One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: zombinis3
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 26 next>>
Jun 29, 2020 02:34:22   #
proud republican wrote:
I doubt EVERYTHING that is coming from NYT and other Leftwing publications ....But I want to see proof !!


What will you consider to be enough proof , on a search engine type in the search box bounty on American soldiers, there is a number of sources some are stateside others are overseas. American sources maybe controlled by six groups it could be a conspiracy. I don't think the overseas sources will be in on the conspiracy , if one exists.
Go to
Jun 24, 2020 08:45:53   #
Oldsailor65 wrote:
FBI chart / why America is Burning


Sorry messed up on the sequence
Actually this is what the protesters are up in arms about ;
This is how the info is collected

We use data on police-involved deaths to estimate how the risk of being k**led by police use of force in the United States varies across social groups. We estimate the lifetime and age-specific risks of being k**led by police by race and sex. We also provide estimates of the proportion of all deaths accounted for by police use of force. We find that African American men and women, American Indian/Alaska Native men and women, and Latino men face higher lifetime risk of being k**led by police than do their white peers. We find that Latina women and Asian/Pacific Islander men and women face lower risk of being k**led by police than do their white peers. Risk is highest for black men, who (at current levels of risk) face about a 1 in 1,000 chance of being k**led by police over the life course. The average lifetime odds of being k**led by police are about 1 in 2,000 for men and about 1 in 33,000 for women. Risk peaks between the ages of 20 y and 35 y for all groups. For young men of color, police use of force is among the leading causes of death.



https://www.pnas.org/content/116/34/16793


Go to
Jun 20, 2020 12:17:27   #
Capt-jack wrote:
The Supreme Court Won’t Be Bolstering the Second Amendment Any Time Soon
Jun 16, 2020


The Supreme Court has decided not to take action on certain cases dealing with the scope of the Second Amendment.

Although the court is ostensibly conservative, lol, the justices turned down petitions from 10 challenges to state laws that limited the “availability and accessibility of some firearms and when they can be carried in public,” said a CNN report.

The last landmark Second Amendment decisions were District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and McDonald v. Chicago (2010), which upheld an American citizen’s right to keep and bear arms. Since these pro-Second Amendment decisions, the court has not taken up a significant Second Amendment case again. As recently as April, the court refused to weigh in on a case regarding a New York handgun law that regulates the t***sportation of firearms.

CNBC reports:

The cases rejected by the court involved questions of whether laws banning interstate handgun sales in some cases violate the Second Amendment, whether there is a constitutional right to carry a firearm outside the home for self-defense if Illinois and Massachusetts can ban assault rifles and large-capacity ammunition magazines, and whether a state can limit handgun permits to people who demonstrate a specific need for self-defense.

Jacob Charles, executive director of the Center for Firearms Law at Duke Law School, was caught by surprise at the court's decision not to address any of the Second Amendment petitions. "The petitions denied today presented some of the biggest open questions in Second Amendment law, including what types of weapons the Constitution protects and how and whether the right extends outside the home," Charles stated. "For now, it appears that a majority of the Court is content to let these issues be sorted out by the lower courts."

Several justices on the bench have made it clear in recent years about their intent on hearing Second Amendment cases. In May, Justice Brett Kavanaugh voiced his concerns about lower courts ignoring precedents established by the Supreme Court. Kavanaugh suggested that the court "address that issue soon, perhaps in one of the several Second Amendment cases with petitions for certiorari now pending before the Court."

Back in 2018, Justice Clarence Thomas criticized lower courts for treating the Second Amendment rights "cavalierly."

Jonathan Lowy, Chief Counsel and Vice President of the anti-gun organization Brady: United Against Gun Violence declared that the court's decision not to hear any Second Amendment cases is "well-reasoned.

"Today's decision is welcome, but we are vigilant that there remains a concerted effort to reverse it and undermine our nation's hard-earned progress in instituting common-sense gun safety measures and that those arguments have found sympathy with several of the Justices," Lowy told CNN in a statement.

