One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: rebob14
Page: <<prev 1 ... 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 ... 71 next>>
Jan 23, 2016 07:16:23   #
thebigp wrote:
Hillary the Gift that keeps giving:
SO THE CLINTON'S WEREN'T SO BAD, EH ? 47gh .b43
When Bill Clinton was president, he allowed Hillary to assume authority over a health care reform. Even after threats and intimidation, she couldn’t even get a v**e in a democratic controlled congress. This fiasco cost the American taxpayers about $13 million in cost for studies, promotion, and other efforts.

Then President Clinton gave Hillary authority over selecting a female attorney general. Her first two se******ns were Zoe Baird and Kimba Wood – both were forced to withdraw their names from consideration. Next she chose Janet Reno – husband Bill described her se******n as “my worst mistake.” Some may not remember that Reno made the decision to gas David Koresh and the Branch Davidian religious sect in Waco, Texas resulting in dozens of deaths of women and children.
Husband Bill allowed Hillary to make recommendations for the head of the Civil Rights Commission. Lani Guanier was her se******n. When a little probing led to the discovery of Ms. Guanier’s radical views, her name had to be withdrawn from consideration.

Apparently a slow learner, husband Bill allowed Hillary to make some more recommendations. She chose former law partners Web Hubbel for the Justice Department, Vince Foster for the White House staff, and William Kennedy for the Treasury Department. Her se******ns went well: Hubbel went to prison, Foster (presumably) committed suicide, and Kennedy was forced to resign.
A good reminder of our recent history with the Clinton's......

If you're under 50 you really need to read this . If you’re over 50, you lived through it, so share it with those under 50. Amazing to me how much I had forgotten!
When Bill Clinton was president, he allowed Hillary to assume authority over a health care reform. Even after threats and intimidation, she couldn’t even get a v**e in a democratic controlled congress. This fiasco cost the American taxpayers about $13 million in cost for studies, promotion, and other efforts.

Then President Clinton gave Hillary authority over selecting a female attorney general. Her first two se******ns were Zoe Baird and Kimba Wood – both were forced to withdraw their names from consideration. Next she chose Janet Reno – husband Bill described her se******n as “my worst mistake.” Some may not remember that Reno made the decision to gas David Koresh and the Branch Davidian religious sect in Waco, Texas resulting in dozens of deaths of women and children.
Husband Bill allowed Hillary to make recommendations for the head of the Civil Rights Commission. Lani Guanier was her se******n. When a little probing led to the discovery of Ms. Guanier’s radical views, her name had to be withdrawn from consideration.

Apparently a slow learner, husband Bill allowed Hillary to make some more recommendations. She chose former law partners Web Hubbel for the Justice Department, Vince Foster for the White House staff, and William Kennedy for the Treasury Department. Her se******ns went well: Hubbel went to prison, Foster (presumably) committed suicide, and Kennedy was forced to resign.

Many younger v**ers will have no knowledge of “Travel gate.” Hillary wanted to award unfettered travel contracts to Clinton friend Harry Thompson – and the White House Travel Office refused to comply. She managed to have them reported to the FBI and fired. This ruined their reputations, cost them their jobs, and caused a thirty-six month investigation. Only one employee, Billy Dale, was charged with a crime, and that of the enormous crime of mixing personal and White House funds. A jury acquitted him of any crime in less than two hours.

Still not convinced of her ineptness, Big Bill allowed Hillary to recommend a close Clinton friend, Craig Livingstone, for the position of Director of White House security. When Livingstone was investigated for the improper access of about 900 FBI files of Clinton enemies (Filegate) and the widespread use of drugs by White House staff, suddenly Hillary and the president denied even knowing Livingstone, and of course, denied knowledge of drug use in the White House. Following this debacle, the FBI closed its White House Liaison Office after more than thirty years of service to seven presidents.

Next, when women started coming forward with allegations of sexual harassment and rape by Bill Clinton, Hillary was put in charge of the “bimbo eruption” and scandal defense. One of her more notable decisions in the debacle was:
She urged her husband not to settle the Paula Jones lawsuit. After the Starr investigation they settled with Ms. Jones.

