One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
Posts for: RT friend
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 96 next>>
Jul 22, 2019 19:48:33   #
slatten49 wrote:
Arch, as Michael Martin Murphy would say, that's cowboy logic 101.

Lazy, I never woul have guessed.
Jul 22, 2019 14:25:23   #
Don G. Dinsdale wrote:

"Discomfort is required for change."

I don’t like to be uncomfortable, and for a long time, I drank a lot to avoid feeling that way. When I had stress at work, I’d drink as soon as I got off. When relationships got complicated, I drank before, during, and after interactions. After a while, my solution—drinking—made my life unmanageable, so I drank even more. Finally, when I was forced to admit my solution was no longer working, I grew so unhappy that I was willing to change. And that’s when I entered recovery.

Once in the program, I was very uncomfortable again. I wasn’t familiar with how meetings went, didn’t know anyone, and the feelings that were bubbling to the surface made staying sober nearly impossible. Plus, my sponsor was suggesting many actions that made me even more uncomfortable, like sitting in the front of the room. He said, “Sit up front in recovery row, instead of at the back in denial aisle.” He also suggested I take commitments, go out to fellowship, and write a First Step inventory. What had I gotten myself into?

Because I couldn’t imagine a life of drinking anymore, I was willing to follow his direction. As I did, something magical happened: I began to feel better. I soon learned that feeling uncomfortable doesn’t last, as long as I’m willing to take action. I also learned that I wouldn’t be willing to take the actions unless I was motivated by discomfort. In this way, I have come to see anxious feelings, negative thoughts, and old fears as merely signal that change is needed. I honor these feelings today and get into action to make the changes required for my life to get better.
THE WISDOM OF THE ROOMS br br "Discomfort is... (show quote)

When normal is not all that normal any more, what is it then ? abnormal and anti matter has two things to think about which is what exactly is both of them ? one question covers two things to think about if the answer is spot on.

Only you can know about what spot on is but if you want to know about anti matter then watch ; Tara Shears- Antimatter. Why the anti-world matters "The Royal Institution ".

This is assuming I am you are the Universe amongst other stuff.
Jul 22, 2019 06:34:06   #
BigMike wrote:
Johnny Rivers had tons of talent. Plays guitar well, too. Go back in time a minute

Dig it
Jul 22, 2019 06:24:45   #
BigMike wrote:
They've had 2 other leading ladies since. It was probably tough for Nightwish to keep from becoming her she was going with the keyboardist. Never good.

Freaky but cool.
Jul 21, 2019 20:36:35   #
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Ilhan Said, aka Omar, isn't in Congress legitimately. Like Obama, she slithered in on a phony past and a phony marriage certificate.
Ilhan Said hates America as founded. Her mission is to destroy it and rebuild it to the specifications of the international left.

The international left is why people voted for a Liberal Country Party Coalition (Liberal -National Coalition) they mistakenly got everything mixed up, because everything is all over the place, political boundaries have merged, the right wing is Globalist the Left wing is Globalist ,the new political division is better described as two factions of Globalists going head to head.

It's called Popularism, or Identity Politics the National identity is giving way, Trump is or maybe was representing the National Identity, this could be the last hurrah chanting USA USA doesn't matter what counts is the Culture that supports that idea appear to being modern.

Obama couldn't be tied into being a sheep in wolves clothes, so why would that tactic be successful with Ilham Omar or Ilham Said totally irrelevant, and makes her look like the victim of a Cyclops most swing voters want to be on the winning team, Trump has got to trim the dead wood and look modern.
Jul 21, 2019 09:46:07   #
Mikeyavelli wrote:
bombshell report released Thursday claims that Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN-05) entered the country fraudulently in 1995 as a member of the “Omar” family, which allegedly isn’t her real family.

The article was published Thursday at Powerline by David Steinberg, formerly an editor of PJ Media who has written extensively on Omar over the past three years.

