One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: maximus
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 237 next>>
Feb 10, 2021 21:15:41   #
Geo wrote:
He replaced the POS. Would be dictator.


Biden himself said that only a dictator would do EOs like Trump did. In ONE month in office, he has signed off on almost SIXTY EOs!!! 60!!! Those EOs do not include congress' involvement!!! So, tell me again that "TRUMP" was a dictator! Biden has described himself as a dictator. Proud of 'im, are ya?
Go to
Feb 10, 2021 18:09:19   #
Michael10 wrote:
That's a vile and d********g thing to say to someone you don't know. I've never k**led a baby or adult and I don't condone it. The idiocy here sir is own your part for posting such a perversion of the t***h. To think you can judge someone because you think you know what they stand for is immature at best.


Are you a Democrat? Coz that's what they fight for. So much so, that Biden is going to start paying for a******ns in other countries!
It's pretty damning to belong to a party that champions something you stand against!
Go to
Feb 10, 2021 15:26:35   #
woodguru wrote:
Wow, that was the most compelling case I've ever heard, you must be right, you are so strong in your beliefs.


Time magazine just published an article saying that a "very powerful cabal" spent many millions of dollars to influence the American public. That it was enough to turn the e******n. They didn't say it was r****d but that public opinion was turned by a constant barrage of negative propaganda.
Go to
Jan 23, 2021 12:26:01   #
peg w wrote:
I got friendly with a middle aged woman that was Iranian. She couldn't either go see her mother or fly her here. I bet she wss happy with Bidens decision. I know there are problem states in the world, but good people live in them, too. The vetting to get into America is pretty strong, so you really shouldn't worry that they are going to come here and say, take over the capital


Oh, I disagree, Peg. We put criminals in prison to punish them, but also to separate them from lawful society because they are dangerous. The American thing to do would have been to tell the Iranian woman...I understand and I'm sorry, but it's what we have to do right now to protect ourselves from another 9/11. If she could not understand that, then should she even be in this country?
As far as breaking into the capital, there were plenty of people that could have wiped out congress if they wanted to do that. They didn't.
Go to
Jan 23, 2021 12:02:31   #
JFlorio wrote:
50 Cal.


It was a farce. She did it to make it look worse for Trump supporters and to show Trump was a t*****r. She was telling America, See? We have to have an Army to protect ourselves from Trump and his supporters.
Go to
Jan 23, 2021 11:55:21   #
rumitoid wrote:
At least 21 state and local Republican officials attended the J*** 6 rally in Washington, D.C., that turned into a violent r**t, according to a new HuffPost tally, many of whom are now under pressure to resign.

They traveled from 16 different states, arriving for the “Stop the Steal” demonstration on the White House Ellipse, where they watched President Donald Trump tell incendiary lies about having been robbed of ree******n. He then told the crowd of thousands to march on the Capitol.

In the crowd that day were 13 members of state Houses or Assemblies; three state senators; a county commissioner; a city council member; a GOP congressional district chair; a district director; and a co-chair of the Michigan Republican Party. The group also includes a Q***n conspiracy theorist; a self-described member of a f*****t m*****a; and a man who once declared that “the only good Democrat is a dead Democrat.”

Only two of those GOP officials appear to have breached the Capitol property itself that day, and have since been arrested, but the prevalence of Republican legislators and party functionaries at the demonstration underscores the party’s rank complicity in fomenting a historic i**********n.

These GOP officials, after all, were taking part in, and lending credence to, the finale of a monthslong campaign to falsely discredit the results of a f**r e******n. All were eager participants in a nakedly anti-democratic ploy to keep their preferred president in power, and helped whip a f*****t mob into a frenzy.

All are now facing calls to resign, but only one has done so. And although most have since condemned the violence, vandalism, and l**ting at the Capitol — which led to the deaths of five people — many have sought to deflect blame. Of the 21 GOP officials in HuffPost’s tally, at least 13 have made statements attempting to blame the violence on “a****a” or “paid provocateurs.”