She refused to release the Whitewater documents, which led to the appointment of Ken Starr as Special Prosecutor. After $80 million dollars of taxpayer money was spent, Starr's investigation led to Monica Lewinsky, which led to Bill lying about and later admitting his affairs.

Hillary’s devious game plan resulted in Bill losing his license to practice law for 'lying under oath' to a grand jury and then his subsequent impeachment by the House of Representatives.

Hillary avoided indictment for perjury and obstruction of justice during the Starr investigation by repeating, “I do not recall,” “I have no recollection,” and “I don’t know” a total of 56 times while under oath.

After leaving the White House, Hillary was forced to return an estimated $200,000 in White House furniture, china, and artwork that she had stolen.

What a swell party – ready for another four or eight year of this type low-life mess?
Now we are exposed to the destruction of possibly incriminating emails while Hillary was Secretary of State and the “pay to play” schemes of the Clinton Foundation – we have no idea what shoe will fall next. But to her loyal fans - “what difference does it make?”

Electing Hillary Clinton president would be like granting Satan absolution and giving him the keys to heaven!


source-hemingway report
Hillary the Gift that keeps giving: br SO THE CLIN... (show quote)


White Trash!!!!!
Go to
Jan 23, 2016 07:14:41   #
missinglink wrote:
Well now, If these Hollywood weirdo twits are against Trump then he's got my v**e without further adue.

Per Yahoo

Many celebrities have joined the Stop H**e, Dump Trump campaign, including Kerry Washington, Lily Tomlin, Connie Britton, Cynthia Nixon, Jane Fonda, Danny Glover, Harry Belafonte, Thandie Newton, Dylan McDermott, Rosie O’Donnell, Macy Gray, Roseanne Barr and director Michael Moore.

http://www.yahoo.com/celebrity/news/kerry-washington-more-stars-join-203504734.html?ref=gs
Well now, If these Hollywood weirdo twits are agai... (show quote)


Deport them all to NYC
Go to
Jan 18, 2016 08:06:28   #
Radiance3 wrote:
================
RWNJ, you have a massive ignorance of the Catholic faith.
1. Example: You accuse Catholics of praying to Mary. Catholics honor Mary as the mother of Jesus. She sacrificed so much as she witnessed Jesus suffered on the Cross.
Catholics asked Mary for intercession only, as all of us pray for others to Christ, what more of Mary who is the Mother of God.

Why don't you mention anything about those mega multi-millionaire Protestant Pastors using Jesus as the inventory selling to the people as they gain hundreds of millions of dollars for their own pockets and live in mansions? At the same time violating the Not-For-Profit laws, that is why many of then are under investigation by the Federal government for not disclosing earnings and charities they claimed. Yet they use Jesus while so many are brainwashed like you are.

You point out Catholics who worship Christ as our Saviour and follow His commandments of loving one another, as He loved us. Catholic priests and Missionaries, and most members serve the poorest of the poor in the US and all over the world. Catholic members contributions are mostly used to helping the poor. the Priests are paid only $3000 every month. From that money, they pay federal income tax, Medicare and Social Security tax, unemployment insurance tax, SSI or Medicaid tax, medical insurance premium, etc. Then they pay their rent for the apartment, and for their essential daily needs like food, personal needs and utilities. To be honest, the i*****l a***ns are funded much better than this, as well as i******s defraud the government in may ways.

And you by claiming homeless, and receiving SSI, the priests are also paying for you as you breath hatred to them.

What kind of creature are you?

The other day RWNJ, you claimed that you are homeless. That you are 100% disabled and is currently receiving some $700 SSI monthly, waiting for a section 8 government funded housing.

My question now if you are homeless now, how are you able to have computer and internet connection to satisfy your claim of hatred to Catholics in this forum?

You are lying to your teeth. I know that you are a free loader right now, and taking all the opportunities to h**e God, blamed Him why you are not so wealthy like others. I know that you are sucking the taxpayers' money right now, but you are a pathological liar which God right now is looking down at your sinful ways and what are in your brain.

Fact is the other day, I felt a lot a sympathy for you on your confession that you are homeless and 100% disabled.
Well let God judge you now.

