On Friday, as former Ambassador Maria Yovanovitch was testifying, President Trump made a series of tweets criticizing her performance as ambassador, which got Democrats so triggered, his tweets were read soon after they were made, and the narrative presented was that the tweet was witness intimidation.

"Everywhere Marie Yovanovitch went turned bad," Trump tweeted. "She started off in Somalia, how did that go? Then fast forward to Ukraine, where the new Ukrainian President spoke unfavorably about her in my second phone call with him. It is a U.S. President’s absolute right to appoint ambassadors."

"They call it 'serving at the pleasure of the President,'" Trump continued. "The U.S. now has a very strong and powerful foreign policy, much different than proceeding administrations. It is called, quite simply, America First!" Trump also noted that he's done far more for Ukraine than his predecessor than Obama.



Donald J. Trump
✔
@realDonaldTrump
· Nov 15, 2019
Everywhere Marie Yovanovitch went turned bad. She started off in Somalia, how did that go? Then fast forward to Ukraine, where the new Ukrainian President spoke unfavorably about her in my second phone call with him. It is a U.S. President’s absolute right to appoint ambassadors.

Donald J. Trump
✔
@realDonaldTrump
....They call it “serving at the pleasure of the President.” The U.S. now has a very strong and powerful foreign policy, much different than proceeding administrations. It is called, quite simply, America First! With all of that, however, I have done FAR more for Ukraine than OBama



This triggered Adam Schiff. "What we saw today is it wasn't enough that Ambassador Yovanovitch was smeared. It wasn't enough she was attacked. It wasn't enough that she was recalled for no reason, at least no good reason. But we saw today witness intimidation in real-time by the president of United States," Schiff said. "Once again going after this dedicated and respected career public servant in an effort to not only chilled her but to chill others who may come forward. We take this kind of witness intimidation and obstruction of the inquiry very seriously," he added.

Really? First of all, Yovanovitch wouldn't even had known about the tweet until after her testimony had Schiff not posted the tweets in the first place, but regardless, where's the intimidation? I can't see any. If Schiff was taking this seriously, he wouldn't be lobbing absurd charges for the purpose of piling on more ridiculous charges against Trump hoping something will stick.


But what really gets me is how it's been almost seven years since Barack Obama left one of his ambassadors to die in a terrorist attack on a U.S. consulate, and the same people who defended the Obama administration endlessly over that, are feigning outrage over Trump's tweet expressing his opinion. Democrats have been crying "impeach!" over everything for years, and now every time Trump expresses an opinion, we're hearing "intimidation." The same party that defended the Obama administration's failure to protect our consulate in Libya from an attack that claimed four American lives, including that of a U.S. ambassador, are now trying to tell us that we should be outraged over a harmless tweet—a tweet that, regardless of what one thinks of the content, was written after Yovanovitch started testifying, and as far as Trump knew, she wouldn't have even had an opportunity to see until well after her testimony concluded? A tweet that she'd have been oblivious to had Schiff not brought it up.
As White House spokeswoman Stephanie Grisham said in a statement, the tweets were “simply the President’s opinion, which he is entitled to.”

The U.S. Senate just blocked a major piece of legislation, and President Donald Trump has been notified that it’s dead — at least for now.

Prescription drug prices are skyrocketing, jumping nine percent per year from 2008 to 2016. These costs have left the average American paying nearly $1,200 out of pocket per year, which is despicable.

And when Republicans introduced the Affordable Prescriptions for Patients Act to lower those costs — Democrats blocked it.


Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer led the charge to block a bipartisan bill aimed at lowering the price of prescription drugs.

The New York Democrat arrogantly claimed that he blocked the bill because he doesn’t think the legislation goes far enough.

In reality, Schumer blocked the bill because he obviously didn’t want Trump and Republicans to secure another legislative victory heading into the 2020 p**********l e******n.

One of Schumer’s own colleagues, Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, urged passage of the bill because he said it would play a big role in lowering the cost of prescription drug costs.

