One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
Posts for: karpenter
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 510 next>>
Aug 21, 2019 15:40:25   #
fullspinzoo wrote:

If Anyone Wants To Say The Federalist
Is A No Credibility Alt Rag

Here's The Source Article From VICE
Cameron Joseph Held The Reid Interview
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/ywadgw/exclusive-harry-reid-of-course-medicare-for-all-and-decriminalizing-border-crossings-are-bad-ideas
 
Aug 21, 2019 15:33:55   #
bmac32 wrote:
Both of our boys were home schooled though the first 9 grades when into a machine shop to become machinists. Neither kid has even been laid off ever.

And It Didn't Cost $40,000 Year
For A Full Curricula Of Social Crap They Don't Need
Aug 21, 2019 12:46:57   #
I Missed Harry
But Progs Will Universally Tell You You're Paranoid, Reactionary
That There's Nothing Wrong
With Encouraging Your Child To Be Gender Confused
Or Exposing Small Children To Any Of This:






Aug 20, 2019 19:07:52   #
emarine wrote:
The IRS collects tax... The CBO reviews tax policy...


And That Changes Everything....
Aug 20, 2019 11:51:44   #
zombinis3 wrote:
Sorry color me embarrassed should have gone a little further back into the records. The contest used by the article was Gore vs Bush;
George W. Bush popular 50,456,002 electoral 271
AL Gores popular 50,999,987 electoral 266 [2]

This changes the view, but still has the same possible outcome of a handful of people picking the winner, If it treads out. Still that particular contest was pretty much in contention.

These Are National Popular Votes
Which Is Not How We Elect Our Presidents
No One Threw Their Electoral Votes, Either
Although Gore Wanted To Change The Rules After The Election

STATES Elect Presidents
The Electoral Votes Of The State
Goes To Who Carried The STATE In The Election

As I Keep Pointing Out
Hillary's 3.2 Million Votes
Came From ONLY ONE State....California
And She Needed 4.5 Million Votes In California To Get It

It Wouldn't Matter If EVERY Vote In California
Had Been Cast For Hillary
Or If She Had Carried California By Only ONE Vote
California Has 58 Electoral Votes,
Regardless Of How Many, OR FEW, People Vote
California Still Gets The SAME Amount Of Electoral Votes
Because The Electoral Votes
Are Based On Congressional Representation
And EVERYONE Has Congressional Representation
Whether They Vote Or Are Too Young To Vote

It's The States That Elect The President

National Popular Vote Interstate Compact
Is High-Jacking The Election Away From The Will Of Their Own Constituents
Aug 20, 2019 05:04:41   #
Seth wrote:
.....want to bring us all down with them.
That's The Problem I Have With Progs
They Won't Just Go Fail On Their Own
They Require Everyone Fail With Them

They're Bludgeoning Us With Their Democracy
 
Aug 20, 2019 04:55:10   #
zombinis3 wrote:
According to the results of the 2000 election between Romy and Obama the college voted against the popular vote in Arizona

No, It Didn't

2012 Election In Arizona
Romney Had 1,233,654 Votes
Obama Had 1,025,232 Votes
Republicans Got All 11 Electoral Votes
Aug 19, 2019 21:07:28   #
National Popular Vote Interstate Compact
With-Out Regard For The Votes Of Their Own State's Citizens

All This Because Hillary's 3.2 Million Votes
Came Only From California's 4.5 Million Votes

With-Out California's 4.5
Hillary Loses The National Popular Vote Too
Aug 19, 2019 16:49:53   #
The Chicken Took Only The One Hour To Cook
They're Resting In The Oven Now
Speaking Of Resting
Looks Like Siesta Time Around Here

My Wife Has Some Wine In The Fridge
Think I'll Enjoy A Couple Ounces...
Aug 19, 2019 16:32:57   #
I Currently Have Chicken Quarters In The EGG
I'm Running Them About 350 With Cherry Smoke
They've Been On Just At One Hour Now
I Separated The Legs, Thighs, Cut Off The Backs