I think you must go and see how the Catholic church pray ad serve Jesus Christ our Lord. The Catholic does follow what Christ asked us to do both in worshiping Him alone as loving and helping one another as He commanded us.

But what you do is LIE to us, SUCK THE TAXPAYERS' MONEY, perhaps wanting to live in luxury mansions as what others do paid for by us. But you are a free loader and a liar.

You are a LYNG human being, full of hatred by your actions. You are deceptive by deceiving all of us about your status as 100% disabled and homeless.

Fact is the other day after I read your message of being homes, I felt very sorry for you. I even tried to inform you that there are others ways to get shelter, because even i*****l a***ns right now are given shelter. Why are living outside in the cold, homeless, but could write here in the OPP?

May God forgive you! May God judge you!
================ br RWNJ, you have a massive ignor... (show quote)


The title of the congregation is irrelavent, the spirit of humans substituting "ologies" for the word and intentions and plan of God is the same. "From this day, you have need to call no man father, you have one Father, who is in Heaven". The human craving for power is the original sin and the sin of Judas as well as the Mcabees. You cannot improve on God's plan or make Him adhere to yours.........stop trying....it only grieves the Holy Spirit.
Go to
Jan 16, 2016 21:04:27   #
Shanksamillion wrote:
Do any 2nd Amendment supporters have any suggestions for all of the death and injuries from guns? Anything? I hear a lot of deflecting saying it's a "mental health" issue, but nothing passed by our legislators. Nothing has even been proposed.


And these all-knowing legislators are the final abritrator of all we think and believe because???.....................because???.................because????...................?????they look good, they have nice friends, they live in a nice house, they give us other peoples money, they keep us safe.......um......they keep us safe?? Really??? They think "nice" things and other legislators like them and look like them?? So, So nice to be contained between the covers of People Magazine.
Go to
Jan 16, 2016 06:58:53   #
Leah wrote:
Hello!

I am a Christian mother of two. I love the Lord and my politics are based on my faith. This means that sometimes I cannot help but post the two together. They go together and I am not ashamed of believing in Christ Jesus. Do I think that the Lord is political? No, but I think as Christians we need to pray and be vocal about our hopes for a better moral government based on Biblical values.

I am not a politician. I am a woman that works hard on a small paycheck to make ends meet. I am passionate about American workers and the value of them. I don't take kindly to the idea that Americans are lazy and every company should hire Hispanics because they are better workers. Americans working hard built this country and it is time that politicians quit giving our jobs away for below average wages. It is hard to make ends meet on a $10-$12 dollar wage. I make the same wage I made in 1996 and everything that is necessary to raise a family is doubled. So its offensive when Trump says our wages are too high.

This country and the people who are running it have lost touch with the American people and basic moral values.
Looking forward to debate.

Leah
Hello! br br I am a Christian mother of two. I l... (show quote)


Hello, Leah......and a hearty welcome from a fellow traveler!!
Go to
Jan 16, 2016 06:30:07   #
missinglink wrote:
A blog reference. Great. I Read it. Full of generalities and vague undocumented statements and I am taking a wild guess here, mostly from far left zaelots.

A very nice feel good fairy tale for squeamish little girls from blue states. Oh yeah, your winning !!! Winning what ?

Keep practicing your propaganda sk**ls and maybe one day you will discover how parroting generalized vague statements and or personal opinions don't mean squat to those who can think.



They know they can't affect anything - and that's net even the goal, it's all about acquiring and maintaining power. Anyone who cares to inquire honestly already knows that gun violence has been steadily declining for decades. Obama even acknowleged as much to Taya Kyle during his farce of a townhall. Carl Rove said it best: he who frames the debate wins it.
Go to
Jan 15, 2016 23:14:50   #
RWNJ wrote:
A bubble head? I've heard stories about you guys. And why would any sane person want to get on a boat that sinks on purpose? :shock:


That's where nobody knows where you are
Go to
Jan 15, 2016 07:56:54   #
RWNJ wrote:
...and offer your younger self some advice, what would it be?

If I could do that, I'd tell myself to never pick up that first cigarette. :hunf:


I would not have left the Submarine Service
Go to
Jan 15, 2016 07:31:53   #
Kevyn wrote:
It is not, it is photoshopped bulls**t, what kind of world class assholes would put something like that on their welcome sign? Visitors would rightly question the mental health of everyone in the state.


