Too funny. Your point is ridiculous. Their expenses, how they use those vast subsidies, is the same that the GOP demands of those on Welfare.
If my point is ridiculous.... consider that you think a company can eat, sleep, or go to the bathroom. A company is not a human, animal, fish or a plant.... it has human needs or requirements....
But, regardless of that. Let us talk about government subsidies (although has nothing to do with your initial thread). And tell me, which ones would you eliminate.
Farm Subsidies....America's food supply must be protected from droughts, tornadoes, and recessions. In fact, agricultural subsidies were originally created to help farmers ravaged by the Dust Bowl and the Great Depression of 1929. This price support system lasted until the 1990s. The federal government guaranteed farmers a high enough price to remain profitable. Most subsidies go to farmers of grains, such as corn, wheat, and rice. It is because grains provide 80 percent of the world's caloric needs.
Oil Subsidies..... ended by obama.
Ethanol Subsidies.... ended by obama
Export Subsidies, WTO bans export subsidies. But it allows two U.S. federal government export subsidy programs. They help U.S. farmers compete with other countries' subsidized exports. The U.S. Department of Agriculture promotes:
The Export Credit Guarantee Program, which finances U.S. farm exports. The USDA guarantees the buyers' credit when they can't get credit approval locally.
The Dairy Export Incentive Program, which pays cash subsidies to dairy exporters. It helps them meet the subsidized prices of foreign dairy producers.
There are/were others like obama's cash for clunkers, obamacare, and housing subsidies.
And then you may not be talking about subsidies but rather tax insensitivities provided by states to encourage companies from moving to more tax friendly countries or states. If that is the case.... consider how much these companies give back to the community and how many people they employ.