News
Let’s Be Clear: Immunization Travel Papers Are Unconstitutional
By US Politics and News On Apr 16, 2020




The American right to freedom of movement was included in the Articles of Confederation, predating the Constitution. Americans in the US colonies would not be required to “show their papers” if they wanted to cross from North Carolina into Virginia.

This freedom of movement principle was so obvious to everyone that the Founding Fathers didn’t even bother to include it in the Bill of Rights. It’s too bad that Thomas Jefferson and John Adams didn’t have a super-genius like Dr. Anthony F***i around to tell them how dumb they were!

Vice President Mike Pence banned the members of his c****av***s task force from talking to CNN and MSNBC, and that’s a good thing. Unfortunately, Dr. Anthony F***i is still running over to CNN regularly to spout his insane (and usually inaccurate) ideas. CNN is loving it!

On one of his latest appearances, one of the Democrat Party operative hosts asked F***i if Americans should be required to carry a C****-** “immunity card” before they can leave their houses or travel from point A to point B. F***i thought that idea sounded just peachy.

“It’s one of those things we talk about when we want to make sure that we know who the vulnerable people are and not,” said F***i.

Who’s this “we” that is talking about restricting the movement of Americans unless they show their papers to the authorities?

No, seriously. I want their names. The American people deserve to know the names of every federal official who is “talking about” the idea of preventing kids from going off to college, couples from honeymooning in Vegas, grandparents from visiting their grandchildren in Pennsylvania and so on, unless they get an official Mother-May-I card from the government.

“This is something that’s being discussed,” F***i continued. “I think it might actually have some merit, under certain circumstances.”

No.

And again, no.


It is not a thing that has any merit under any circumstances. This would be no different than abolishing the First Amendment, Second Amendment, or pick any amendment unless you first obtain a government license. Freedom of movement is a fundamental right that is so obvious that it wasn’t even included in the Bill of Rights.

So again… NO!

Here’s an example of how venerated the freedom of movement actually is, according to the US Supreme Court:

Suppose that a person lives in State A, but wishes to move to State B. That person is on welfare in State A. If that person moves to State B, that state has to immediately begin paying welfare payments to them. State B cannot put a one-month, six-month or one-year residency requirement on that individual before it begins paying welfare to them. That’s according to the Supreme Court in Shapiro v. Thompson in 1969. The reason behind the ruling is that it places an undue restriction on that individual’s right to freedom of movement.

I know that sounds a bit crazy to all of us normal people, but that is how the law actually works and is interpreted. It’s kind of like free speech. You may not like what a person is saying, but their right to say it supersedes your nonexistent right to never be offended.

Placing any sort of restriction on an American’s right to travel from one place in the US to another is blatantly unconstitutional – even though there’s nothing in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights that says Congress cannot infringe your right to freedom of movement.

You know who required citizens to carry around papers to prove that they should be allowed to move around?

N**is. And c*******t Soviets.

“Your papers, please!” is almost a cliché and it used to be sort of funny whenever we would see it in a movie about N**i Germany or the Cold War Soviets. It is an utterly ridiculous concept to us as Americans, because we have a constitutional right to move about within our own country without having a special license from the government. (I know, I know, all the libertarians started whining about driver licenses when I said that. Just go smoke some more weed and give it some more thought, guys.)

A C****-** immunization card for travel is no different than a Jew Card or a Black Card or a Mexican Card or an Asian Card in terms of constitutional law. That’s why we shouldn’t be tinkering with our constitutional rights during a temporary medical panic.

I haven't watched TV for 20 years, don't even own one now. Life is for living not for watching from the sidelines.

NPP

And just where is this 24000 per person per year supposed to come from? There are a lot of people who would never bother to go to work is they could get $2000 per month and not have to get off their fat butts at all.

That sounds like an impossible scenario to me, but I am not a scientist

Donald Trump has one ace in the hole to shut down the WHO


The World Health Organization has emerged as one of the great villains of the c****av***s p******c.

The organization helped China cover up the outbreak and allowed it to spread across the globe.

And now Donald Trump has one ace in the hole to shut down the WHO.

At a White House press briefing on Tuesday President Trump announced he was putting a hold on the over $500 million the United States sent to the World Health Organization.

The President made this decision to hold the WHO accountable for its disastrous pro-China stance during the early days of the outbreak.

President Trump cited the fact that on January 14 the WHO repeated Chinese propaganda that there was no evidence of human to human t***smission of the c****av***s.

Nearly ten days later the WHO fought against declaring an emergency based on the faulty data from China.

Now a devastating report in Australia found that in January when countries could have stopped the spread of the v***s, the WHO fought with health experts from multiple countries over travel bans to keep infected people traveling out of China from seeding the globe with potential outbreaks.

In Australia, Sky News digital editor Jack Houghton reported:

[WHO] actually decided not to go ahead with [travel ban recommendations] and not declare a global health emergency but there were a few dissenting voices. So the official meeting records say there was a divergence of views but they won’t actually go into detail about who was trying to block it. But there were doctors there who wanted to issue travel bans and the World Health Organization blocked it.

The WHO also strongly condemned the President’s travel ban at the end of January.

Many Americans cheered the President’s decision to stop funding to the WHO.

The WHO failed its primary mission during the c****av***s p******c by acting as a propaganda mouthpiece for the Chinese government instead of a organization to protect the public health.

We are waiting for our check or extra money in the bank. .........thereare many people who need food or clothing, so whe the stay in place rule as gone we will probably take a couple with kids to the WalMart or some other inexpensive place and help them pick out a few things. The adventure of taking them out and sharing their miles is worth it, and frankly, I have a lot of clothes that I haven't worn and should, why buy more?

SWMBO

That is good to know. I have used ZiCam for a Mastiff dog with a serious intestinal problem and within a week he was back to normal and has no problems since.

Maybe he's looking for boyfriends

Thank you for the compliment.

Excellent idea!!!

Lots of people don't like me, and the feeling is mutual, so we all sleep well enough. Actually I may sleep better than they do because I am armed and have 3 140 pound dogs to protect me, and they probably only have a goldfish.

Yes, I understand that Alaska has not totally shut down and I want to know why. Supposedly the v***s spreads more quickly in cold areas so Alaska should be hit really hard.

And we really want those two to survive?

SWMBO

That it came from a lab really makes a lot of sense from the point of China. Apparently it was not originally designed as a weapon but just as a case of one upmanship against the USA. Instead it appears that it will put China back by fifty years. Hopefully we can get enough USA workers to do many of the jobs we decided the Chinese could do better and cheaper. Cheaper, yes, as they do have labor camps, and look upon their citizens as ants that are all disposable, as is the norm for all Communist countries.

How to you define inbred? The correct definition is two people, or animals who are brother and sister, father and daughter, mother and son, a grandparent grandchild breeding. There is no such genetic evidence in the Trump family. However, if you want inbreeding or close breeding look to the Muslim community where it is common for men to have as wives or mistresses their cousins or grand daughters. While thousands of years ago people in small tribes did breed to cousins or second cousins because that was what was available, and the British royalty did the same thing to keep the power and wealth close at hand, it is now illegal in most civilized countries because of the genetic problems. Unfortunately, because a great number of children do not know which of the sexual partners of the mother is actually their sire, there are several studies that indicate that within the slum communities inbreeding is now starting to be a problem. However, don't say Trumps family is inbred, it only indicates that you know nothing about the subject. On second thought, keep saying stupid things like that, it reminds us of what a fool you really are.