One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Ranger7374
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 503 next>>
Mar 5, 2024 23:46:19   #
So If the past four years was so bad, why not let Don build it back again, quickly? Or do you like failing?

So now the question posed to every American is, why keep beating your head up against that stone wall, and v**e for biden, or we can break through that wall, if we v**e for Trump?

Why fail when we can succeed?
Go to
Mar 5, 2024 16:05:23   #
So, in 2016, we elected Donald Trump as president and he did both good and bad things for the country. Then we elected Joe Biden as president and supposedly he did both good and bad things for the country.

Now since success over time, is generally a measure of whether a person did a good job or a bad job. Can you name five things that Joe Biden did, for the United States of America, that was 1. Built upon Trumps sucessesses, and 2. Has made America better off?

These answers would be, logically, the determining factors in this e******n...

Have fun!
Go to
Mar 5, 2024 12:51:07   #
crazylibertarian wrote:
That's not a bad idea Calconserv but Kevyn will not do it. I've challenged him that way numerous times. He believes that he is above reproach and not bound by the usual rules of discussion.


True
Go to
Mar 5, 2024 12:47:01   #
Just because I, or the media, or a lawyer, or a butcher, baker, candlestic maker accuse some one of a crime, say (i**********n or a felony) that person is innocent until proven guilty.....5th amendment. Which precedes the 14th amendment.

Therefore the ruling of the Supreme Court is just! They're main function interpret the constitution. They interpreted the constitution. Donald J. Trump was never found guilty in a court of law, either by impeachment, or by federal law. Therefore he is not a felon or an i**********nist. Until he his found guilty, he is innocent until proven guilty. They have not proved him guilty.

Show me one ruling where Donald j Trump has been found guilty of i**********n against the United states....I'm waiting....
Go to
Mar 4, 2024 19:39:43   #
1. Do you think Donald Trump is an honest man? Irrelevant. As compared to the politicians in politics today, he is the most honest. But unlike politicians today he gets the job done. What relevance is this question?

2. Do you think he is and was faithful to his wives? What does that have to do with anything, relevance once again. He was faithful as much as a billionaire is. Look at Kennedy, or Clinton, don't be a hypocrite. II can for this question mention Kennedy and Clinton for the simple fact and premise of the act of hypocrisy. What is good for the Democrats is good for the Republicans. If that's not true, we do not live in a democratic Republic.

3. Do you think he committed any financial crimes as a businessman. Such as fraud, tax evasion or wage theft? Again relevance. As far as the ridicules court case in New York, a good lawyer can charge and convict you of the same alleged crimes against Trump. However, there was no victim. So, if there is no body, is there a murder? Same holds true here, if there is no victim, there is no crime.

4. Do you think he retained sensitive records and files when he left office and refused to return them when confronted? again relevance

5. Do you think he reacted properly to the attack on our Capitol? he acted shocked, like anyone in his position would. Some would have ordered the national guard, (to hell with Nacy Pelosi, who refused the Guard). Some would have addressed his supporters not to get involved. What would you do?

6. Do you feel he takes and expresses responsibility for his failures and mistakes? Yes, he does, but not in the manner you expect him to.

As you contemplate these questions please do not resort to saying others have behaved similarly, simply express your honest opinion. [/quote]

Again, I question the relevancy of these questions. The reason I ask relevancy, is because judgement of one should be the judgement against all, which means all gets tried the same way. This is not being done in Trump's case, therefore all questions of this manner is irrelevant for argument on Trump.
Go to
Mar 4, 2024 19:24:22   #
Fedup Veteran wrote:
WELL, if he is ever charged with i**********n, tried and found guilty, I'm sure he would find himself behind bars and at that time congress would disallow him from every running again. You folks seem to think just because you think he is guilty that is all that is needed! WRONG!!!!!!! I'm not a Trump supporter but I am a supporter of T***H who is tired of the folks who tried to impeach the man BEFORE he was even in office! You see you people have no credibility.


Exactly, however in the case of Trump, he was charged in the impeachment, so the double jeopardy law now applies. The House charged him and he was acquitted by the Senate. So he can run for office again. Supreme Court said so. Unless, the constitution is changed, Trump can run.
Go to
Mar 4, 2024 19:20:38   #
Kevyn wrote:
What a joke to call yourself liberty tree. The constitution clearly spells out that Trump is ineligible to hold office. People who support that i***t Svengali are a cancer on everything our nation stands for. Open your eyes, you are under the spell of a mid grade con man.


Again Kevyn he must be tried and found guilty. That was never done. You are wrong. Sorry bro, but you are wrong.
Go to
Mar 4, 2024 19:17:33   #
Kevyn wrote:
How pathetic to allow a t*****rous scumbag who tried to o*******w our country on the b****t, he should be in prison. It is a sad day for our nation.


Never was proven in a court of law Kevyn. Trump has never been charged, never tried, so the ban against him from running, is unconstitutional.
Go to
Mar 1, 2024 10:46:46   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
Moloch
As with many details in ancient history, the exact origin of Moloch/Molech/Molek worship is unclear. The term Moloch is believed to have originated with the Phoenician mlk, which referred to a type of sacrifice made to confirm or acquit a vow. Melekh is the Hebrew word for “king.” It was common for the Israelites to combine the name of pagan gods with the vowels in the Hebrew word for shame: bosheth. This is how the goddess of fertility and war, Astarte, became Ashtoreth. The combination of mlk, melekh, and bosheth results in “Moloch,” which could be interpreted as “the personified ruler of shameful sacrifice.” It has also been spelled Milcom, Milkim, and Malik. Ashtoreth was his consort, and ritual prostitution was considered an important form of worship.