“If we pass this legislation, millions of Americans may no longer have to choose between food on the table, rent payments, and the medicine they need and deserve,” said Blumenthal.

Blumenthal added: “The Democrat senator also pointed out that the proposed legislation would make sure that any company caught “red handed” engaging in harmful practices would be held accountable.”

Republican Senator John Cornyn is hoping that Schumer abandons his effort to k**l the bill. He would like it to reach the Senate floor for a full v**e in the near future.

Early Warnings of Colon Cancer
Colon Cancer | Sponsored Links
Ads by Revcontent
Find Out More >
97,306
One America News reported:

The Democrat senator also pointed out that the proposed legislation would make sure that any company caught “red handed” engaging in harmful practices would be held accountable.

While the Senate battles over the bill’s contents, there are ways Americans can trim down drug costs on their own.

Those needing prescriptions could reportedly save up to 50 percent on drug costs if they have memberships to stores such as Costco, Kroger or Kmart.

Additional discounts can also be found on free phone apps such as GoodRX and Blink Health.

The apps let people pay directly out of pocket at a lower cost and, in some cases, gives drugs free of costs altogether. It even allows users to use a flexible spending card to mitigate costs.

It’s stunning that Trump and Republicans worked with Democrats to present a bipartisan bill to lower the price of prescription drugs — and Schumer blocked it.

He’s so petty that rather than help the American people, he would rather stick it to the president because he doesn’t want him to get any credit.


Schumer’s plan came after he has been losing a lot lately on key battles

1. If you were to strip naked and run around in a circle at the speed of 186,282 miles/sec (the speed of light), it would theoretically be possible for you to screw yourself.

2. However, since you are not physically capable of achieving that speed at your age, you can also accomplish the same result by: V****g Democrat in the next November e******n.

----- Original Message -----
From: Bill Maximiek
To: Al Orth ; david brinkley ; harold babb ; joe millard ; Jack Kardisco ; Ken Gardner ; wally weckter
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 7:21 PM
Subject: Fwd: Best Ever Hillary email



Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: Tom Dawson <wmbg2016@gmail.com>
Date: October 31, 2019 at 11:21:43 AM EDT
To: Billmaxi@msn.com, notzy2@verizon.net, mickpsu@gmail.com, peachw0169@gmail.com, hookies@wildblue.net, dan@danandsuzi.com
Subject: Fwd: Best Ever Hillary email












Quite a summary.....

I just can't seem to put my finger on it!
BEST EVER HILLARY EMAIL


I'm still trying to figure out how I lost the e******n.

I thought we had the thing bought and paid for!

Was it the Russian Uranium Deal?



Was it Wikileaks?



Was it Podesta’s Emails?



Was it Comey?



Was it having a sexual predator as a husband?



Was it Huma Abedin’s sexual predator husband Anthony Weiner?



Was it because the Clinton Foundation ripped off Haiti?



Was it subpoena violations?

Was it the congressional testimony lies?



Was it the corrupt Clinton Foundation?



Was it the B******i fiasco?



Was it pay for play?



Was it being recorded laughing when I got a child rapist off when I was an attorney?



Was it the Travel Gate scandal?

Was it the Whitewater scandal?

Was it the Cattle Gate scandal?

Was it the Trooper-Gate scandal?

-OR-

Was it the $15 million for Chelsea's apartment bought with Clinton Foundation money?



Or my husband's interference with Loretta Lynch & the investigation?



Or when I happily accepted the stolen debate questions given to me by CNN?



Or my own secret server in my house and my disdain for classified information?



Or deleting 30,000 emails after I was told not to?



Or having my cell phones and computers destroyed with hammers and Bleach-bit?

Was it the Seth Rich murder?



Was it the Vince Foster murder?



Was it the Gennifer Flowers assault & settlement?

Was it the $800,000 Paula Jones settlement?

