Ah, I was initially just calling B.S. based on the fact the site is known for B.S., it wasn't until I read the article that I called B.S. based on the contents of the article.

For clarification sake, you aimed your comment at the wrong person. I KNOW you don't have common sense.

Did you note the date on that one, "Introduced in House (08/07/2018)". Obviously they were working very hard on getting the wall funded from day one, they didn't d**g their feet at all did they? They present the bill shortly before e******n day, just 3 months shy of e******n day. What happened to the other 19 months? 21 if you consider that they had those months from the time they knew Trump had been elected until he actually took office. They could have worked on the bill they KNEW they were going to be working on with Trump as president. You are correct, it wasn't a priority, it is only a priority if he has someone else to blame for it's failure.

Don't be so sure, though I think the only ones foolish enough to fall for the tricks this time will be the Trumpsters so we should be fine. The rest of us now know the t***h and won't likely be so easily fooled. Some of us weren't even fooled the first time around.

Seems the denial is on your end. The evidence of possible closeness between Trump and Epstein is everywhere. While none of it is "damning" on it's own, with so much of it out there, it does add up to a fairly strong circumstantial case for at the least, a strong suspicion. One particularly "damning" piece is the fact that while Trump owned Miss U.S.A and Miss Teen U.S.A., Trump would walk on into the woman's and the girl's dressing rooms while they are in various stages of dress/undress and gawk about. Grown men should know better than to do such things, especially in the case of underage girls.

Was his walking into those dressing rooms an unthinking mistake or did he do such with the hopes of getting some good looks at naked/partially naked women and girls? His comments on the "Access Hollywood" open mic tape might suggest that it was in the hopes of seeing them naked/partially naked. There are also some photos of him and IVanka at very young ages that look very creepy, or perhaps the creepiness of those photos are in light of other comments and actions that we know he has made? He has made some very creepy comments about Ivanka on television and radio shows and in print interviews too.

One particularly creepy comment he made was on a talk show where he and ivanka were asked what their favorite thing they had in common with one another, Ivanka said golf, Donald comes off saying "Well, I was going to say sex...". Another very creepy thing he said on another talk show was "I've said that if Ivanka weren't my daughter, perhaps I would be dating her". Those are just two examples of oh so many on television and radio, think Howard Stern show and the comments Trump has made on that show. Trump is ALWAYS remarking on Ivanka's beauty, not so uncommon for parents, but most don't take it to the creepy level and discuss their child's body as Trump does. Most parents would also object if an on air personality were to ask if they could call the offspring "a piece of ass", Trump was fine with it and even agreed with him.

Trump IS a creep and he makes no bones about it either. Time to give up on all these feeble denials and admit the t***h, it is quite possible that Trump may just be as much of a p*******e as Epstein and that might explain why they were so close, until Epstein was outed as a p*******e and Trump had to distance himself.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0_axTST2aY (Trump's sex comment)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DP7yf8-Lk80 (Trump's "dating Ivanka" comment)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tp-ljdL13TM (Trump allowing Stern to talk crudely about Ivanka)


No denying any of those videos.

Many names on that list one can say, maybe, maybe not, if one is talking about p********a, one name that sticks out as a " I think not" would be Barbara Walters, she comes off as a bit too uptight to be interested in either young boys or young girls, in that way. It has been said that Epstein lends his plane out to others so just being on a manifest, doesn't mean any hanky panky is going on.

Perhaps, depends on definition, Epstein donated money to their foundation, Epstein lent Bill his plane on more than one occasion, that does not mean that they were close friends nor does it mean that Bill got in on the p********a either. Trump talks highly of Epstein, several pictures of Trump and Epstein appearing quite chummy and there was even a lawsuit involving both Trump and Epstein (2 but they pertained to the same allegations from the same "victim") regarding one of Epstein's "party favors" at some of Epstein's "sex parties" including underage girls.

You are wasting your time on that delusional fool. They believe EVERY conspiracy theory, bit of propaganda and lie they ever hear/see.

Ah, so you knew that article was garbage when you posted it? Why post garbage?

Okay then, let us forget about any possible c*****e c****e, that works for me. Now, what's your thoughts on clean air and water?

I don't recall the specific details that came out immediately following his death but as for botched robberies, if someone happens along while another is robbing a man, the robber may decide to scrap the robbery and bail rather than have to keep k*****g everyone that happens along. Like I said, I can't recall the details of the reports immediately following his death but a botched robbery is definitely not off the table, it does happen.

There is the beginning of the article, I wanted to do the entirety of the article but it wouldn't fit. That doesn't matter, I have read the whole article twice now and nowhere in that article does it say that the Russians k**led Seth. I pointed out with bold text and in one spot, colored text, the pertinent facts that show that the story IS NOT claiming the Russians K**LED seth, merely that they jumped on the opportunity of his death to smear Hillary. Please feel free to direct me to any portion of the article, short form or long form, that proves my reading of this article was inadequate and that the article DOES say that the Russians actually k**led him.

Hey, if you are going to take the time to train as a contortionist so that you can shoot yourself in the back or the back of the head, why not keep shooting until you succeed?

An interesting take on that story. I read that story too and do not recall anywhere in there that the Russians k**led Seth, they just merely started pushing the conspiracy theory that a "Hillary Clinton hit squad k**led him".

Even though that story doesn't say anything akin to "The Russians k**led Seth", I am just now after reading your take on the story left to wonder, is it possible that they did? What better way to get a nasty conspiracy theory smear campaign going on someone you NEVER want to see as president? K**l someone connected with them, start a smear campaign alleging that the person has a "k**l squad" and that the "k**l squad" k**led the victim and let it snowball on the internet. Something to think about, just not too hard or it could drive you as insane as all these Trumpsters.




Edit: Sorry, I read a bit beyond your post then went back and replied to yours first somehow thinking you suggested the Russians k**led Seth.



Edit #2: Oh wait, the title.