The FBI says there is no evidence “a****a” orchestrated that day’s chaos. There is a mountain of evidence, however, showing the violence was committed by a Make America Great Again mob.

Here are the names of the state and local GOP officials that were part of that mob. (This list does not include the federal lawmakers in attendance.)
https://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/republican-lawmakers-at-the-capitol-r**t-104500197.html
At least 21 state and local Republican officials a... (show quote)


And who had the responsibility of making sure there was enough security to cover what both sides KNEW would be a massive protest? that would be the speaker of the house...and who is that? com on now....I can't hear you.....that's right! Nancy Pelosi has responsibility for the C*****l P****e. Adam Schiff, as chairman of The Preferred Committee on Intelligence, had the very same information that Trump had and if he had it, she had it. So, why did Nancy do nothing? I'll tell you, she WANTED a r**t to blame on Trump...which she did and people bought it. She wants Trump destroyed and erased as quickly as possible...wants it so that he can't even do business after the WH. Why? Because sooner or later, Trump would hit up on the one piece of evidence that the e******n was a fraud that would be impossible to explain away.
How could Nancy prevent this? By making Trump unbelieveable, by demanding every congressman who stood with Trump to resign, by making it illegal to question the e******n. If the e******n was won fairly, then none of that would have been necessary. Who is the REAL EOP?
Go to
Jan 23, 2021 11:38:09   #
Looks to me like McEnamy blasted the hostile press with facts in their face daily, while, Psaki, when asked a serious question pretty much said we have other things to worry about. How does that make her smarter?
Go to
Jan 23, 2021 11:33:13   #
permafrost wrote:
I did not know you were so strongly in favor of foreign aid..

Or did you not read my post/link? gosh, what are the odds???

Beyond the pipeline itself, we must be aware of the money not going to the US, the problems caused by the low grade shale oil the Canadians ship on it. The resistance to clean energy which this infrastructure brings us to and the limited value of any jobs/profit... 32 permanent jobs.. not near enough to consider the pipe line a good project.


Which brings us to fracking. Our omissions are down because of fracking that supplies us with a cleaner gas product. Whoops! Biden is against that too and will shut it down...he said so.
Go to
Jan 23, 2021 11:19:10   #
Milosia2 wrote:
Bush's 'new world order' gives way to Trump's 'no world order'
Analysis: Two moments in a single day pointed to America's relinquishing of its role as the globe's top cop.
Image: Donald Trump, Mohammed bin Salman
All smiles in Buenos Aires.Pablo Martinez Monsivais / AP
Dec. 1, 2018, 8:42 AM EST
By Jonathan Allen
BUENOS AIRES, Argentina — America once advocated for a "new world order." Now, it seems to prefer no world order.

The t***sformation took nearly 30 years, but it was encapsulated Friday in two moments: an exultant greeting between the Russian president and Saudi crown prince here, and the death of internationalist President George H.W. Bush in Houston.

It was at the opening of the G-20 summit here that Vladimir Putin and Mohammad bin Salman signaled with a bro slap — half high-five, half handshake and all scofflaw — that they will do as they please without fear of repercussion from President Donald Trump or any allies who would need his help to make sanctions stick.

Just hours later, Bush — who had announced an allied invasion of Iraq in 1991 by calling for "a new world order — a world where the rule of law, not the law of the jungle, governs the conduct of nations" — died at the age of 94.


Trump vs. the world: The president finds himself isolated at G20
The reasons for the t***sformation are complicated — a combination that includes Trump's belief in national sovereignty, his affinity for authoritarian leaders, the relative decline in American power and possibly Trump's personal interests — but the result is clear, Trump critics say.

"It's deeply disturbing that this president has become a global enabler of despots," said Rep. David Cicilline, D-R.I., who is a member of the House Foreign Relations Committee. "He praises them as if they're close personal friends and then he fails to do anything to stop them or even condemn them when they commit some of the worst atrocities in recent memory."