Was it calling half the United States deplorable?

Was it my underhanded treatment of Bernie Sanders?



Was it Bill's impeachment?

Was it the lie I told about being under sniper fire in Bosnia?



Was it the $10 million I received for the pardon of Marc Rich?

Or the $6 BILLION lost while I was in charge of the State Dept.?

Or was it because I’m perceived as a h**eful, lying, power-hungry, overly ambitious, greedy,

and nasty person?



Gee, I just can't seem to put my finger on it!

Gun control nuts – we all know at least one. You try to argue with them rationally, make them see the light…but it just doesn’t work! When all else fails, the snark in your voice can start rising to the top, and who can blame you? If you’re lost for a response, try something from this mix-and-match list of sensible and sassy responses that highlight the absurdity of gun control arguments.

Suggested Gun Control Responses

Instead of gun control, why don’t we just make gun violence and murder illegal? I bet people wouldn’t commit those crimes if we did.
There’s no such thing as an “assault” weapon. Assault is something you do, not something you hold or carry. Calling an AR15 an “assault rifle” is like saying the 400 or so murders using hammers each year occur because of assault hammers.
You want to give peace a chance? I can respect that. My rifle and I will give you cover in the meantime.
You think guns should be treated like cars? I agree! We should be able to buy as many as we like, take them almost anywhere, rent them in every city, upgrade and modify them as desired, and own hundreds if desired!
I’m a supporter of gun control, too. That’s why I head to the gun range every Sunday to practice. You can only achieve accuracy if you control your gun properly, you know.
Guns are only made to k**l? This simply isn’t true. Guns are designed to eject a small projectile at a very high force. If anything, it’s the bullet that is designed to inflict maximum damage – and that’s not even true for every bullet.
Look, I have strong feelings about gun control, too. If there’s a gun anywhere near me, I want to be the one controlling it!
Sure, you can have my gun – ounce by ounce. Sadly, it has a max t***sfer rate of an ounce or two at a time.
You don’t need an AR15 to hunt? Actually, as it turns out, a properly used AR15 will take most animals down quickly and efficiently. That’s far more humane than a standard rifle or even a bow and arrow.
How do you handle people who try to change your views on gun laws and gun control?

Daniel and his team were tasked in developing options to handle Russia’s cyber attacks on the United States and our e******ns. Russians hacked the Democratic National Committee servers in 2015 and the v***r r**********n systems of several U.S. states in 2016. No real harm was ever done to the Democrats, but it certainly prepped the attack on President Trump.


It is widely held that the Obama administration failed to adequately piece together intelligence about the Russian campaign and develop a forceful response. Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA), the ranking Democrat on the panel, said in an opening statement that “we were caught flat-footed at the outset and our collective response was inadequate to meet Russia’s escalation.” Really? That’s the best you’ve got? Because it’s your job to not get surprised by stuff like this.

That conclusion was reinforced by another witness, Victoria Nuland, who served as assistant secretary of state for Europe during the Obama administration. She told the panel that she had been briefed as early as December 2015 about the hacking of the Democratic National Committee, long before senior DNC officials were aware of it, and that the intrusion had all the hallmarks of a Russian operation. As she and other State Department officials became “more alarmed” about what the Russians were up to in the spring of 2016, they were authorized by then Secretary of State John Kerry to develop proposals for ways to deter the Russians. But most of those steps were never taken because officials assumed they would be taken up by the next administration. “I believe there were deterrence measures we could have taken and should have taken,” Nuland testified. It was a setup.


We know for a fact that foreign agents hacked Hillary Clinton’s emails. They won’t tell us who exactly, but it is a good bet that Russia, China, Iran and North Korea all got a look-see and the Dems seemed to have been fine with that. It went towards their “greater good.” All of this was laid out as an elaborate trap for Trump and it failed spectacularly. But they are still trying to sandbag him with Russia. If there was real justice here, Obama, Clinton, Rice, Kerry, and others would all be prosecuted for trying to o*******w our government and all the crimes that go with that. But here we are

Written by a college student by the name of Alyssa Ahlgren, who's in grad school for her MBA. It's a short article but definitely worth a read. This article tells it like it truly is. The author has hit the nail on the head. The only unfortunate aspect of her article is how right she is and that is both sad and dangerous.

