One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
Posts for: acknowledgeurma
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 64 next>>
May 5, 2019 14:30:44   #
Carol Kelly wrote:
All our sins can be and will be forgiven if we repent and live a truer life. However, if we admit that we are living in sin and continue to do so, we’ll be left behind. In my most humble opinion, transgenders spit in the face of God by trying to improve on His perfection. I’m not perfect but like most of us, I try to live up to what God created me for.

I wonder, do you wear makeup Carol?
 
May 5, 2019 14:02:40   #
bahmer wrote:
Phoenix Muslim Kills Wife & 2 Daughters in Honor Killings Because Allah Told Him To
By BarbWire - May 2, 2019

For the past decade, as tens of thousands of Muslim have immigrated to the Untied States, with the help of Barack Obama, have claimed that they don’t want to change America, but just take advantage of the American dream.

However, many Muslim immigrants continue to live by the barbaric customs and traditions that they sought to leave behind – namely sharia law.

Under Islamic and sharia law, women are not any different than livestock or material possessions which can be discarded and destroyed if no longer wanted of they do anything to harm the honor of the men in the family.

Such is the case with a Phoenix Muslim who is trying to justify the murder of his wife and 2 daughters, claiming that due adultery and extramarital affairs, his honor was shamed and that according to Allah, he had the right to kill them.

The Sone of Liberty – Arizona: Muslim Honor Murders His Wife & 2 Daughters – Claims Allah Told Him To Do It – “He said that the reason he shot these individuals is because in God’s eyes, it was all right for him to deal with someone in this manner who had been involved in adultery, extramarital affairs.”

Apparently, Smith was trying to cleanse his family’s honor, which is done by killing the offender.

And there will be much, much more of this in America: Muslims commit 91 percent of honor killings worldwide.

The Palestinian Authority gives pardons or suspended sentences for honor murders.

Iraqi women have asked for tougher sentences for Islamic honor murderers, who get off lightly now.

Syria in 2009 scrapped a law limiting the length of sentences for honor killings, but “the new law says a man can still benefit from extenuating circumstances in crimes of passion or honour ‘provided he serves a prison term of no less than two years in the case of killing.’” …

This is not the first case of honor killings here in America and it won’t be the last.

This is why some states have passed or tried to pass laws that prohibit the legalization of sharia law.

Over the years, I’ve seen accounts of a father and mother killing their teenaged daughter because she was seeing a boy.

And not to mention a judge in Pennsylvania who happened to be a Muslim set free a fellow Muslim for physically assaulting a man dressed as a zombie Muhammad for Halloween, even though the incident was witnessed by police.

In that case, the Muslim judge berated the victim for insulting Islam, something you never see in court with someone insulting or blaspheming Jesus Christ.
Phoenix Muslim Kills Wife & 2 Daughters in Hon... (show quote)

I think the problem with the Phoenix murderer was that he didn't consult a good American Imam about the appropriate action under Sharia in the United States of America. If he had, I'm pretty sure his wife and daughters would still be alive.
https://ing.org/a-closer-look-at-sharia-in-the-united-states/
https://abuaminaelias.com/obeying-the-law-in-non-muslim-countries/
May 5, 2019 13:53:54   #
John King wrote:
...we must not allow ones religious beliefs and practices degrade the American rule of law to the point of saying to us that you can murder your family if your religion authorizes it! This must not ever be!!!


John King wrote:
I believe what you have said is true . . . accepting Jesus as Lord and Savior in that His death was the payment required for all mankind's sin . . . but, does that mean the sin of murder is forgiven by mankind?

Consider the following:
"Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God." Romans 13:1 NIV

This verse reveals that the laws of man are to be respected and, to me, reveal that our sins can be forgiven by God through Jesus . . . but may not be forgiven by man. Thus, the act of murder in America can hold the death penalty and a true born-again Christian can be put to death for that crime.

One more point of interest . . .
17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.
18 For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. Matt. 5:17,18 NIV
I believe what you have said is true . . . accepti... (show quote)

Following Romans 13:1,"...there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God", so if an authority has decided that honor killing is legal, is God ok with honor killing for those under that authority?
May 3, 2019 15:52:52   #
bahmer wrote:
Can't we pass a law that says if they don't assimilate that they are then removed from citizenship from America?

How would you determine assimilation? What test would you give?
May 3, 2019 15:50:54   #
waltmoreno wrote:
Have you noticed that whenever Muslims relocate to western countries ostensibly for a better life they want to bring their backward, barbaric ways with them. If the Muslim way of life was so good, why did they want to leave their Muslim country? And why do they insist on bringing those barbaric cultural norms with them to their western host country?
Go back to your Muslim sh*th*l*! We westerners want no part of your satanic beliefs.

Have you noticed that whenever people relocate to the United States of America ostensibly for a better life they bring their foreign ways with them? Most will accommodate their behavior to local norms. Some more than others. In almost all cases their children will adopt local norms to an even greater degree. Some will object to their children's immersion into local norms. If they object so much that they end up killing their children, then it is not likely that their customs will propagate into the local culture.

