In TX the cases are decreasing despite the news saying the opposite. This morning I listened to a hospital release from a hospital official in Tucson which said Banner Hospital had the highest percentage of C***D cases of all the Tucson hospitals, and they had 20% of the beds occupied were with C***D related cases, as well as saying the hospitals had far more empty beds than normal. ICU at Banner was only 30% occupied. Less than an hour later the local Tucson news related that hospitals in Tucson were overwhelmed with C***D cases and advised rescheduling any other medical procedures.

So which do you believe on the conditions of the hospitals? The Hospitals or the reporters?

Not that you'd acknowledge even if you noticed, but since Trump became our president, he has worked hard for and made great strides into prison reform, he has begun programs to bring more businesses and jobs to poor black communities and allocated more federal subsidies to black universities. This is all stuff Obama never cared about - for him it was just lip service based on race politics intended to keep the black v**e while getting it on the cheap.

That said, personal choices count no matter what color you are or what economic background you come from. I know plenty of b****s who grew up in "disadvantaged" circumstances and, rather than waste their lives doing drugs or taking the criminal route to obtain money, took responsibility for themselves, studied, worked hard and to this day live normally and independently of taxpayer largesse.

Unfortunately, too many young b****s drink the Democrat Kool-Aid® and end up permanent wards of the government, alternating between the public dole and prison unless they're k**led early by street violence or drugs.

I see it all the time when I go into Santa Monica or downtown L.A., scores of young black men sitting around during prime daytime hours smoking dope and blasting rap music instead of being out looking for work. I'd be willing to bet that 9 in 10 of them collects some form of relief and probably food stamps as well.

The tired story that because most of them probably have criminal records and therefore can't get work is B.S.; I have chatted with homeless men in the L.A. area who manage to find labor jobs every day, some paying well above the minimum wage, and none of these casual labor jobs comes with the hiree's background as an issue. Two such homeless men were black.

The problem is that the Democrats, needing the black v**e, believe that the best way to retain it is to throw as many obstacles to independence and success in front of the b****s as they can, then blame "r****m" and "white privilege" while lyingly assuring them that "we're the only ones who empathize with you and the only ones who have your back."

It's utterly despicable that a political party is so bloodless and soulless that it can knowingly keep nearly an entire race living in tragic circumstances by lying to them purely to achieve political power.

While you seem to be "understanding" where drug addicted criminals are concerned, I am not. Most of them come from environments in which they've seen first hand what happens when you mess with these drugs, be it crack, heroin, meth, wh**ever, and without anybody twisting their arms, they try them anyway and continue to use them until they are addicted.

I have no problem with any moron who wants to destroy his or her life via drug or alcohol addiction -- I do have a major problem with those who victimize others they don't even know in order to feed their habits, making these Innocents co-dependents of habits they aren't stupid enough to have acquired.

These addicts introduce tragedy of various kinds into the lives of people who have absolutely nothing to do with them or their habits.

Democrats are always screaming about justice and claiming victimhood for these very real victimizers while completely ignoring the damage they perpetrate on their very real victims, who almost never get any justice.

In short, I look at sympathizing for the druggies in question while dev****g what amounts to zero time to their victims, a trait of liberal Democrats going back decades, as profoundly convoluted.

I'm not talking about the c****av***s itself is f**e I'm talking about the media trying to hike the p******c is f**e this k**ls less people than the flu and we have doctors that are just all out lying to you especially dr. Falchi first he says that mass don't protect you and then he says I would wear a mask and you got doctors that talk out of both sides of their mouth I don't take those people seriously just like I don't take this p******c seriously cuz this is another false-f**g to try to bring President Trump down that's all it is just that people are too dumb to see it

Dr. Fouchi is a liar and a fraud he's also an Obama holdover so is Doctor Burks! Need I say more! Both of them doctors have been wrong from the beginning because they were part of the plan along with the Democrat Party the WHO and the Chinese C*******t party to try to bring President Trump down with this f**e p******c! I guess with all the r**ting no social distancing. Two weeks ago municipalities all across America wanted to arrest you for opening your business back up but,yet it's alright to l**t and destroy cities. That's how you know this was a f**e p******c created by the powers that be to bring down this President.

There's also the degree of crimes to be considered, I think.

A little over a quarter century (wow, tempus does indeed fugit!) ago when I was employed in a casino security department in Reno, we and the other clubs' security and surveillance departments collectively kept statistic track of such items as g****r, race and ethnicity and age groups of those observed (surveillance cameras virtually always recorded even those who got away, so no assumptions were made) and/or apprehended committing crimes on casino property.

At that time, b****s only made up about 7% of the local population, yet represented some 85-90% of crime perpetrators in the casinos, and it was almost uniquely the same degree of crime -- the easiest to get busted for, potentially lowest yield (stupid?) stuff like purse snatching, inevitably doing so in front of several videocams.

On the other hand, the majority of white perpetrated crimes were gutsier, smarter and higher yield venues such as fraud, forgery and passing counterfeit bills.

Hispanics and Asians fell right in between the two with considerably less of any crime while native Americans, mostly of the Paiute tribe, never committed any monetary crimes at all, essentially their only offenses had to do with becoming intoxicated and going on "the warpath" (drunk and rowdy).