In his article, Steinberg claims:

“In 1995, Ilhan entered the United States as a fraudulent member of the ‘Omar’ family. That is not her family. The Omar family is a second, unrelated family which was being granted asylum by the United States. The Omars allowed Ilhan, her genetic sister Sahra, and her genetic father Nur Said to use false names to apply for asylum as members of the Omar family.”

He goes on to claim that Omar’s real name, before applying for asylum, was Ilhan Nur Said Elmi. The family split up in 1995 when three of her siblings were granted asylum by the United Kingdom, including Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, whom Omar allegedly married in 2009 and divorced in 2017. As The Minnesota Sun has previously reported, this alleged marriage to her brother occurred at a time of massive immigration fraud.

Steinberg cites as his sources multiple members of the “Minneapolis Somali community,” who claim that Omar was born as Ilhan Nur Said Elmi, as well as marriage records, address records, court documents, and online communications that he provides pictures of in his article.

He concludes the article by declaring that law enforcement has enough information to “open an investigation.”

“I believe Scott Johnson, Preya Samsundar, and me, with our three years of articles, columns, and posts, have provided more than enough evidence to give law enforcement authorities probable cause to open an investigation,” he writes.

The Minnesota Sun reached out to Omar’s office for comment on the allegations, but didn’t receive a response.

“We do not share the personal information of refugees, due to privacy considerations,” a State Department spokesperson told The Minnesota Sun in response to a request for confirmation of the information in the article.
bombshell report released Thursday claims that Rep... (show quote)

"Ilhan Omar Happened Because Media Chose to Lie to You" published July 18 2019.

David Steinberg uses his own Twees and like minded Tweeters as evidence, deceitfully sub-titled to be Public available State Recordes he uses his own previous article and backs it up with such references as "Power Line" article posted September 9, by Scott Johnson 2016.

I didn't follow every link but if you do I think they will all prove to be unofficial.

Probably this publicity is helping Ilhan Omar maybe not I don't know, but I think it's all going to end badly, it's about attention grabbing by assuming a major upheaval is about to happen, like selling backyard air raid shelters provisioned for years to wait out the contamination, people with too much money to spend are targeted by shysters exploiting their fears, it's not real, and is seen as apartheid politics, as soon as there is a kick back the support evaporates.

How could this emotional targeting of individuals based on Religion and race have a average central voter appeal ?.
Jul 20, 2019 20:10:44   #
eagleye13 wrote:
IMO; this booklet is concise in covering Russian Bolshevik Communism.

by Frank L Britton. Probably published in 1952. ( The whole booklet is downloadable for free) Behind Communism By Frank L. Britton : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive >>>>>******* (I make one qualification to 'Behind Communism'. Frank Britton does not differentiate the different factions of Jews/Judah, including the non-Hebrews, or Torah followers and Talmudic followers) *******

Britton's 96-page booklet is undated, but, judging by internal evidence—Korean War, but Stalin still alive—was published about 1952, in the USA (The Americanised English spelling has been left unchanged).
There are 120 or so of these, including a few maps
and pictures relating to pre-20th century times, some photos from the Revolution, and many 'mug shots' of contemporary American Jews. All are uncredited, but appear to be from encyclopediasand newspapers.
Unfortunately, any deep-down discussion of communism and Marxism involves the Jewish question. We cannot honestly discuss the subject without revealing—and commenting on—the fact that the founders of Russian communism were Jewish. Neither can we ignore the fact that all but a few top leadership of the American communist party—including the recently convicted spys [sic]—are of the same race. ... Historical writers have been understandably reluctant to hold forth on the subject for fear of marking themselves as "race haters" and bigots." [sic] For this reason the entire subject has been placed beyond the pale of discussion. One simply does not use the word [sic] "Jew" and "Communism" together.
The result is, of course, censorship. ...'
This booklet deals mostly with Russia and the Russian Revolution, then the USA of about 1950; there's a huge gap, missing the entire period of the 1930s and Second World War. Possibly Britton had the main part of his text ready before the 1930s, and tacked on the final part, on Iron Curtain dictators, atom spies and Hollywood, later.