Putin has tampered with Democratic e******ns across the globe, including in the United States, annexed Crimea from Ukraine and most recently detained Ukrainian ships and sailors operating in waters that were not his.

A recent CIA assessment found with "high confidence" that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman ordered the murder of Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi at a Saudi consulate in Turkey in October.

Rather than publicly condemn them on the global stage provided by this summit — or simply confront them — President Donald Trump chose to maintain his distance from them by keeping them off his official calendar.

Trump has refused to blame bin Salman for Khashoggi's death, citing Saudi investments in U.S. goods as a reason not to upset the relationship between the two countries. His son-in-law, Jared Kushner, has become close with bin Salman, and Trump's business has benefited from Saudi dollars over the years.

And while he attributed canceling a planned meeting with Putin here to the Ukraine situation, Russia's foreign ministry suggested Trump did it because he couldn't afford the political optics in the days after former aide Michael Cohen pleaded guilty to lying to Congress about Trump's efforts to develop real estate in Moscow while he was running for president.

Trump long denied having any financial interest in Russia, even though he pursued business opportunities there for many years.


Russia investigation looms over Trump's G20 summit trip
Wh**ever Trump's calculus, Putin and bin Salman seemed to be celebrating like bank robbers who had just pulled off the heist of the century while strolling past armed guards.

"Opportunist leaders like Putin, MBS, and others take advantage of ... the void created as America retreats from internationalism to nationalism, the appetite for flattery of a needy president, and the greed of a self-dealing (and potentially corrupt) one," David Rothkopf, a visiting scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and a former CEO and editor of Foreign Policy magazine, said in a text message.

"Thus, by virtue of his ideology and the deficiencies of his character he has t***sformed America's historic role and created a space for some of the world's worst bad actors to flourish and violate international laws and norms of behavior with impunity," he added.

Recommended

ON THE TRAIL
Jaime Harrison elected chairman of the Democratic National Committee
Trump's kid-glove treatment of autocrats — Putin, bin Salman, North Korea's Kim Jong-un and others — is all the more apparent because of his tendency to impose economic and diplomatic pain on long-standing American allies.

"One of Trump’s most troubling instincts is to support authoritarian leaders at the expense of democratic leaders," said retired Ambassador Nicholas Burns, who served presidents of both parties. "He is close to MBS and refuses to criticize Putin, Kim Jong-un, [Chinese President] Xi [Jinping] and [Turkish President] Recep Erdogan. At the same time, he has been incessantly critical of [U.S. allies]. He has turned American foreign policy on its head. It is weakening the U.S. and diminishing our credibility."

It's bad enough for advocates of the old American-led liberal world order to see bin Salman and Putin flaunting their immunity from true sanction by the leader of the free world. But there's additional danger in the prospect that Trump's quiescence will give others the idea that they can get away with wh**ever they want, too.

"Other nations are watching this," Laura Rosenberger, director of the Alliance for Securing Democracy and a former foreign policy adviser to Hillary Clinton, said. "If we send signals that this sort of behavior will not be met with consequences, there’s no reason for others not to adopt these practices."

And, she added, "this is essentially a playbook that anyone can pick up and use if they want to."
Bush's 'new world order' gives way to Trump's 'no ... (show quote)




Meanwhile...on his first day in office, Biden cuts thousands of high paying jobs and strains relations with Canada, rejoined the Paris Accord, ( that will cost the US lots of money), and rejoined the WHO which covered up for China's release of the C****-** v***s. Way to go, Joe! You really ARE rebuilding the economy...depending on how you look at it. Trump built UP the economy and he was bad. Biden tears DOWN the economy and he is good!

With Trump the economy exploded, but he was bad. With Biden, the economy slumps in less than two days, but he is good?????