America’s judicial system plays a crucial role in defending our civil liberties. The courts, though, and above all, the Supreme Court, will not always be there to save gun owners.

Second Amendment activists must take this to heart and start focusing their efforts in their state legislatures. State governments are just as capable of infringing on our rights, which necessitates a strong response from activists. By being engaged at all levels of government, we can avoid having to wait on the Supreme Court to save us all the time.

PS. if Biden wins in just 150 or fewer days, you will then watch the 2nd amendment go into the shredder forever. To many of the justices have conservative coats on but are lefties in their hearts.
The Supreme Court Won’t Be Bolstering the Second A... (show quote)



"Several justices on the bench have made it clear in recent years about their intent on hearing Second Amendment cases. In May, Justice Brett Kavanaugh voiced his concerns about lower courts ignoring precedents established by the Supreme Court. Kavanaugh suggested that the court "address that issue soon, perhaps in one of the several Second Amendment cases with petitions for certiorari now pending before the Court."

Why make a decision that won't been considered. If Kavanaugh concerns
are right that is a problem that has to be fixed.
Go to
Jun 20, 2020 10:43:26   #
fullspinzoo wrote:
https://www.lifezette.com/2020/06/odds-improving-that-aoc-could-lose-her-seat-in-congress/?utm_source=author-archive


Well she has had her 15 minutes of fame, now there is an idea of what people are looking for which are fresh faces and fresh ideas.
Go to
Jun 20, 2020 01:22:34   #
Mario Moreno wrote:
Thank you so much!!! Yes these articles are what I was looking for I knew I had seen an article concerning this issue, I just couldn’t find it. Thanks again.


Welcome
Go to
Jun 19, 2020 22:39:07   #
Mario Moreno wrote:
Help me help me!!!
I seem to remember an article that explained how Garcia won his seat in California. I’ve looked everywhere I can think of and googled but can’t find!!! The key point of the article was that the repubs out harvested the Dems so that’s how he won.


Here are four the article you may have read isn't here ,the closest are Politico and the signal they both mentioned the harvesting . Hope it helps

https://www.politico.com/states/california/story/2020/04/28/california-republicans-were-prepared-to-match-democrats-on-b****t-harvesting-then-c****av***s-happened-1280474

https://signalscv.com/2020/05/ronna-mcdaniel-garcia-wins-despite-democrats-best-efforts/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/republican-mike-garcia-holds-12-point-lead-in-california-special-e******n-likely-flipping-seat/2020/05/13/fb62d788-954c-11ea-9f5e-56d8239bf9ad_story.html

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/may/13/california-e******n-winner-mike-garcia-christy-smith-katie-hill-seat
Go to
Jun 19, 2020 08:32:01   #
ACP45 wrote:
I oppose the idea on the grounds that it is needlessly d******e. It just serves the interests of those whose goal is to divide people rather than unite them - black vs. white, liberal vs. conservative, Black L***s M****r vs. All L***s M****r, Northerners vs. Southerners. Why don't we all just think of ourselves as members of the same human race?


Can't because to many get a benefit from the consideration that we are a member of the same race.
Go to
Jun 19, 2020 08:24:23   #
Kickaha wrote:
Don't forget the e******ns in Iraq. They had terrorists targeting v**ers and polling places with bombs and bullets. The Iraqis turned out to v**e, they were proud and defiant. You mean to tell me Americans are too scared to practice social distancing and sanitizing v****g machines and booths. During our primary a month ago, I walked in and v**ed. We were required to wear a mask, social distance, and the booth was disinfected after each v**er.


Unfortunately it has gotten to the point where people are so spoiled by convenience that it takes something like mail in b****ts to get them to do something. If it is to much trouble to do, some won't. Example look at all the drive in windows and how many are in line to get a cup of coffee.
Go to
Jun 18, 2020 22:46:23   #
Peewee wrote:
The sole purpose of the Supreme Court is to determine if a law is Constitutional or not. A******n, same-sex marriage, sodomy, all unconstitutional, and so is DACA. I sure hope Mark Taylor is right. We may need to appoint 3 more Supremes.