Criminals might............terrorists and thugs would make a bee-line to your house
Go to
Jan 11, 2016 07:01:57   #
Richard94611 wrote:
I would like to know what in the opinions of readers of this forum were the accomplishments of President George W. Bush while he was in office. Any suggestions ?


Reduction of AIDS in Africa
Go to
Jan 4, 2016 08:07:01   #
JMHO wrote:
Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.....yawn.....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz


Have to disagree with you on this; read "Shadows of Power".
Go to
Jan 3, 2016 06:49:42   #
Floyd Brown wrote:
I have been on this site long enough to see that there is a great division among us.

There are those that claim to be a Patriot who would destroy our nation by force rather than make room in this country for those that are not to their liking.

Those that feel it is best to destroy what made this country what it was at it's best.

Just remember that there is a fine line between a Patriot & a Terrorist. Even though the line is fine it all depends on who draws the line. It is the ones with the most power.

Just remember the Minutemen were Terrorist to the British.

I will let you claim to be what ever you wish but there are others that may claim you to be the other.

The system has come to be not what you would like it to be. You fail to put the blame in the right place.

The way to make things better is to Unite & find the real cause of our problems & look for the changes need to put the country back on track from with in the system.

The greatest threat to this nation is coming from within because we are so divided.

Be careful of what you would destroy in your quest to make this country into what you would like to see.
I have been on this site long enough to see that t... (show quote)


Immigration used to seen as an asset to which newcomers contributed, rather than a limitless well of abundance from which they could draw endlessly without contributing anything.
Go to
Jan 2, 2016 09:40:11   #
AL gouhti wrote:
Over the past few years a t***satlantic political and social movement that is now commonly known as the Counterjihad has gained increasing prominence. As it became more mainstream, it attract attention from the legacy media, especially in Europe, where the debate over Islamization has made it to the pages of major newspapers.

The resistance to Islamization and sharia started long before September 11, 2001. The roots of the movement can be traced back to antiquity, since the first violent razzia against Christian civilization in the 7th century, under Mohammed and the early Caliphs. Successive jihad attacks destroyed the Christian cultures of the Middle East, North Africa, and parts of southern Europe. With each wave of Islamic invasion, Europeans became aware of Islamic ideology through its deadly praxis. Popes, Patriarchs, and scholars wrote about the nature of the Mohammedan aggression, and the necessity for resistance to it. European Christians massed forces to launch Crusades in an attempt to reclaim Muslim-conquered territories in the Near East for Christendom.

Moorish Islam was expelled from Spain by the Reconquista in 1492, and the tide of the Ottoman expansion was turned back at the Gates of Vienna in 1683. For the next two centuries European civilization was ascendant, as Turkish power gradually receded and disappeared from the Balkans and Greece. Europeans were technologically superior to Islamic cultures, and became the colonial masters of Muslims in North Africa, Asia Minor, the Arabian Peninsula, the Indian subcontinent, and the archipelagoes of the Indian Ocean.

During those years the ideology of Islam ceased to matter to Europeans, and the violent and expansionist doctrines of the Koran, the hadith, and the Sunna no longer drew much attention among non-Muslims. Occasionally a European writer — most notably Winston Churchill, in The River War — would analyze the barbaric, inhumane, and imperialistic ideology of the Mohammedans. By and large, however, the menace of Islamic violence, which had been intimately familiar to millions of Europeans for a millennium, was forgotten.

All that changed when the ownership of Middle Eastern oil fields passed from European and American corporations into the hands of Muslim emirs. Suddenly the Islamic world was awash with wealth. And, for the first time in history, all that bounty became available to Muslims without the necessity of conquest and slaughter.

The reality of Islamic economic power drew the attention of the West during the oil crisis of 1974. The satraps of Muslim countries were able to put a thumb on the petroleum carotid of Western Europe and bring European political leaders to their knees. In the ensuing years, the Islamic colonization of London, Paris, Marseille, Brussels, and Rotterdam began in Europe. The first urban Islamic enclaves formed in those cities and others, becoming the nuclei of the notorious no-go zones and sharia enclaves that have metastasized for the last three decades all across Western Europe.