So, you guys got rid of the bad man that did good things and v**ed in a good man that does bad things???
Go to
Jan 18, 2021 12:48:50   #
Milosia2 wrote:
Insider:
White House was Warned March was Illegal
Trump’s Call to March Broke Promise to DC Police
by Greg Palast Special to Consortium News

Before Donald Trump exhorted the J*** 6 rally to march on the Capitol, the White House had been warned by the rally sponsor that there was no permit for a march, that DC Metro Police were promised there would be no march, and that such an unplanned march was dangerous.

As a result, the Metro police were stunned, undermanned and unprepared for Trump’s surprise launch of thousands of his enraged Trump supporters, some armed, on the Capitol.

“I mean, it was shocking. It’s something we advocated against doing for exactly the reasons that ended up playing themselves out,” said a high-level source inside Women for America First, the organization that held the permit for the rally. They spoke to this reporter on condition of anonymity.



Even more damning, the march Trump set in motion was led and promoted by ultra-right, violence-threatening extremist Ali Alexander, head of Stop the Steal. The Palast Investigative Team filmed Alexander, only weeks before the r**t, exhorting a crowd:
“Either they take Trump …[or] we’ll light the whole sh*t on fire!”
The White House had been warned about Alexander and his dangerous plan to move on the Capitol. The leaders of Woman for America First sent several frantic, angry text messages to the White House warning that such a march was both illegal and dangerous. “When Ali was putting up things about the Capitol on the sixth, [we were] screen-shotting that, sending it to people both at Parks and at the White House, a couple of times, like ‘WTF’!,”a organizer source said.

One series of texts between the sponsors apparently sent two days before the rally reads, “Did you see that Ali’s website says we are marching at 1.” The reply: “We’ve just had to up our numbers with the NPS [National Park Service] and we can’t say anyone is marching.”

Women for America First founders Amy and Kylie Jane Kremer, who have had a well-reported feud with Alexander and Alex Jones, the far-right radio host with whom Alexander had teamed to lead the march. It is credible that the Kremers would have tried to prevent their sworn enemy from using their rally to launch a march which would leave the group on the hook for violation of their permit.



The permit issued by the U.S. Interior Department, which has jurisdiction over federal parkland, says: “Women for America First will not conduct an organized march from the Ellipse at the conclusion of the rally.”

The Kremers have been feted by the president, and so has Alexander. That gave Alexander access to the front of the rally where Trump would speak. “Ali was running amok in the VIP section–it was d********g–saying we’re going to go to the Capitol. What the f***! We’re not doing a March to the Capitol! What a terrible idea to try to move that number of people all the way to the Capitol,” the source said.

The insider claims that Woman for America First was quite worried that they had no marshals to keep the crowd in line. “We did advocate against [the march] for all kinds of reasons. So, excuse me, it’s not a big stretch to say when you have a bunch of people heading that way, it’s going to be a problem.”

Trump said he's walking!
The first news that there would be, despite warnings, an illegal, uncontrolled march was at 12:15 pm when Trump himself surprised the protest organizers with his announcement.

The charge on the Capitol was set in motion when the President announced he himself would join it. “The announcement that he was going to go was news to us,” the insider said. “But then [Trump] said he’s walking! It caught our team by surprise and unprepared.”

Alex Jones stated on his podcast that he and Alexander were called by the White House just before the president’s speech and were told to prepare to lead the crowd on a march. “We had a legitimate deal with the White House,” Jones said in an InfoWars show filmed with Alexander after the r**t. “‘Hey Jones and Ali,’ literally, with Alexander, we were supposed to lead a peaceful deal.”

The White House has not denied the duo’s extraordinary claim, a claim consistent with events.

Alexander has been filmed cavorting with the white power group P***d B**s and yucking it up with a N**i displaying a giant swastika f**g in an online forum. Alexander has had a well-known fan in Trump who, more than once, reportedly referenced with approval Alexander’s uncanny resemblance to the late entertainer Sammy Davis Jr.