May not be mentioned in the Constitution but the 14 admendment was used to decide that it was a constitutional right.

Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States protects a pregnant woman's liberty to choose to have an a******n without excessive government restriction.

Citations: 410 U.S. 113 (more)93 S. Ct. 705; 35 L. Ed. 2d 147; 1973 U.S. LEXIS 159

Subsequent: Rehearing denied, 410 U.S. 959 (1973)

The same sex marriage was proven to be a constitutional right

Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015) (/ˈoʊbərɡəfɛl/ OH-bər-gə-fel), is a landmark civil rights case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States

Sodomy was against the law I don't think it is mentioned in the Constitution.
As per Shouse Law group it is now legal between consenting adults as long as the person receiving or giving is above the age of 18.
This is what I used to look it up "sodomy as per shouse law group."

Daca was set up by executive order the Supreme Court say in their decision that the adminstration didn't give enough of a reason to decide on a different course.
https://www.ncsl.org/research/immigration/deferred-action.aspx
https://www.ilrc.org/daca
https://news.usc.edu/171697/supreme-court-ruling-daca-dreamers-usc-experts/
Go to
Jun 18, 2020 20:29:48   #
Peewee wrote:
Since your from CA. maybe you can verify a rumor for me? Was there any party identifier on the outside of the envelope?


Not from California, normally the mail in b****ts don't have a identifier on the outside. Based on the alignment of California in 2019 to the dems. For Garcia to get the majority he would have to get some dems to v**e for him.Of course you will have to take account the lines of the district .
Go to
Jun 18, 2020 02:11:57   #
American Vet wrote:
Perhaps you better up-date yourself. California and several other states are planning to mail a b****t to everyone on the v***r r**********n rolls. Do you want to know how up to date they are?

Easier to commit fraud with the mail in b****t system.


Well as of 2019 California has been sending verification request to the v**ers about the eligibility of v****g. So the rolls have been verified, so the accuracy should be be fairly accurate. About easier to commit fraud , the last e******n in cailfornia was a mail in b****t it got Garcia in the 25th district seat.
So the possibility of the mail in b****t seems not to benefit ether party.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/06/20/calif_begins_removing_5_million_inactive_v**ers_on_its_rolls__140602.html
Go to
Jun 18, 2020 01:42:26   #
Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:
Yes, but some, not many, better themselves. I'm thinking exactly of a guy I met on f*****t book with the same first name. He started business and was doing pretty well the last time I spoke to him.


Unfortunately to many people want their millions by the the time their twenty.
Also there's always the I know a guy that people have a tendency to base their opinions on. I also know a guy who would love to better himself but can't because he is trying to be responsible.
Go to
Jun 16, 2020 08:15:35   #
dtucker300 wrote:
Linda Goudsmit
June 12, 2020

Get off your knees and stand up America! Americans stopped kneeling to tyranny in 1776.

Our country vehemently rejects submission and adamantly rejects w***e s*******y AND black supremacy. Racial pandering and prostrating is un-American. It is reverse discrimination and political exploitation of the black community by race-baiting Democrats. Law-abiding Americans, black and white, want e******y and ordered liberty. Freedom and e******y is a colorblind American privilege.

R**ting and anarchy never lead to peace – they are the precursors of tyranny. Costumed, kneeling Nancy Pelosi and her g*******t handlers are deliberately fomenting racial d******eness, social chaos, and anarchy in their bid to make America ungovernable and defeat President Trump in November. Chaos is the Democrat party political strategy and the preferred political strategy of tyrants. This is how it works.

Tyranny is a binary social structure of rulers and the ruled. The ruling masters, monarchs, oligarchs, emperors, and dictators all consider the subjects they rule to be property. Not in America! In America we belong to ourselves. It is a privilege to be an American citizen and to live in a society where individual rights, upward mobility, and private property create a robust middle class that supports freedom. Equal opportunity, not equal outcome, is the privilege and guarantee of e******y in America.