My Generation Is Blind to the Prosperity Around Us! I’m sitting in a small coffee shop near Nokomis trying to think of what to write about. I scroll through my news feed on my phone looking at the latest headlines of Democratic candidates calling for policies to “fix” the so-called injustices of capitalism.
I put my phone down and continue to look around.
I see people talking freely, working on their MacBook’s, ordering food they get in an instant, seeing cars go by outside, and it dawned on me. We live in the most privileged time in the most prosperous nation and we’ve become completely blind to it.

Vehicles, food, technology, freedom to associate with whom we choose. These things are so ingrained in our American way of life we don’t give them a second thought.

We are so well off here in the United States that our poverty line begins 31 times above the global average.

Thirty. One. Times.

Virtually no one in the United States is considered poor by global standards! Yet, in a time where we can order a product off Amazon with one click and have it at our doorstep the next day, we are unappreciative, unsatisfied, and ungrateful.
Our unappreciation is evident as the popularity of socialist policies among my generation continues to grow.

Democratic Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez recently said to Newsweek talking about the millennial generation, “An entire generation, which is now becoming one of the largest e*****rates in America, came of age and never saw American prosperity.”
Never saw American prosperity!

Let that sink in. When I first read that statement, I thought to myself, that was quite literally the most entitled and factually illiterate thing I’ve ever heard in my 26 years on this earth!

Many young people agree with her, which is entirely misguided. My generation is being indoctrinated by a mainstream narrative to actually believe we have never seen prosperity. I know this first hand, I went to college, let’s just say I didn’t have the popular opinion, but I digress. Why, then, with all of the overwhelming evidence around us, evidence that I can even see sitting at a coffee shop, do we not view this as prosperity?
We have people who are dying to get into our country. People around the world destitute and truly impoverished.

Yet, we have a young generation convinced they’ve never seen prosperity, and as a result, elect politicians dead set on taking steps towards abolishing capitalism.
Why?

The answer is this: My generation has only seen prosperity. We have no contrast. We didn’t live in the great depression, or live through two world wars, the Korean War, The Vietnam War or see the rise and fall of socialism and c*******m. We don’t know what it’s like to live without the internet, without cars, without smartphones.

We don’t have a lack-of-prosperity problem.

We have an entitlement problem and an ungratefulness problem, and it’s spreading like a plague."

You
The whole

Secrets of the Secret Service. Excerpts from the book...
Very interesting, but not surprising. Scroll down to read what Kessler thinks of the presidents he served.
Interesting snippets from Ronald Kessler's book about our presidents AND read all the way to the end for the explanation of "Never Stand In Line ."


JOHN & JACQUELINE KENNEDY

He was a philanderer of the highest order. She ordered the kitchen help to save all the left-over wine from State dinners, mixed it with fresh wine and served again during the next White House occasion.




LYNDON & LADYBIRD JOHNSON
LBJ was as crude as the day is long.. Both JFK and LBJ kept a lot of women in the White House for extramarital affairs and both had set up early warning systems to alert them if/when their wives were nearby. Both were promiscuous and oversexed men. She was either naive or just pretended to not know about her husband's many liaisons..



RICHARD & PAT NIXON
A "moral" man, but very odd, weird, paranoid. He had a horrible relationship with his family and was almost a recluse. She was quiet most of the time.



SPIRO AGNEW
Nice, decent man. Everyone in the Secret Service was surprised by his downfall.



GERALD & BETTY FORD
A true gentlemen who treated the Secret Service with respect and dignity. He had a great sense of humor. She drank a lot!