With Shrill Insistence
We cannot undertake even this brief history of the modern Jew without taking note of a phenomenon which has confounded gentile societies for twenty centuries. This is the ability of the Jewish people to collectively retain their identity despite centuries of exposure to Christian civilization. To any student of Judaism, or to the Jews themselves, this phenomenon is partly explained by the fact that Judaism is neither mainly a religion nor mainly a racial matter, nor yet is it simply a matter of nationality. Rather it is all three; it is a kind of trinity. Judaism is best described as a nationality built on the twin pillars of race and religion. All this is closely related to another aspect of Judaism, namely, the persecution myth.
Since first appearing in history we find the Jews propagating the idea that they are an abused and persecuted people, and this idea is, and has always been, central in Jewish thinking.
The myth of persecution is the adhesive and cement of Judaism; without it Jews would have long since ceased to exist, their racial -religious nationality notwithstanding. Jews do not always agree among themselves, and it is only in the presence of their enemies—real or imagined—that Jewish thinking crystallizes into unanimity. In this respect they differ not at all from other peoples:
Adolph Hitler solidified German opinion around the idea that Germany was wronged at Versailles, that the German people were abused and victimized by the Allies, and that only by holding together could they prevail against the overwhelming might of their enemies ...
For twenty-five centuries the Jewish mind has been conditioned by the same appeal. Through all Jewish thinking and all Jewish history the refrain of persecution has sounded with shrill insistence. Thus we find every accident of fortune being chronicled, enhanced, and passed on to succeeding generations as another example of gentile cruelty to the chosen race. And almost inevitably we find opposition to Jewish aspirations and ambitions being translated into these same terms of persecution, and all Jewish shortcomings being excused on the same basis.
Now it is a fact that the Jewish people have suffered numerous hardships in the course of their history, but this is true of other peoples too. The chief difference is that the Jews have kept score—they have made a tradition of persecution. A casual slaughter of Christians is remembered by no one in 50 years, but a disability visited upon a few Jews
is preserved forever in Jewish histories. And they tell their woes not only to themselves, but to a sympathetic world as well ...
Even The Coins Were Jewish. We find the first Jews filtering into Europe some time before the Christian era, particularly in the region of Greece. The ancient Greeks spoke of these Asiatic invaders with considerable bitterness. Very quickly they spread throughout the Roman Empire and into Europe proper. The Jewish merchant, artisan, and slave trader appear on the Roman scene with increasing frequency after the second century A.D. and there can be no doubt that their position in the Roman world was one of growing importance even as the
Empire drifted to destruction. Under Justinian, says the Jewish Encyclopedia
"They enjoyed full religious liberty, in return for which they assumed all a citizen's duty toward the state; minor offices were also open to them. Only the synagogues were exempt from the duty of quartering soldiers. The trade in slaves constituted the main source of livelihood for the Roman Jews, and decrees against this traffic were issued in 335, 336, 339, 384, etc."
[Funk & Wagnall's Jewish Encyclopedia, page 460, vol. 10]

". . . there was an inevitable tendency for him to specialize in commerce, for which his acumen and ubiquity gave him special qualifications. In the dark ages the commerce of Western Europe was largely in his hands, in particular the slave trade. and in Carolingian cartularies Jew and merchant are used as almost interchangeable terms."
[Encyclopedia Britannica, page 57, vol. 13—1947.] This hold over European commerce finally became so utterly complete that few gentiles engaged in trade at all; it had become almost entirely a Jewish monopoly. In Poland and Hungary, the coins bore Jewish inscriptions ...
Throughout the Medieval period, ["Dark Ages,"
"Medieval Period," and "Middle Ages" are synonymous terms used to describe the period of decline which characterized western civilization between 500-1300 A.D.] which lasted from 500 A.D. to 1300 A.D., the Jew merchant was dominant all over Europe (except Scandinavia, where he was never permitted to enter) and this dominance included control over the eastern trade routes to the Levant. There was to be no relief from this situation until the Jews were evicted from Europe in the century directly preceding the Renaissance....

