One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: nwtk2007
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 3811 next>>
Mar 27, 2024 10:38:24   #
ACP45 wrote:
For those of you who may be unfamiliar with Colonel Douglas McGregor, what he stands for, and his ideas for the type of leadership our country needs, listen to his "alternative State of the Union Speech" and see if that resonates with you!

Colonel McGregor in his alternative State of the Union address, on behalf of his organization “Our Country, Our Choice.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cRmv8gQEOo

https://preview.mailerlite.io/emails/webview/817511/116959170494727539
For those of you who may be unfamiliar with Colone... (show quote)


Go to
Mar 27, 2024 10:23:08   #
JFlorio wrote:
That lily white liberal judge is a pussy. There's a reason most of these prosecutors are a certain type and in a certain political district. They are of the protected class with an entire jury pool of morons to pick from.


True, and there is only the appellate courts to fix things.
Go to
Mar 27, 2024 10:21:44   #
slatten49 wrote:
https://theconversation.com/trump-is-no-navalny-and-prosecution-in-a-democracy-is-a-lot-different-than-persecution-in-putins-russia-223840

Excerpt:

"Often, distinguishing good faith proceedings from bad faith “witch hunts” is not a fact-based exercise, especially for the targets of investigations and among their supporters.

But the law and evidence help to elucidate some themes that lead any reasonable observer to categorically differentiate Navalny – and other victims of bona fide maltreatment – from Trump."
https://theconversation.com/trump-is-no-navalny-an... (show quote)


All we have to do is look at the similarity and parallels here; the use of the courts to make it appear legitimate as one party (candidate) uses the courts to eliminate their opposition. Oh, the claim is that WE apply the rule of law. Well the Russian courts and Putin make and have made the very same claim.

The we look at the cases individually and see that is not the t***h. in one case, a judge makes a summary judgement of fraud without even hearing the witnesses or the testimony of the alleged "victims," because they are not victims. Others in the very same business have spoken out defending how the real estate business works all over the country, but no matter to this judge. And then, the very same judge defies the constitution and hits Trump with an outrageous fine and places undo burden on Trump to try to prevent him from appealing the judges verdict. Rule of law???

Then there is the one where a woman from nearly 30 years ago makes an uncorroborated claim of rape in a department store , without evidence at all. When Trump denies it they claim he is "defaming" her. He says it didn't happen. They claim he is defaming her by denying it. No matter what the language, he has the right to deny it happened and declare her a liar. The contents of her book, which she is coincidentally now promoting, certainly supports Trump's claims about her. But no matter, if one cannot deny an accusation without being accused and convicted of defamation, then we have no freedom of speech. In fact, the one being defamed is Trump. But wasn't he denied his reverse defamation case by the courts???

But there is more, the cases of "Trump said this and that on a phone call, he said this or that and incited an i**********n." ALL hearsay blabber by those making outrageous interpretations of his words. Of course they delete the words which say just the opposite of what they claim he means; words like peacefully and patriotically. And, of course, the suppression of evidence which supports Trump's claims and not theirs; testimony of witnesses who contradict their chosen witnesses who weren't even there, but rather, just 'heard" from someone else what Trump did or didn't do.

And all brought to the court system during the year Trump is running, once again, for president.

oh, these cases and Nalvany cases are most certainly similar with the only difference being that Putin doesn't even need to do it; use the courts to get rid of an opponent. He's a supreme dictator, right!???? Or, maybe he isn't. Or maybe Biden is one, it just hasn't become clear to the people yet.

Either way. your article is bull.
Go to
Mar 27, 2024 10:02:37   #
JFlorio wrote:
Love it. She tried to drain his bank account, now let him drain hers.


Go to
Mar 27, 2024 10:01:47   #
JFlorio wrote:
Exactly what the Democrats are trying to do in this country.


Sounds a lot like what some of the states supreme courts have tried to do to Trump.
Go to
Mar 27, 2024 09:58:04   #
JFlorio wrote:
Don't like Maher much but he's not wrong on this. He has a tendency to talk out of both sides of his mouth.


The dems don't care about this because they think they have already r****d it again.
Go to
Mar 26, 2024 20:12:43   #
Ri-chard wrote:
The former president has properties valued at $4.3 billion.