Washington DC’s anti-C***d laws required a complex separation of the crowd into groups of no more than 50 which would have been impossible to maintain.

Attorney James Lafferty has spent decades defending protests. Reached in Los Angeles, he said if Trump had launched the march knowing it was unplanned, dangerous and led to this mayhem, that would make Trump culpable of “high crimes and misdemeanors,” that is, grounds for impeachment. Trump was impeached on Wednesday by the House of Representatives for “inciting” an “i**********n.”

“It doesn’t matter that he didn’t call for or know the details of the damage that would follow,” according to Lafferty who hosts a radio show on legal rights. “He is guilty of the consequences.” The Senate will presumably examine this issue when it tries Trump.

GOP Teams up with DC Provocateur Alexander
As Palast Investigations reported on Jan. 8, the team’s Zach D. Roberts had discovered that both the Republican Party of Georgia and the National Republican Senate Committee had sponsored Alexander to lead the GOP’s get-out-the-v**e operation in suburban Atlanta in Jan. 5’s run-off for two U.S. Senate seats.

The Republican state and national officials sponsored the event promoting Alexander while he was calling for an illegal march — and weeks after our reports of Alexander’s violence-threatening screed.

The GOP officials who sponsored Alexander have not returned calls to explain their reason for teaming up with the Alt-right provocateur.

Alexander is, as of this writing, in hiding.
Insider: br White House was Warned March was Illeg... (show quote)


I believe a couple of reporters that were there found it impossible to go from where Trump made his speech to the capital in the time frame given. In other words, Trump could NOT have incited the r****rs because they were already there.
Go to
Jan 18, 2021 12:38:43   #
factnotfiction wrote:
In addition to everything else that is wrong with their, old, out dated and repressive/regressive policies, they suffer from:
WHAT ABOUT ITIS!!!!

That no matter what the scumbag rightwing conservative trump supporting r****rs did in attacking the capitol, the fools at fox and the usual rightwingnut media, and of course the always malevolent yappers and yakkers on OPP always bring up wh**ever happened in the past as justification for their current ignorant and criminal behaviors.


It's a shame that the snot sucking liberals that have caused billions of dollars in damage all over America including loss of life get a free pass for it while the non conservatives who raided the capital get the name d******c t*******ts put on the entire rest of the 3 million people that protested peacefully on J** 6., along with the rest of all conservatives. All the wankers and tit babies of the left, all the c*******ts and socialists, the literal scum of the earth, all the terrible acts that they committed should just be brushed aside because it was in the past? Should we just let murderers go because their trial is a year after their act and therefore in the past?
Go to
Jan 18, 2021 12:22:00   #
Michael10 wrote:
Several months ago I posted here on OPP that trump would burn this country to the ground before he left office. Well he came very close to just that and if he had won this e******n he would have installed himself as king over America. I hear many of you saying how bad things will be under Biden, at the very least he won't be trying to divide this country more.
Question: how many of the trump supporters here would have v**ed for a third term If he had managed to win this one and would you have still supported his sons or daughter to take his place when he died? Would you have stood by and watched Democrats herded up and tossed into ovens cause that's where this mad man was going
Several months ago I posted here on OPP that trump... (show quote)


