Q***n is reputed to be a patriot with extensive evidence of the Deep State’s war on President Trump. He took to the Internet yesterday to reveal what will be revealed either directly in the House’s Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence memo or as a result of the investigation that will result from it..

Q***n’s post requires some explanation but it makes clear that the information detailed in the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence is going to blow the lid off the treasonous intent of Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama Obama, the highest levels of his administration, and the entire Democratic Party.

Q***n’s Internet post yesterday exposes all of they key points in their plot to take down the United States.

Q***n begins by asking “Does Sessions have the courage to bring criminal investigations against Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, as well as criminal elements in the DNC, the FBI, and the DOJ?”

He says that if Sessions lacks the nerve after the “Nunes Memo” has been made public, President Trump will be forced to replace him as Attorney General.

He then confirms that the memo is so damning that the entire Russian collusion narrative will be blown out of the water and that the result will:

A) Have Sessions reinstated with full authority including over the Russia probe.
B) Provide undeniable evidence of collusion between the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the DNC.
C) Provide undeniable evidence that Obama administration appointees John Brennan (CIA), James Clapper (DNI), Susan Rice (NSA), James Comey (FBI), and Loretta Lynch (Attorney General) along with many underlings conspired to create a false sense that Donald Trump a Russian plant.
D) Reveal absolute proof that the Obama administration knowingly provided a FISA court with false documentation to obtain the warrant that illegally authorized surveillance of the Trump campaign.

Q***n says their brazen disregard for the law was based on their belief that Hillary was a slam-dunk to be elected and that they would never be held accountable.

The Deep State patriot then outlines the Obama-Clinton 16-year plan to destroy America. Nothing Q***n posted contradicts a briefing I sat through during Obama’s first term discussing some of the very same issues.

The plan called for a complete infiltration of rogue elements, including Muslim Brotherhood operatives – elected and appointed – throughout every level of government.

The multi-point plan called for:

A) Leaking intelligence – especially military intelligence regarding assets and methods.
B) Cutting and gutting the military. Cut spending and deplete and degrade military assets through endless and unwinnable (because of strategy and rules of engagement) war. Obama left the military at pre-WWI levels of preparedness when he left the White House at the same time we were fighting on multiple fronts. NOW CHUCK SCHUMER HAS CUT OFF ALL MILITARY SPENDING!
C) Purging qualified Generals to strengthen civilian command over military decisions within the White House.
D) Placing Chief of Staff Valerie Jarrett in charge of determining any “Good Guys” either in the military, among elected Republicans, or within the permanent bureaucracy, and find a way to have them removed.
E) Compromising all Special Asset Program (SAP) highly sensitive intelligence protocols and SAP actors (spies) worldwide as Clinton did with her private server that she maintained with Obama’s approval.
F) Edward Snowden providing open source access to highly sensitive information that has proven catastrophic to our military.
G) Obama ordered the targeting of Conservatives both inside and outside of the federal bureaucracy. From the IRS targeting Conservatives and Libertarians to reinstating Project Mockingbird funding of l*****ts journalists, authors, and the MSM, to Net Neutrality rules that provided Internet edge providers with the power to censor conservative content. The Obama administration allowed the Internet giant edge providers to dominate the Internet content and revenue (space advertising) without fear of DOJ or Federal Trade Commission anti-trust lawsuits.
H) Flood the United States with i******s to insure the Dems’ v****g base grew larger.
I) Maintaining a hands-off approach to North Korea’s developing nuclear weapons program.
J) Funding the development of Iran’s nuclear capabilities while arming and subsidizing their minion terrorist wing ISIS.
K) Instilling uncertainty in the US population by targeting conservative and libertarian leaders and media for removal while promoting hard-left Marxist groups like Black L***s M****r and A****a to create fear.
L) Strangle the economy through massive regulation, high taxes, and outsourcing jobs and manufacturing.

Clinton was going to continue leading the American decline using the same plan that Obama had implemented but with her eye on unfinished business:

A) Overturn the Bill of Rights either by packing the Supreme Court with Marxist sympathizers, using the judicial appointments already in place to stifle court actions – like we’re witnessing now with Trump’s immigration Executive Orders – through legislative action or by unchallenged and unconstitutional Executive Decree similar to how Obama established DACA. This would include:
B) Banning personal firearm sales.
C) Ending Fourth Amendment protections against unlawful search and seizure
D) Forever ending the Tenth Amendment that protects the rights of the states and individuals.
E) Ending the E*******l College so that sanctuary states would determine the president
F) Finally from a March 13, 2013 HRC intercept; throw Black v**ers – who they kept “starving”, “blind” and “stupid” all of these years – overboard.

