manning5me wrote:
I support the position that we do not know how life originated. I will use a single argument to buttress my position.
Science has postulated that life began with a single cell.
A living cell has been shown to be extremely complex, with all kinds of interior mechanisms needed for it to function, including DNA and RNA to manufacture amino acid chains and other large complex functional structures. Many of the structures must be completed inside time limits of a few hours, and not millions of years too, or else they refuse to form properly. Protein folds, are a good example of this.
Science has absolutely no clue as to how to construct such a cell and to ensure its functionality. Thus they have no way to state that they have conquered the origin of life.
The idea that in the early times, a primal soup had all the chemicals needed to make life once struck by lightning, the Miller/Uray Experiment, has been proven to be false.
I thank Dr. James Tour for his insight into the origins of life.
I support the position that we do not know how lif... (
show quote)
I wasn't aware that the Miller-Uray experiment had been proven false... In what way???