England, ironically enough, was the last country to be invaded by the Jews and the first to evict them. After the Fourth Lateran Council the Jews had become increasingly difficult to deal with and there were a number of anti-Jewish riots. Perplexed by the problem posed by this alien minority which seemed well on its way to corralling the kingdom's wealth, and failing in an attempt to force its assimilation. Edward I confiscated all Jewish wealth and evicted them permanently in 1290….
In France too the Jews were dominant in trade and finance and had been since before Charlemagne's time. Under Philip the Fair (1285-1314) one of the last, and certainly one of the greatest of the Capetian line, France had become the greatest power in Europe.

The Evictions.....
IMO; this booklet is concise in covering Russian B... (show quote)

I can't download books I just had laser therapy on my eyes, looking into a laser is something psychedelia else far-out and staring at a screen they said doesn't hurt but its not good either.

But I sort of know what he's going to say, I got the title and author, let's go through your description to see if it worth me getting a paperback.

I differentiate between the Torah and Judiasm when the place of worship was relocated from Mt.Gerizim to Jerusalem, see Deuteronomy 12 took place about the year 1,200 BC. (a guess). Next differentiation after that was when (P) Nehemiah in Office from 445 to 433 BC ended which became according to Judiasm "the end of the age of Prophecy" and the beginning of the Pharisees stages and much later the modern secular Zionist era that began with Theodore Herzl just 120 years ago.

There was a lot of information about Theodore Herzl on the internet that appears to be taken down or hidden by the search engines, he actually was murdered by the Zionist because he rejected the Homeland being established in what was then Palestine, other articles just said he died of a broken heart as a young man in hospital, his family died suspiciously also and were all accuse of being schizophrenic amongst other things, but I don't think any of that matters much now.

I am not an expert but follow on most things what Christopher Read reports about the Communist period and the ethnic related interactions that cause it, the Polish Bund actually shut down Lenin's Bolsheviks and they were all Jews, but Jews were the Leadership of the Bolsheviks mainly because of the pogroms.

The Korean war was pure politics nothing to do with changing ideologies, and I don't think a deep-down discussion of Communism and Marxism does involve the Jewish question.

I think it's all about Philosophy, I follow "James D. White" on the history of that developing philosophy. Probably if I studied it and followed a lot of stuff up I would disagree somewhat but his associations are convincing to the ways reason and logic occurs to me.

I think the American Communist party was similar to the Australian Communist party I was a member from 1968 till it broke up then there was a legal caveat on the name so the Trotskyist factions got the name but apparently they went defunct and now the Commies got the name back but I'm more into motorbikes now and am a bit old. I don't know much about the Rosenbergs that got executed, half their luck, I'm a Salafist now so I have to say that.

I'll phone my book sellers and see if "Behind Communism" is readily available in paper back, sounds interesting.

The Persecution myth come from the traitorous Flavius Josephus who went over to the Romans and began spilling his guts about the time of the seige of Jerusalem, 70AD, I think it was Josephus who recorded his thoughts with the help of the Romans and began the institution of Jewish Banking developing from Roman Tax collecting and what then evolved into the Talmud.

So in modern Persecution mythology I agree and support our contemporary Norman Finkelstein, a very courageous outspoken representative of the proper Jewish ethnicity, the Einsatzgruppen aka SS were mainly young men who were indoctrinated to hate Jews and Commies but as David Irving reminds us these young men still had feelings that they believed were commendable, they treated Jews and Commies with equal disrespectful horror, but the gas chamber stories and Anne Frank were not true, this will become known because of the recorded empirical evidences will not disappear, better to just fess up and blame the Zionist

I watched a good documentary "How the Red Army Defeated Germany : The Three Alibis" - Dr. Jonathan House.

He doesn't mention the Reds reading all the German encrypted messages so it's a bit suspect, but everything else is accurate as far as I know.

The Jews had to go somewhere after they were evicted by the Christians in Spain that was 1492.

Great post will follow up on Frank L Britton.

Jul 20, 2019 16:59:51   #
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Ilhan Omar isn't an Omar, she's a Said posing as an Omar, you see, she lied to get here on another family's coattails.