JIMMY & ROSALYN CARTER
A complete phony who would portray one picture of himself to public and very different in private, e.g. would be shown carrying his own luggage, but the suitcases were always empty. He kept empty ones just for photo ops. He wanted people to see him as pious and a non-drinker, but he and his family drank alcohol a lot! He had disdain for the Secret Service and was very irresponsible with the football" with the nuclear codes. He didn't think it was a big deal and would keep military aides at a great distance. Often did not acknowledge the presence of Secret Service personnel assigned to serve him. She mostly did her own thing.



RONALD & NANCY REAGAN
The real deal, moral, honest, respectful and dignified. They treated Secret Service and everyone else with respect and honor, Thanked everyone all the time. He took the time to know everyone on a personal level. One favorite story was early in his Presidency when he came out of his room with a pistol tucked on his hip. The agent in charge asked: "Why the pistol, Mr. President?" He replied, "In case you boys can't get the job done, I can help." It was common for him to carry a pistol. When he met with Gorbachev, he had a pistol in his briefcase. She was very nice, but very protective of the President, and the Secret Service was often caught in the middle. She tried hard to control what he ate. He would say to the agent, "Come on, you gotta help me out." The Reagan's drank wine during State dinners and special occasions only, otherwise they shunned alcohol. The Secret Service could count on one hand the times they were served wine during family dinner. For all the f**e bluster of the Carters, the Reagan's were the ones who lived life as genuinely moral people.



GEORGE W. & LAURA BUSH
The Secret Service loved him and Laura Bush. He was also the most physically in shape who had a very strict workout regimen. The Bushes made sure their entire administrative and household staff understood that they were to respect and be considerate of the Secret Service. She was one of the nicest First Ladies, if not the nicest. She never had any harsh word to say about anyone.



BILL & HILLARY CLINTON
Presidency was one giant party. Not trustworthy. He was nice mainly because he wanted everyone to like him, but to him life is just one big game and party. Everyone knows about his sexuality. She is another phony Her personality would change the instant cameras were near. She h**ed, with open disdain the military and Secret Service. She was another who felt people were there to serve her. She was always trying to keep tabs on Bill Clinton.



ALBERT GORE
An egotistical ass who once overheard by his Secret Service detail lecturing his son that he needed to do better in school or he would end up like these guys, pointing to the agents.



GEORGE H. & BARBARA BUSH
Extremely kind and considerate, always respectful. Took great care in making sure the agents' comforts were taken care of. They even brought them meals. One time she brought warm clothes to agents standing outside at Kennebunkport. One was given a warm hat and, when he tried to say "no thanks" even though he was obviously freezing, the President said "Son, don't argue with the First Lady. Put the hat on." He was the most prompt of the Presidents. He ran the White House like a well-oiled machine. She ruled the house and spoke her mind.



BARACK & MICHELLE OBAMA
Clinton all over again - h**es the military and looks down on the Secret Service. He is egotistical and cunning.
He looks you in the eye and appears to agree with you but turns around and does the opposite. He has temper tantrums. She is a complete b***h who basically h**es anybody who is not black, h**es the military and looks at the Secret Service as servants.




A 'TRUE STORY ABOUT' General McChrystal's resignation in Obama's office from General McChrystal's book, "NEVER STAND IN LINE AGAIN." Some men carry and handle their diplomacy better than others. When former U.S. Military commander in Afghanistan, General McChrystal, was called into the Oval Office by Barack Obama, he knew things weren't going to go well when the President accused him of not supporting him in his political role as President. "It's not my job to support you as a politician, Mr.. President, it's my job to support you as Commander-in-Chief," McChrystal replied, and he handed Obama his resignation. Not satisfied with accepting McChrystal's resignation, the President made a cheap parting shot. "I bet when I die you'll be happy to piss on my grave." The General saluted and said, "Mr. President, I always told myself after leaving the Army I'd never stand in line again.” _._,

SEE IT!: HERE IS THE $600 MILLION TERRORIST MONEY TRAIL THAT LEADS STRAIGHT TO BARACK OBAMA



THE UNITED STATES HAS HAD TO REAP THE CONSEQUENCES OF SOME UNFORTUNATE AND DISAPPOINTING DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTS IN THE PAST DECADES.

