This is true Jack, let's see what new laws they'll come up with, I've already read to reinstate being a property owner, but as things stand now that may include a lot of Chinese. LOL

Something I could see the Republican party trying to do next.

I see and doesn't that equate to the "lexicon" of the right relentless narrative calling everyone, not on the right, c*******ts, Marxists, and anything else they can think of which they spew from their misdirected h**eful minds.

It wasn't defunded by Obama at all, is this a mistake or intentional misinformation? If anyone were to defund in 2012, it would've come through the Republican House, not Obama. Obama had probably changed conditions to TANF due to the hampered recovery of the great recession(ha)from the obstruction from the right, not to mention the unemployment rate at that time. Let us all give them a BIG thank you for that...good job.

You're avoiding(ignoring) what I said, why...because you don't want to acknowledge the t***h of the parties changing. Newsflash nothing remains the same, want proof, take a look at every amendment we've made. The parties have changed...period, go take an American political history class. In respect to what we're talking about reading the history of 1773-74 is pointless.

Show me where it was socialism that caused unrest, and not the dictatorship it was under. Your post is first untrue, second, your comment of liberals doing wh**ever it takes to achieve their goal is not only false but completely over exaggerated. What are these socialistic goals, where are they against our democracy, and "force" their political agenda upon anyone,? Go ahead show me...If you want to see bucks manipulate people with felonious acts, look at your own party before you throw your counterfeit mantra.

Go figure? You obviously haven't been able to do that yet concerning the history of political parties, maybe try and do some research, aah forget it, you'll just deny the t***h and facts.

I'm a defensive player, insults are only thrown back and only on occasion.
I am disappointed more hadn't been done with lobbyists but Obama did issue two executive orders and three p**********l directives that included strict limits on the of work former lobbyists would be able to do. if they are still in place I would have to look into it.

Obama had been disappointing in some ways while he was also constantly undermined, I believe these are the same sentiments from Trump supporters, maybe the third time is the charm and someone worthy will come forward to sew the country together again, that is what I hope.

You've posted this already, you must really like it. The ironic thing is it only shows all that the deniers have denied, good job.

Being "right" means being a 'denier'
Can't argue with that...

Dumb is the comment made by Lindajoy, or dumb is the comment from the right on how much better the earth will be with more CO2 in the atmosphere, dumb is the denial from the right over the physical and factual changes that have been taking place and have been progressing more often and severely every year. Dumb is not implementing industrial changes, now. Dumb is allowing other countries to develop and produce other sources in energy while we get left behind as the dinosaurs the right wishes to keep us as, (still feeding the oil racketeers),you do know what happened to them correct?

This debate is over, the only question at this point needs to be, How to get it done...

Lets be a little more realistic, a campaign speech, really, shall we comb through all the candidate's of past presidents on champagne speeches, as Bush's historic"read my lips... no new taxes". I'm not taking the time to research each little champagne promise that didn't happen, my God man.

How many of those things did he try to do? He, like Trump, had high aspirations but ounce in the house had to come to terms to the reality and how the games are really played.

The key in my mind is not the president but it is our representatives, they are the true engine for change, and as someone had posted where I was researching, it matters little after the bill is passed, let's get it up before it is passed to have a true dialog with the people, now that would be something...but would they listen or ignore us?

I also think posted records of promises not met from their previous terms be published before their ree******n, that of course would be the responsibility of someone to collect that information in each district, something we can pass forward and spread the word. Our representatives are either our strongest links or weakest for our governing the way we wish it to be.

I welcome any civilized non-insulting dialog.

The t***h here varies greatly by ones interpretation. I have wanted to have an opportunity to sit with an Obama h**er during one of his speeches and ask, time after time after a pause..."Ok what do you think he was just saying there?"

More hearsay and unsubstantiated accusations. It's always about planting doubt in the publics mind, why do you think they do that Dave?

Hey Straight, nice to have another person with reason join the party... it's been blast for nick and I LOL