement that Russia was involved. Politifact gets a Pants-on-Fire rating.
It's becoming painfully clear that Donald Trump is continuing to expose the fake news of the mainstream media, and it's a wonderful thing to see.
source-freedom outpost, tim brown, soetoro sobarkah, jim sciutto, the daily caller, ap, nyt.
...continue reading this topic >>
 
For more, check out Active Topics page.
 
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2016 IDF International Technologies, Inc.