Among Sunni Muslims the fundamentalist revival was spearheaded by a group known as Al-Ikhwan Al-Muslimeen, or the Muslim Brotherhood. Founded in Egypt in 1928 by Hassan al-Banna, the Brotherhood grew in popularity during the middle of the 20th century, even under official state repression by the Nasser regime. Al-Banna was assassinated in 1949, after which Sayyid Qutb took over the leadership of the group. Qutb was a prolific writer and theoretician, and his works inspired millions of Sunni Muslims throughout the Middle East and beyond. By the time he was hanged in 1966, the Muslim Brotherhood had become a formidable force in Middle Eastern politics, even though it was banned. The stage was thus set for the oil-funded Islamic revival.

The current crisis began with the Islamic Revolution in Iran in 1979. The origins of the Counterjihad may be traced to the writer V.S. Naipaul, who was the first prominent observer to understand what was at stake, and what lay ahead. He visited Iran and other Muslim countries in the wake of the Iranian revolution in an attempt to understand the Islamic awakening. The following report, from the hinterlands of Sind in Pakistan, presents the Islamic worldview in a nutshell*:

The maulana’s [religious teacher’s] room was more enclosed than the guest house, but not less bare. He had been lying down on his string bed; he sat up to talk to me. He was turbanned and bearded, an old man, but still vigorous, and not gentle. In the late-afternoon gloom, soon made gloomier by a very weak electric bulb, in the dust and bareness of his peasant setting, he was alive with a religious passion that was like malevolence: the passion for the true faith running, as it can easily run, into the idea of Islam in danger, the need for the holy war, the idea of the enemy.

He asked me about myself and my travels. I told him I had been to Iran.

He said, “Khomeini is a good man. He is Islamic.”

“Why do you say that?” I had expected him, so orthodox and fierce, to disapprove of Khomeini’s Shia Islam as a deviation.

He said, “He has banned women from appearing on television.”

This was all that he knew of Iran since the revolution.

He said, “We don’t have an Islamic government here.”

How could he say that? The government had ordered civil servants to break off every day and say their prayers It had legislated for Koranic punishments like whipping and stoning to death. It was talking of levying a Koranic tax, to be paid out to the poor as alms. The president had just made the pilgrimage to Mecca. What more did the maulana want?

He said, “They haven’t abolished interest in the banks.” The Prophet had outlawed usury; a banking system that depended on interest was not Islamic.

What kind of banking system did he want? How did he want the financial affairs of the country to be managed?

He didn’t know. He hadn’t thought about it. But he didn’t care. He said, “If Pakistan makes money in an Islamic way, everything will follow.” He was pleased with that thought — logic was one of the subjects taught at his school — and he repeated it slowly.

He was half a politician, a man of local influence; and in his criticism of the government there was no doubt some local or personal grudge. But he was not being disingenuous; he lived by his rules. His world had shrunk to a hut in a crumbling village. He was prepared for even that to crumble away further, once the faith was served.

Mr. Naipaul was prescient in his analysis of the ideological imperatives of Islamic doctrine, anticipating the rest of us by more than twenty years. His brief account includes the Sunni-Shi’a divide, jihad, the subjugation of women, barbaric Islamic punishments, sharia-compliant finance, and Islam’s theological indifference to the material well-being of its adherents. All of these issues are now routinely highlighted by 21st-century Counterjihad activists.

The Third Wave of the Great Islamic Jihad was further inflamed by the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, which also took place in 1979. Over the next decade the United States covertly armed and trained the Afghan mujahideen as an anti-Soviet resistance force, laying the groundwork for what eventually became the Taliban.

Islamic violence intruded more and more on Western consciousness throughout the late 1980s and 1990s. The death fatwa against Salman Rushdie, the first World Trade Center attack in 1993, the Khobar Towers bombing in 1995, the African embassy bombings in 1998, the attack on the U.S.S. Cole in 2000: all of these served to increase public awareness of Islam’s propensity for violence, and forced Western political leaders to adjust their policies to take the new reality into account.