Bottom line: As long as our culture helps our children and the children of immigrants thrive, we need not fear immigrants from anywhere.
May 2, 2019 16:25:36   #
bahmer wrote:
... not to mention a judge in Pennsylvania who happened to be a Muslim set free a fellow Muslim for physically assaulting a man dressed as a zombie Muhammad for Halloween, even though the incident was witnessed by police.

In that case, the Muslim judge berated the victim for insulting Islam, something you never see in court with someone insulting or blaspheming Jesus Christ.

Uh, the judge is NOT a Muslim.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/02/29/an_atheist_a_muslim_and_a_judge_what_really_happened_113293.html
 
Apr 13, 2019 18:49:10   #
Apr 10, 2019 01:34:31   #
eagleye13 wrote:
"Interesting analysis." - acknowledgeurma
Did you read it, acknowledgeurma?

Please give us a summary of Nickolai's long "history" lesson.

Yes, I did read both of Nickolai's long posts given in response to your question:
How did the working middle class become the "underclass"?

Did you read them?

Summary of first post:
The growth of unions in the 1930s and 40s brought about government policies that brought working people into the middle class. The rich and corporations fought the growth of unions by demonizing people who had helped the growth of unions (communists and socialists) and by getting laws that weakened the power of unions (e.g. Taft Hartly Act of 1947).

The second post (interesting to me because I did not know what was in Taft Hartly) went into detail about how the Taft Hartly Act weakened unions. It's worth a read.
Apr 9, 2019 11:21:17   #
Nickolai wrote:
The great purge part #2

The Taft Hartley Act

In 1947 congress passed the Taft Hartley Act it was a remarkable Bill. It specifically told labor unions they could not elect democratically their own leaders. For example it forbade a communist from running for office winning a majority of the votes and serving as the leader of a union which communist had been doing for 20 or more years in the US without incident. It became illegal. But it went much further it had a remarkable clause that remains law to this day, and the clause goes like this--if at a workplace, a factory, an office, a store, and let’s say there is a union, and let’s say half the workers in this workplace have voted for the union and joined the union and have a union there and lets say that union negotiates with the employer and gets a contract. Let’s say a wage increase of ten cents per hr.

Under the Taft Hartley law then and to this moment that union must give anything it wins to all the workers there whether they are in the union or not. Whether they joined the union or not, whether they pay union dues or not, whether the union if it thought it had to called a strike to tell the public about their situation to help pressure the employer to meet them half -way and give them a wage increase. The workers that went on strike and therefore didn't get paid had to give to all the other workers who didn't go on strike and didn't lose a days pay the same benefits they won. The Taft Hartley law in effect created an incentive not to join the union-- not to pay the union dues. They would get whatever the union won whether they did so or not. That’ fundamentally unfair and you and I both know it and the people then knew it.


It was a hammer blow against the union. This was designed to destroy the communist and the labor unions and the coalition between them it was a clever way to abuse the law in the interest of a purge but it it had the effect of weakening the labor movement. It was the opening gun and there are many more laws that came afterward that amounted to a direct assault on the labor movement which has worked well in reducing union membership from about 35 % in 1945 to about 6 % today in the private sector a staggering cut back. Anyone in America (and there are a few) who talks about big business on the one hand and big labor on the other is either ignorant or lying in your face. Big business has gotten bigger and richer and big labor is gone.


There is no big labor hasn’t been for years we are an economy which is dominated by one side of what used to be a rough balance and boy does it show. Beginning in the 1970's the Government began reverting to the order of things as it had been from inception untill the National labor Relations Act was passed in 1935. Moving the fulcrum of the tetter tottor not to the center for equeal ballance between labor and capital but to the right lifting capital and management and leaving labor sitting on the ground going no where. I saw the first evidence of it in 1978 but didnt recognize it as a conspiracy for another year and then it was clear it was a conspiracy by 1984 I was forced to gonon union in orer to survive the onslaught of non union competition At the time I waspying my union employees $20.000 per hr plus $7.50 in benefits. Health ins, vacation pay, pension plan. Last summer I researched the pay of todays non union carpenter in Calif and found the average pay for a non union carpenter to be $26.50 with no benefits fifty cents less than My pay package 35 years ago.
The great purge part #2 br br The Taft Hartley Ac... (show quote)


Interesting analysis. I wonder what the Trumputistas think of it.
Mar 22, 2019 09:34:10   #
Hmm, I don't think that has been confirmed.
Mar 21, 2019 21:54:26   #
proud republican wrote:
You love this President so much,that you are speechless today!!!!

Now that is really funny.
 
Mar 21, 2019 20:34:49   #
archie bunker wrote:
Great topic for discussion! Are you in need of attention, and/or entertainment?


Mar 21, 2019 20:21:56   #
working class stiff wrote:
Did you forget why you are rolling your eyes?

No.
Mar 21, 2019 20:09:49   #
Mar 19, 2019 23:39:55   #
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Hilliar lost the election at "what difference does it make".
Trump won it before he ran; at "birther", when he alone forced Obama to produce a phony birth certificate. America noticed both incidents, and voted.
Relativism? Never thought about it. I just live it. Seems like the lefty moralities are turning back to Mayan culture where they sacrifice children to the gods for better weather and they all live in equal misery under one rule and one roof.


Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 64 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2019 IDF International Technologies, Inc.