The Phoenicians were a loosely gathered group of people who inhabited Canaan (modern-day Lebanon, Syria, and Israel) between 1550 BC and 300 BC. In addition to sexual rituals, Moloch worship included child sacrifice, or “passing children through the fire.” It is believed that idols of Moloch were giant metal statues of a man with a bull’s head. Each image had a hole in the abdomen and possibly outstretched forearms that made a kind of ramp to the hole. A fire was lit in or around the statue. Babies were placed in the statue’s arms or in the hole. When a couple sacrificed their firstborn, they believed that Moloch would ensure financial prosperity for the family and future children.

Moloch/Molech worship wasn’t limited to Canaan. Monoliths in North Africa bear the engraving “mlk”—often written “mlk’mr” and “mlk’dm,” which may mean “sacrifice of lamb” and “sacrifice of man.” In North Africa, Moloch was renamed “Kronos.” Kronos migrated to Carthage in Greece, and his mythology grew to include his becoming a Titan and the father of Zeus. Moloch is affiliated with and sometimes equated to Ba’al, although the word ba’al was also used to designate any god or ruler.

In Genesis 12 Abraham followed God’s call to move to Canaan. Although human sacrifice was not common in Abraham’s native Ur, it was well-established in his new land. God later asked Abraham to offer Isaac as a sacrifice (Genesis 22:2). But then God distinguished Himself from gods like Moloch. Unlike the native Canaanite gods, Abraham’s God abhorred human sacrifice. God commanded Isaac to be spared, and He provided a ram to take Isaac’s place (Genesis 22:13). God used this event as an illustration of how He would later provide His own Son to take our place.

Over five hundred years after Abraham, Joshua led the Israelites out of the desert to inherit the Promised Land. God knew that the Israelites were immature in their faith and easily distracted from worshiping the one true God (Exodus 32). Before the Israelites had even entered Canaan, God warned them not to participate in Moloch worship (Leviticus 18:21) and repeatedly told them to destroy those cultures that worshiped Moloch. The Israelites didn’t heed God’s warnings. Instead, they incorporated Moloch worship into their own traditions. Even Solomon, the wisest king, was swayed by this cult and built places of worship for Moloch and other gods (1 Kings 11:1–8). Moloch worship occurred in the “high places” (1 Kings 12:31) as well as a narrow ravine outside Jerusalem called the Valley of Hinnom (2 Kings 23:10).

Despite occasional efforts by godly kings, worship of Moloch wasn’t abolished until the Israelites’ captivity in Babylon. (Although the Babylonian religion was pantheistic and characterized by astrology and divination, it did not include human sacrifice.) Somehow, the dispersion of the Israelites into a large pagan civilization succeeded in finally purging them of their false gods. When the Jews returned to their land, they rededicated themselves to God, and the Valley of Hinnom was turned into a place for burning garbage and the bodies of executed criminals. Jesus used the imagery of this place—an eternally burning fire, consuming countless human victims—to describe hell (Matthew 10:28).
i b Moloch /b br As with many details in ancien... (show quote)


That is interesting, that Moleoch and Cronus was one and the same.....thank you Blade, thank you.
Go to
Mar 1, 2024 10:36:00   #
microphor wrote:
Do what you have to do to take care of you in yours. There isn't a migrant illegal or legal of more value than my own family members So stay out of my home and off my property or suffer the consequences


Thank you for your post, however and apparently I must explain something to our liberal friends:

I am an honest man. I live and let live. However, if my life is threatened, I shall stand firm and fight for my own survival. This is not anti American nor anti Christian. This is the law of the jungle, the same law you guys force us to live by.

A hypocrite cannot hold thier fellow humans accountable to a rule or a law, they themselves will not follow. But there is one rule, they can't argue against that is if my life or that of my family and friends life is endangered, I can and will fight to survive, using wh**ever force is necessary.

In the past, I would not have to do that, for the government would do that for me, when the government was just. But when the government t fails to protect the people, it is the duty and right of the people to protect themselves.

That is the course of men since Cain slew Able.
Go to
Mar 1, 2024 00:14:59   #
I live on the border as my signature says, and I'll be damned if those damn migrants will take me or my family out!!!!
Go to
Mar 1, 2024 00:13:26   #
NotMAGA wrote:
The rancher murdered an unarmed man by shooting him in the back. The AZ bill would make that legal.

As I have said before, those who say they are "right to life" only mean "right to birth"


And migrants k**led a rancher near Portal, New Mexico, and Douglas, Arizona. Plus in Cochise County alone, there are hundreds of cases of migrants holding homeowners at gun point. To the extent there is a sign on federal land that says "use at your own risk" the area is known for human smuggling and drug t***sportation

It is about time citizens have a right to fight back!

What would you do, if migrants came to your door with guns and cartel members? The police can't help you.
Go to
Feb 29, 2024 23:59:43   #
proud republican wrote:
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/02/28/illinois-trump-b****t-constitution-00144019

What are these assholes in blue states and cities are afraid of??? I know why?? Because Trump is winning.. STOP these stupidity and ket WE THE PEOPLE to decide who should be President of the United States!!..


I guess the GOP should kick biden off the b****t especially in Texas for treason....
Go to
Feb 29, 2024 23:58:15   #
Slatten, your holding a good debate however, if you are going to charge Trump with a crime, why not charge him with something biden isn't already guilty of?

Let's try some anti hypocracy here.
Go to
Feb 29, 2024 23:56:30   #
slatten49 wrote:
I, too, am okay with your antics. Having read your posts/comments for over 10 years, I am continually reminded of the saying about how a pigeon plays chess. Debating/arguing with you is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter the level of his defeat, the bird is going to s**t on the board and strut around like it won anyway.

Sort'a like Trump's refusal to accept his loss in 2020.

Or Hillarys in 2016....
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 503 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.