During these “prodromal” years in the 1990s, members of the Muslim Brotherhood quietly inserted themselves into positions of influence in federal, state, and local governments in the United Stares. Their new roles allowed them to exert subtle influence over the direction of American government policy vis-à-vis Islam. A parallel Brotherhood infiltration occurred in Western Europe during the same period, especially in cultural institutions.

These pr********ns left the Ikhwan fully prepared to neutralize any serious attempts by Western governments to deal with radical Islam within their societies. Brotherhood operatives developed a shrewd understanding of modern Political Correctness and M**************m, which allowed them to exploit the weak spots in Western culture by invoking the shibboleths of “r****m” and “xenophobia”.

Then came September 11th. Millions of people who had never paid any attention to Islam suddenly became aware of the destructive power that was inherent in its ideology. They began to educate themselves and talk to other people whose interest had been similarly awakened. They formed volunteer organizations, did research, and published articles. With the onset of blogging, anyone could contribute to the cause, and many thousands did.

Thus was the Counterjihad born.
Over the past few years a t***satlantic political ... (show quote)


What are the current activities of this movement and how great are its numbers? What are its sources of funding?
Go to
Jan 2, 2016 08:38:38   #
Onelostdog wrote:
Received from a friend today.

When Bill Clinton was president, he allowed Hillary to assume authority over a health care reform. Even after threats and intimidation, she couldn’t even get a v**e in a democratic controlled congress. This fiasco cost the American taxpayers about $13 million in cost for studies, promotion, and other efforts.

Then President Clinton gave Hillary authority over selecting a female attorney general. Her first two se******ns were Zoe Baird and Kimba Wood – both were forced to withdraw their names from consideration.

Next she chose Janet Reno – husband Bill described her se******n as “my worst mistake.” Some may not remember thatReno made the decision to gas David Koresh and the Branch Davidian religious sect in Waco, Texas resulting in dozens of deaths of women and children.

Husband Bill allowed Hillary to make recommendations for the head of the Civil Rights Commission. Lani Guanier was her se******n. When a little probing led to the discovery of Ms. Guanier’s radical views, her name had to be withdrawn from consideration.

Apparently a slow learner, husband Bill allowed Hillary to make some more recommendations. She chose former law partners Web Hubbel for the Justice Department, Vince Foster for the White House staff, and William Kennedy for the Treasury Department. Her se******ns went well: Hubbel went to prison, Foster (presumably) committed suicide, and Kennedy was forced to resign.


Many younger v**es will have no knowledge of “Travelgate.” Hillary wanted to award unfettered travel contracts to Clinton friend Harry Thompson – and the White House Travel Office refused to comply. She managed to have them reported to the FBI and fired. This ruined their reputations, cost them their jobs, and caused a thirty-six month investigation. Only one employee, Billy Dale was charged with a crime, and that of the enormous crime of mixing personal and White House funds. A jury acquitted him of any crime in less than two hours.

Still not convinced of her ineptness, Hillary was allowed to recommend a close Clinton friend, Craig Livingstone, for theposition of Director of White House security. When Livingstone was investigated for the improper access of about 900 FBI files of Clinton enemies (Filegate) and the widespread use of drugs by White House staff, suddenly Hillary and the president denied even knowing Livingstone, and of course, denied knowledge of drug use in the White House. Following this debacle, the FBI closed its White House Liaison Office after more than thirty years of service to seven presidents.


Next, when women started coming forward with allegations of sexual harassment and rape by Bill Clinton, Hillary was put in charge of the “bimbo eruption” and scandal defense. Some of her more notable decisions in the debacle was:
She urged her husband not to settle the Paula Jones lawsuit. After the Starr investigation they settled with Ms. Jones.

She refused to release the Whitewater documents, which led to the appointment of Ken Starr as Special Prosecutor. After $80 million dollars of taxpayer money was spent, Starr's investigation led to Monica Lewinsky, which led to Bill lying about and later admitting his affairs.

Hillary’s devious game plan resulted in Bill losing his license to practice law for 'lying under oath' to a grand jury and then hissubsequent impeachment by the House of Representatives.

Hillary avoided indictment for perjury and obstruction of justice during the Starr investigation by repeating, “I do not recall,” “I have no recollection,” and “I don’t know” a total of 56 times while under oath.