Question for you! Why on earth would Trump want to divide the nation? He called for unity MORE than once, told the Democrats that his office was always open, and asked them to negotiate with him. They came with nothing more than demands. What did he get from you guys? NOT my president. You guys did your own dividing.
It's ironic that you mentioned Trump throwing Dems in ovens, when as I write this, the Dems are planning to ostracize 2 senators who legally questioned an obviously r****d e******n, planning to prosecute Trump for s******n for suing to have the e******n fairly recounted. I know what you're thinking and no, the same people just recounted the same v**es. If 50 courts say that there is no crime in America, does that make it true? Those 50 courts just refused to hear the cases. There was massive fraud. Add to that, they're going to make even questioning the e******n a crime. THAT's where your ovens come in, my friend. That's socialism!
Here's another question or two. When trump said that there would be a v*****e before the e******n, did Biden not say that there would be NO v*****e under his watch without full testing? He did! So, when did that testing happen? It didn't because the e******n was over. How did that v*****e come out only two days after the e******n?
Pelosi said that Old Joe is delivering on his promise that help is on the way in the form of a stimulus check. Have any of you checked to see how much pork barrel is in the almost 2 trillion dollar bill? Trump wanted a bill with NO pork barrel spending to help families and small businesses. Did you know that Pelosi's husband got some of that first stimulus? He did!
Anyway, it wasn't Trump who held up the stimulus, it was Pelosi. She held American families ransom so that Trump would not get any credit for a stimulus check!
Have you not even chewed on the idea that it's odd that suddenly after the e******n, all these great things are happening?
Let's talk again after Biden puts 11,000,000 "un-documenteds" on Social Security. You know, that HAS to be paid for...
Go to
Jan 7, 2021 00:06:08   #
SSDD wrote:
YOU R-E-A-D slowly, The inane ramblings of a moronic nut job is not proof of anything! I don't care what you may "think" and yes, quotation marks ARE appropriate since you obviously DO NOT think, if you did, you would realize, and I MUST repeat myself, "The inane ramblings of a moronic nut job is not proof of anything!". Can you even understand proper English? Had you shown actual proof, THEN you may have had a point, that it would be on me to prove that your "proof" isn't proof. Do you have ANY clue what constitutes evidence? While SWORN testimony can be determined to be proof or evidence, the inane rantings of a lunatic with an obviously biased perspective is ANYTHING BUT proof, does that compute? Can you comprehend? If you REFUSE to provide proof of your claim, then as far as I am concerned, your claim us null and void and this conversation between you and I is OVER!

Now that we are done with that portion of your lunatic rant, I highly recommend that you take a break, go cool off, give it all a quick think and perhaps come to terms with the fact that what you offered up is nothing more than a mere allegation from someone with an ax to grind and not even remotely proof of ANYTHING other than the lunacy of the far right. You are obviously in meltdown mode and seriously need to take a breather, get your head in order, consider my words and if you would like to, take another attempt at offering up some sort of ACTUAL proof of the legitimacy of your allegations. You will get nowhere with your petulant insistence that the video you offered up represents anything resembling positive proof of your allegation.

I will even assist you in this, I will give you an idea of what will constitute ACTUAL proof. Okay, the video makes the allegation that the v****g machines were examined and that they were to have been found to have actually changed v**es. Okay, let us assume that what the lunatic says within the video is actually true, actual facts. Go find the evidence that was recovered that proved that the machines changed the v**es. We are assuming that evidence WAS found, go find it and post THAT as your proof. Some nut job lunatic with an obvious intention to convince people that Trump actually won the e******n and was robbed of his victory, that is nothing more than an allegation if it doesn't present evidence of the validity of the claim. GO FIND THE EVIDENCE! PRESENT THAT EVIDENCE! THAT will be proof. The video you presented is NOT proof, it is merely another allegation with no supporting evidence.

Now, will you take the opportunity to go cool your head, maybe look up this so called evidence that MUST be out there somewhere if the claims the lunatic Trumplican in the video made are actually true. I am still willing to view ACTUAL evidence, if you persist with nothing but ad hominem attacks without bothering to offer any actual evidence, I will soon retract the offer to consider any evidence you may be able to come up with. I am a somewhat patient person, but my patience is NOT unlimited, there is a limit. Provide ACTUAL proof or I will continue to consider your claims to be unfounded. The ball is in your court now, don't drop the ball.