The Backs Are In A Pot On The Camp Stove
Simmering For Stock Outside
I Have My Own Grown Herbs
I've Dropped In Fresh Rosemary, Plus I Have A Bay Laurel Plant
Since I Have Fresh Tender Leaves,
I Finally Know What Bay Really Tastes Like
I'm Going To Save The Schmaltz This Time

So We'll Have Some Chicken A Bit Later
Plus I'll Shred Mine For Carnitas And Quesadillas
Aug 19, 2019 13:36:21   #
Parky60 wrote:
No, we are not a satire site. We are not a conspiracy theory site. The information you are about to read is factually accurate and 100% real despite the ostensible ‘skeptics’ who claim otherwise. The controversial subject of geoengineering or weather modification – which was popularized, and oversimplified with the term “chemtrails” – is once again stepping from the shadows and into the light of public scrutiny. And it may soon be a reality as Harvard scientists plan first ever experiment to spray particles in the sky to dim the sun. Latest News – Dawson County Journal

Harvard Scientists, Funded By Bill Gates, To Begin Spraying Particles Into The Sky To Dim The Sun
Matt Agorist ~ August 3, 2019
Harvard has formed an advisory board to begin moving forward with their plan to spray particles into the stratosphere to test the geoengineering method of dimming the sun…

What was once a conspiracy theory is now the subject of congressional debate, peer-reviewed studies, and now a Harvard experiment. Harvard scientists will attempt to replicate the climate-cooling effect of volcanic eruptions with a world-first solar geoengineering experiment. The university announced this month that it has created an external advisory panel to examine the potential ethical, environmental and geopolitical impacts of this geoengineering project, which has been developed by the university’s researchers.

According to Nature Magazine, Louise Bedsworth, executive director of the California Strategic Growth Council, a state agency that promotes sustainability and economic prosperity, will lead the Harvard advisory panel, the university said on July 29. The other seven members include Earth-science researchers and specialists in environmental and climate law and policy.

What was once a conspiracy theory will soon be a reality—any day now.

Known as the Stratospheric Controlled Perturbation Experiment (SCoPEx), the experiment will spray calcium carbonate particles high above the earth to mimic the effects of volcanic ash blocking out the sun to produce a cooling effect.

The experiment was announced in Nature magazine last year, who was one of few outlets to look into this unprecedented step toward geoengineering the planet. As Nature reported:

If all goes as planned, the Harvard team will be the first in the world to move solar geoengineering out of the lab and into the stratosphere, with a project called the Stratospheric Controlled Perturbation Experiment (SCoPEx). The first phase — a $3 million test involving two flights of a steerable balloon almost 12.5 miles above the southwest United States — could launch as early as the first half of 2019. Once in place, the experiment would release small plumes of calcium carbonate, each of around 100 grams, roughly equivalent to the amount found in an average bottle of off-the-shelf antacid. The balloon would then turn around to observe how the particles disperse.

Naturally, the experiment is concerning to many people, including environmental groups, who, according to Nature, say such efforts are a dangerous distraction from addressing the only permanent solution to climate change: reducing greenhouse-gas emissions.

The idea of injecting particles into the atmosphere to cool the earth also seems outright futile considering what scientists are trying to mimic—volcanic eruptions. If we look at the second largest eruption of the 20th century, Mount Pinatubo, which erupted in the Philippines in 1991, it injected 20 million tons of sulfur dioxide aerosols into the stratosphere. Scientists from the USGS estimated that this 20 million tons only lowered the temperature of the planet by about 1°F (0.5°C) and this only lasted a year because the particles eventually fell to back to Earth.

The Harvard team, led by scientists Frank Keutsch and David Keith, has been working on the SCoPEx project for several years but they haven’t always been in total agreement. In fact, as Nature reported, Keutsch—who is not a climate scientist—previously thought the idea to be “totally insane.” But he’s since changed his mind. As Nature reports:

When he saw Keith talk about the SCoPEx idea at a conference after starting at Harvard in 2015, he says his initial reaction was that the idea was “totally insane”. Then he decided it was time to engage. “I asked myself, an atmospheric chemist, what can I do?” He joined forces with Keith and Anderson, and has since taken the lead on the experimental work.