Dr. Jerome Corsi, a terrific investigative reporter provides greater details here:

Any one or even two of these points could be chalked up to a miscalculation by the Obama administration but the totality of all of these policy decisions is roadmap that points to TREASON.

That means that every Democrat – because not a single one raised any red f**gs along the way – was complicit in TREASON.

It doesn’t end there. Where were the Republicans who sat in the majority and did nothing but pay lip service to us? Remember, without a scintilla of evidence of wrongdoing the Democrats are committed to impeaching President Trump if they gain control of the House.

Either Republicans shirked their Constitutional mandate or they are too stupid to recognize a pattern of TREASON right under their collective noses.

In any event it’s time to clean Congress’ house.

Rosemary LaBonte wrote to the editors of a California newspaper in response to an article they printed and written by Ernie Lujan who suggests we should tear down the Statue of Liberty because the immigrants of today aren't being treated the same as those who passed through Ellis Island and other ports of entry. Seems Mr Lujan wants a free pass for some. The paper never printed a response, so her husband sent it out via internet. Now I am posting some it here.

Rosemary wrote:
Maybe we should turn to our history books and point out to people like Mr. Lujan why today's American is not willing to accept this new kind of immigrant any longer. Back in 1900 when there was a rush from all areas of Europe to come to the United States, people had to get off a ship and stand in a long line in New York and be documented.

Some would even get down on their hands and knees and kiss the ground. They made a pledge to uphold the laws and support their new country in good and bad times. They made learning English a primary rule in their new American households and some even changed their names to blend in with their new home.

They had waved goodbye to their birth place to give their children a new life and did everything in their power to help their children assimilate into one culture. Nothing was handed to them. No free lunches, no welfare, no labor laws to protect them. All they had were the sk**ls and craftsmanship they had brought with them to trade for a future of prosperity.

Most of their children came of age when World War II broke out. My father fought alongside men whose parents had come straight over from Germany , Italy , France and Japan None of these 1st generation Americans ever gave any thought about what country their parents had come from. They were Americans fighting Hitler, Mussolini and the Emperor of Japan . They were defending the United States of America as one people.
When we liberated France , no one in those villages were looking for the French American, the German American or the Irish American. The people of France saw only Americans. And we carried one f**g that represented one country. Not one of those immigrant sons would have thought about picking up another country's f**g and waving it to represent who they were. It would have been a disgrace to their parents who had sacrificed so much to be here. These immigrants truly knew what it meant to be an American. They stirred the melting pot into one red, white and blue bowl.
And here we are with a new kind of immigrant who wants the same rights and privileges. Only they want to achieve it by playing with a different set of rules, one that includes the entitlement card and a guarantee of being faithful to their mother country. They get free tuition to our schools, health care, housing, a credit card, a v**ers card!!! All this cost over 135 BILLION
dollars a year and it's going up. Our roads and bridges are falling apart, but our Democrat leaders care not. They only care about the v**e these people can make.
I'm sorry, that's not what being an American is all about. I believe that the immigrants who landed on Ellis Island in the early 1900's deserve better than that for all the toil, hard work and sacrifice in raising future generations to create a land that has become a beacon for those legally searching for a better life. I think they would be appalled that they are being used as an example by those waving foreign country f**gs.
And for that suggestion about taking down the Statue of Liberty , it happens to not mean a lot to the Senators who are not v****g on the immigration bill. They would shut down our country
instead.
I wouldn't start talking about dismantling the United States just yet.

FOR THE WRONG THINGS TO PREVAIL, THE RIGHTFUL MAJORITY NEEDS TO REMAIN COMPLACENT AND QUIET.
LET THIS NEVER HAPPEN!

I sincerely hope this letter gets read by millions of people all across the nation! And we do something to fix it.

UN chief unveils plan to promote global mass migration
JAN 14, 2018
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/01/un-chief-unveils-plan-to-promote-global-mass-migration

"United Nations Secretary General António Guterres has unveiled his plan to promote global mass migration in the left-liberal Guardian newspaper…His article, titled ‘Migration can benefit the world. This is how we at the UN plan to help’, makes the bold claim that mass migration “powers economic growth, reduces inequalities and connects diverse societies”

His plan will be accepted unquestioningly by those who have difficulty comprehending the difference between responsible immigration and reckless immigration policy. To oppose a policy of leaving the gates wide open for any and everyone to enter, including those who have openly issued jihad threats, is not anti-immigrant.