I googled "Is Ilhan Omar legit", out of 10 results the nearest to your post is that she married her brother so in any case Ilham would have the Omar name and not be Ilhan Said.

Obama was accuse of being a foreigner, but he's still there making a small fortune, I'm not against other races rising to the top, but foreigners I don't believe are legitimate contenders for public office.

However using this argument as a political strategy seems to undermine public confidence in the legal system, I'm a victim of corrupt legal systems in Australia and New Zealand I was illegally brought before the authorities many times, but how can the legal system be no good, what else is there?. I don't want to get the crap kicked out of me by someone who noticed I hadn't tied my shoe laces property.

We all want to shape society in our own images, some do it better than others, in this case I think, the better players realise where past leaders were sometimes completely wrong with their BS but it work out for the best anyway because the folks who don't have the opportunity, or the will, to be studying the social sciences and or Religion latch on to bad logical ideas and they just become normal, like same-sex marriage and transgenders in the military.

It works the other way too, good outcomes can come from mistaken ideas, some people, me included, see that as Divine intervention, some see it as Predestination, I definitely don't, and am willing to take up that argument with anyone because I'm predestined to win, now that doesn't make sense unless it's a mistaken idea with an excellent outcome which I'm hoping for.

Politically this is very important I suppose it depends if Trump destroys the USD as the main calibration of international account then it would be self-sufficiency, if Trump wins internationally and the USD become the only source of value calibration for trade then we must look to the virtues of spot and art.for satisfaction. I am Religious but I personally don't believe Religion offers satisfaction.

Either way if Ilham Omar wasn't legitimate and succeeded to be a high roller then the system can't be any good which can't be true because there is no switch to change everything immediately.
Jul 20, 2019 06:54:28   #
BigMike wrote:
Nightwish! Tarja is a pretty good nightwish!

Why tie myself to the wheel?

Cool. Maybe following Queen resemble to me Bohemian Rhapsody she does it better.
I read that was her last performance with the band.

Jul 20, 2019 02:04:42   #
lindajoy wrote:
I think you are mistaken here, perms.. That applies to the progressives...Every time I think they have truly hit rock bottom they prove me wrong ...And the left blindly support them never admitting their error..

Take for example Omar..Married her brother, had two children, married to another man filed tax returns with both, used campaign funds fraudulently as well and not a peep from the left other than try to cover it up...Hypocrisy rules, perm~~ but thats ok~~

Where do you get em, Linda joy ?,

Woody Wood Pecker knocked on Trump's door, Boris Johnson was there at the time , come in Boris, but what about my wooden head I don't want them wood peckers hitting on me.

Aren't they with you Trump said, no answered Boris I only collect Tankers which is why I'm here, can you help me out and save Britain one more time?.

For Trump to say no he'd have first say Boris "can't do a great job" and further more he'd have to admit he was wrong also about AOC, Rashida Talib, Ayanna Pressley and Ilham Omar.

A small price to pay for a Statesman, a big price to pay for the leader of gang.

Jul 19, 2019 20:41:42   #
dtucker300 wrote:
Are you confusing Brezhnev's name with Brzezinski's in some places? You have me very confused as to what you are actually saying.

Trump won't need to bail out England. However, they will become a strong trade partner, with mutual benefit to both.

Yep I see I see getting Brezhnev mixed up with Brzezinski, sorry about that you type something and it comes up different doesn't matter, just disregard that one.

So far I listened to Kim Iversen and CGNT America and Kim is certain it's war and CGTN is more or less certain putting a hopeful spin on it.

I think CGTN saying it can go like North Korea is not valid, because that can only work once, if Trump tried that tactical arrangement again on Iran straight after North Kore it would be seen as the third time round to Iran.

Iranians don't see Trump as much different than Obama so after JCPOA Iran didn't cave and give up missile testing voluntarily, maybe Obama was counting on that, and consequently that's why Trump undid JCPOA with the blessing of the Democrats, I think that's the way a lot of Iranians see it.