Jimmy Carter begun in 1979 by holding back the Iranian army. His actions lead to Iran’s terrorist state overruling the Iranian government as a result.


Next on the list, we can thank Bill Clinton for conducting the Monica Waron Iraq. Despite these men not doing a darn thing to help America, they sure gave a helping hand to Iran.



But the most wanting and lowest of all the Democratic presidents that has bruised the nation with the most damage is, none other than Barack Obama. Without holding any apprehension, we can clearly see and prove, Obama was the most unfavorable of the Democratic presidents thus far in US history.

..and rightfully so.



He’s a proven Terrorist.

Reported by thedailydeplorables:

Pretty much immediately after Obama was inaugurated into office he took troops out of Iraq. By doing this, he basically let Iran take over Iraq without any hesitation. The problem for us? This decision cost us 500 American soldiers.





At the time, Secretaries of State, Hillary Clinton and John Kerry, aided Obama in creating a platform for negotiating with Iran directly. Hillary was a major factor in the deal, dubbing her “the groundskeeper.” Former CIA Analyst Fred in Obamabomb stated: “A Dangerous and Growing National Security Fraud, the nuclear deal with Iran and the Obama administration’s defense of it are full of deceptions and dishonesty.”

Of course, the deal was full of “deceptions and dishonesty.” Just take a look at the criminals who were involved. The Obama Administration provided false narratives to the media in order to applaud the horrid deal that they had made. On top of that, the Obama Administration provided $150 BILLION in sanctions relief directly to IRAN. Oh yeah, and one important thing wasn’t included in the deal. They never even mentioned to Iran anything about them attempting to gain nuclear bomb capabilities.






After all of this nonsense, on January 17th, 2016, the Obama Administration covertly sent $400 million to Iran. How did they send it? On an unmarked cargo plane… not sketchy at all. They exchanged the money for four Americans being held captive by Iran. Something is wrong with this picture. We shouldn’t have to pay the bad guys to give our citizens back. Another major issue with this exchange, Obama approved the release of seven Iranian terrorists that were being held captive by the U.S. Obama’s lying-self claimed that the money wasn’t ransom money… even though we all knew that it was. Later, the State Department made Obama out to be the liar he is when they confirmed that the money was, indeed, ransom money. On top of that, $1.3 BILLION more was given to Iran, just because. (Seriously guys, this was the guy in charge of the entire United States. Scary, isn’t it?)

To make the story even more ridiculous, Jewish News Service Yeshiva released a report explaining exactly where the money went that Obama had sent. It went right to a terrorist group, Hezbollah.

From the Jewish News Service Yeshiva:

According to a Saudi Arabian newspaper report on April 25th, Hezbollah had received $600 million worth of Iranian aid. The Al-Youm newspaper reported that the aid was t***sferred almost completely in hard cash, and is being used for the terror group’s institutions and salaries paid to its terrorists and their families.

Hezbollah is a terrorist organization that is headed by Hassan Nasrallah, its Secretary general. It was conceived by Muslim clerics and funded by Iran primarily to harass the Israelis who had entered Lebanon to increase stability in the north. Its leaders were followers of Ayatollah Khomeini, and its forces were trained and organized by a contingent of 1,500 Revolutionary Guards that arrived from Iran with permission from the Syrian government, which was in occupation of Lebanon at the time.

Hezbollah receives money from several sources including monies received from Shiite businessmen abroad, charity taxes, profit from Shiite websites in Iraq; and money received from Shiite imams in Iraq and abroad.