Not all visible minority immigrants are mass rapists, jihadists, misogynists and h**ers of the West. So to imply that it is anti-immigrant to responsibly control borders is irrational. Europe is a mess, thanks to a g*******t agenda which is destabilizing free societies and endangering the freedom of free speech and the rule of law.

The t***h is that the UN is a stalwart friend and partner of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, which has long abandoned the UN Declaration of Human Rights for the sharia-driven Cairo Declaration of Human Rights, which states:

Reaffirming the civilizing and historical role of the Islamic Ummah which God made the best nation that has given mankind a universal and well-balanced civilization in which harmony is established between this life and the hereafter and knowledge is combined with faith; and the role that this Ummah should
play to guide a humanity confused by competing trends and ideologies and to provide solutions to the chronic problems of this materialistic civilization.

In mid-December, the OIC weighed in on mass migration into Europe — not surprisingly supporting the hijrah — with the lie that Europe needs mass Muslim migration to pay its pensions. Out of the 1.2 million migrants who flooded into Germany in 2016, only “34,000 or 2.8% have found a job,” while only one-third of 1% found jobs in Sweden. In Britain, migrants were found to be “a net drain…on the order of between £115 and £160 billion.”

So now, OIC puppet and socialist António Guterres is out to convince all that “Migration can benefit the world.” President Trump has rejected Guterres’ plan as “simply not compatible with US sovereignty.”

“New United Nations Boss Unveils Plan to Promote Global Mass Migration”, by Jack Montgomery, Breitbart, January 12, 2018:

United Nations Secretary General António Guterres has unveiled his plan to promote global mass migration in the left-liberal Guardian newspaper.

Guterres, a former Socialist Party prime minister in his native Portugal, took over the top job at the UN on January 1st, having previously served as the institution’s High Commissioner for Refugees.

His article, titled ‘Migration can benefit the world. This is how we at the UN plan to help’, makes the bold claim that mass migration “powers economic growth, reduces inequalities and connects diverse societies”, in order to promote the Global Compact for Migration.

“This will be the first overarching international agreement of its kind,” he boasted — but claimed it would not “place any binding obligations on states”, but rather serve as “an unprecedented opportunity for leaders to counter the pernicious myths surrounding migrants”.

These assurances have failed to convince the Donald Trump administration in the United States, with the White House rejected it as “simply not compatible with US sovereignty”, and President Trump summarising it as “no borders, everyone can come in!”

Prime Minister Theresa May’s government in the United Kingdom has not pulled out, however — apparently unconcerned by its implications.

Guterres said it was crucial to “recognise and reinforce the benefits of migration … Migrants make huge contributions to both their host countries and countries of origin.”

He made the contentious claim that migrants “take jobs” that local workers “cannot” fill, and asserted that this is a positive thing. He also attempted to spin the fact that migrants send huge sums of money straight out of their host countries and back to their countries of origin as a kind of supplement to foreign aid.

The new secretary general is not the first senior UN figure to extoll the supposed benefits of mass migration. The intergovernmental institution has promoted it as “inevitable, necessary, and desirable” through its #ForMigration campaign for some time…..

In 2012, he infamously remarked that the European Union — which he had previously served as a European Commissioner — should be doing its best to “undermine national homogeneity” and promote “multicultural states” through mass migration.

~~~~~
Don't you mean "tee"?

Wow, how long did it take you to write this short book? Of course you know that some of us saw through a lot of what you did although you had so much there that was excellent information. For instance, you pulled the very same trick that so many of your liberal friends say when you wrote: Now, I know you don't like Obama, but to his credit, the number of uninsured veterans decreased nearly 40% between 2013 and 2015 due to his expansion of Medicare under the ACA.. You said there that Obama expanded Medicare and the next sentence or two started talking about Medicaid. Don't you of the liberal bent know that Medicare and Medicaid are totally different? I have been on Medicare for 20 years so I know the difference in the two things and it seems that you don't.

Your pile of crap from VA was interesting to look at as to veterans and non-veterans but I am not sure what you were trying to prove with all of that.

More could be said to prove some of what you said but Obama didn't cause me to get any differences in my Medicare money although you may believe it did. No matter what you of the left lean try to prove about Obama and Medicare when you throw ACA into the discussion you prove to me that you don't really know what you are talking about.