Edit: For extra credit, you can explain to me how more than one hand count of the paper b****ts has determined that the v**e count by those machines match the hand counts within the margin of error. IF the machines DID actually change the count of the v**es, how did the numbers match within margin of error with the hand counts? Wouldn't the hand counts show different results? The hand counts were done with the PAPER B****TS. What? Did the "tampering" done on those machines cause the machines to find a way to change the actual v**es on the paper b****ts? Stop believing in CTs without at the very least checking their "facts", like someone with ACTUAL intelligence would do, check the facts.
YOU R-E-A-D slowly, The inane ramblings of a moron... (show quote)


[quote] While SWORN testimony can be determined to be proof or evidence,[quote] your words...

https://indianlegalsolution.com/testimony-and-affidavit/

In a way an affidavit can be seen as written testimony, affirming the contents mentioned in the written affidavit. The law relating to affidavits is governed by section 139, Order XIX if the code of civil procedure and Order XI of the Supreme Court rules.

http://lawtimesjournal.in/what-is-an-affidavit-is-affidavit-an-evidence/

"Affidavit" has originated from a Latin word which means to "pledge ones faith." It is to be signed and witnessed by a notary authority. It is to be signed without any cross-examination by the affiant. Another way of thinking of an affidavit is as a kind of written court testimony.

Just to get THAT out of the way...

https://gellerreport.com/2020/11/press-secretary-mcenany-announces-234-pages-of-affidavits-alleging-e******n-irregularities-in-michigan.html/

White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany late Tuesday announced 234 pages of what she said were sworn affidavits alleging e******n irregularities in a county in Michigan.

McEnany appeared alongside Republican National Committee Chair Ronna McDaniel on Fox News’ “Hannity,” where she shared several allegations listed in the affidavits—statements made under penalty of perjury—from Wayne County.
“They’re alleging—this is one county, Wayne County, Michigan—they are saying that there was a batch of b****ts where 60 percent had the same signature,” she told host Sean Hannity. “They’re saying that 35 b****ts had no v**er record but they were counted anyway, that 50 b****ts were run multiple times through a tabulation machine.”

McEnany also shared details of another affidavit where a woman alleged that “her son was deceased but nevertheless somehow v**ed.”

“These are one of many many allegations in one county, and a county no less, where poll watchers were in many cases threatened with racial harassment, they were pushed out of the way, and Democrat challengers were handing out documents, how to distract GOP challengers,” she continued. “These are real, and anyone who cares about t***sparency and the integrity of the system should want this to pursue to the discovery phase.”

On Monday, President Donald Trump’s ree******n campaign filed a suit in Wayne County Circuit Court alleging v***r f***d in b****t-counting procedures. The suit alleges county e******n officials allowed various fraudulent processing of v**es, including telling poll workers to backdate b****ts and not verify signatures on absentee b****ts. Several witnesses have filed sworn affidavits attesting to alleged e******n f***d. The plaintiffs, two poll challengers, are seeking a temporary restraining order on b****t counting. The case is pending.

Late Tuesday, the Trump campaign announced the filing of a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court in the Western District of Michigan that alleges pervasive e******n irregularities and violations in Wayne County and seeks a review of the D******n V****g software which caused glitches in several states.

A number of media outlets declared Democratic nominee Joe Biden president-elect on Nov. 7 after they projected victories for him in Pennsylvania and Nevada, putting him over the 270 e*******l v**e threshold, although the v**e counts have not been completed in those states. V**e counts also continue in Georgia and Arizona. Georgia and Wisconsin will have recounts of the v**es, where results initially yielded a Biden lead.

Trump has alleged v***r f***d and said any declarations of victory are premature, with his campaign having launched multiple legal challenges in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, Arizona, Nevada, and Michigan. The president said on Tuesday that his campaign is making progress and said that he will ultimately be declared the winner of the 2020 e******n.

McDaniel told Hannity that the Trump campaign has received 11,000 incident reports and has compiled at least 500 affidavits from witnesses across various states.