Britain wants to be a tax haven not a trade partner, that's why they never ditched the £. It was the same when they joined the Common Market we weren't even given a second though, if it wasn't for China Australia would now be a part of Indonesia.

Jul 19, 2019 18:12:51   #
eagleye13 wrote:
"To his credit Trump is changing policy, to his detriment he seems to be replacing donations with coercion based on the US maintaining the singular superpower status that Brzezinski wrongly predicted." - RT friend

Brzezinski's point of view was the globalisst CFR/Bilderberger point of view.
I have quoted him many times;

Zbigniew Brzezinski formed Trilateral Commission for David Rockefeller in 1973, and Jimmy Carter was made a founding member. Jimmy Carter became President, & ZB was installed as Carter's National Security Adviser. ZB continued where CFR/Trilat/Bilderberger/ Republican, Henry Kissinger, left off.

“Marxism is simultaneously a victory of the external, active man over the inner passive man and a victory of reason over belief… and has served to stir the mind and to mobilize human energies purposefully ”- Zbigniew Brzezinski - 'Between Two Ages' 1970 (p.72)
Referring to the rivalry between the USSR and the United States – “The eventual outcome of the competition is however, foreordained, given the inherent superiority of the communist system.” - ZB 'Between Two Ages' 1970 (pp.146,147)

Internationalist Banker’s globalist agenda:

“An end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal attack" –
Richard Gardner , Ambassador to Italy - quoted in (CFR)Foreign Affairs, April, 1974

"Actions at the multinational level will be required; if the process of international relocation of industries is to be achieved in an organized fashion." - TC Report #23, 1982

Trump is reversing that!!!!
"To his credit Trump is changing policy, to ... (show quote)

I apologize if anyone who read the pre-edited version of my comment , I hit the wrong button.

A well thought out post I agree with your objectives.

But I think you're trying to make right something that is going very wrong, we will see if Trump is suckered into bailing out Britain if so I believe nothing will save the situation, !!! the Dems will impeach him offering a rational alternate that will sweep Europe East and West not to mention Asia.

And I don't think it will be Bernie riding high, so once again I will probably find myself on the losing team, thank you for being there with me.

Who would have thought Boris Johnson was the master of the Grand Chess Board, maybe he's not maybe Trump will tell him to go bite a bumb, and there certainly many to choose from in England that's for sure.

Brezhnev was marooned in Canada with his Diplomat father when Stalin the true genius invaded Poland, how sad for America.

Brezhnev became high and mighty at Harvard, at Columbia he climbed to be an expert on Commie affairs, Carter gave him a leg up 1976 then he went back to Columbia till 1989 as Professor he then went off to John Hopkins University.

Brzezinski"s biggest hit on fame came with the Salt 2 treaty, and his avid support for the Shah of Iran.

The Grand Failure I'm going to research so I can't comment at the moment, but my overall take on Brzezinski is his understanding of the way Lenin leapfrogged the capitalist era out of Russian history.

To understand it properly, which I think he did, can only be done on the basis of being familiar with Lenin's understanding of Marxism and not many people know the Marx wrote 3 volumes of das Capital, none were finished by him all were rewritten more than edited and published by Friedrich Engels.

When Marx changed his mind about the progression of history ( Communal, Slavery, Feudal, Capital, then back to Communal ) it became obfuscated however and it was the first volume of das capital containing the false information and was published about 1860 (a guess) and Lenin in about 1905 (a guess) got hold of this incorrect volume of das capital not knowing or caring it had been debunked.

This transpired because Marx had visited Russia seen the Tsar's railways and then changed his mind, volumes 2 and 3 maintained that there is no progression of history at all.

Brzezinski recognized the genius of Lenin and Stalin came from using this method so he repeated it, that's when he started talking about leapfrogging.

Truly remarkable because there was never anything to jump over for the Soviets or for Brzezinski, a straight line for a small fortune now done to death.

Perchance Trump migh not emulate the imaginary obstacles or mistake real one for fakes.

