This is pretty brazen for a politician but I can't imagine that the "Good Ole Boy's" will be complaining
after all he is the chosen one right?

He can't do no wrong as long as he is on someone else's money.

I can see it coming now, he is going to pull out of the race last minute with tons of raised money in his pocket and
blame it Hillary's Emails!

There is a sucker born every minute and his base is ripe for the picking. Pick on Brother!

https://www.yahoo.com/news/selling-trump-profitable-post-presidency-170703308.html

Faux Nouse is not a news network.
Roger ailes went to the Supreme Court
To get a Right Wing broadcasters license.
The license the court gave him, was only required to broadcast 1 hour of news per day. This license is not a news broadcasters license. It is an Entertainment License.
This license is not restricted as those in news broadcasting.
They , on Fsux Nouse can say say wh**ever they please because it isn’t news.
It’s mostly “Opinions” of news.
Would Fsux nouse lie to you ????
Of course, it isn’t news it’s
“ Entertainment “!
So , when you try to compare networks, try to keep on mind that Fsux Nouse can say anything they please.
Because , it isn’t news.
It’s Opinions of news.
AKA-
Propaganda!

Staggering satellite images paint revealing picture of the Beijing Winter Olympics

Fascinating satellite images from high above Beijing, China, and its surrounding areas are opening viewers' eyes to the not-so-wintery reality of the 2022 Winter Olympics.

What are the details?
The pair of photographs, released by NASA earlier this month, shows the staggering amount of f**e snow used to make it possible for the Chinese capital to play host to the Games.

In one image of the Xiaohaituo Mountain in Yanqing, one can clearly see the white splash of artificial snow dumped on the venue terrain, separating it from the miles upon miles of surrounding brown mountains.

Yanqing, a suburb of Beijing located about 45 miles northwest of the city, was selected to play host to alpine skiing and sliding events such as bobsled, skeleton, and the luge due to its steep mountain faces. But while the terrain itself is suitable, the lack of snow has made hosting the events a sizable challenge.

According to Time, 100% of the snow used in the 2022 Winter Games will be artificial, and to t***sform the terrain, Olympic organizers had to make use of nearly 300 fan-powered snow guns and 83 lance-style snow guns from Italian firm TechnoAlpin.

"The output from those machines was easy to spot in satellite imagery of the area," remarked NASA. "On January 29, 2021, the Operational Land Imager (OLI) on Landsat 8 captured an image of the downhill trails covered with artificial snow. The water used to make the snow gets piped in from the nearby Foyukou and Baihepu reservoirs."

In another image, this one of downtown Beijing, a mostly arid cityscape can be seen but with certain plots of land covered in more f**e snow.

While the city center was set to host mostly indoor events such as figure skating and hockey, Beijing did construct a "big air" stadium for aerial skiing and snowboarding on top of a former steel mill in nearby Shougang.

Other images shared of the "big air" stadium posted on social media have raised eyebrows and sparked criticism globally as commenters compared the Shougang backdrop to a "dystopian" industrial center and a "hellscape."

What else?
In its report on the NASA images, Yahoo News noted that China claims the energy used to power its arsenal of snow machines will primarily be renewable and thus won't leave too much of a carbon footprint.

However, some are concerned about the massive amount of water needed to produce the snow, especially in a region where water scarcity has long been a concern.

China reportedly estimated that it will need something like 50 million gallons of water to produce artificial snow throughout the Games. Artificial snow is produced using air and water.

But Madeleine Orr, a sports ecologist at the University of Loughborough, warned, "If the region has enough warm days and snow melts, water use could really climb."

She went on to describe the Winter Games in Beijing as "a bit of a test case," saying, "Researchers haven’t examined the consequences of 100% f**e snow melting rapidly."

While artificial snow has been used in large capacities to host the Games before, some athletes have also raised concerns about how an 100% artificial snow terrain could affect their performance.

https://www.theblaze.com/news/satellite-images-beijing-olympics-f**e-snow?utm_source=theblaze-dailyAM&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily-Newsletter__AM%202022-02-12&utm_term=ACTIVE%20LIST%20-%20TheBlaze%20Daily%20AM

The supreme court (lower case disrespect intended) has been operating in a totally backwards way from what is intended in emergency cases where lower courts are halting unconstitutional actions by state e******ns officials as well as a******n and other topics.

When an unconstitutional action is challenged in the court system, the logical action by a court that agrees that something is likely unconstitutional is to stop that action before it does harm, and it can be put to the constitutionality challenge. It would not make sense for a court to allow a new and questionable law to take effect to where it would affect an upcoming e******n.

We are seeing courts at state and federal level that are properly stopping unconstitutional actions, states are putting stops, and when they are appealed to federal courts they are agreeing and maintaining that position...only to have the supreme court act in the interim period before a full supreme court case can settle the matter of constitutionality by reversing the proper stays of the lower courts to say the unconstitutional action can take place.

Apparently they are taking the truly backwards and mentally r****ded view that by preventing the constitutionally illegal action it would alter an upcoming e******n it would be an improper overreach...Duh, that is why it is before the courts is to keep an unconstitutional overreach from affecting an e******n.

Texas makes the case, by trying to make it harder to v**e they are violating constitutional v**er rights. Court steps in and says we agree, no you are not going to do this. Texas takes it before a federal court, only to get the same logical and expected result...

The supreme court sees it, and not having time to properly hear the case, instead of supporting lower court holds on the illegal actions, says sure go ahead, being prevented from doing this would affect the upcoming e******n.

The supreme court is there to protect the constitution and especially v****g rights, and they have been instead undermining v**ers rights at every turn by allowing states to make it harder to v**e. GOP friendly courts are not observing the first rule of determining whether a new rule is an unconstitutional action....make the ones that want the change make the case that there is a reason for the change in the first place.

https://www.rawstory.com/texas-v****g/?cx_testId=4&cx_testVariant=cx_undefined&cx_artPos=5&cx_experienceId=EXC93HV4HK4I#cxrecs_s

Hot Air https://hotair.com/ed-morrissey/2022/02/10/cnn-poll-biden-collapsing-across-the-board-n447745

CNN poll: Biden collapsing "across the board"

QUOTE: Nearly 6 in 10 Americans disapprove of how Joe Biden is handling his presidency, with most of that group saying there's literally nothing Biden has done since taking office that they approve of. The finding, from a CNN Poll conducted by SSRS in January and February, highlights the entrenched politics driving the nation at the start of the midterm year, with little agreement across party lines on priorities for the government or how to handle the c****av***s p******c.