One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: acknowledgeurma
Page: <<prev 1 ... 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 ... 77 next>>
Feb 23, 2018 12:14:13   #
eagleye13 wrote:
It appears attacking "W****s" is Okay with you Jedi. You are poisoned, and you live here. Go try out Rhodesia/Zimbabwe.
The Constitution was designed to protect minorities; not give them the power they can't handle, or abuse.

Well, the Constitution's design did include the Senate, which does give some minorities more power than population numbers would allow. Whether they handle that power well and without abuse, some may wonder.
Go to
Feb 23, 2018 11:28:55   #
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
Hymen continues to prove her ignorance!


Trumps c***t sheet!

https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/21/politics/trump-parkland-notecard/index.html

The report does say, "Trump didn't appear to use the visible prompts, but he did cast a tender tone during the event, saying he grieved for those affected."

Just because an aide made a list of talking points, does not mean they were needed. This alone would not be proof of President Trump's lack of empathy.
Go to
Feb 23, 2018 11:13:48   #
lindajoy wrote:
Helll the FBI is more of a crooked run operation than the mafia~~ save it no one believes your spin on everything..

Do you really believe this?
Go to
Feb 22, 2018 17:02:37   #
eagleye13 wrote:
No problem with wondering acknowledgeurma.
You make some points worth wondering about.
But you think poly-wogs (early species) given a whole lot of time would develop the intelligence of Homo Sapiens. Even monkeys? Homo Sapiens are in a class by themselves. Both good and bad.

BTW; I do not think you have a pointy head. Just having some fun

I do not think "poly-wogs (early species)" would develop the intelligence of Homo Sapiens, but it seems very plausible that their descendants did.
Go to
Feb 22, 2018 16:46:38   #
drlarrygino wrote:
You did see where the Trump curse was put on Lindsey "Gone" Vaughn the "not so great" American Olympic skiier who flopped again because she bad mouthed Trump? She didn't even medal in the combined downhill!!. Be careful kemmer, you bash Trump at your peril. Trump is God's anointed leader. So many others who have bashed Trump are now failures!!!

That's why always try to think good thing about President Trump. And after all, who could think anything bad of a six year old boy?
Go to
Feb 22, 2018 15:49:03   #
drlarrygino wrote:
You loons on the left will be the 1st ones to r**t, pillage, burn and plunder when you hear and see that the 1st black president has been indicted for treason and is heading to prison. What a glorious site that will be as finally real justice has prevailed against this l*****t con man. I already heard that Congress is ready to charge ovommit with criminal activity for illegally surveilling Trump even before he took office and that Ovommit has now sought legal counsel. It's getting closer to Dday for the corrupt dems and ovommit.
You loons on the left will be the 1st ones to r**t... (show quote)

Why does this kind of talk remind me of Harry Turtledove's novel Joe Steel?
Go to
Feb 22, 2018 12:34:46   #
Floyd Brown wrote:
We need to have reasonable control over what is in the best interest of public safety on the issue of gun control.

In any rational settings the findings of SOCTUS would be considered.

Limitations are needed in just who has & what kind of weapons can be had.
The court finding out lined reasonable rules.
The issue of a M*****a is the one legal way to bring about control over the issue.

There is such a great fear or h**e in the minds of some that lack a basic trust in their fellow man.
Not the best person to have unlimited access to Weapons.
We need to have reasonable control over what is in... (show quote)

I think what you suggest is reasonable and probably in line with what the founders intended with the 2nd amendment. But given the current climate, and Republican politicians' reliance on the enthusiasm for unlimited gun access on the part of a large and active group of their supporters, seeing the limitations you suggest are very unlikely. Sad.
Go to
Feb 22, 2018 11:51:50   #
Floyd Brown wrote:
Get one thing in your head clear.
In the end only individuals with a connection to a regulated State M*****a as per the Constitution will be allowed to have guns.
Just how & what they can doo with those weapons will be controlled by the M*****a.
Now if you feel that you wish to keep your weapons that is a issue you need to work on.

Every one should not be able to carry a gun. The M*****a is the only approved way to go about the issue.

There once was a National Guard until they made it part of the regular Military.
I would say that many present gun owners could qualify & ways could be found for most to keep their Guns.

The buying & selling of guns would cut back greatly in just who could have & what kinds.
Get one thing in your head clear. br In the end o... (show quote)

That is not what SOCTUS determined:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller
Go to
Feb 20, 2018 15:09:38   #
drlarrygino wrote:
The only thing really hilariously kooky is the way you tried to spell persuasion. I am LMAO about how ignorant you l*****ts are and how your spelling is atrocious. I would enjoy debating you further but it's obvious you are not the brightest bulb on the l*****t intellectual chart. Most l*****ts aren't too bright by the way! CIAO YOU L*****T LOSER!!

Before you cast aspersions on another's spelling, remember:
evert means - turn (a structure or organ) outward or inside out.
avert means - prevent or ward off (an undesirable occurrence).
Go to
Feb 20, 2018 15:01:32   #
Jakebrake wrote:
I was unaware McConnell wielded that much power. Next you libs will be telling us it was McConnell running the country during the 8 years of the halfricans failed reign. Gawd, you loons are a hoot!

Did you listen to what Bidden said? Did you understand what he said? If so, could you paraphrase what he said?

I understand Bidden to say, that Obama proposed to McConnell that a bipartisan statement be sent to the Russians, stating that the United States was aware of the Russian's efforts to interfere in our e******ns and if they refused to stop there would be consequences. McConnell refused to go along with this bipartisan statement. Bidden (and Obama?) understood this to mean that, if Obama sent a public warning to Russia, the Republicans would say that it was an attempt on Obama's part, to bring US intelligence agencies into the e******n process.
Go to
Feb 20, 2018 11:55:46   #
lpnmajor wrote:
Um, he did do something. Remember the sanctions Obama put on Russia? Remember the Russian personnel ousted and the spy buildings confiscated? You know, the buildings Trump was going to give back. The only thing Obama screwed up, was not telling the American people exactly what the Russians were doing, telling it loudly and often.

Regarding Obama's silence on this, Bidden says this:
Former Vice President Joe Biden claims that Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) blocked the Obama administration from warning the public about possible Russian interference in the 2016 p**********l e******n.
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2018/01/24/biden-mcconnell-blocked-obama-admin-sot.cnn
Go to
Feb 20, 2018 11:42:01   #
proud republican wrote:
Yes i did Thats why its BS!!!

So you say that it is BS, when the article says the Republican Party has embraced Supply-Side Economics?
Go to
Feb 20, 2018 01:59:17   #
proud republican wrote:
Yes i did Thats why its BS!!!

So you say that it is BS, when the article says the Republican Party has branded itself as The Party Of Tax Cuts?
Go to
Feb 20, 2018 00:37:32   #
whitnebrat wrote:
Ummmm ... if I recall correctly, the Dossier was originally started as an oppo research project by the Trump Campaign. For some reason, they discontinued and the Clinton campaign picked it up and finished it. In either case, it has been verified in many instances as to its accuracy, most recently in the indictments that were made public last Friday. Why can't you all accept factual evidence from multiple sources?

As I recall, the Dossier was originally started by Republican opponents of Trump, not the Trump Campaign.
Go to
Feb 20, 2018 00:15:26   #
proud republican wrote:
Dont believe a word in this alternet s'it
img src="https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/ima... (show quote)

Of course you don't, but did you even read it?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 ... 77 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.