“It is a long process and people need to be patient. The media keeps saying ‘where’s the evidence, where’s the evidence,’ because they’re not giving us time to show it,” she said. “But even the evidence we’re putting forward they’re deciding ‘oh we’re not going to report it’ or ‘we’re going to break away from press conferences’ and we don’t want to hear from these 500 people who have signed affidavits talking about what they saw with this e******n.”

McDaniel’s comments come after Fox News late Monday swiftly cut away from airing a briefing by the Trump campaign, after McEnany appeared to allege that the Democrat Party had been involved in e******n f***d. The outlet claimed that McEnany did not have details to back up her allegations.

https://www.thedailyfodder.com/2020/12/poll-60-percent-of-americans-believe.html

By John Paluska, Founder of The Daily Fodder

Unlike what the Mainstream Media declares, most Americans believe our e******n was r****d in some capacity. According to a YouGov poll, a whopping 60% of Americans believe the 2020 e******n had v***r f***d, of that, 36% believe there was A LOT OF V***R F***D.

Only 29% believe there was no v***r f***d and the remaining 11% are unsure.

Additionally, 48% OF AMERICANS believe the e******n was only "moderately" fair or worse, with 37% believing the 2020 E******ns were MOSTLY UNFAIR.

Further, 60% of Americans believe the country is headed in the wrong direction and 47% do not believe there will be "unity" under Biden. Additionally, 42% Of Americans Are DISSATISFIED WITH THE PROSPECT OF A BIDEN PRESIDENCY.

You can view the YouGov poll for yourself here.

https://thenewamerican.com/widespread-v**er-fraud-myth-or-reality/

If you read this article, it says that 60 percent of Americans believe the e******n was r****d. Based on a rounded off figure, there are 331 million people in the US. 60% comes out to 198,600,000.
Go to
Jan 6, 2021 13:53:54   #
SSDD wrote:
The inane ramblings of a moronic nut job is not proof of anything. And no, You are not the defendant other than the fact that you need to defend your assertion that there was e******n f***d as you claim, and I mean with evidence, not some moron, nut job Trumplican sitting in front of a camera making false claims, I don't care how good you thought you looked in that video. Come forth with REAL evidence or just stfu about it, if you can't prove you allegations, no point in making them is there?



Read this s-l-o-w-l-y...YOU said show me proof. I said here is proof. YOU said it was false. The burden of proof falls on you...why? because you ain't no damn judge!
You're just another foul mouthed libtard full of piss.
Let's go back to the court room scenario. YOU have stated that my evidence is false. The judge says 'What proof do you have that the evidence presented is false?' You say 'Its false because I say so!' You'd be laughed out of the courtroom.
I'll give your side one thing though...there is SO much dishonesty in the Dumbocratic party that you have managed to bring America down in this e******n by destroying the faith of millions in our v****g system. Y'all have really brought America out of the terrible state of the best economy ever, lowest unemployment for many races, more opportunity for all races and g****rs, better trade deals, less i*****l i*********n, and one of the most t***sparent administration's of ANY president. Congratulations!
Go to
Jan 5, 2021 11:44:37   #
vernon wrote:
The msm is going to tell it,go to one am news.



www.wavy.com%2Fnews%2Fnational%2Famen-and-awoman-congressman-receives-backlash-for-opening-prayer%2F" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">www.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.wavy.com%2Fnews%2Fnational%2Famen-and-awoman-congressman-receives-backlash-for-opening-prayer%2F" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www-wavy-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.wavy.com/news/national/amen-and-awoman-congressman-receives-backlash-for-opening-prayer/amp/?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQHKAFQArABIA%3D%3D#aoh=16098649982447&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.wavy.com%2Fnews%2Fnational%2Famen-and-awoman-congressman-receives-backlash-for-opening-prayer%2F" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">www.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.wavy.com%2Fnews%2Fnational%2Famen-and-awoman-congressman-receives-backlash-for-opening-prayer%2F
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 237 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.