THIS NATION WAS BLESSED WHEN WE ELECTED TRUMP. HE IS FINALLY ACKNOWLEDGING THESE TERRORISTS AND MAKING THEM SH*T THEIR PANTS

UKRAINIAN MP: BURISMA PAID JOE BIDEN $900,000 FOR LOBBYING WORK

Ukrainian MP Andriy Derkach allegedly provided documents at a press conference that shows that Burisma paid Joe Biden $900,000 for his work as a lobbyist.



If this is true, Biden is finished and Elizabeth Warren will be the Democratic candidate for president, assuring President Trump of a second term. Far-left loonies do not fare well in a general e******n. Look no further than McGovern, Dukakis and Mondale.

Derkach also provided a trove of other documents showing payoffs from Burisma. The Biden camp has not commented yet and as far as we know, there has been no confirmation of the payment, but there is also no repudiation.

From The Gateway Pundit

Former Vice President Joe Biden was personally paid $900,000 for lobbying activities from Burisma Holdings, according to Ukrainian MP Andriy Derkach.


Derkach publicized the documents at a press conference at the Interfax-Ukraine agency Wednesday as he said the records, “describe the mechanism of getting money by Biden Sr.”

“This was the t***sfer of Burisma Group’s funds for lobbying activities, as investigators believe, personally to Joe Biden through a lobbying company. Funds in the amount of $900,000 were t***sferred to the U.S.-based company Rosemont Seneca Partners, which according to open sources, in particular, the New York Times, is affiliated with Biden. The payment reference was payment for consultative services,” Derkach said.

Via Interfax:



At a press conference at the Interfax-Ukraine agency on Wednesday, he made public the documents received from investigative journalists, including correspondence between NABU officers and representatives of diplomatic missions of foreign states in the framework of criminal proceedings opened under Article 111 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (High Treason). In particular, the documents that the deputy possesses indicate that Uglava, through his assistant Polina Chyzh, gave information to the U.S. Embassy, which, he said, is an important part of the “puzzle” of interference in U.S. e******ns and international corruption.
Joe Biden’s drug addict son H****r was sitting on the board of Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian natural gas company and being paid by some accounts over $200,000 a month even though he had zero experience in the field.

Something big is going down and we don’t know what it is but we do know it’s huge.



When US Attorney John Durham was assigned this investigation, the outline is that it would cover the time all the way through inauguration day of 2016. That has changed. John Durham has extended the time frame of his investigation to the spring of 2017. This did not happen in a vacuum. Something was discovered that changed the entire dynamic of the investigation.

What did he find out happened after Trump’s inauguration. It must be criminal. If it weren’t criminal, there would be no need to investigate it. Of course, this is pure speculation on my part, but it’s worth keeping an eye on to see where it leads.

From The Gateway Pundit

US ATTORNEY JOHN DURHAM HAS RECENTLY EXPANDED HIS PROBE INTO THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION’S SPYING ON CANDIDATE DONALD TRUMP.

DURHAM IS NOW LOOKING AT EVIDENCE UP TO THE LAUNCH OF THE MUELLER SPECIAL COUNSEL.

Bret Baier and Jake Gibson broke this story this afternoon on FOX News:


John Durham, the U.S. attorney reviewing the origins of the 2016 counterintelligence investigation into Russia and the Trump campaign, is probing a wider timeline than previously known, according to multiple senior administration officials.

Fox News previously reported that Durham would be reviewing the days leading up to the 2016 e******n and through the inauguration.

However, based on what he has been finding, Durham has expanded his investigation adding agents and resources, the senior administration officials said. The timeline has grown from the beginning of the probe through the e******n and now has included a post-e******n timeline through the spring of 2017, up to when Robert Mueller was named special counsel.

Attorney General Bill Barr and Durham traveled to Italy recently to talk to law enforcement officials there about the probe and have also had conversations with officials in the U.K. and Australia about the investigation, according to multiple sources familiar with the meetings.