Jul 19, 2019 07:12:55   #
maximus wrote:
I don't think Trump is leading a race to anywhere, he is just calling a spade a spade. Iran has been a turd for many years now and I think they need a good a$$ whoopin! Trump will not let these crap hole countries push us around.

We won't have long to wait, Trump make antifa type statements and it riles people up, we all know what happened to Muhammad Ali always giving out a good $$ whoopin ! but that is sport this is real life the difference is, well hummm, you can ask anybody but don't ask Donald Trump he is clueless.

Jul 19, 2019 03:09:32   #
dtucker300 wrote:
We still have too many Cold War warriors looking east toward Russia as the Great Satan. The Democrats missed the boat by focusing on the Russian collusion thingy, while Trump was primarily concerned with China's ascendency as a global economic and military power. Now we are ignoring Africa where China is becoming the hegemonic power, filling our power vacuum. Next will be South America if we ignore their aspirations.

True to all of that but eventually the facts will be inescapable, the Russians went from being poetry in motion as they defected to become the arrow on satan's tail.

I don't know why the Dems unloaded all their sorrow on Russia, Trump was half sensible being in the Russian camp when he started the tarde war with China, too late now.

There is also Turkey now a real big problem, the smart thig to do would have been to give up Gulen, guilty as sin, who else had the capability, but what a creep, all the people that followed him lost everything, he could have turned himself in and the prisons would now be just about empty, as if he's ever going to lead anything ever again.

Same as the Shah of Iran both of them was about to die anyway they got caught out and all they can think of is what their having for supper tomorrow night.

The conflict happening between China and the US is State capitalism verses Corporate capitalism, State will win, because they control. If don't control how can you win with investment in places like Africa, how could any business no matter how big have a economic interest in building high speed rail and port cities in Africa ?.

Corporate control must end up with the shareholders pulling the strings all tied to representatives who's loyalty to National interest can only be expressed by ideologies impossible for normal folks to understand.

I'm not really a democracies person.

Jul 18, 2019 23:37:18   #
dtucker300 wrote:
He is why Carter was such a doofus.

Peanut farmers often take on the characteristics of their crop, but why not ask him, I'm sure he would appreciate it.

But first you should know that Carterism is probably what the future is economically, regardless of 2020.

Because Monetarism and Keynesianism were parallel doctrines and now they have become merged into each other as Corporate Welfare directed from the White House which is managed by the Corporations.

It has to be that, because the traditional boom bust cycles of Capitalism have been overcome by Globalism and Quantative Easing, close to, or actual zero interest rates, over population in some parts of the world and under population growth in other parts.

This is the new economic environment that has been compensated for and caused by the end of the Techno Industrial Age which was replaced as some of the old fixtures of capitalism were themselves shafted by wacky Space X type rubbish, Cyber Space Tech Industries and Private/ Public at the same time Corporations, and last but not least Artificial Intelligence.

Even if the West could reverse gear the East never could, because the reason we now have this new era, that Brzezinski was blind to, is because our present contemporary circumstances were dominant after all things were considered at the end of the last century.

(I calls it Fate who is my friend, my best friend, I was righ about everything hahaha).

But look, we've had this Brzezinski business on OPP before Big Mike who appears to be keeping in his head down was a big fan of Brzezinski's turn around which did happen, Brzezinski turned on his heels and started to say.

quote ; "Russia's movement westward can be hastened and facilitated by China's outreach to Europe and an arrangement between China and Russia of de facto shared influence in Central Asia.

These were his written words published June 2016 and he died not long after, Obama witnessed and blessed his appraisals which ended on a final wrong assumption that became Obama's pivot to the Pacific that began about 2009.

Why would you pivot to the Pacific when all the action is in the Europe which has very little to do with the Pacific, was Obama thinking to shut China down !!! while being directed by Brzezinski, he certainly was and Trump moved into that spot, would Jimmy Carter have tried that?.

Ask him, check all the things he's said about it.

I'm pretty sure he would never have considered it.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 96 next>> - Forum
Copyright 2012-2019 IDF International Technologies, Inc.