Former President Donald Trump has entered Bloomberg’s list of top 500 global billionaires after his stake in T***h Social was valued at nearly $4 billion.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/donald-trumps-net-worth-hits-6-5-billion-enters-500-richest-people-list-5615263?utm_source=Goodevening&src_src=Goodevening&utm_campaign=gv-2024-03-26&src_cmp=gv-2024-03-26&utm_medium=email&est=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAc%2FEofRIZxJDo%2BrYct39WBfp0zlf34%2FYXsNLCEoS%2FFE%2BELMR5
The former president has properties valued at $4.3... (show quote)


But it can't be!!!!!
Go to
Mar 26, 2024 17:50:59   #
LostAggie66 wrote:
https://youtu.be/Oc3vFwLnM-E?si=MBrdokVfh5bspt_y (New Pro Biden Ad)


Typical gaslighting lyinga$$ democrat video.
Go to
Mar 26, 2024 13:43:30   #
proud republican wrote:
Sorry, but this is BS! He showed clip from when we had C***d, why didn't he showed clips before C***d.. When we had low gas prices, when we had low inflation, low crime, when Border was more secure, when there were no wars...


Exactly. And as regards to C***d, Trump followed the advice of the experts, he got the v*****es in place faster than ever before, he took the v*****e, he let the states decide on their lock downs as required by the constitution, and he didn't panic like the dem's wanted to do.

Biden lost more to C***d in his term, WITH v*****es, and mandated v*****es like an authoritarian dictator.
Go to
Mar 26, 2024 13:21:35   #
publican wrote:
Yesterday the ruling came down substantially reducing tfg's bond requirement., and giving him an extra 10 days. This is really pissing me off. I pay plenty of taxes, and I expect the tax-supported justice system to do its f---ing job. With this latest ruling, I have been c***ted. We all have.

Not only that, but we can also expect that the fine will be set aside altogether. "He's been through enough", they will say. F--- that. If he had been through 1% of the crap most people have to deal with just to stay alive, he would not have made it past age 30.
Yesterday the ruling came down substantially reduc... (show quote)


As a Trump h**er, I can see this is difficult for you to perceive. Well get ready, it's going to get worse for you.
Go to
Mar 26, 2024 13:20:23   #
publican wrote:
Yesterday the ruling came down substantially reducing tfg's bond requirement., and giving him an extra 10 days. This is really pissing me off. I pay plenty of taxes, and I expect the tax-supported justice system to do its f---ing job. With this latest ruling, I have been c***ted. We all have.

Not only that, but we can also expect that the fine will be set aside altogether. "He's been through enough", they will say. F--- that. If he had been through 1% of the crap most people have to deal with just to stay alive, he would not have made it past age 30.
Yesterday the ruling came down substantially reduc... (show quote)
Go to
Mar 26, 2024 13:18:48   #
publican wrote:
Yesterday the ruling came down substantially reducing tfg's bond requirement., and giving him an extra 10 days. This is really pissing me off. I pay plenty of taxes, and I expect the tax-supported justice system to do its f---ing job. With this latest ruling, I have been c***ted. We all have.

Not only that, but we can also expect that the fine will be set aside altogether. "He's been through enough", they will say. F--- that. If he had been through 1% of the crap most people have to deal with just to stay alive, he would not have made it past age 30.
Yesterday the ruling came down substantially reduc... (show quote)
Go to
Mar 25, 2024 23:39:13   #
Ri-chard wrote:
Civil Fraud Case After Nearly Half Billion Dollar Bond Slashed to $175K: “Judge Engoron is a Disgrace to This Country”.

WATCH >
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/03/watch-trump-responds-appeals-courts-fifth-overruling-judge/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=the-gateway-pundit&utm_campaign=dailypm&utm_content=2024-03-26


Go to
Mar 25, 2024 16:35:12   #
Kevyn wrote:
Trump caused the i**********n by running his mouth stupidly with his “fight like Hell” call to arms. You would think the i***t would learn his lesson and stop inflaming already stoked up crackpots. When “bloodbath” sputtered out of his sphincteresque pie hole with the rest of the verbal diarrhea of h**e and lies he knew exactly what he was saying.



To you, peacefully and patriotically mean the very same thing. How stupid.
Go to
Mar 25, 2024 16:31:51   #
Kevyn wrote:
Will it be as bad as the d******c t*******ts attack on our capitol J****** 6th?


If you think J** 6th was a d******c t*******t attack, then yes, it will be way worse. Duh!!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 3811 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.