The Italian News reported this past weekend that Bill Barr and John Durham met with Italy’s spy chief Gennaro Vecchione twice in August.

When listening to people, one way that I separate t***h from fiction is, if it is consis- tent and makes sense then it is probably true. If it does not, then red f**gs go up. Let me give you an example.
Recently, a whistleblower filed a complaint related to a conversation that President Trump had with President Zelensky of The Ukraine. Nancy Pelosi without having read the com- plaint or hearing testimony from the whistle- blower immediately opened an impeachment investigation. Why would she do that? It made no sense; it reminded of a line in Alice in Won- derland, “Verdict first, then trial!” Even the liberal press questioned her motives.
More evidence then came out showing that the informer was a partisan Democrat. Instead of following federal regulations that required him to report his complaint directly to the I.G., he instead went to Rep. Schiff’s office. There they discussed his second-hand information and then directed him to a law- yer who had worked for Senators Schumer and Clinton. That lawyer wrote up the complaint in the most incriminating manner possible and then sent him to the I.G. Once there, he never shared with them that he had any discussions with Schiff’s office or the Schumer-Clinton lawyer.
Schiff had this information for six weeks before it went public; he intentionally hid it from the Republicans on his committee, from the press and from the American people. Reporters questioned him numerous times asking if he or his staff had had any contact with the whistleblower, and his response was always, “We have not spoken to or had any contact with him or her.” Those statements were an outright lie. Although I do know one person he did choose to share his informa- tion with, Nancy Pelosi; it is clearly the missing link that makes sense in her rush for impeachment.
President Trump immediately declassified
the transcript and made it public. Schiff then shared it in a committee hearing, but instead of reading the actual transcript he delivered a fabrication filled with lies that had nothing to do with the call. This is the same man who for over two years falsely proclaimed almost daily on CNN and MSNBC that he had seen un- equivocal evidence that the 2016 Trump cam- paign colluded, cooperated and coordinated with Russia. As it turned out, Robert Mueller’s very partisan group of Democratic lawyers found absolutely no evidence of collusion.
Pelosi has said this process will be fair;
it is not. She refuses to allow a House v**e
on impeachment, this move allows only the Democrats to have subpoena power and the ability to question those brought before the committees. It effectively gives the Demo- crats the power of prosecution but denies the Republicans their defense. This would never be allowed in any prosecution in the United States, but it is the new standard for the kan- garoo court of Pelosi.
Since getting Schiff’s information, Demo- crats have orchestrated this phone-call contro- versy with lies and deceptions and once again their goal is to remove a sitting president and overturn an e******n of the American people. Their investigations have been continuous for three years. They are so consumed by h**e that they can do nothing other than seek the destruction of this man. It needs to stop!
President Trump’s policies have given America a GDP of over 3% for four quar- ters, an unemployment rate of 3.5%, energy independence, 5 million new jobs, tax cuts, regulation cuts, support of the free market, securing of our boarder, and the rebuild-
ing of our military. These radically Left Democrats are adamantly against all of his policies. Does anyone doubt they are actively seeking to destroy him?
ROBERT A. RIDAL

You are then saying”He was always a termite?”

Anyone that would answer a totally unenforceable request to come in for questioning in a one sided trial or impeachment is not only opening himself up for charges but has to be really stupid. Especially if the party that is trying to build a case has no enforceable powers to do so. The democrats, because they are i***ts and will do anything, including constant lying, to get rid of a duly elected opponent, are trying any tactic they can but Trump is countering them very well. This impeachment process is going to the same place as the democrat party. Nowhere except the trash.

That is only a partial list of that so called president did. His other faults a too numerous to post, but one of the biggest crimes he committed was ignoring laws that he didn’t like and punished those who attempted to follow them. That, in my mind, is anarchy and a sign of trying to dictate instead of rule the country reasonably. Another fault is that he weaponized the agencies that never had weapons in the past. Sounds like he tried to create his own brow shirts, just as Hitler did.