Damn sounds like you are talking about Biden?

FACT CHECK: Donald Trump was never accused for i**********n. The house of representatives v**ed to impeach, which means they accused the president. Then the senate tried the president and he was acquitted of all charges.

Thus, according to the constitution. He can't be tried again, in any court, for the same crime. That is called double jeopardy which is prohibited by the bill of rights.

Therefore, the beginning of your thesis fails. Then moving on, do you realize by calling Donald Trump an insurectionist, and not proving it in a court of law, you hereby are guilty of two things: 1. Slander, and 2. Bearing false witness against your neighbor.

This fact thus, destroys your entire post. GAME OVER deposit 25 cents and try again. Your entire post is false.

Sounds like a republican Ross Pero

Well is it Rocky VS Apollo Creed in Rocky II or is it Grumpier old men?

Donald T***p w*n the Republican nomination.

Joe Biden won the Democrat nomination.

The rematch is on.

What horse is yours?

That may be true

I can see, old Joe being a stoner.

Most likely, cocaine, meth, speed, or Crack. The meth, coke, or speed was so he could deliver the state of the union speech. As far as the downer, most likely, Mary Jane, or perhaps, alcohol. But there is definitely cocaine because he likes singing women hair....lol

That's a half t***h.

Tombstone, Arizona is a prime example, of how drugs, in that case opium, and alcohol caused more deaths than the criminal or the law enforcement. If you watch closely at the movie by the same name, as the Earps and Doc Holiday were marching to the O K corral, you will see in the background a fire, and kids running to get water to put it out.

Little known fact about October 26, 1881, the Tombstone epitaph recorded that at the same time the gunfight a occurred, the opium den was ablaze.

The difference between then and now, is that the abuse of drugs, uppers to stay awake, and downers to sleep, had had a major effect on American politics. Major.

Sure we know about, Marilyn Monroe, and the Kennedys, and Nancy Regan, and the Betty Ford hospital. But if you look closely, those who are sober are moderates and those who are high are the extremists.

And those on drugs can't tell you why they h**e someone. All they can do, is complain about what they think they witnessed. And in the end, the story is false.

That's what I'm saying, it's going from coast to coast. Just think about the G****e F***d incident, sure George was on drugs, but what about the cop? A man does not hold another man down like that unless there is some emotion behind it. And usually that emotion is amplified by drugs.

People do things moderately, normally. But it's when they do extreme stuff, it usually involves drugs or alcohol. This had been true since the optimum dens of the 1800s.

Sound familiar with today's political field?

Joe Biden is an example of the 'functional' drug addict. One who could go through the motions but never really do anything.

Couple that with truck driving, and he'd have more accidents than any other driver in the fleet.

But couple that with age, and the office of the presidency, and all the pressure that comes with the leader of the free world. He would at times appear to go through, what I term 'internet lag' or a 386 processor in an old computer.

Today we need a 5G or the newest pentium computer like Donald Trump or even RFK Jr.

The old drug addict, who lived through the 60s, 70s, and 80s, is dying off because of drug use. How many people today, that lived during that Era, can honestly say, 'I feel fine' after all the drugs they did.

Don't believe me, look at Ozzy Osborne or Bret Michaels. Look at what happened to Prince and Michael Jackson.

Ronald Reagans, 'war on drugs' helped many with DADD, MADD, and SADD, but that was against those under the influence driving.

Both Bushes and Clinton supported DARE, which helped some.

Facts are facts, if a person doesn't want help, they will fight you on it. Sound familiar with the war between the Democrats and Republicans?

Awe don't take it personal, he probably didn't get his fix of drugs yet.

Donald would, if you pointed to the right type of drugs, would perhaps be the dealer. He wants control, so you lefties always think. Trump is an argue-er, he thrives on winning the argument, not controlling the people.

He demands loyalty on his team, but argues in the old fashioned way. Anyone who enjoys a good debate knows what I mean.

Joe Biden on the other hand is a user. He's addicted to the likes of cocaine, meth, speed or crack....to me it's all the same.

Trump does things in reality. For the most part, he tries to improve what needs improving. A man like Trump spends money on a functional purpose for improvement. Some of self, but how can you have an argument where you are trying to persuade your opponent, when your opponent is drugged out of his mind....it's a losing battle and nothing comes of it. Just wasted time.

Look closer at Bidens speech when he tries to announce his accomplishments, he totes the stuff that was done by people before him....like a strung out college student who realizes that the term is ending and finals are coming up.

Look at the situation even closer, and you would see that Biden the person, supports Israel but like a drug user doesn't want to piss off the dealer, he chooses his words carefully. It never works for the user because he misses off both those he tries to appease as well as his friends and allies.

Wrong type of drugs bucky.

Doesn't it make sense?