It wasn’t long after Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in a Manhattan jail cell Aug. 10 that conspiracy theories started to bloom.
It was predicted from the day he was arrested. There was never even the slightest doubt that he would not survive to answer the charges in court. You can scoff at the 'conspiracy theories' if you want, but he was in a bare cell that doesn't lend itself easily to the commission of suicide. He was murdered, that much is beyond doubt for me and many others. By whose hand may never be determined, but the motive is also quite obvious.
What? he hanged himself latteraly
Well, at least he didn't shoot himself in the back of the head - five times
Trump has good timing.
He sure seems to have a knack for getting it just right...
Most drugs by far come in via commercial loads on the high ways.
How can anyone possibly know that? If the border patrol knew drugs were being smuggled and how much, why would they not intervene to apprehend the perpetrators? That statement is indefensible. Show me the source and I might be persuaded, but there are no credible numbers because drug smugglers don't send in a report detailing their activities.
To toss out a many Billions in a new direction is more than foolish.. we can handle the border without construction of a wall.
Right, with cameras, and such like. A 2000 mile burglar alarm. I read a study somewhere that said such 'security' measures would go upward of $2 billion a year. Every year, rain, snow or shine. How much was that wall again?
It would do next to nothing to stem the drug inflow nor to cut the numbers asking for asylum in this country..
Those are two entirely separate issues. First, drugs. I disagree. Drug traffickers love the desert, where they can send people across with 60 or 70 pounds on their backs, straight to the drop-off and back again with the cash in their pack. Putting a wall in their path would force them to rethink their strategy and make them easier to detect.
As for asylum-seekers, they have nothing to do with either illegal immigration or illicit activities.
By ‘secure border’ he means keep the brown people out. But white people? Y’all come now, y’heah?
Really? Where does it say that?
Yup … Trump called it. Fredo should be "red flagged." Looks to me like Fredo has YUGE anger issues.
This could be one of those "teachable moments" that obama used to talk about. Fredo could be used as an example of how the new Red Flag laws will work!
Hm. Didn't think of that. Then again, he probably has his 'security detail' around him anyway. Of course, if it could be arranged so he is banned from coming within 500 feet of a firearm, now you're talking!
It would be interesting, though.
Maybe this time they'll accuse the Trump nominee of making sexual advances to a classmate in second grade, or staring at his fifth grade teacher, or using the "n" word in junior high.
Or, *Horrors!* enjoyed playing 'cowboys and indians' as a toddler!
Liberals are for border security, just like most people.
Glad that message finally got through, that most people want a secure border. Now go tell your reps in congress, because they didn't get that memo yet.
son of witless wrote:
I found it interesting the various requirements these other nations had before they would admit Americans. I notice that America is not enforcing anything like that at our Southern Border.
I wonder if Yahoo will do a follow up in a few years to see how many of these ex Americans made out in their new homelands and how many come crying home ?
Well, there's nothing stopping them, coming or going, it's their decision. And yeah, America is very
lax compared to the rest of the world when it comes to migration.
proud republican wrote:
img src="https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/ima... (
I know. If you didn't see it with your own eyes you'd never believe it. Check this
And remember, these are soon to be voters, if they aren't already. Terrified yet?