Adding to the questionable nature of this experiment is the fact that it is largely funded by none other than Microsoft co-founder, Bill Gates. Gates is no stranger to funding controversial experiments as he’s publicly funded many of them including one that would implant devices into babies to automatically give them vaccines.

While the Harvard team’s experiment may sound like something out of a dystopian science fiction movie, the reality is that it has long been on the table of governments and think tanks from around the world. In fact, just last November, a study published in Environmental Research Letters, talked about doing the exact same thing—geoengineering and planes spraying particulates into the atmosphere to curb global warming.

What’s more, that study echoed the sentiments of then-CIA director John Brennan when he addressed the Council on Foreign Relations in 2016, detailing a similar process of spraying chemical particulates in the atmosphere to cool the planet.

At the meeting, Brennan addressed instability and transnational threats to global security at a meeting with the Council on Foreign Relations. During his long-winded talk of threats to US interests and how the largely CIA-created ISIL threat is impacting the world, Brennan brought up the topic of geoengineering.


Another example is the array of technologies—often referred to collectively as geoengineering—that potentially could help reverse the warming effects of global climate change. One that has gained my personal attention is stratospheric aerosol injection, or SAI, a method of seeding the stratosphere with particles that can help reflect the sun’s heat, in much the same way that volcanic eruptions do.

Brennan went on to echo the calls from some scientists who have called for aerial spraying.

An SAI program could limit global temperature increases, reducing some risks associated with higher temperatures and providing the world economy additional time to transition from fossil fuels. The process is also relatively inexpensive—the National Research Council estimates that a fully deployed SAI program would cost about $10 billion yearly.

The extent to which Brennan talked about stratospheric aerosol injection shows that he and the CIA have likely been considering this for some time.

Although we are hearing more and more talk about geoengineering, it has been around for a very long time and not just in the realm of conspiracy theories. In fact, scientists have already suggested that it could be going on right now, unintentionally.

Researchers with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) are suggesting contrails from airplanes may be inadvertently geoengineering the skies.

Chuck Long is a researcher with the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES) at the NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory at the University of Colorado in Boulder. At the American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting in 2015, Long and his team released their paper, “Evidence of Clear-Sky Daylight Whitening: Are we already conducting geoengineering?” The analysis found that vapor from airplanes may be altering the climate through accidental geoengineering.

To be clear, no one here is claiming to be an expert on climate change or the effects of geoengineering. But one thing is clear and it’s the fact that there is still much to be debated and learned before humans deliberately begin altering Earth’s climate. Aside from doing nothing to curb carbon emissions, if we are so quick to jump on this method, it could set off a chain reaction that could prove to be catastrophic.
i No, we are not a satire site. We are not a cons... (show quote)

This Sounds Like A Absolutely Brilliant Way
To Learn About Unintended Consequences
 
Aug 19, 2019 06:40:29   #
WWII Was The Last Time Progs Loved America
Joe Lieberman Was Famously Booted From The Democrat Party
For Saying America Is Worth Defending

Libs, Progs, Leftists
Are All Miserable Shells Of Human Beings
Aug 19, 2019 06:33:11   #
Yep
The Innocence Of The Left
Is Like The Innocence Of Muslims
Aug 19, 2019 06:30:10   #
When Fascism Comes To America
It Will Masquerade As Anti-Fascist
Have They Fooled You Yet ??

If Antifa Wanted To Confront NAZIs
Why Aren't They Outside The NAZI Compound At Coeur d'Alene ??
Aug 19, 2019 06:25:28   #
PeterS wrote:
What else needs be said...

If You Own A House
Give It Back
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 510 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2019 IDF International Technologies, Inc.