After leaving the White House, Hillary was forced to return an estimated $200,000 in White House furniture, china, and artworkthat she had stolen.
What a swell party – ready for another four or eight year of this type low-life mess?

Now we are exposed to the destruction of possibly incriminating emails while Hillary was Secretary of State and the “pay to play” schemes of the Clinton Foundation – we have no idea what shoe will fall next. But to her loyal fans - “what difference does it make?”

Electing Hillary Clinton president would be like granting Satan absolution and giving him the keys to heaven!

Please pass this on. Our way of life may depend on it.
Received from a friend today. br br When Bill Cli... (show quote)


Poster children of the term: white trash!
Go to
Jan 1, 2016 09:37:25   #
mwdegutis wrote:
As we enjoyed the Holidays with our family and friends, House DEMOCRATS moved to implement America’s first Sharia Law. If they get their way…they will be stripping us of our basic rights, and we need to be prepared for their TERRIFYING hope…and get Americans aware of what is happening!

On December 17, Democrat Congressmen quietly sponsored House Resolution 569, a resolution that asks lawmakers to condemn “violence, bigotry, and h**eful rhetoric towards Muslims in the United States.” The resolution specifically mentions Muslims, no other religious groups, and will serve as a test by which further criminalizing of “Islamophobia” may be introduced.

Democrats have shamelessly lumped together “h**e speech” with “violence” in an effort to compare criticism of Islam to physically harming Muslims. H. Res. 569 threatens to restrict our right to even report facts that tarnish Islam’s reputation, a law that all Sharia-governed countries already have in place.

According to Congress.gov, the resolution reads:

“Now, therefore, be it resolved, that the House of Representatives denounces in the strongest terms the increase of h**e speech, intimidation, violence, vandalism, arson, and other h**e crimes targeted against mosques, Muslims, or those perceived to be Muslim; urges local and Federal law enforcement authorities to work to prevent h**e crimes; and to prosecute to the fullest extent of the law those perpetrators of h**e crimes”

Muslims are slaughtering innocent people more than any other religious groups combined, all while refusing as a whole to condemn this barbaric Islamic terrorism, yet we are working to ensure these silent, consenting “moderates” have special protection — protection that they have never allowed religious minorities in their own countries.

In another passage, Democrats laughably purport that Muslims have contributed to the fabric of American society, but we’re assuming they don’t mean terrorist attacks on U.S. soil, countless frivolous CAIR lawsuits, whitewashed Islamic education in public schools, or whining about pork products and a lack of taxpayer-funded prayer rooms.

“Whereas this Muslim community is recognized as having made innumerable contributions to the cultural and economic fabric and well-being of United States society”

Still, the bill is purposefully vague in that it mentions prosecuting the perpetrators of “h**e speech,” yet gives no definition for what it considers h**e speech. Of course, we who have spoken out about the intolerant fundamentals of Islam understand that this means uttering anything critical of Islam or its followers, regardless of facts or relevance to the Quran.

In conclusion, the bill ridiculously compares criticizing Islam as a violation of Muslims’ “civil rights,” as if disagreeing or even openly mocking someone’s beliefs is unconstitutional. Our forefathers had exactly political and religious mockery in mind when they penned our amendments, having experience the violation of limited speech and worship by their own King George III.

Indeed, free speech was never intended to defend inoffensive speech, because inoffensive speech needs no protection. Freedom of speech is solely for the offensive, meant to prevent those who would limit it because of their opposing beliefs.

We are witnessing the very implementation of Sharia law as it has always been established in every modern-day Islamic country. Of course they wouldn’t start by legalizing the execution of homosexuals or mandating the hijab for every woman, because we wouldn’t accept being forced to adopt full Sharia right off the bat. You can’t cook a frog by placing him in scalding water — he’ll jump out. However, you can slowly increase the temperature until he is boiling before he ever knew the water was uncomfortable.

The ONLY way to keep Sharia Law from stripping us from our FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS…is to practice them! Spread the awareness of what the Democrats are doing! Fight for your rights!
As we enjoyed the Holidays with our family and fri... (show quote)



Riding the coat tails of Fabion Socialism
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 ... 71 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.