One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: kegler299
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 next>>
Feb 8, 2014 20:48:56   #
cold iron wrote:
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:


:thumbup: :thumbup: He is so smart that all the computers in America couldn't create his website. :P :lol:
Go to
Feb 8, 2014 18:52:40   #
First I would say that it depends on how quickly it is increased by spending and second by how high the interest rate becomes because of our stupidity.
Go to
Feb 8, 2014 18:30:46   #
I like the way this person thinks.

bmac32 wrote:
Definition: Political conservatism in the United States is both an intellectual/theoretical tradition and a popular political movement.

As an intellectual tradition, political conservatism does not necessarily focus on any particular political position or issue. In fact, most conservative traditionalists disagree with one another over a number of issues including (but not limited to) a******n, stem cell research, capital punishment, the environment and war. Nevertheless, these intellectual traditionalists tend to subscribe to the same conservative principles, those being primarily the importance of family, but also a small or limited government, a strong national defense and free enterprise.

Conservatism is also an umbrella term that embodies several different types of politically conservative philosophies. These are often primarily identified as neoconservatism, paleoconservatism and social conservatism, but they also include fiscal conservatism, cultural conseratism and crunchy conservatism.
Definition: Political conservatism in the United S... (show quote)
Go to
Feb 8, 2014 14:25:58   #
And we haven't made jokes about Putin without his shirt? We need to think about the athletes and the years of work they put in to compete in the Olympics. This is something to praise and not corrupt with politics. Root for your team and enjoy the sports!
Go to
Feb 6, 2014 22:02:23   #
More libertarian than I thought.

http://theadvocates.org/quiz/images/graphImages/70_100.png
Go to
Jan 28, 2014 19:14:37   #
Oh Bo. Please compare Pana's new vs your existing and tell me how you justify the comparison. Apples and Oranges just don't compare as the old saying goes.
Go to
Jan 25, 2014 23:23:08   #
Four questions to a number of individuals.
50% agree with question 1 premise
36% agree with question 2 premise
30% agree with question 3 premise
17% agree with question 4 premise

Each individual can answer any or even
all of the questions with agreement.
Go to
Jan 25, 2014 22:23:39   #
For those who don't understand the polls presentation:
It does not add up at all and isn't meant to.
It simply states four items discerned from the poll.
Go to
Jan 20, 2014 22:45:29   #
BoJester wrote:
The forum has many wacko name-calling conservative/teaparty homophobes, so the fact that 3 gay republicans have come out and are running aggressive campaigns should drive the fundementalist christisn h**e group crazy.

This should most entertaining during the upcoming campaigns

Will history be made? Just have to wait and see



http://news.yahoo.com/3-gay-republicans-trying-e******n-history-132555972--e******n.html


Being a sort-of Republican I simply say; where do they stand on the issues? Their being gay is simply a side issue. Just as being wheelchair bound, or blind would be. Let's v**e for those who have good records that we agree with. Be that left or right or Independent.
Go to
Nov 7, 2013 19:37:09   #
Just the beginning.
Go to
Nov 3, 2013 20:39:02   #
:cry: Why do these blogs always go negative? Can't we just debate and then go have a beer or something? Maybe we might even learn something new or which might make us see our own opinion in a new light. But going negative seems to be where it's at on these blogs.
Go to
Nov 2, 2013 23:43:25   #
lone_ghost wrote:
Hmmm, our forefathers were not right wingers. By definition they were all liberals since they wished to liberate us from the tyrannical rule of England. That said, the liberalism of our forefathers was very different from what we call liberals today who are social liberals. There was no right wing left wing back then. Just FYI.


I believe you are conflating liberal with liberationists. They wanted minimum government that worked for the people not just liberation. Their actions and attitudes would today be right-wing.
Go to
Nov 2, 2013 21:32:04   #
It must be you! Liberals would never admit that our forefathers were right-wingers! :-D :-D
Go to
Nov 1, 2013 17:57:34   #
You can do so much more if you get donations from large companies. On its face her cause looks good. Given the benefit of the doubt, let's hope she does some good.
Go to
Oct 31, 2013 19:06:37   #
So I'm supposed to go to the bank(the people) and ask them to have the FED(the people) to give me an $18 trillion dollar loan so I can pay off my $17 trillion dollar debt and then everything will be great?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.