The middle class is the buffer against tyranny, including the tyranny of a permanent political ruling class in America. America is on fire because the desperate Democrats and their g*******t handlers are fomenting, funding, and encouraging anarchy. Their promise of equal outcome is the great lie of the 21st century because it destroys the middle class and denies individual freedom.

The promise of equal outcome is rooted in collectivism and cradle-to-grave socialism. Here is the problem. Collectivism, whether it is socialism, c*******m, or Islamism, is a binary social structure of rulers and the ruled. The rulers control all means of production and its distribution. There is no upward mobility, individual rights, private property, or middle class in collectivism because the individual does not own or control what he produces – the government does.

There is no freedom without a middle class in America, only the political class of rulers and the ruled. The r**ting and l**ting is deliberately destroying the private businesses of the middle class in America, black and white. The publicly-traded g*******t business sector is participating in the wreckage by pandering to racially d******e groups like Black L***s M****r.

We do not kneel in America! We stand tall for liberty, equal opportunity, and law and order. We are all privileged Americans and reject the racially d******e groveling that is reverse discrimination designed to foment race r**ts. The colors of America are red, white, and blue because ALL L***S M****R in America!

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s recent performance is pure political theater. She should get off her knees, take off her unnecessary mask, remove her contrived African Kente sash, and get back to work. Black and white communities require a robust, independent, working middle class to be free. American civil rights leader Martin Luther King's unifying, colorblind message of e******y supports peace and prosperity in America, Malcolm X’s d******e message of black supremacy supports anarchy.

The law-abiding white community must stand with the law-abiding black community and get off our knees and back to work! Together we must acknowledge our American privilege and deny the democrats and their g*******t handlers the racial d******eness they need to collapse America from within and become the permanent political party that will ens***e us all.

Do not be fooled by the political theatrics of masks, social distancing, r**ting, and l**ting. They are weapons in the war against America designed to create social chaos and collapse the U.S. economy by destroying the middle class. The goal is to replace our capitalist infrastructure with their binary socialist nightmare in pr********n for a one-world government of rulers and the ruled.

Reverse discrimination and self-loathing are political tools designed to make us kneel in surrender. Stand up America – American privilege is colorblind! ALL L***S M****R in America. Anything less is un-American and unacceptable.
Linda Goudsmit br June 12, 2020 br br Get off you... (show quote)


There are three reasons why people work, one is for survival, two to better themselves,three to enjoy life. The middle class started to be destroyed when the disposable income was removed. Living paycheck to paycheck doesn't allow for the middle class to grow. Yes some do manage to get out of the middle class that is the reason the class seems to be getting smaller there is no one able to replace the few who get into the higher classes.
Go to
Jun 15, 2020 08:13:06   #
American Vet wrote:
Joe Biden, the Democrats’ presumptive 2020 p**********l nominee, told “The Daily Show” Wednesday that he expects President Donald Trump to try to “steal” the p**********l e******n and expressed hope that the United States military would remove Donald Trump from the White House if he refused to vacate.

Echoing conspiracy theorists, including failed 2016 p**********l contender Hillary Clinton, Biden explained vague comments he’d made previously, telling “Daily Show” host Trevor Noah that he believes Trump will not accept a loss at the b****t box and that the president will try to create chaos around the e******n.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/biden-warns-trump-will-steal-this-e******n-predicts-military-may-have-to-remove-trump-from-white-house?itm_source=parsely-api?utm_source=cnemail&utm_medium=email&utm_content=061420-news&utm_campaign=position4
Joe Biden, the Democrats’ presumptive 2020 p******... (show quote)


Just like every other conspiracy thoughts out there. Both persons have had a hand in promoting conspiracies.
Go to
Jun 11, 2020 20:10:34   #
American Vet wrote:
Maybe it doesn't have to do with skin color........


Good point but most of the best dressed usually don't hang in the neighborhood that have the worst problems.They were able to get out of the places ,but since most of the time the folks in the neighborhood don't have a good example of what a good adult is maybe a good suggestion could be a mentoring program. Which those who have tried have had some success with.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 26 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.